LECOM At Village Square, Llc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 97.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation and clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents reviewed regarding transfers (Resident R72) was free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of an anterior dislocation of left shoulder (when the shoulder slides forward out of the socket). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Abuse and Neglect Definitions dated 10/14/24, indicated Neglect: The failure to provide the goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm . Review of facility policy entitled Abuse and Neglect dated 10/14/24, indicated It is the policy .to have zero tolerance for incidents of abuse and/or neglect. Review of facility policy entitled Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents dated 10/14/24, revealed that Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for five of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R4, R14, R43 and R100).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated dated 10/1/25, indicated Should a resident be transferred or discharged for any reason, the following information is communicated to the receiving facility or provider: The basis for the transfer., Contact information., Resident representative information., Advance directive information., All special instructions or precautions., Comprehensive care plan goals., All other information necessary to meet the residents' needs. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/18/25, with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R11).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered dated 10/1/25, indicated Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/19/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R11's progress notes revealed a note dated 11/21/25, at 6:56 p.m. indicating that his/her urinary catheter was removed. Review of Resident R11's Care Plan for altered genitourinary status dated 9/19/25, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an expired medication was discarded in a timely manner in one of two medication carts reviewed (East Wing Cart). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated [DATE], revealed that, multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Manufacturer's guidelines for Humalog insulin (a fast-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes), indicated that after opened, vials and pre-filled pens should be discarded after 28 days. Observation on [DATE], at 3:22 p.m. of the East Wing medication cart revealed an open injector pen of Humalog insulin with an open date of [DATE], therefore the medication was expired. During an interview at that time Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-30 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — pattern
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documents and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the needs of residents in a timely manner for nine of 11 residents interviewed (Residents R1, R4 through R9, R11 and R12). Findings include: During a tour of the facility on 3/29/25, from 8:20 a.m. through 10:00 a.m. during random resident interviews, the following residents complained of poor call bell response time: Resident R1 expressed frustration related to that often after activating the call bell for assistance, the staff would not respond for an hour or longer. Resident R4 indicated that they were worried that in the event of an emergency staff would not respond and often wait for response to their call light for over an hour. Resident R5 stated that staff would not respond to call bells, and were frequently observed ignoring the call lights while looking at their cell phones. Residents R6 and R7 also complained that call bell response was extremely slow and they often had to up to an hour or longer for assistance. Resident R9 indicated that he/she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documents and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was at a palatable temperature for nine of 11 residents interviewed (Residents R1, R4 through R9, and R11). Findings include: During a tour of the facility on 3/29/25, from 8:20 a.m. through 10:00 a.m., during random resident interviews, the following alert and oriented residents complained of consistently of receiving cold food. Residents R1, R4 through R9, and R11 all expressed frustration that their meals were not palatable because the food was usually cold when delivered by staff, partly due to the trays sitting in the hall for long periods of time until they are delivered. A review of Resident Council meeting concerns for January 2025, February 2025, and March 2025, documented multiple resident complaints of being served cold food. During an interview on 3/29/25, at approximately 11:00 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed awareness of the issue of facility food being served cold to the residents. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for four of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R71, R49, R28, and R7) and failed to ensure that a baseline care plan for an indwelling foley catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) was developed and implemented for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R178 ). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plans - Baseline dated 10/14/24, revealed The baseline care plan included instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident to meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident .The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan in a language that the resident/representative can understand that includes, but is not limited to the following: a. The stated goals and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) upon or within 24 hours of transfer for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R41 and R7). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Admission, Transfer, and Discharge Rights dated 10/14/24, revealed, In cases of emergency transfer, notice at the time of transfer means that the family, surrogate, or representative are provided with a written notification within 24 hours of the transfer. Review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed an initial admission date of 9/8/23, with diagnoses that included intellectual disabilities (certain limitations in cognitive functioning), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A progress note dated 6/27/24, revealed that Resident R41 was transferred to the hospital. The clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transcribe a physician's order for an anxiety medication for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication and Treatment Orders dated 10/14/24, indicated Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the physician's order sheet in the resident's chart. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/31/24, with diagnosis that include Anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), Diabetes (a health condition that caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's progress note dated 11/12/24, that indicated to add Hydroxyzine (an antianxiety medication) 25 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for anxiety. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed his/her physician's orders lacked evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate physician orders were in place for an indwelling urinary catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) for one resident reviewed for catheters (R178). Findings include: Resident R178's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/6/24, with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate gland), heart failure, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident R178's admission documentation revealed an indwelling foley catheter was present upon his/her entry into the facility. Review of R178's order summary lacked evidence of that physician orders were in place for a urinary catheter, which would include but not limited to foley catheter and balloon size, foley catheter scheduled changes, foley catheter as needed changes due to soiling or dislodgement, draining the foley catheter collection bag, foley catheter collection bag changes, and foley catheter hygiene care. During an interview on 11/18/24, at 12:15 p.m. Charge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days and failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mind altering) medication for two of six residents reviewed regarding psychotropic medications (Residents R12 and R67). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 10/14/24, revealed The need to continue PRN orders of psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order Pertinent non-pharmacological interventions must be attempted, unless contraindicated, and documented following the resolution of the acute psychiatric situation. Resident R12's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-11-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LECOM SENIOR LIVING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA