Millcreek Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 139.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical and hospital records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient safety precautions to prevent a resident with a history of suicide attempt by overdose, from appropriating a significant number of prescription medications that resulted in an overdose of the prescription medications that were provided during medication administration by the facility for one (Resident R234) of three residents reviewed with a history of suicide attempts, and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Administration dated 10/30/23, indicated that staff will remain at bedside with the resident until all medications are taken. Resident R234's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/09/23, with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, anxiety, long-term pain, spinal stenosis (inflammation of the vertebrae causing compression of the spinal cord) of the neck, and epilepsy. Resident R234's clinical record lacked evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's privacy rights by opening residents' mail/delivered packages without resident consent for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Mail/Package Screening revealed that delivered items would be opened by the facility upon written consent from the resident. The policy also made reference to residents' right to send and promptly receive unopened mail and other letters, packages and other materials delivered to the resident, including those delivered through a means other than a postal service. During an interview on March 28, 2026, from approximately 10:00 am through 11:30 a.m. Resident R1 revealed that facility staff, at the direction of a previous administrative staff person, were opening packages delivered to the resident without his/her consent, and that the previous staff person explained that since the packages were not always delivered by the U.S. Postal Service he/she did not have the right to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/19/25, with diagnoses that included bladder cancer, diabetes, pain, high blood pressure and muscle wasting. Resident R1's clinical record revealed physician's orders, dated 1/26/26, that the resident was scheduled for a colonoscopy on 3/18/26, and directed that the resident's Aspirin be held for five days prior to the procedure. During an interview on 3/28/26, from approximately 10:00 a.m., through 11:30 a.m. Resident R1 revealed that the colonoscopy procedure scheduled to be done on 3/18/26, had to be canceled because the facility nursing staff failed to hold the daily Aspirin and continued to administer the medication daily up to the day of the scheduled procedure. During interview on 3/28/26, at approximately 12:15 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the physician's orders were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for four of eight residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents R1, R56, R58, and Closed Record Resident CR149). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Transfer or Discharge, Facility - Initiated, dated January 2026, indicated that should a resident be transferred or discharged for any reason, the following information is communicated to the receiving facility or provider: basis for the transfer or discharge, contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information, advance directive information, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, comprehensive care plan goals, and all other information necessary to meet the resident's needs. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/18/25, with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation for one of 28 residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR149). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Charting and Documentation dated January 2026 indicated All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any change sin the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychological condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. The policy further sated The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: Objective observations, Medication administration, Treatment or services performed, Changes in the resident's condition, Events, incidents or accidents involving the resident, and progress toward or changes in the care plan goals or objectives. Resident CR149's clinical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of a current facility policy entitled Management of Hypoglycemia revealed that nursing staff must notify the physician if the resident has signs of hypoglycemia [low blood sugar] that are not resolved by following the facility protocol for hypoglycemia management. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/07/21, with diagnoses that included diabetes (condition of improper blood sugar/insulin levels), pancreatectomy (removal of the pancreas), and Hodgkin's lymphoma (cancer of the immune system). Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 8/22/25, for Lispro (type of insulin) 100 Units/ml (milliliter) inject 3 units subcutaneous (sq - injected into the tissue between the skin and muscle) three times daily (9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) for diabetes. Hold if BS (blood sugar)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding the administration of insulin for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 11/12/24, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/19/21, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer of the immune system) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing). Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/8/25, for Insulin Lispro (a hormone that works by lowering level of glucose [sugar] in the blood) inject 3 units subcutaneously (sq - between the skin and muscle) after meals. Hold for BG (blood glucose) below 270. Resident R1's June 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of a current facility policy entitled Management of Hypoglycemia revealed that nursing staff must notify the physician if the resident has signs of hypoglycemia [low blood sugar] that are not resolved by following the facility protocol for hypoglycemia management. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/07/21, with diagnoses that included diabetes (condition of improper blood sugar/insulin levels), pancreatectomy (removal of the pancreas), and Hodgkin's lymphoma (cancer of the immune system). Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/27/25, for Lispro (type of insulin) 100 Units/ml (milliliter) inject 3 units subcutaneous (sq - injected into the tissue between the skin and muscle) in the morning (9:00 a.m.) for diabetes. Hold if BS (blood sugar) is below 270…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and resident Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R121). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Advance Directives dated [DATE], indicated The Director of Nursing services . of advance directives (or changes in advance directives) so that appropriate orders can be documented in the residents medical record and plan of care. and The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Resident R121's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that causes shaking, slows a person's ability to move and worsens over time),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mind altering) medication for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident R58). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 11/12/24, revealed Pertinent non-pharmacological interventions must be attempted, unless contraindicated, and documented following the resolution of the acute psychiatric situation. Review of Resident R58's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/14/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety, major depressive disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. The clinical record revealed that on 8/28/24, Resident R58's physician ordered Hydroxyzine (a medication ordered to treat anxiety) 10 milligrams (mg) every 24 hours PRN for anxiety. Review of Resident R58's December…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store schedule II-V medications in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in one of four medication rooms reviewed (3 West) and the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of four medication rooms reviewed (2 West). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated [DATE], indicated Controlled substances . and other drugs subject to abuse are separately locked in permanently affixed compartments . and Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed . are dated and discarded within 28 days . Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Lispro Insulin (medication to treat diabetes and control blood sugar) must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded, even if the vial still contains insulin. Observation of drug storage on [DATE], at 1:15 p.m. of the 3 [NAME] medication room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$100,240 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $100,240 — penalty dated 2024-02-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LECOM SENIOR LIVING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA