South Park East

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 39.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 09/09/25, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide protection from sexual abuse/inappropriate touching from two residents towards three residents sampled for abuse.On 09/09/25 at 11:19 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 09/09/25 at 11:54 a.m., the administrator and ADON were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided.On 09/10/25 at 11:53 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Identification of total number of residents at risk for the same failed practice:42Actions taken to remove the immediacy of the alleged failed practice:o There are 3 residents identified as affected by this alleged deficient practice with the potential for 42 residents overall to be affected including the 2 residents alleged to have had the behaviors affecting others. Resident #1 and Resident #4 have dementia related conditions as does the entire population of this Specialized Dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow menus and provide bread for 1 of 1 meal observation. The dietary manager identified 38 residents in the facility received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings:On 05/04/26 at 12:00 p.m., cook #1 was observed serving the noon meal. [NAME] #1 was observed serving 38 out of 38 trays without any bread or bread sticks. On 05/04/26, the facility menu for the noon meal showed residents were to have the following items served: Ravioli, Italian blend vegetables, bread sticks, and desert. On 05/04/26 at 12:35 p.m., the dietary manager stated no bread had been served, but the cook was supposed to provide plain bread because the stove and oven was not working. On 05/06/26 at 11:15 a.m., cook #1 stated they did not serve bread because there was no way to toast it. They stated they had never had the stove break, so they did not know.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a water management program to prevent the growth and detection of Legionella. The DON identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Legionella Surveillance and Detection, revised July 2017, read in part, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water borne contaminants, including Legionella. A facility policy titled Legionella Water Management Program, revised July 2017, read in part, The purpose of the water management program are to identify areas in water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread and to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease.The water management program includes the following elements . A detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility.The identification of areas in the water system that could encourage the growth and spread of Legionella or other waterborne bacteria.Specific measures used to control the introduction and/or spread of legionella.The water management program will be reviewed at least…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to:a. report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours to the OSDH for 1 (#22); andb. complete a final report for an allegation of abuse within 5-days to the OSDH for 1 (#30) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The DON identified 38 residents resided in the facility.Findings: 1.An undated face sheet showed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, depression, and psychosis. A Form 283 showed an initial/final incident report for an incident, dated 04/23/26, for Resident #22. The form narrative identified Resident #30. The optional page, read in part, Staff and other residents were interviewed with one further complaint of rape attempt from [Resident #22]. The report's fax transmittal showed the report was sent to OSDH on 04/27/26 at 2:31 p.m., three days after Resident #30 made the allegation. There was no documentation to show the allegation from Resident #22 was reported within two hours to the OSDH. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly assessment accurately reflected wandering behavior for 1 (#30) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The DON identified one resident was coded on assessments as a wanderer in the facility. Findings:On 05/04/26 at 11:50 a.m., Resident #30 was observed to walk out of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The name plate on the door was not the name of Resident #30. On 05/04/26 at 12:20 p.m., Resident #30 was observed to come out room [ROOM NUMBER] with a purse and walk down to room [ROOM NUMBER], their assigned room. As Resident #30 exited room [ROOM NUMBER], they told another resident to get out of their room.On 05/04/26 at 1:56 p.m. Resident #30 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], got a pillow, and took it down the hall. Resident #30 was heard stating room [ROOM NUMBER] was their room. On 05/04/26 at 3:26 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] and told the resident who resided in the room to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed for 2 (#8 and #30) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The DON identified 38 residents resided in the facility.Findings: 1.On 05/07/26 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #8 was observed in a Geri-chair with the fingers on their right and left hand curled inward. On 05/07/26 at 10:51 a.m., hospice aide #1 was observed to transport Resident #8 to the shower room. A facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 2016, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. An annual assessment, dated 02/26/26, showed a BIMS score of 00, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making. The assessment showed the resident had impairment in range of motion to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure inspection of u-bars was part of their regular maintenance program for 1 (#38) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards related to bed rails.The DON identified one resident utilized bed rails.Findings: On 05/05/26 at 12:00 p.m., the bed for Resident #38 was observed to have a u-bar (a type of bed side rail) on the right side of their bed. On 05/05/26 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #38 was observed in their bed with their eyes closed with a u-bar on the right side of the bed. A Bed Safety policy, dated December 2007, read in part, Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. A physician order, dated 06/14/25, showed a u-bar may be used to assist with transfers for Resident #38. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/17/26, showed a BIMS score of four, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making and required partial to moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 (#22) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated face sheet showed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, depression, and psychosis.A Form 283 showed an initial/final incident report for an incident, dated 04/23/26, for Resident #22. The form narrative identified Resident #30. The optional page, read in part, Staff and other residents were interviewed with one further complaint of rape attempt from [Resident #22]. The report's fax transmittal showed the report was sent to OSDH on 04/27/26 at 2:31 p.m., three days after Resident #30 made the allegation.An undated statement, signed by CMA #2, showed Resident #22 approached them and requested a medication to assist with sleep because someone of the opposite sex had just tried to rape them. The undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed for 1 (#8) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospice services.The DON identified eight residents received hospice services. Findings: A Physician's Certification for Hospice Benefit, dated 03/18/26, showed Resident #8 had been certified for hospice services for a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The form, read in part, It is my clinical judgement that this patient has a life expectancy of six months or less, if the terminal illness runs its normal course. The form had been signed by the physician. Review of the electronic clinical record did not show a significant change assessment had been completed when the resident elected the hospice benefit. On 05/07/26 at 10:52 a.m., LPN #1 stated Resident #8 had received the hospice benefit for a couple of months. On 05/07/26 at 10:54 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated Resident #8 had received the hospice benefit since March 2026. They stated when a resident elected the hospice benefit a significant change assessment was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 5 (#1, 2, 3, 4, and #5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, read in part, The nurse will assess the individual and document related findings.An OSDH incident report, dated 08/20/25, showed Resident #1 touched the breast of Resident #3. There were no safe surveys/assessments of other residents to assure safety, and there was no abuse education documented for all staff.An OSDH incident report, dated 08/26/25, showed Resident #1 touched the breast of Resident #2. There were no safe surveys/assessments of other residents to assure safety, and there was no abuse education documented for all staff. An OSDH incident report, dated 08/31/25, showed Resident #1 touched the breast of Resident #5. There were no safe surveys/assessments of other residents to assure safety, and there was no abuse education documented for all staff.An OSDH…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's family was notified of an allegation of abuse for 1 (#5) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 12/2016, read in part, Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/30/25, showed Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed they were independent with mobility.An incident report, dated 08/31/25, showed Resident #1 was observed touching Resident #5's breasts. The report showed the family was notified. An order summary, dated 09/04/25, showed Resident #5 had diagnoses which include Alzheimer's disease and dementia. A family representative interview with Resident #5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,480 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,480 — penalty dated 2025-09-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PHOENIX HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $149K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK