No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highlands Rehabilitation And Healthcare

918 Main Street, Laporte, PA 18626 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (570) 946-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 946-7700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
102 E Main St · (570) 928-8146 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
218 S German St · (570) 928-8010 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
524 Main St · (272) 251-1005 · Call to confirm hours
Park
82 Cabin Bridge Rd · (570) 924-3287 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms31.2%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.3%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.9%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.2%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.2%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.091.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.511.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.1%CMS range 24.4–46.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.5–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 2.9–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
41.1%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the correct required notification to a resident whose payment coverage changed for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 109 and 114).Findings include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care received from the skilled nursing facility is ending; and how to contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. The provider must ensure that the beneficiary or their representative signs and dates the NOMNC to demonstrate that the beneficiary or their representative received the notice and understands the termination of services can be disputed. A review of the Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) Form CMS-10055 revealed that examples of the common reasons why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to promote acceptable parameters of nutrition for three of six residents reviewed for nutritional concerns (Residents 1, 2, and 44). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, last reviewed August 27, 2025, revealed that resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record chart and in the individual's medical record. Any weight change of five percent or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Unless notified of significant weight changes, the dietitian will review the unit weight record monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. The threshold for significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain the environment in a safe and sanitary condition in the facility's main kitchen.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on February 2, 2026, at 9:18 AM revealed the following: There were four boxes of thickened coffee packets, three boxes of thickened tea packets, and a sleeve of lids stored in the cabinet under the sink. Two bins with carafes (beverage holder) and lids were stored beside the sink and all the carafes and lids had a white residue on them. There was a silver four tier open shelf. On the bottom shelf there was a large open basin of water/juice pitchers and a large open basin of lids. Observation of the oven revealed the knobs were dirty and there was burnt residue all over the stovetop. Observation of the dry storage room revealed there was a loaf of bread with no use by date, a half loaf of bread not secured, a bag of egg noodles, powdered sugar, vanilla tapioca quick pudding, and pie filling mix…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that active physician orders incorporated resident wishes related to end-of-life care for one of three residents reviewed for advance directives concerns (Resident 2).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed an active physician order dated [DATE], that instructed staff to not resuscitate Resident 2 (DNR, do not attempt to resuscitate, do not perform CPR, allow natural death) in the event of no pulse or breathing. Review of a POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, a binding medical order that instructs healthcare providers the specific types of medical treatment a resident wishes to receive at the end of life) form signed by Resident 2's physician on [DATE], and signed by Resident 2 indicated that Resident 2 desired CPR/attempt resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, chest compressions and artificial breathing assistance) if there is no pulse or breathing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment on two of two nursing units (Second and Third Floor Nursing Units, Residents 1, 5, 10, and 11), and provide a safe and clean environment in the facility's main laundry area. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main laundry area on February 4, 2026, at 11:53 AM with Employee 6, Director of Environmental Services, revealed a folded blanket on the floor behind the washing machines and under the wall mounted chemical dispensers. There was an extensive build-up of a dried and flaky substance on the blanket and surrounding floor. The Nursing Home Administrator was informed of the main laundry area findings on February 4, 2026, at 12:02 PM. Observation of Resident 5's room on February 3, 2026, at 9:25 AM revealed that door to the room was all marred and the floor was dirty around the bed and under the dresser near the cove base. Observation of Resident 1's room on February 3, 2026, at 10:30 AM revealed the floor to be dirty with crumbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer and written notice of the facility bed-hold policy to residents' responsible parties at the time of transfer for two of six residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Residents 2 and 6).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed profile information that indicated that she had resident representatives that included her mother, a male emergency contact, and an adult protective services county representative. Nursing documentation dated October 1, 2025, at 1:45 PM revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the hospital following an above-the-knee amputation. The facility provided a Notice of Transfer or discharge date d October 1, 2025, addressed to Resident 2, that noted the transfer to the hospital on October 1, 2025, was necessary for the surgical procedure of a right above-the-knee amputation. Staff documented a verbal review of the notice with Resident 2 on October 1, 2025. There was no indication that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 3, and 4).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated October 2, 2025, in which facility staff assessed Resident 4 as having no impairments to her upper extremities. The next quarterly assessment completed on January 20, 2026, revealed staff now assessed Resident 4 as having bilateral upper extremity impairments. Review of Resident 4's occupational therapy treatment notes from September 30, 2025, to October 27, 2025, noted Resident 4's range of motion was impaired to her bilateral upper extremities. Interview with Employee 2 (registered nurse assessment coordinator) on February 5, 2026, at 9:21 AM, confirmed the above findings for Resident 4. Employee 2 verified the therapy documentation from the lookback period for October 2, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 7 on September 26, 2024, with diagnosis including a family history of alcohol abuse and dependence. Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed a PASARR Level II determination letter dated May 22, 2024, from the Department of Human Services noted based on a review of the information submitted, the Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services had determined that Resident 7 does not meet the mental health criteria for further review by the office. The letter further stated that although Resident 7 did not meet the criteria for serious mental illness, the documentation submitted indicates that Resident 7 could benefit from drug and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include a resident's representative in participation with care planning for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 6), revise a care plan after a resident's change in condition for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 2), and revise a care plan related to a pacemaker intervention for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 86 revealed the resident had a physician order dated December 26, 2025, that noted a pacemaker (an implanted electronic device to help regulate the beating of the heart). Hospital documentation for Resident 86 dated December 24, 2025, at 1:30 PM revealed that the resident had a permanent pacemaker insertion on February 15, 2023. Observation on February 3, 2026, at 12:14 PM revealed that there was an electronic pacemaker transmittal device on the dresser next to Resident 86's bed. Review of Resident 86's current care plan revealed the resident has an impaired cardiovascular status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided that was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed for pain (Resident 1). Findings include: Interview with Resident 1 on February 2, 2026, at 10:51 AM revealed that she has constant pain. She said sometimes it is from her stomach, and sometimes it is her legs or back. Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed that she has a diagnosis of chronic pain (pain that last for longer than three months or occurring with an ongoing condition, that affects daily life and well-being). Review of Resident 1's current physician's order revealed that she had the following medications ordered for pain: Gabapentin 100 milligrams (mg) one every morning and at bedtimeTramadol 50 mg one every four hours as needed for pain. Tylenol 325 mg two tablets every six hours for mild pain 1-3, (on a 1-10 pain scale). Review of Resident 1's medication administration record for the month of December 2025, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care for one of one resident reviewed for behavioral health related to suicidal ideation. (Resident 82). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Suicide Prevention and Intervention Guideline, last reviewed without changes on August 27, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility that individuals voicing and/or displaying feelings and/or actions which indicated suicidal ideation (thoughts, or preoccupations with ending one's own life, ranging from fleeting, passing thoughts to detailed, active planning), receive services and interventions to help them manage these feeling and maintain their psychosocial well-being. Employees are responsible for monitoring acute mood and behavior changes which may indicate potential suicidal ideation and for reporting these changes to their supervisor for appropriate assessment and interventions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental care for one of one resident reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 58).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Dental Consultant, last reviewed August 27, 2025, revealed that dental care shall be provided through the services of a consultant dentist. A consultant dentist is retained by the facility and is responsible for providing a dental assessment of each resident within ninety (90) days of admission and, .performing or supervising an annual dental revaluation for each resident. The policy did not confirm that the facility would provide dental services provided by the State Medicaid plan (e.g., prophylactic dental cleanings every six months). Interview with Resident 58's daughter on February 2, 2026, at 10:12 AM revealed that she believed Resident 58 needed to have her teeth fixed, and that Resident 58 had natural teeth that likely needed to be extracted. Resident 58's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain or improve a resident's range of motion (ROM) and mobility for four of five residents reviewed (Resident 19, 48, 59, and 74). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Restorative Nursing Services, last reviewed without changes on August 15, 2024, revealed that residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and outlined in the resident's plan of care. Restorative goals may include but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident in adjusting or adapting to changing abilities; developing, maintaining, or strengthening their physiological and psychological resources; maintaining their dignity, independence, and self-esteem; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice regarding the facility's bed-hold policy for one of five residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Resident 63). Findings include: Interview with Resident 63 on January 13, 2025, at 12:12 PM revealed that he was hospitalized with symptoms that were questionably indicative of a stroke (cerebrovascular accident, interruption of blood flow or bleeding in the brain), but he returned to the facility after his hospitalization. Clinical record review for Resident 63 revealed nursing documentation dated October 12, 2024, at 12:24 PM that indicated Resident 63 was calling for help, had an elevated temperature, increased confusion, and agreed to transfer to the hospital for evaluation. Nursing documentation dated October 12, 2024, at 12:47 PM revealed that Resident 63 left the facility via an ambulance in route to the hospital. Nursing documentation dated October 12, 2024, at 1:25 PM revealed that staff spoke to Resident 63's sister…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: Review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted her with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Further review revealed a PASRR (Pennsylvania Preadmission Screening Resident Review Identification Level 1 form) completed on May 22, 2019, that indicated the resident had a mental health condition or suspected mental illness that may lead to a chronic disability and the resident met the criteria (positive screen) to have a PASRR Level 2 evaluation done. A completed PASRR Level 2 by the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Office on Mental Health and Substance abuse services dated August 1, 2019, indicated Resident 34 had evidence of a Mental Health condition that met the criteria, and the resident was determined as eligible for Mental Health services. Review of Resident 34's last comprehensive (annual) MDS (minimum Data set - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident, family, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise residents' care plans for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 79, 81, and 86). Findings include: Interview with Resident 79's daughter on January 13, 2025, at 10:29 AM indicated that she believed that her mother could become verbally and/or physically abusive to staff when she gets anxious. She stated that she believed that her mother has an anxious response when approached by two staff to perform care and that she suggested to the facility that her mother receive care by one staff. Resident 79's daughter also indicated that she provides soda for staff to give her mother to provide caffeine since she no longer smokes cigarettes or drinks coffee to lessen her behaviors and improve her compliance with care. Clinical record review for Resident 79 revealed social services documentation dated November 26, 2024, at 1:39 PM that during a care plan meeting, Resident 79's daughter expressed concerns that Resident 79 may be more combative in the morning with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve the ability to perform activities of daily living for one of two residents reviewed for rehabilitation concerns (Resident 12). Findings include: Interview with Resident 12 on January 13, 2025, at 12:58 PM revealed that she had a walker device in her room that is used when staff walk with her; however, that does not occur, too much because they (the facility) don't have too many people (staff). A discharge summary by physical therapy staff dated November 29, 2023, indicated that services included patient and caregiver training, and instruction regarding an in-home exercise program (HEP) to preserve Resident 12's current level of function and prevent functional decline. Resident 12's prognosis was assessed as good with consistent staff follow-through. Discharge recommendations included that Resident 12 was to continue with the HEP restorative nursing program for gait and independent transfers and wheelchair mobility. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician ordered supplemental oxygen consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed for supplemental oxygen concerns (Resident 63). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 63 revealed a physician's order dated November 11, 2024, for staff to administer supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute as needed to keep oxygen saturation levels above 90 percent, use as needed for oxygen saturations of less than 90 percent. Review of Resident 63's medication administration records and treatment administration records (MAR and TAR, electronic documentation completed by staff to record the completion of medications and treatments) dated November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025, revealed that staff did not obtain routine assessments of Resident 63's oxygenation saturations to determine the need for supplemental oxygen. Observation of Resident 63 on January 13, 2025, at 12:20 PM revealed no supplemental oxygen in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of one resident reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 43 revealed the facility admitted her on October 31, 2024, with diagnosis including Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 43's most recent annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated November 6, 2024, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 43 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 43's care plan entitled impaired cognitive function related to dementia revealed that there was no indication that the facility had implemented an individualized person-centered care plan to address the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services related to partial dentures for one of two residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 86). Findings include: Interview with Resident 86 on January 14, 2025, at 11:37 AM revealed that she had partial dentures for her upper and lower jaw but they went missing. Resident 86 stated that they (the facility's consultant dental provider) are supposed to be making new ones. Resident 86 indicated that it was eight months to one year that she did not have her partial dentures. Observation of Resident 86 on the date and time of the interview revealed that she had natural teeth and was missing teeth. Clinical record review for Resident 86 revealed a plan of care created by the facility on Resident 86's admission date of December 8, 2023, to address her self-care deficits in her activities of daily living (ADL). The plan of care noted that Resident 86 had partial upper and lower dentures. Progress note documentation by the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records included documentation that residents' representatives were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of immunizations for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 21 and 46). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 21 revealed a quarterly MDS (minimum data set, an assessment completed by the facility at intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that indicated Resident 21 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of three, indicating she had severe cognitive impairment. A psychiatric note dated October 4, 2024, at 12:00 PM indicated that Resident 21 was awake, alert, and oriented. Review of Resident 21's Influenza Vaccination (a shot that protects against the flu) consent form revealed that there was no signature by the resident or her responsible party indicating that she received and understood the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a residents' medical records included documentation that the residents' representative was provided education regarding the risks and benefits of receiving a COVID-19 immunizations for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 46). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 46 revealed a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], that indicated resident had a BIMS score of three, indicating she had severe cognitive impairment. A physician's progress note dated October 3, 2024, at 5:23 PM revealed that Resident 46 is alert with confusion and has a diagnosis of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). Review of Resident 46's COVID-19 vaccine consent/administration record provided by the facility, revealed that Resident 46 signed the form on November 7, 2024, indicating that she understood the benefits and risks of the vaccine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of one resident reviewed for resident-to-resident interactions (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 1 on March 7, 2012, with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (a decline in mental ability that affects thinking, memory, and behavior, and interferes with daily life). Review of nursing documentation revealed a fall occurrence note dated November 30, 2024, at 4:37 PM indicating Resident 1 was noted to be on the floor next to her bed laying on her right side. Resident 1 was noted to be guarding her right arm and complaining of pain to her right arm. The fall was unwitnessed by staff. Resident 1's statement indicated Resident 1 reported her roommate (Resident 2) pushed me out of bed, and I'm scared. Nursing documentation dated December 1, 2024, at 1:22 PM revealed the facility received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit on two of two floors (Second and Third floors). Findings include: Observation of the facility on October 19, 2024, at 3:00 PM revealed the following temperatures: Second Floor: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 83 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 84 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 84 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 82 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 83 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 83 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 82 degrees Fahrenheit Second Floor Medication room [ROOM NUMBER].4 degrees Fahrenheit Third Floor: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 88 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 87 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 86 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 86 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program for outbreak testing and transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infection on one of two nursing units (3rd Floor Nursing Unit; Residents 1 and 2, Employees 1 and 2). Findings include: Review of the policy entitled COVID-19 Testing Requirements last reviewed on May 10, 2023, indicates that a single new case of COVID-19 infection in any staff or resident should be evaluated to determine if others in the facility could have been exposed. The approach could involve either contact tracing or a broad-based approach. A broad-based approach is preferred if all potential contacts cannot be identified or managed with contact tracing or if contact tracing fails to halt transmission. Testing is recommended immediately, and again 48 hours after the first negative test, and if negative, again 48 hours after the second negative test. Testing should continue on affected units until there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding investigating an allegation of abuse for two of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 4). Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy implemented on April 1, 2024, indicated that allegations must be reported to the Administrator or other officials and an investigation will be initiated immediately. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed nursing documentation dated April 3, 2024, at 3:45 PM indicating that Resident 3 walked down the hallway and was witnessed striking Resident 4 in the face. This was witnessed by Employee 3, housekeeper, and that further investigation will be made. The documentation indicated that the incident was reported to the Director of Nursing. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that an investigation was started regarding the physical incident between Resident 3 and Resident 4. There was no documented evidence that Resident 4 was assessed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding the administration of physician ordered pain medications for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of Resident CR1's closed clinical record revealed a physician's order dated March 23, 2024, for nursing staff to administer Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml (milligrams/milliliter) 0.5 ml every two hours as needed for pain. A physician's order dated March 24, 2024, indicated that nursing staff were to administer Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml, 0.75 ml every four hours around the clock for pain, scheduled to be given at 12:00 AM, 4:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM, every day. Review of Resident CR1's Medication Administration Record (MAR, a form utilized to document the administration of medications) dated April 2024, revealed that Employee 4, registered nurse, only administered 0.5 ml of Resident CR1's Morphine Sulfate dose on April 3, 2024, at 4:47 PM and again at 8:47 PM. Resident CR1's Morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings included: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on February 6, 2024, between 9:15 AM and 10:15 AM revealed the following: There was a significant amount of debris on top of the dishwasher. There was also a significant amount of dust accumulating on the ceiling above the dishwasher including where the clean dishes came out of the washer. A pipe just behind the dishwasher had an accumulation of dust and had a large piece of protective covering falling off the pipe. The dry storage room had a large bucket of rice with no date or expiration on the bucket. There were dried splashes on the entire wall behind the drink prep area. There was a large number of dead bugs and debris in the bottom of the ceiling light covering above the drink prep area. A plastic container holding lids for juice containers had two lids that were put away wet. There was a plastic drink pitcher with a maroon lid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and resident, family, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment on one of two nursing units reviewed (Third floor nursing unit; Residents 8, 51, and 67). Findings include: During an interview with Resident 8's family member on February 7, 2024, at 9:29 AM it was reported that the building gets too hot and sweltering, especially on warm winter days. This includes resident rooms and the lounge behind the elevator on the third floor. There are times the staff leave the front entrance doors open and when they do, there is no security. This past Christmas day was an example. Interview with Resident 67 on February 7, 2024, at 1:50 PM revealed his room is very hot and gets very hot in the afternoon and has a fan on. Concurrent observation of the thermostat in Resident 67's room revealed the thermostat read 83 degrees Fahrenheit. The surveyor then observed the thermostat in the room shared by Residents 8 and 51 and it read 82 degrees Fahrenheit. Concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that is palatable on one of two nursing units (Third floor nursing unit, Residents 67 and 90). Findings include: Review of food committee meeting minutes date November 29, 2023, revealed that the residents would like more gravy over their meats. Review of food committee meeting minutes dated December 27, 2023, revealed the residents reported the pork is dry. Neither meeting minutes mentioned follow-up of the previous month's concerns. Interview and observation on February 6, 2024, at 12:00 PM with Resident 90 revealed the pork chop was tough. The pork chop was dry and very difficult to cut. There was no gravy or broth on the pork chop. Interview with Resident 67 on February 7, 2024, at 10:09 AM revealed that he is on a soft diet and received a pork chop yesterday that he could not chew. On February 8, 2024, at 11:20 AM the surveyor tested a food tray of regular consistency foods in the presence of Employee 2, nurse aide. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records included documentation that residents' representatives were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of immunizations for three of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 88, 22, and 92); and that residents received the pneumococcal vaccine for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 88 and 91). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Influenza Vaccine, last reviewed February 22, 2023, indicated that all residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. The facility will provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives). Prior to the vaccination, the resident (or resident's legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's responsible party participation in the development of end-of-life treatment wishes for one of six residents reviewed for advance directive concerns (Resident 33). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 33 revealed an electronic physician's order dated [DATE], that instructed staff to not provide resuscitation (CPR, chest compressions and artificial breathing assistance upon a medical emergency and/or death). Review of Resident 33's physical chart revealed a POLST form (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) signed by Resident 33's brother/responsible party on [DATE], that indicated he wanted CPR/full treatment. Interview with Employee 6, licensed practical nurse, on February 7, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, review of clinical record and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated and reported to the appropriate agencies for two of four sampled residents (Residents 82, 84, 79, and 92). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, last reviewed February 22, 2023, revealed that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment, and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. The role of the investigator, the individual conducting the investigation, will, at a minimum, review the resident's medical record to determine events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process, which begins on admission, including resident's assessments and goals for care for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 90). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 90 revealed that the resident was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE], following a fracture of the right proximal humerus (upper arm). The surveyor requested an admission history and physical for Resident 90 and was provided with a history and physical competed by the referring hospital dated October 17, 2023. The history and physical revealed the resident lived at home prior to the hospitalization. The resident reported current drug use of marijuana and prescription drugs. Resident 90 lived with two roommates. Review of a care plan for Resident 90 dated October 23, 2023, revealed the resident concealed medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for a resident dependent on staff assistance for one of two residents sampled for activities of daily living (Resident 71). Findings include: Clinical record review of Resident 71's task documentation (computerized documentation completed by staff to record residents care needs and care performed) revealed that his preference for bathing was to have a shower. His shower was to be completed on Wednesdays and Saturdays during the evening shift. Review of Resident 71's current plan of care revealed that he required limited (resident is highly involved in performing the activity but receives some physical help) to extensive (resident requires weight bearing support) assistance from staff for bathing. Review of Resident 71's bathing/shower documentation for December 2023, revealed that he did not receive a shower from December 1-12, 2023, with documentation on December 1, 5, 8, and 12 indicating NA (not applicable). Review of Resident 71's bathing/shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions for injury prevention for one of seven residents reviewed for accident concerns (Resident 38). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 38 revealed an electronic medical record physician order dated January 26, 2024, to implement floor mats bilaterally (on both sides) when Resident 38 was in bed. Review of a plan of care developed by the facility to address Resident 38's risk for falls revealed interventions that included bilateral floor mats when in bed. Nursing documentation dated October 19, 2023, at 7:09 PM revealed that staff responded to Resident 38 yelling in her room. Staff found Resident 38 on the floor on the right side of her bed. Resident 38 reported that she rolled out of bed. Nursing documentation dated December 11, 2023, at 5:10 PM revealed that nurse aide staff reported to the nurse that Resident 38 was on the floor. The nurse observed Resident 38, face down, on her fall mat. Nursing documentation dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for two of five residents reviewed for catheter concerns (Residents 7 and 55). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a physician's order dated July 17, 2023, that instructed staff to change a Foley catheter (thin, flexible, tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) as needed. Another physician's order dated July 17, 2023, instructed staff to irrigate the Foley catheter with 60 milliliters of normal saline as needed for blockages. A physician's order dated September 6, 2023, instructed staff to attach the Foley catheter to a leg bag (smaller bag that can be attached to the leg under clothing to conceal urine collection during the day) when he was out of bed; and to a straight drainage bag (larger urine collection bag that can be hung from the bed frame) when he was in bed. Documentation by Resident 7's urologist (doctor that specializes in the urinary and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care and eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident 93). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed that the facility admitted her on December 8, 2023. Further review of her clinical record revealed that a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) was added to her medical diagnosis on December 13, 2023. Review of Resident 93's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment completed by the facility at intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated PTSD was an active diagnosis for Resident 93. Clinical record review for Resident 93 on February 7, 2024, at 9:30 AM revealed that she did not have a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from an unnecessary antibiotic medication for one of one resident sampled (Resident 90). Findings include: Review of a history and physical for Resident 90 dated October 17, 2023, revealed the genitourinary (a physical exam of the female internal and external urinary and reproductive system) exam was deferred (put off until a later time). Review of a nursing progress note for Resident 90 dated February 5, 2024, at 2:02 PM revealed that the physician was made aware that the resident had vaginal burning and odor. Augmentin (antibiotic to treat a bacterial infection) 875/125 milligrams was ordered to be given twice daily for seven days. Clinical record review for Resident 90 revealed that there was no related physical exam documented of the genitourinary system and that there was no details of the type of vaginal odor or signs of infection for use of an antibiotic. The antibiotic was ordered without adequate indication for its use. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time dietitian. Findings include: During the initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on February 6, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Employee 3, Dietary Manager, stated that she was the dietary manager, and had been in that role since November 2023. An interview with Employee 3 on February 8, 2024, at 1:06 PM revealed she was not certified; however, the facility was discussing enrolling her in certified dietary manager courses. An interview with Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, on February 8, 2024, at 2:25 PM revealed the facility did employ a consultant dietitian; however, the dietitian was not full time and worked remotely 24 hours a week. Employee 1 confirmed there was no evidence that Employee 3 had any qualifications of food service manager certification/degree, or a certified dietary manager credential in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(1)(6) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's water management program and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assess the building's water system for waterborne pathogen risk; and implement measures to monitor and prevent the growth of opportunistic pathogens within the facility's water system. Findings include: The CDCs (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) current Water Management Program Toolkit, Practical Guide to Implementing Industry Standards, indicated that many buildings need a water management program to reduce the risk for Legionella (bacteria that can grow and spread in water systems and can cause a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) known as Legionnaires' disease) growing and spreading within their water system and devices. Developing and maintaining a water management program is a multi-step process that requires continuous review. Steps to building an effective Legionella water management program include: A description of the building's water system using flow diagrams and a written description to include details like connections to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' representatives received education regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination; and that residents' responsible parties were given the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccination for residents incapable of making medical decisions independently for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 22 and 88). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, revised May 2023, revealed that residents who are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so. COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation, and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist and coordinated by his or her designee. Before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. Information is provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavior health care that was individualized to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being for one of five residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident 1). Findings include: The current facility policy entitled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, revealed the facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavior symptoms will be identified using facility-approved behavior screening tools and a comprehensive assessment. As part of the comprehensive assessment, staff will evaluate based on input from the resident, family, and caregivers, review of medical records, and general observations. The interdisciplinary team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facilities policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food, prepare, and distribute food, and ensure temperature monitoring was in place to prevent the potential spread of food-borne illness in the facility's main kitchen. Findings included: The current facility policy entitled Food Preparation and Service, revealed potentially hazardous foods are cooled rapidly. This is defined as cooling from 135°F (Fahrenheit) to 70°F within two hours and then to a temperature of 41°F or below within the next 4 hours. The total cooling time between 135°F and 41°F should not exceed 6 hours. Proper hot and cold temperatures are maintained during food distribution and service. Foods that are held in the temperature danger zone are discarded after 4 hours. The temperatures of foods held in steam tables are monitored throughout the meal service by food and nutrition services staff. The current facility policy entitled Food Receiving and Storage, revealed all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident and/or their responsible party in writing of a transfer to the hospital with the required information for five of five residents reviewed (Residents 18, 59, 63, 91, and 98). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 59 revealed that they were transferred to the hospital on December 1, 2024, after a change in their condition. There was no documentation that the facility provided written notification to the resident or the resident's responsible party regarding the transfer that included the required contents: reason for the transfer, effective date of the transfer, location to which the resident was transferred, a statement of the resident's right to appeal, including the name, contact, email, and address, how to obtain and appeal form, assistance completing and submitting the appeal form and hearing request, and contact, email, and address information for the Office of the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage. Findings include: Observation of the main dumpsters outside of the kitchen dock entrance on February 6, 2024, at 10:10 AM revealed the following: There was debris and garbage on the ground surrounding the facility's two dumpsters that included: a large piece of balled up tin foil, multiple small pieces of cardboard, broken glass, food condiment packets, and a balled-up medical glove. The area between the dumpsters and the dock had a pile of garbage that included various paper products, a discarded water bottle, dead leaves, and various food packaging containers. There was a bag of lids open and spilled on the ground behind one dumpster. The dumpster lid was found open with garbage visible in the dumpster and there were no staff noted near the dumpster at the time of the findings. There were pieces of dried food on top of the dumpster. A cardboard box was found broken apart and laying in a pile of snow. The entrance to the kitchen at the dock next to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTURY HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTURY V PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2024
CENTURY V TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2024
KULANU OC TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2024
KLEIN, EFRAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2024
OHI ASSET (PA), LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
BERDUGO, SHAIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
POTTS, ABIGAILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2024
ROSCOE, BRANDONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
BERDUGO, GINAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-58.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$996K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 2%Other / private 7%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $996K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,326per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395683. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next