Oakwood Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 134.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of food safety standards, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure beverages were stored in accordance with standards for food service safety.Findings Include: Review of Refrigeration & Food Safety guidelines by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food Safety and Inspection Service, revealed cold food should be kept at or below 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Further review of guidelines by the USDA revealed the danger zone is defined as temperatures between 40 and 140 degrees F where bacteria grow most rapidly. A tour of the main kitchen conducted on May 4, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E11, and District Manager, Employee E12, revealed the following: Observations of the milk cooler revealed the gasket (a sealing component used to keep the milk at correct temperatures by maintaining an airtight seal between the cooler's body and its lid) was broken and needed to be replaced. Observations inside the milk cooler revealed it was fully stocked with a fresh delivery of individual milk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and maintain oxygen equipment for one of two sampled residents (Residents R2).Findings include:A review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of January 23, 2026, with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, epilepsy, tracheostomy (surgically created opening in the neck into trachea to assist with breathing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A physician's order dated January 23, 2026, revealed, Administer oxygen at 5 liters per min via trach continuously. A comprehensive care plan, last revised on January 26, 2026, revealed, oxygen as ordered via trach mask. On May 4, 2026, at 11:24 a.m., an observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse, Employee E3, who confirmed that Resident R2's oxygen was set at 1.5 liters, which was inconsistent with the physician's order. On May 5, 2026, at 2:0 p.m., an observation was conducted with the Unit Manager, Employee E4, who confirmed that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to required temperature ranges and failed to maintain refrigeration equipment in a sanitary and operational condition.Findings Included: Review of Medication Room Temperature Log states, temperature are to remain between 36-41 degrees. Defrost freezer monthly on the fifteenth. Observation conducted on May 4, 2026, at 10:30 am, with Nurse Manager, Employee E4 of Medication Room Refrigerator revealed two out of three days the refrigerator temperature exceeded the acceptable range of 36-41 degrees. The facility failed to notify maintenance of the temperature variance and failed to remove or quarantine medications exposed to out of range temperatures. On Monday May 4, 2026, at 10:30 am, with Nurse Manager, Employee E4 observation of Medication Room Refrigerator revealed approximately five inches of ice accumulation in the freezer compartment. The facility failed to notify maintenance of excessive ice buildup and failed to defrost the refrigerator. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one of two residents reviewed who had a tracheostomy, feeding tube, and an indwelling urinary Foley catheter (Resident R2).Findings include:Review of facility policy and procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) revealed All applicable employee to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions, per guidelines. Under Process: A physician order for enhanced barrier precautions is entered in the EHR. The order will contain the a reason for the EBP. EBP will be Care Planned and tasked out to the Care Kardex. An Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign will be posted on the door/outside of the room, of Residents that required Enhanced Barrier Precautions. A red Dot (Sticker) will be placed on the affected Resident's door tag to indicate which Resident requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The Unit Manger is responsible for: Updating and completion of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions log, Providing the IP or designee an updated EBP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately to the Pennsylvania Department of Health for two of 26 residents reviewed. (Resident R24, R433) Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled Oakwood Health and Rehabilitation Center Policy and Procedure, revised September 2023, revealed the following under Section #6, Investigating and Reporting: Once an allegation of abuse has been made, the supervisor who initially received the report must inform the Administrator of Nursing immediately and initiate gathering the requested information. An investigation must be directed by the Administrator or designee immediately. Review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were revised in a timely manner related to fall interventions for one of three records reviewed for falls. (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, revised March 2022, indicated that care plans are revised as information about the resident's change. Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], had diagnoses including, but not limited to, muscle wasting, difficulty walking and atrophy, and muscle weakness. Review of Progress Note dated, October 15, 2024, revealed Resident R5 had an unwitnessed fall and was observed sitting on the floor next to her bed. Further review revealed that on October 16, 2024, Resident R5 complained of right femur pain post fall yesterday. On October 17, 2024, Resident R5 was admitted to the hospital with diagnosis of right femur fracture. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and interviews with residents, family members, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain proper grooming for five of the five residents reviewed (Residents R24, R53, R33, R93, R433) Findings: Review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, disorder of muscle, adult failure to thrive, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness. A review of Resident R24's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, reflecting cognitive intact. The functional abilities section of the MDS indicated that Resident R24 requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene tasks. An interview conducted on June 2, 2025, at 12:35 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician orders related to medication administration for one of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R433). Findings include: Review of Resident 433's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of adult failure to thrive, muscle wasting and atrophy, acquired absence of left leg above knee, and muscle spasm. A review of Resident R433's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, reflecting cognitive intact. A review of the clinical progress notes indicated a progress physician note dated on May 16, 2025 indicated resident admitted to the facility. She is alert and oriented. All medication were reviewd and verified with physician, [Employee E3]. Review of hospital's physician orders indicated that Resident R433 was prescribed Insulin Aspart Flex Pen 100 unit/ml Sopn…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions in accordance with professional standards for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R120). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pain Evaluation and Management Policy, revised December 12, 2020, revealed that The comprehensive pain evaluation is reviewed by the nurse and the physician, and interventions are implemented as appropriate. Care plans will be developed to include both pharmacologic and non- pharmacologic interventions. Care plans will be reviewed and revised as new interventions are needed. Review of Resident R120's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including fracture of left femur(left hip fracture) with orthopedic aftercare. Review of Resident R120's care plan revised May 2, 2025, revealed the resident was at risk for pain related to the diagnosis of left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and procedures, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to the use of appropriate personal protective equipment for one of three nursing units on transmission-based isolation precautions. (B unit) Findings include: Review of a undated facility policy titled Managing Residents with COVID-19, revealed 1. Use of standard and transmission-based precautions for COVID-19, per current guidelines, with appropriate PPE use and signage. 2. Place in a single-person room when able. 3. If single-room quarantine is unavailable due to limited single rooms or multiple residents are identified as COVID-19 positive, resident~ positive for COVID-19 will be cohorted. 5. Restrict the resident to their room when[ possible. 6. Provide the resident with a surgical mask if they need to leave their room. 7. Restrict residents to medically necessary outings during the isolation period Review of CDC guidelines for COVID-19 revealed that Residents placed in Transmission-Based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$5,269 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $1,882 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $3,387 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COLEV GESTETNER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA