The Lakes

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 10/09/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for Resident #1 with severe cognitive impairment, daily wandering behaviors, and a history of elopement. An initial State Reportable Incident, dated 10/06/24, documented the facility charge nurse was called and notified by the local church Resident #1 was at their facility. It documented the resident was assessed and noted to have bruising to left and right lower extremities, and bilateral knees. It documented the resident reported they fell but did not hit their head. It documented the resident was sent to the ER and would be placed on 1:1 with staff to ensure safety. An Incident Note, dated 10/06/24 at 1:29 p.m., documented Resident #1 returned to the facility from the hospital with no new orders. Staffing assignment sheets were reviewed from 10/06/24 through 10/09/24. There was no documentation 1:1 was completed by staff on 10/06/24 for the day and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident from a fall resulting in a close head injury during the provision of care for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility and 34 residents required assistance with activities of daily living. Findings: The Safety and Supervision of Residents policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #3's care plan for ADLs and falls, revised 10/29/24, documented the resident: a. was dependent on staff for bed mobility, b. was totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed, c. required total assistance with transfers, and d. was at risk for falls. Resident #3's quarterly resident assessment, dated 10/30/24, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, Sexual abuse is defined .as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included dementia and senile degeneration of brain. Resident #2's quarterly resident assessment, dated 10/23/24, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 12/02/24, documented an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. It documented Resident #4 was witnessed putting their hand on Resident #2's crotch while sitting at the TV area. It documented Resident #4 was immediately removed from the area and placed on one on one with staff. It documented no injury noted to Resident #2 who was unable to answer any questions regarding the situation. On 12/17/24 at 9:57 a.m., Housekeeper #1 stated they observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new diagnosis of a serious mental health condition had a pre-admission screening and resident review updated for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for PASARR level two. The DON identified 28 residents with serious mental health diagnoses. Findings: The facility policy titled, admission Criteria, read in part, Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders, intellectual disabilities will be determined by coordination with the Medicaid Pre-admission and Resident Review program (PASARR) to the extent possible. Resident # 1 had diagnoses which included psychosis, anxiety, and recurrent depression. Resident #1's Nursing Level of Care Assessment, dated 01/23/18, did not document they had any serious mental health conditions. The primary diagnosis was listed as multiple sclerosis. A review of the order summary medical diagnoses list documented Resident #1 had the following new diagnoses after the initial PASARR was completed in 2018: a. anxiety with an onset date of 09/11/18; b.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for: a. IV and antibiotic usage for one (#20); b. visual function for one (#6); and c. antipsychotic medication use for one (#35) of 18 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 71 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised 12/16, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 1. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, and urinary tract infection. A progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 2:31 p.m., documented they received a urine culture report and the resident would need a midline or PICC placement for IV antibiotic. It documented the resident was sent to the emergency room for a long term access device placement and to receive their first dose of antibiotic for monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were provided for one (#18) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified three residents had been admitted to the facility with wounds since 10/01/24. Findings: An undated facility policy, Guidelines for Notifying Physician of Clinical Problems, read in part, These guidelines are to help ensure that .medical problems are communicated to the medical staff in a timely efficient manner .The charger nurse or supervisor should contact the attending physician at anytime if they feel a clinical situation requires immediate discussion and management .the nurse should have the the following information available .active medical problems. The admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, last revised September 2012, read in part, conduct a physical assessment including .skin .contact the attending physician to communicate and review the findings of the initial assessment and any other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure an insulin label indicated the order had changed for one (#41); and b. ensure medications were administered following standards of practice for one (#41) of ten sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified five residents with orders for a lidocaine patch. The Resident Matrix, dated 11/18/24, documented 16 residents received insulin. Findings: An Administering Topical Medications policy, revised 10/10, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of topical medications .Apply glove to your dominant hand .assess area for .debris .Clean the skin. Remove old medication residue .Don clean gloves if necessary .Trans-dermal patches .Clean and dry a selected area that is approved for application of the patch. Rotate sites with each new application, if possible. An Insulin Administration policy, revised 09/2014, read in part, To provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes .The type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. maintain a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system; b. adhere to enhanced barrier precautions for one (#18) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for infection control; c. remove gloves and/or wash or sanitize hands in order to prevent cross contamination for six (#2, 22, 23, 26, 41, and #49); and d. clean out the nebulizer canister after use for one (#26) of ten sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified 71 residents resided in the facility and eight residents with orders for nebulizer treatments. The Resident Matrix, dated 11/18/24, documented 16 residents received insulin. Findings: A Pulse Oximetry policy, revised 10/2010, read in part, Steps to procedure .Perform hand antisepsis .Remove probe when monitoring is complete .Perform hand antisepsis. The Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection policy, revised 11/2011, read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to provide documentation the facility administered the pneumococcal vaccine for two (#62 and #69) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The DON identified 71 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, dated 8/2016 read in part, Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility. 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The pneumococcal consent was signed on 12/04/23. The immunization record for the resident did not document the pneumococcal vaccine was administered. 2. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The pneumococcal consent was signed on 05/02/24. The immunization record for the resident did not document the pneumococcal vaccine was administered. On 11/21/24 8:38 a.m., the DON stated they were not able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the attending physician of a wound without a treatment order for one (#18) of two sampled residents with wounds. The DON identified three residents had been admitted to the facility with wounds since 10/01/24. Findings: An undated facility policy, Guidelines for Notifying Physician of Clinical Problems, read in part, These guidelines are to help ensure that .medical problems are communicated to the medical staff in a timely efficient manner .The charger nurse or supervisor should contact the attending physician at anytime if they feel a clinical situation requires immediate discussion and management .the nurse should have the the following information available active medical problems. The admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, last revised September 2012, read in part, conduct a physical assessment including skin .contact the attending physician to communicate and review the findings of the initial assessment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a MDS was coded accurately for one (#30) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The DON identified 71 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #30 had diagnoses which included spondylosis and peripheral vascular disease. An admission assessment, dated 10/31/24, documented the resident had an indwelling catheter. On 11/20/24 at 12:45 p.m., MDS coordinator #2 stated Resident #30 did not have a catheter. They stated for some reason the system auto populates. MDS Coordinator #1 stated they would do a correction and that was not the only one. They stated they needed to pay better attention and it was not coded accurately.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one (#72) of one sampled resident reviewed for discharge. The Admission/Discharge To/From Report, dated 05/01/24 through 11/18/24, documented 10 residents discharged from the facility within the last six months. Findings: Res #72 discharged from the facility on 09/03/24 after a respite stay since 08/26/24. A communication note, dated 09/03/24 at 4:37 p.m., documented, Resident picked up by transport to be taken home. Wife, Hospice, ADON and PA aware. Personal belongings and medications given to transport. There was no documentation a discharge summary had been completed. On 11/19/24 at 11:16 a.m., LPN #3 stated they did not see the summary. They stated the policy was to document where the resident was going, how they discharged , any teaching, medications, a brief summary, who picked them up, and details of the stay.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,073 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $11,052 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-02 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PHOENIX HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $609K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK