Centennial Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 172.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with resident and facility staff, review of resident and facility documentation and policy it was determined that the facility did not ensure one resident was free from verbal and mental abuse during two incidents for 39 resident records reviewed (Resident R116).Findings include:Review of the facility policy and procedure. Last revised on October 2022, for Abuse of Residents states. It the facility's policy that acts of physical, verbal, psychological and financial abuse directed against residents are absolutely prohibited. The policy defines verbal abuse as to any use of oral written or gestured language that included disparaging and derogatory terms to residents and their families, or within hearing distance to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. The same policy states, Mental abuse, includes, but not limited to resident humiliation intimidation threatening demeanor, harassment and threats of punishment or withholding a treatment, services, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to rule out verbal and mental abuse for one resident during two incidents with staff of 39 resident records reviewed ( Resident R116). Findings includeReview of the facility policy and procedures, revised on, October 2022 titled, Abuse of Residents states. It the facility's policy that acts of physical, verbal, psychological and financial abuse directed against residents are absolutely prohibited. The policy defines verbal abuse as to any use of oral written or gestured language that included disparaging and derogatory terms to residents and their families, or within hearing distance to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. The same policy states, Mental abuse, includes, but not limited to resident humiliation intimidation threatening demeanor, harassment and threats of punishment or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and treatments, clinical record review, interviews with residents and staff, and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R116 and R180). Findings includeReview of the facility's policy titled, Care plan Policy revised March 2024, states the interdisciplinary team (IDT) is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Each resident's care plan is consistent with the resident's right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care including the right to participate in the planning process, request revisions, see the care plan and sign it after significant changes are made. The same policy states that care plan interventions are chosen based on relevant clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident on oxygen therapy was assessed for the need of oxygen for one of 31 resident records reviewed. (Resident R127)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy dated February 10, 2010, revealed that under section Policy: It is the policy of the facility that oxygen therapy is administered per physician's order or as an emergency measure util a physician order is obtained. Under section Steps to administer oxygen # 12. Document the procedure in the medical record. Review of Resident R127 revealed that Resident R127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (poor circulations of the extremities). Review of physician's order revealed an order for Oxygen at 2 liters n/c (nasal canula) PRN (when needed) every shift, notify MD if oxygen is less than 94% as needed for SOB (shortness of breath). Observation on initial tour of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based upon interviews with staff, review of residents' records, and facility policy it was determined the facility failed to determine one resident with a substantial weight loss was reweighed in a timely manner for one of 39 resident records reviewed (Resident R99) Findings includeReview of the facility's policy titled, Weight and Weight Change Management not dated states, Residents with a suspected weight change (per MDS guidelines) will have a reweigh completed in a timely manner. Review of Resident R99 weights reveal on July 17, 2025, a weight of 140.6 lbs. and on July 23, 2025, was 133.6 lbs. calculating a substantial weight loss per MDS guidelines, of 4.98% in six days. Further review of Resident R99 clinical record revealed the facility failed to re-weigh the resident in a timely manner. This was confirmed with the registered dietician on August 12, 2025, who confirmed the substantial change in weight loss should have been reweighed and was not done.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was administered in accordance with physician orders for one of one resident observed in oxygen therapy. (Resident R167)Findings Include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Therapy dated February 10, 2010, revealed that under section Policy: It is the policy of the facility that oxygen therapy is administered per physician's order or as an emergency measure util a physician order is obtained. Review of Resident R167's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructed Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of physician's order dated July 4, 2025, reveled an order to administer Oxygen at 3L (liters)/min via nasal cannula continuously every shift Review of MDS (minimum data set- a federally required resident assessment conducted at a specific interval) dated May 3, 2025, revealed that resident was on oxygen.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews with staff, reviews of clinical records and policies and procedures, observations of resident care and treatment, it was determined that for one of 31 residents reviewed, the facility failed to administer and use its' resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. (Resident R180). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled incident and accident dated July 2025, revealed the facility was responsible to complete a report of all accidents/incidents for each resident. The facility was responsible for investigation of the incident/accident for each resident to determine the risk factors that contributed to the event. The facility was also responsible to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards as possible. The policy said that the interdisciplinary team would develop a care plan to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards as possible. The policy indicated that the completed investigation and review by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents clinical records were completed related to oxygen therapy for one of 31 resident records reviewed. (Resident R127)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy dated February 10, 2010, revealed that under section Policy: It is the policy of the facility that oxygen therapy is administered per physician's order or as an emergency measure util a physician order is obtained. Under section Steps to administer oxygen # 12. Document the procedure in the medical record. Review of Resident R127 revealed that Resident R127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (poor circulations of the extremities). Review of physician's order revealed an order for Oxygen at 2 liters n/c (nasal canula) PRN (when needed) every shift, notify MD if oxygen is less than 94% as needed for SOB (shortness of breath). Observation on initial tour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration to one of one resident observed during medication pass. (Resident R127)Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy entitled Infection Control Policy revealed that under section Policy #1. The infection control nurse, in conjunction with the Quality Assurance committee, has responsibility for overall infection control in the building. Under section Purpose In order to provide maximum protection to residents, visitors, and personnel from pathogenic microorganisms and infectious diseases, methods of prevention and control shall be implemented. Medication administration observation conducted on August 12, 2025, at 10:56 AM revealed that the Licensed nurse, Employee E15 was in the process of administering medications to Resident R127. Further observation revealed that two white tablets were on top of the medication cart. Interview with Licensed nurse, Employee E15, conducted at the time of the observation revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy, staff interviews, and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered on time, as ordered by the physician for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration and Disposition, with a revision date of June 2023 indicated that medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). During an observation on March 12, 2025 st 10:50 a.m. Employee E3 (licensed nurse) was observed standing at her medication cart, and confirmed that she was still administering medications to residents and that she had some rooms in 219-233, in addition to other rooms in which she still had to administer medications. Employee E3 reported that she did not start medication administration because she got into work later. Review of March 2025 physician orders for Resident R1 included diagnoses of respiratory failure (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COLEV GESTETNER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA