No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gwynedd Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

773 Sumneytown Pike, Lansdale, PA 19446 · For profit - Corporation · 181 certified beds · (215) 699-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 699-5000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$24,065 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,065 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-26)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1031 S Broad St · (215) 362-6889 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
799 Sumneytown Pike · (215) 616-4632 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
525 N Sumneytown Pike · (215) 699-7722 · Call to confirm hours
Park
816 Garfield Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
837 Sumneytown Pike · (215) 699-9159

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.4%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.1%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.4%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.9%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.351.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.681.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 257 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.2%CMS range 50.8–62.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.6–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge87.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge79.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 6.3–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
45.9%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 181 beds and averages 170.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R109 was provided with the necessary equipment of wheelchair leg rest to ensure safety and proper positioning during transportation to an outside appointment. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R109 who while being wheeled out of the transportation van fell face forward from the wheelchair and sustained a right femur fracture for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R109). Findings included:Review of facility policy titled Wheelchair Leg Rest Usage undated, revealed The facility will ensure that residents who utilize wheelchair are transported safely.If a resident is not able to self-propel their own wheelchair or if they cannot lift their legs while being transported the staff will provide leg rests. Review of Resident R109's clinical record revealed the resident was alert and oriented, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of professional literature, review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance while providing incontinence care to a resident, resulting in actual harm to Resident R215 who rolled off the bed and sustained head injuries, including an acute right subdural hemorrhage, left diffuse subdural hematoma, right-to-left midline shift and right uncal herniation and subsequence death for one of six residents reviewed. This deficiency was cited as past-noncompliance. (Resident R215) Findings include: Review of professional literature, published by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility article 2017;98:1907-10, revealed, The term bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling (turning from lying on one's back to side-lying), side-lying to sitting, and sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise a resident care plan with new interventions status post a fall for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, revealed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives to meet the resident's needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the residents' conditions changes. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition and/or when the desired outcome is not met.Review of Resident R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 27, 2025, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments and diagnoses of dementia (decline in memory or other thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one resident who displayed and was diagnosed with dementia, receive the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable, mental, and psychosocial well-being that during care for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of Resident R11's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August 2022, diagnosed with psychological disorders that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances, and delusional disorder. Resident R11 was assessed as cognitively impaired, did not speak English, and spoke through a translator to communicate.Resident R11's care plan dated January 2022 revealed the resident was resistant with care and combative, known to swing arms and throw objects. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, facility documentation, review of clinical records and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation related to potential resident abuse and/or neglect related to an injury during resident care for one of eight residents reviewed. (resident R 121) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Reporting and Investigating Resident Accident/ Incident Policy and Procedure reviewed November 2018 revealed that all occurrences which are not consistent with the routine operation of the facility and care of residents that have or may cause physical injury or harm will be reported, reviewed, and investigated. All accidents/ incidents must be reported the supervisor must immediately examine the resident, the appropriate accident incident and investigation report must be completed, the resident's representative and attending physician will be notified, all accidents slash incidents will have an investigation conducted by the supervisor, upon completion of the investigation report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan related to incontinent care for one of eight residents reviewed.( resident R121) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care plans, comprehensive person centered Revealed a comprehensive, persons and our care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The care planned interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered is a part of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive persons care plan includes measurable objectives and time frames, describes the services that are to be furnished to attain them or maintain the residents highest practical physical mental and psychosocial well-being, includes the residents' dated goals, builds on the resident strengths, and reflects currently recognized standards of practice for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store, food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Receiving revealed that under section Policy Statement, Safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery and subsequent storage of all food. Under section Procedures #5 All food items will be appropriately labelled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. #8. The Dining Services Director is responsible for following distributor instructions for all applicable products Observation of the kitchen conducted on November 12, 2024, at 9:09 am with the Director of Dietary, Employee E3 revealed the following: One plastic bag containing hamburger buns had a sticker with date delivered of 10/13. Further best by date was not written on the sticker. One plastic bag containing hamburger buns was not labelled with date delivered and was not labelled with best by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of hospital records and facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to permit one of four residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized . (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled readmission to the facility revealed that it was the responsibility of the administrator and the director of nursing to ensure that all residents who have been discharge from the facility would be readmitted to the facility regardless of race, color, creed, national origin or payment source. Review of the undated policy titled Coronavirus Disease-identification and management revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for screening, monitoring, rapid identification and management of this virus. The policy indicated that information about residents being transferred to the facility with suspected or confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection would be clearly communicated to the facility by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the Food and Nutrition Services Department, reviews of policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that foods and fluids were not being stored, prepared, delivered and served under sanitary conditions to meet professional standards of food service safety. Findings include: A review of the policies titled sanitizing food surfaces and equipment cleaning dated October 2022, revealed that it was the responsibility of the dietary staff to ensure that food contact surfaces were maintained clean and sanitary in the main kitchen. The policies also indicated that dietary staff were also responsible for maintaining all food service equipment clean and sanitary to prevent a food safety hazard. Observations made between 9:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., on January 22, 2024, of the main kitchen, of the food and nutrition department, where foods and beverages are stored, prepared and served for the residents revealed that procedures were not being followed in the food preparation and servining process to reduce, eliminate or prevent the possiblity of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and staff and observations of the food and nutrition services, a meal tray evaluation and reviews of facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foods were served palatable and at proper temperature (Residents R6, R14 and R98). Findings include: Areview of the facility policy titled Test Tray Evaluation dated January, 2023 revealed that the acceptable temperature for the foods at point of service to the residents was 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on January 22, 2024, at 10:58 a.m. Resident R14 stated that sometimes the food was served cold. Interview on January 22, 2024, at 11:08 a.m. Resident R98 stated that foods and coffee were served too cold. Observation during the luncheon meal on January 22, 2024, at 12:52 p.m. Resident R98 stated that his lunch tray was cold and that it could be served warmer. During a group meeting with residents on January 24, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. Resident R6 stated that her breakfast was served cold. Obsservations inside the main kitchen on January 23, 2024, of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and review of clinical records, it was determined tha the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs of one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R140). Findings include: Resident R140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],with the diagnosis of hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left-dominant side and heart failure (heart does not pump sufficiently). Review of Resident R140's care plan revealed pain and general discomfort dated July 11, 2023, interventions included to assist the resident to a position or comfort using pillows or appropriate positioning devices and to place the resident's call bell within resident's reach. On January 22, 2023, at 1:15 p.m. during an interview Resident R140 stated he was very uncomfortable and his whole body hurt. He wanted to recline his head back in bed but couldn't. The television was too loud but could not reach the remote. He explained that his left side didn't work anymore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for edema for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R140). Findings include: Resident R140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], witht the diagnoses of hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left-dominant side and heart failure (heart does not pump sufficiently). Review of Resident R140's care plan revealed pain and general discomfort dated July 11, 2023, interventions included to assist the resident to a position or comfort using pillows or appropriate positioning devices and to place the resident's call bell within resident's reach. On January 22, 2023, at 1:15 p.m. during an interview Resident R140 stated he was very uncomfortable and his whole body hurt. He explained that his left side didn't work anymore because of a stroke. Part of his left lower arm was wrapped in gauze and the rest of his arm was swollen and red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of resident's clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's wound care recommendations to prevent pressure injuries were followed for one of four residents reviewed with pressure ulcers (Resident R150). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Prevention and Management, not dated, stated that each resident receives the care and services necessary to retain or regain optimal skin integrity. Residents identified as a risk for development of pressure ulcers will have a plan and interventions included in the care plan to address risk factors for development of pressure ulcers. Orders/changes to the treatment will be documented and the care plan will be updated to aide in healing and prevent further breakdown based upon the co-morbidities and the risk factors associated with the resident. Implementation of relevant treatment and preventative measures will be implemented should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to the failure to provide appropriate assistance during incontinence care to Resident R215, resulting in the resident rolling off the bed and sustaining serious head injuries, which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator revealed, The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) assumes full-time administrative authority, responsibility and accountability for the operations and for the financial viability of the nursing facility. Manages facility employees in the provision of care and services rendered in accord with professional standards, and in compliance with state and federal laws and regulations. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing revealed that the primary purpose of the position, is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of facility policies and procedures, observations of the main kitchen of the food and nutrition department, the garbage and refuse area and the pest control operators reports, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the interior of the building was pest free. Findings include: A review of the policy titled Pest Control dated May, 2008 revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to ensure that the facility was free of insects and rodents by having an effective pest control program. The policy also indicated that garbage was not permitted to accumulate on the premises. Observations of the hall way outside the food and nutrition department revealed that the threshold of the double doors, upon closing were not sealed properly. When opened, the doors lead directly outside the building, onto the loading dock. Observations at the threshold of the double doors upon closing evidenced a two inch gap. This opening located at the bottom of the doors allowed easy access into the building for common household…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,065 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $24,065 — penalty dated 2024-01-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COLEV GESTETNER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GESTETNER, COLEVIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST67%since 12/01/2016
MOSKOWITZ, YISROELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 12/01/2016
TAYLOR, MICHELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/27/2018
STERN, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 13%Other / private 18%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,566per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395479. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next