Lecom At Presque Isle, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 113.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding wound treatments and showers for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated 10/30/25, indicated Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently. including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing.). Review of facility policy entitled Charting and Documentation dated 10/30/25, indicated Documentation of procedures and treatments will include care-specific details, including: the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided. the signature and title of the individual documenting. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/30/24, with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a brain disorder that affects a person's movement and muscle coordination caused from abnormal development or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (a method for providing nutritional needs via tube feeding) and hydration in accordance with physician's orders for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump dated 10/30/25, indicated Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: Rate of administration (mL/hour). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/30/24, with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a brain disorder that affects a person's movement and muscle coordination caused from abnormal development or damage to the brain), chronic respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), and gastrostomy (a surgical opening in the abdomen into the stomach). Review of Resident R1's physician's orders revealed an order for Enteral Feed Order every shift for at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, review of facility and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a weekly bath/shower for four of six residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Resident Self determination and Participation, dated 10/30/25, revealed Each resident is allowed to choose activities, and schedule health care and healthcare providers, that are consistent with his or his interests, values, assessments and plans of care, including: a daily routine, such as sleeping and waking, eating, exercise and bathing schedules. Resident Council minutes dated 12/16/25, revealed new business resident concerns as Showers are not being offered as scheduled. Resident's R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/06/24, with diagnoses that included lumbar spina bifida without hydrocephalus (a condition that occurs when the spine and spinal cord don't form properly during early fetal development), diarrhea, diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for seven of 28 residents reviewed (Residents R4, R8, R11, R28, R37, R62, and R126). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 10/30/25, revealed The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. Resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/08/25, with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle often due to inactivity or aging), elevated white blood count (increased infection fighting cells in your body that fight an infection and/or inflammation or a disorder of the white blood cells), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hyperlipidemia (high level of fats like cholesterol in the blood). Resident R4's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary was provided to Resident R4 and/or his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, job descriptions, clinical records, resident council minutes and grievances, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff and services to promote the physical and mental well-being and meet the needs for 13 of 28 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R8, R31, R36, R37, R62, R77, R86, R92, R101, R106, R107 and R111). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Answering the Call Light dated 10/30/25, revealed The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's request and needs. and Answer the resident call system immediately. Review of facility policy entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated 10/30/25, revealed appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs. including appropriate support and assistance with: bathing, dressing, grooming, transfer, ambulation, toileting, dining, and eating. Review of facility job descriptions for a Nursing Assistant (NA) revealed, The C.N.A.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly dated when opened; failed to ensure expired medications were discarded in a timely manner; and failed to store controlled schedule II-V medications (medications that may be abused or cause addiction that are closely monitored due to high risk of diversion) in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in the medication refrigerator in two of three medication carts reviewed and one of two medication rooms reviewed (Northwest Medication Cart, Southwest Medication Cart, and North Medication Room).Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Medication Labeling and Storage dated 10/30/2025, revealed, Controlled medications and other drugs subject to abuse are separately locked in permanently affixed compartments .Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Manufacturer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and facility records, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for one of one test trays completed. Findings include: A current facility policy entitled, Food And Nutritional Services revealed food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Resident Council and food committee minutes from 10/27/25, 11/20/25 and 12/18/25, all revealed that food was being served cold and frequently without the items that have been ordered by residents. Interviews conducted on 1/5/26, with Residents R1, R31, R62, and R111, revealed that the food is frequently served cold. Review of temperature logs completed by kitchen staff on 1/6/26, revealed the following lunch meal temperatures were obtained prior to the food leaving the kitchen: Pork 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F)Broccoli 169 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean environment on one of five units observed (South Wing).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Cleaning and Disinfecting Residents' Rooms dated 10/30/25, indicated Clean curtains. when they are visibly soiled or dusty. Observations on 1/5/26, at 2:00 p.m., of the South Wing in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a privacy curtain pulled between the residents' beds. On the privacy curtain were several areas of a dark brown substance which appeared to be feces. Observations on 1/6/26, at 9:00 a.m. and again at 1:11 p.m. of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s privacy curtain revealed the dark brown substance remained on the curtain. During an interview on 1/6/26, at 1:15 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E6 confirmed that the privacy curtain in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had several areas of a dark brown substance on it. LPN Employee E6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mind altering) medication for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 10/30/25, revealed non-pharmacological approaches are used to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. Review of Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/4/25, with diagnoses that included depression, anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The clinical record revealed that on 12/26/25, Resident R11's physician ordered Lorazepam (a medication ordered to treat anxiety) 0.25 milliliters (ml) every 2 hours PRN for anxiety. Review of Resident R11's January 2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services regarding catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to facilitate urine drainage) for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident R37). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 10/30/25, revealed the purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Maintaining Unobstructed Urine Flow - Catheter irrigation may be ordered to prevent obstruction in residents at risk for obstruction. Resident R37's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/30/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't use the insulin efficiently), long term drug therapy, agranulocytosis (low levels of granulocytes which are a type of white blood cell, infection fighting cell), and asthma (a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation of the airways). Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LECOM SENIOR LIVING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA