No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oak Ridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

500 West Hospital Street, Taylor, PA 18517 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 142 certified beds · (570) 562-2102 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$104,143 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $104,143 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Geisinger0.2 mi
818 S Main St · (570) 562-6003 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
143 N Main St · (570) 562-2626 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
700 Oak St · (570) 471-7983 · Call to confirm hours
Park
500 Union St · (570) 562-1400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms36.8%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.2%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.9%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.191.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.401.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.3%CMS range 27.9–45.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.3–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
45.0%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 134.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-06)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and select facility policy and documentation it was determined the facility failed to consistently store perishable (foods likely to spoil, decay or become unsafe to consume if not kept refrigerated at 40 °F or below, or frozen at 0 °F or below. Examples of foods that must be kept refrigerated for safety include meat, poultry, fish, dairy products, some fruits and vegetables and all cooked leftovers) and potentially hazardous foods (Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) or Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Food means food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens, such as bacterial or viral organisms capable of causing a disease or toxin formation) at safe temperatures to prevent potential food borne illness. This food safety failure placed 102 of 103 residents residing (one resident NPO) in the facility in immediate jeopardy due to their risk for serious complications from potential foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Findings included: Food safety and inspection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect by failing to provide care and services in accordance with the resident's plan of care. Specifically, staff failed to utilize the required sliding board with assistance of one staff member during a transfer from wheelchair to bed, as planned to ensure safety and prevent injury. As a result of this failure, one resident (Resident CR147) sustained an acute distal femur fracture that progressed to an above-the-knee amputation, representing actual harm to one resident out of 3 discharged residents sampled. This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance.Findings include: A review of the facility Abuse Policy last reviewed on January 14, 2026, indicated it was the facility's policy for residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of hospital records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician-ordered bowel protocol for one of 26 residents (Resident 75) reviewed, which resulted in hospitalization and actual harm. Additionally, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice related to medication administration management for one of three closed residents (Resident CR3) sampled.Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine) the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement. The secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week. Clinical record review revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select incident reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms displayed by one resident (Resident CR1) which, resulted in one resident (Resident 4) out of 6 residents sampled sustaining a serious injury, a fractured hip, caused by Resident CR1's dementia-related behavioral symptoms. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability). An admission MDS Assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated November 22, 2023, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select investigative reports and information submitted by the facility and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely implement effective safety interventions including necessary staff supervision of resident with known unsafe behaviors that increased the resident's risk for falls to prevent a fall with serious injuries, a fractured hip and tail bone, for one resident out of six sampled (Resident 365). Findings include: Clinical record revealed that Resident 365 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including history of falls, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, senile degeneration of the brain, and dementia. A review of an admission/readmission evaluation dated July 18, 2023, indicated that the resident was at moderate risk for falls. A review of the resident's baseline care plan initiated July 18, 2023, indicated that the resident was at risk for falls related to not paying attention while ambulating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and incident reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and assistance with activities of daily living for a resident with known unsafe behaviors and poor safety awareness to prevent repeated falls and serious injury, a fractured hip, for one resident out of eight sampled residents (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of the current facility policy entitled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing provided during the survey ending September 20, 2023, (no facility review date noted on the policy) indicated that based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Resident conditions that may contribute to the risk of falls include cognitive impairment and incontinence. The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of existing pressure injuries for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2).Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States, Clinical Practice Guidelines, indicate that the treatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement person-centered care plan interventions related to fall prevention for three of six residents reviewed for falls (Residents 5, 7, and 9).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain not caused by trauma) and hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting the resident's left side.Review of Resident 5's current comprehensive care plan dated March 14, 2024, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility, incontinence and spastic hemiplegia (paralysis characterized by stiff, tight muscles and involuntary spasms). Interventions included placement of bilateral (two) fall mats on the floor next to the bed while the resident was in bed. Observation on April 22, 2026, at 8:40 AM revealed Resident 5 in bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded the right to participate in the planning of care and treatment, including the facility's failure to conduct a required quarterly care plan conference, for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last reviewed by the facility on January 14, 2026, indicated the interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of facility staff from different professional backgrounds to develop, review and revise the residents plan of care) in conjunction with the resident and the resident's family or legal representative, is responsible for developing and implementing a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The policy indicated that each resident has the right to participate in the development and implementation of the plan of care, including the right to participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS accurately reflected the clinical status and services provided for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 8).Findings include: A review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance (a chronic disorder affecting memory and thinking) and anxiety (a condition involving excessive worry or nervousness). A physician's order dated December 19, 2025, at 5:22 PM, revealed an order written by the facility's Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) for intravenous micronutrient hydration therapy provided by an outside contracted nursing service. The order included an intravenous infusion (fluid delivered directly into a vein through a catheter) containing the following substances: B-Complex (a combination of B vitamins…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and individualized interventions to address a resident's diagnosed medical condition for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 13).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, last reviewed by the facility on January 14, 2026, revealed that a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes is to be developed and implemented to meet each resident's physical, psychosocial (mental and social), and functional (ability to perform daily activities) needs. Clinical record review revealed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Viral Hepatitis C (a contagious infection that causes inflammation or damage to the liver, most commonly spread through contact with infected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise a resident's plan of care in response to a significant weight loss for one resident out 26 residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention last reviewed January 26, 2026, revealed care planning for weight loss should include identification of the cause of weight loss, goals with measurable time frames for improvement and interventions and approaches. Review of the clinical record of Resident 8 revealed admission to the facility on November 21, 2025, with diagnoses to include dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning; thinking, remembering, and reasoning; to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). On January 5, 2026 the resident weighed 122.5 pounds and on January 21, 2026 the resident weighted 115. 6 which was a 5.63% weight loss in less than 30 days. A nutritional note dated January 21, 2026, revealed the dietitian continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently monitor residents' nutritional and hydration status to timely identify declines, failed to implement and document effective non-invasive interventions, and implemented invasive measures (intravenous therapy) without documented evidence that less invasive approaches were attempted or optimized for two of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 58 and Resident 12). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed by the facility on January 14, 2026, indicated the nursing staff will monitor and document weights and dietary intakes of resident in a format which permits comparisons over time. The staff and physician will define the individual's current nutritional status (weight, food/fluid intakes, and pertinent laboratory values) and identify individuals with anorexia, weight loss/gain, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure intravenous therapy was provided and monitored in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice failed to obtain physician orders for monitoring of the PICC line and failed to ensure physician-ordered intravenous antibiotic therapy was administered as prescribed for one of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 5) who required care and monitoring of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line (a long, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the arm and advanced to a large vein near the heart to allow administration of intravenous medications and fluids).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on January 14, 2026, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed and in a safe and timely manner. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency dialysis supplies for two of two residents reviewed who received hemodialysis (Residents 72 and 83), and failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan for one of two residents receiving hemodialysis (Resident 83).Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation, patients receiving hemodialysis, (a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with kidney failure that removes waste and excess fluids from the blood) and utilize central venous hemodialysis catheters, (tubes placed into large veins to allow blood to flow to and from a dialysis machine), are associated with serious complications including infection and bleeding. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention further identifies central lines as devices that can result in significant complications such as bloodstream infection and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 83) who had an indwelling medical device.Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) guidance focuses on gown and glove use and other important infection control measures for prevention of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO type of bacteria or microorganism that has developed resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics, making infections harder to treat). EBP are recommended for residents with any of the following: infection or colonization with a MDRO, a wound, or indwelling medical device, even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. Review of the facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident involving a resident being left unattended while at an outside medical appointment to determine whether neglect occurred for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 1).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy last reviewed by the facility on April 8, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy indicated it is the expectation that any allegation of abuse or neglect is to be reported to the Nursing Home Administrator and other officials. The policy further indicates that an investigation into the allegation will be initiated immediately and include complete statements and interviews from staff and residents involved in the allegation within time frames required by federal regulations. A review of Resident 1's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with the required written notice of Medicare coverage termination, including an explanation of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN) and the right to appeal, prior to the end of Medicare Part A services for two of three sampled residents reviewed for Medicare coverage notices (Resident 1 and Resident 2).Findings Include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on May 14, 2025, with diagnoses to include Parkinsons disease (a progressive, neurological disease), muscle weakness and diabetes. Review of the resident's Medicare coverage documentation revealed the last day of covered Medicare Part A services was June 5, 2025. Further review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN) form dated June 3, 2025, which is a standardized written notice that facilities are required to issue to a Medicare beneficiary when services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility investigative reports and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to fully develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans to meet the individualized toileting and safety needs of two residents (Residents 18 and 11) out of 27 sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness that occurs due to disruptions in brain, spinal cord, or the nerves that connect to the affected muscles) following cerebral infarction (also known as an ischemic stroke, is the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain (cerebral infarct) that is caused by disrupted blood supply (ischemia) and restricted oxygen supply), abnormalities of gait (walking [NAME]) and mobility, lack of coordination, and narcolepsy (a neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to fully develop and implement its established abuse prohibition procedures by not adequately screening two of five employees for employment (Employee 2 and 3). Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility April 2025, revealed the requirement for screening potential employees included obtaining references from the most recent or previous employer. Review of employee personnel files revealed the following: Employee 2 (Dietary Manager): Hired on March 3, 2025. The application listed previous employers, but there was no documentation showing the facility had contacted the most recent former employer. Employee 3 (Housekeeping): Hired on January 10, 2025. The application listed prior employers, yet no evidence was found to verify that the facility obtained references or employment information from previous employers. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on April 25, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a significant change Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 76). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023 a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment is required within 14 days of the determination of the significant change when: A resident enrolls in a hospice program; or A resident changes hospice providers and remains in the facility; or A resident receiving hospice services discontinues those services; or A resident experiences a consistent pattern of changes, with either two or more areas of decline or two or more areas of improvement, from baseline (as indicated by comparison of the resident's current status to the most recent CMS-required MDS). A review of the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of select facility policy, review of clinical records and staff and resident interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses follow physician's orders and ensure accurate medication administration as prescribed for one resident (Resident 31) out of one sampled. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated the registered nurse is responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.14 Functions of the RN (Registered Nurse) requires the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as needed (PRN) basis for one resident out of twenty-seven sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, last reviewed by the facility on April 8, 2025, revealed non-pharmacological interventions may be appropriate alone or in conjunction with medications to manage pain. Examples of non-pharmacological interventions included environmental adjustments (such as adjusting room temperature or providing pressure-reducing surfaces), physical interventions (such as ices packs or warm compresses), exercise (such as range of motion exercises), and cognitive or behavioral strategies (such as relaxation techniques, music, or diversional activities). The policy indicated that while pharmacological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 27 residents (Resident 115). Findings include: A review of Resident 115's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 115's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 2, 2025, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 115's nursing progress notes for the month of April 2025, revealed the resident had increased behaviors, almost daily, of self rising and increased anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted by staff prior to administering a PRN antianxiety medication, for Resident 129. Findings include: A review of Resident 129's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities and symptoms interfere with activities in daily lives), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome), and insomnia (a common sleep disorder that can make it hard to fall asleep or stay asleep). A review of Resident 129's clinical record revealed a progress note dated April 2, 2025, at 3:15 PM, completed by the facility's contracted psychiatric Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP). The note indicated that the resident's behaviors may have been associated with underlying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications and failed to prevent significant medication errors for one resident (Resident 31) out of 27 residents sampled. Specifically, a registered nurse administered a medication that was both expired and not prescribed, resulting in a significant medication error. Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition in which the body does not use insulin normally and cannot control blood glucose levels) and parkinsonism (a neurological disorder that affects movement and muscle control). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified that Resident 31 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. A BIMS score of 13-15 indicates intact cognition, meaning the resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness, in the dietary department and the second floor and Memory Care Unit resident food storage areas. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of a facility policy entitled Food Storage and was last reviewed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-10 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director or designee was in attendance at monthly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for four of four months (January 2024 through April 2024) Findings include: A review of QAPI Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of January 2024 through April 2024, revealed that the Medical Director or other physician was not in attendance, virtually or in-person, at the QA meetings held from January 2024 through April 2024, missing 4 monthly meetings (January 2024 through April 2024). Interview with the administrator on May 9, 2024, at 12:00 PM confirmed that the a physician failed to attend the facility's QAPI meetings on a monthly/quarterly basis. 28 Pa. Code 211.2(d)(5)(6)(7)(8)(10) Medical director 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2)(3)(4) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility pest service records and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen that was conducted on May 7, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., inside of the dish room several small black flies (three or more) were observed flying around a large metal wire storage rack of clean cooking equipment and supplies. The CDM confirmed the observations and stated that drain flies are frequently observed in the area due to the damp environment. Observations of the 2nd floor dining area on May 9, 2024, at 9:57 a.m., revealed small dead black bugs on floor, on the windowsills, and the air-conditioning units. The windowsill was loose and gaps to the outside were present. A dead, large-winged insect was observed on the floor below an unoccupied wheelchair. An interview with the facility's Director of Maintenance on May 9, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., revealed that pest treatments were performed to floor drains in the dietary department, but the employee was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean environment on one of three resident units (third floor dementia unit). Findings include: An observation May 8, 2024, at 10 AM in the large dining room floor on the third floor dementia unit revealed that the floor was sticky, dirty and soiled with dried liquid stains. Dirt, dried liquid stains and food crumbs were observed on the window sills in the dining room. The floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dirty and sticky. A strong urine odor emanated from the resident's mattress. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] B, there was a broken floor tile under the resident's bed. On the wall next to the door was damaged with deep gouges in the surface and the wallpaper was heavily soiled. The floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dirty and sticky. The floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was dirty, with dirt accumulated around the perimeter of the room. During an interview May 9,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and grievances filed with the facility and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate timely and adequate efforts to resolve resident grievances including those voiced by two out of 23 residents sampled (Residents 76 and 90). The findings include: A review of clinical record revealed that Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include gastroesophageal reflux disease ([GERD] occurs when stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus) with esophagitis (inflammation or irritation of esophagus, the pipe that carries food from mouth to stomach) and muscle weakness. An annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated February 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, requiring moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). A Grievance/Concern Form filed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement individualized measures planned to meet the toileting needs of one resident out of three residents sampled with a decline in continence (Resident 27). Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Urinary Incontinence - Clinical Protocol that was last reviewed by the facility on November 27, 2023, indicated that as part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals with impaired urinary continence. The staff and physician will review the progress of individuals with impaired continence until continence is restored or improved as much as possible, or if it is identified that further improvement is unlikely. This should include documentation of a resident's response to attempt interventions such as scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or medications used to treat incontinence. A review of Resident 27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with the necessary behavioral health care and services to meet the needs of two residents out of 23 sampled (Residents 90 and 28) to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being). Findings include: A review of clinical record revealed that Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include adjustment disorder (a short-term condition arising due to difficulty in managing stressful changes that can lead to significant impairment in functioning) with mixed anxiety, depression (mood disorder with experiences of persistent symptoms of sadness), major depressive disorder (mental health disorder having episodes of depression that can be dangerous or life threatening if untreated), and acute stress reaction (occurs after an unexpected life crisis or traumatic event). A quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select incident reports, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff possessed the necessary skills and competencies to implement person-centered dementia care approaches planned to decrease the potential for further escalation of dementia-related behaviors for one resident out of six residents sampled with dementia (Resident A1). Findings include: A review of Resident A1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy [is a medical term used to describe a disease that affects brain structure or function and causes altered mental state and confusion], amnesia (a condition characterized by the inability of a person to recall facts or previous experiences), and cerebrovascular disease [is a term for conditions that affect blood flow to your brain that can result in stroke, brain bleed, aneurysm (a bulge in the wall of an artery that can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction of psychoactive medications for two residents out of 23 sampled (Resident 52 and 77). Findings include: A review of Resident 52's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia. The resident had a physician order initially dated April 25, 2018, for Trazadone 100 mg (antidepressant) by mouth at hour of sleep (HS) for insomnia. The resident also had a physician order dated dated April 28, 2018, for Lexapro 10 mg (antidepressant) one time a day for depression . A review of a pharmacist consult to the physician dated December 1, 2023 reveled a request for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for the Lexapro and Trazadone. There was no physician documentation of the clinical necessity of the duplicate antidepressant drug therapy. The physician's response was solely to disagree with the recommendation with no explanation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and manufacturer's directions for use, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adherence to pharmacy supplies expiration/use by dates on two of three resident units (First and Second Floor). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Storage of Medications with a review date of November 27, 2023, revealed that medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging and nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. If the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. Medication refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room at the nurse's station or other secured location separately from food with temperature ranges 36 degrees Fahrenheit to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility scheduled meal times and select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the provision of a nourishing (satisfying to the resident) evening snack when greater than 14 hours elapsed from the supper meal to breakfast the next day for residents including four residents of 23 sampled (Residents 72, 5, 64, and 41). Findings include: Review of the facility's Snacks Policy last reviewed by the facility February 2024, indicated that it is the facility policy to provide the resident with adequate nutrition. Review of the facility's scheduled (not exact times may fluctuate +/- 15 minutes) meal times revealed 15 hours between the evening meal and the next day's breakfast meal. During a group interview with six alert and oriented residents on May 8, 2024, at 10:00 AM, all four residents (Residents 72, 5, 64, and 41) in attendance stated that snacks are not routinely offered to them in the evenings. The residents stated they would like to receive an evening/bedtime snack. Residents reported that when they have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to timely review and update its facility wide assessment in order to identify the specific personnel and resources presently available and/or required, which are necessary to care for its current resident population. Findings include: At the time of the survey ending May 10, 2024, the facility had reviewed its facility assessment on April 15, 2024, to determine the specific and unique needs of its resident population and the available and accessible resources to meet these needs on a daily basis and during emergent situations. The facility provided a facility assessment tool to the survey team on May 7, 2024. There was no documentation on the form that identified and addressed the needs of the locked third floor unit, Dementia/Memory care unit. The form did not include any focus on the care and needs of the 61 residents with documented diagnosis of Dementia/Alzheimers disease and 43 residents residing on the locked dementia unit. A review of the results of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, observation and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintains the personal dignity, privacy and quality of life of two residents out of 23 sampled (Resident 49 and 90). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Dignity with a review date of November 27, 2023, revealed that residents are always treated with dignity and respect. The facility culture supports dignity and respect for resident's by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences values, and beliefs. This begins on admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents by helping to promptly response to a resident's request for toileting assistance. An observation on May 8, 2024 at 9 AM, revealed no curtains, shades or blinds on the windows in resident room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from physical abuse out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 85). Findings including A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility November 27, 2023, revealed that residents have the right to be free from abuse. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The facility's goal is to achieve and maintain an abuse-free environment. A review of Resident 85's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease [is a gradually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's abuse prevention policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established abuse prohibition policy and procedures for responding to incidents of resident abuse for one resident out of 23 sampled (Resident 85). Findings include: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility November 27, 2023, revealed that the facility's abuse prevention/intervention program included training all staff and practitioners' ways to resolve conflicts appropriately. Assessing, care planning, and monitoring residents with needs and behaviors that may lead to conflict or neglect and assessing residents with signs and symptoms of behavior problems and developing and implementing care plans to address behavioral issues. The facility's response to abuse includes an assessment and assessment data will include injury assessment, signs of recent fall, pain assessment, current behavior, all current medications, vital signs, behaviors over the past 24-hours, all active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility incident reports, and the facility's abuse prohibition policy and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate potential neglect of five residents out of 23 sampled (Residents 99, 43, 17, 46, and 97). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, entitled Abuse Policy last reviewed by the facility November 2023, indicated that a complete investigation will be conducted. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of or should have been aware of goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide them to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. A review of medication errors in the facility for the month of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify a resident's need for monitoring of the resident's respiratory status and oxygen use on the resident's comprehensive care plan for one resident out of 23 sampled (Resident 102). Findings include: According to the American Thoracic Society, oxygen (O2) is a medication that requires a prescription from a healthcare provider. The provider will prescribe your O2 at a specific flow rate and a specific number of hours per day. It is very important that O2 is used as prescribed. Using too little O2 may put a strain on the heart and brain, causing heart failure, fatigue, or memory loss. Using too much O2 can also be a problem. For some patients, using too much O2 can cause them to slow their breathing to dangerously low levels. It is important to wear O2 as your provider ordered it. If the patient starts to experience headaches, confusion, or increased sleepiness after using supplemental O2, the patient may be getting too much. A review of the clinical record of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently administer oxygen (O2) as ordered for one out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 7). Findings included: According to the American Thoracic Society, O2 is a medication that requires a prescription from a healthcare provider. The provider will prescribe your O2 at a specific flow rate and a specific number of hours per day. It is very important that O2 is used as prescribed. Using too little O2 may put a strain on the heart and brain, causing heart failure, fatigue, or memory loss. Using too much O2 can also be a problem. For some patients, using too much O2 can cause them to slow their breathing to dangerously low levels. It is important to wear O2 as your provider ordered it. If the patient starts to experience headaches, confusion, or increased sleepiness after using supplemental O2, the patient may be getting too much. A review of the clinical record of Resident 7 revealed admission to the facility on October 14, 2020, with diagnoses that include a history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered care and coordination of individualized resident services for one of one residents sampled receiving hemodialysis (Resident 51). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease that was last reviewed by the facility on November 27, 2023, indicated that a resident's compressive care plan would reflect the resident's needs related to end stage renal disease [(ESRD) is a condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function. This causes changes in urination, fatigue, swelling of feet, high blood pressure, and loss of appetite]. A review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed that he was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease with hemodialysis [is a procedure where a dialysis machine and a special filter called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and accurate and complete clinical records for two out of 23 residents reviewed. Findings included: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings, and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. 21.148 Standards of nursing conduct (a) A licensed practical nurse shall: (5) Document and maintain accurate records. According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure call bells were accessible to one of 23 residents sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: Observation on May 9, 2024, at 9 AM revealed that in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], in which Resident 52, a severely, cognitively impaired resident resided, but was not in the room at the time of the observation there was no call bell connected to the wall outlet or anywhere these in the room. There was no alternate method for use as a call bell, such as a tap bell noted in the resident's room. There were 2 plugs placed into the wall outlet call bell unit. The plugs were utilized to circumvent the alarm when the outlet is unplugged. Interview with Employee 4 (licensed practical nurse) on May 9, 2024, at 9:05 AM confirmed the observation that Resident 52 did not have access to a call bell to summon staff assistance while in bed and verified that call bells are to be placed within reach of the residents and each resident's bedside.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement established procedures to assure safe smoking ability for one resident out of one resident identified as a current smoker (Resident 34). Findings include: During an onsite survey beginning May 7, 2024, a policy was observed on facility bulletin board indicating that the facility was a non-smoking facility that smoking is not permitted within the facility or on facility grounds. During entrance conference on May 7, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator stated that one resident, Resident 34 was a current smoker. Review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to have included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident 34's plan of care, reviewed during the survey ending May 10, 2024, revealed no care plan to address the resident's smoking until surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, guidance issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures designed to protect residents from unacceptable practices of disenrolling residents from their Medicare health plans by ensuring all risks of disenrolling are explained, both verbally and in writing, and the residents are found to be competent to make informed decisions for four of four reviewed disenrolled from Medicare health plans (Resident 11, 16.17, 21). Finding include: A review of a CMS guidance entitled Memo to Long Term Care (LTC) Facilities on Medicare Health Plan Enrollment dated October 2021 revealed that CMS continues to hear reports of the unacceptable practice of nursing facilities or skilled nursing facilities (collectively, long-term care or LTC facilities) disenrolling beneficiaries from Medicare health plans (Medicare Advantage plans with and without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select reports, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized plans to manage residents' dementia related behavioral symptoms to promote resident safety and the residents' highest practicable physical and mental well-being for two residents (Resident 14 and 19) out of 21 sampled. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability), behavioral disturbance (globally described as agitation, wandering, and hoarding), unsteadiness on feet and lack of coordination (refers to abnormal motor planning and execution, disturbed negotiation with obstacles or the environment), and had a history of falls. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey of January 25, 2024, and the findings of the survey ending February 27, 2024, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies related to abuse and dementia care and to ensure that plans designed to improve the delivery of care and services were consistently implemented to effectively deter future quality deficiencies. Findings include: A review of the facility's plan of correction for the deficiencies cited under abuse and dementia care during the survey ending January 25, 2024, revealed the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance monitoring systems to ensure that solutions were sustained, which were to be functional by December 12, 2024. The results of the current survey ending February 27, 2024, identified repeat quality deficiencies in prevention of resident abuse and dementia care. In response to the deficiency cited related to resident abuse during the survey of January 25, 2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility's abuse policy, clinical records, and select reports and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to assure that one resident (Resident 18) out of four sampled was free from sexual abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 19). Findings included: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, provided by the facility during the survey of February 27, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility that the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, contact or sexual assault. Residents have the right to engage in consensual sexual activity. However, anytime the facility has reason to suspect that a resident may not have the capacity to consent to sexual activity, the facility must take steps to ensure that the resident is protected from abuse. These steps should include evaluating whether the resident has the capacity to consent to sexual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 21 sampled was free of chemical restraints used to most readily control the resident's behavior and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 18, 2023, with diagnoses to include Parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, stiffness and tremors), dementia with behavioral disturbances (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change) and adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of decline in older adults that affects their physical, mental, and social well-being). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated December 25, 2023, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, facility investigations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff, providing direct services to residents, who possess the necessary competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as evidenced by five residents out of six sampled (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4 and CR1). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included alcohol induced dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning. A review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interview, a review of grievances lodged with the facility, and test tray results, it was determined that the facility failed to provide meals that are served at safe and palatable temperatures for a test tray completed during the lunch meal for in-room tray service. Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A review of a Grievance/Concern Form completed by on behalf of Resident A1's by her spouse dated January 18, 2024, at 12:15 PM, revealed that the resident complains of cold food during lunch. A review of a Grievance/Concern Form completed during Resident B2's care plan meeting held on January 19, 2024, no time noted, revealed that the resident complained that his food was often cold. During on-site survey ending January 25, 2024, a test tray was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of facility pest service records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: A review of the facility's contracted pest control report dated January 8, 2024, at 2:37 PM, revealed that during a common inspection that the third-floor kitchenette floor drain had build up of organic matter that allowed drain flies to breed and noted that the drain needed to be cleaned to prevent unsanitary conditions and attractions of pests. Drain flies were found in the third-floor kitchenette and that sealing an open drain would resolve the fly problem. During a tour of the 3rd Unit Resident Pantry/Kitchenette on January 25, 2024, at 9:17 AM, revealed that inside of the ice scoop storage container there were two small black flies floating in the pooled water on the bottom of the container. Further observations revealed that upon opening the stainless-steel refrigerator, there were several small black flies that flew out and there small flying insects on the resident food items and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy, clinical records, and investigative reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident 1 and 2) out of six sampled were free from physical abuse perpetrated by other residents, Residents 2 and 3). Findings include: A review of the current facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program, last reviewed by the facility June 6, 2023, revealed it is the policy of the facility that the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. As part of the resident abuse prevention program, the administration will protect the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness on one of three resident pantries areas (3rd Resident Pantry/ Kitchenette). Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During a tour of the 3rd Unit Resident Pantry/Kitchenette on January 25, 2024, at 9:17 AM, observation of the inside of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility and the minutes from Residents' Council meetings and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance as reported by seven alert and oriented residents out of 15 interviewed (Residents 7, 27, 38, 47, 72, 98, and 14). Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meeting on October 26, 2023, revealed that the residents in attendance voiced concerns that staff do not answer their requests for assistance, via the nurse the call bell system, in a timely manner. A review of grievances lodged with the facility revealed a grievance filed anonymously on November 2, 2023, on behalf of a resident, indicating that the resident's call bell was on for an extended period of time with no response from staff. A grievance was filed on November 4, 2023, on behalf of 12 residents, indicating that their call bells were not being answered timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and two of three resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department conducted on December 12, 2023, at 9:00 AM revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and/or obtain radiology/diagnostic services to meet the needs of one of eight residents' clinical record reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses to include unspecified dementia. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed a progress note dated August 26, 2023, indicating the resident had a fall and was complaining of left wrist pain after the fall. An x-ray was completed in the facility on August 27, 2023, and no fracture was noted. Progress notes revealed that the resident continued to have pain in the left wrist another x-ray was completed on August 28, 2023, and the results of this x-ray were inconclusive, and the radiology report recommended that resident see a hand specialist and receive a CT scan (diagnostic imaging test that uses several X-ray images and computer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-07 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and a review planned menus, dietary staffing credentials, hours and job descriptions, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure effective management and execution of the duties and responsibilities of the facility's food and nutrition department to provide consistent planned meals and professional dietary and nutritional services to meet the nutritional needs of each resident. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on August 7, 2023, at 9:50 AM revealed that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. The main walk-in refrigerator cooler was observed to be inoperable since July 25, 2023, as confirmed during interviews with Employee 1, Dietary Manager. When observed at the time of the survey on August 7, 2023, perishable food items were stored at a temperature of 61 degrees Fahrenheit, available for resident consumption, in this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and test tray results it was determined that the facility failed to serve food and beverages at palatable, safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A test tray was conducted, on August 7, 2023, on third floor, at 12:36 PM, at the time the last resident began eating, revealed the following: The lunch meal consisted of meat loaf with gravy, stuffed tomatoes, mashed potatoes with gravy, tomato soup, brownie, milk, and coffee. The food temperatures that were obtained in the kitchen tray-line prior to service that began at 11:45 AM were as follows: meatloaf 200 degrees Fahrenheit, mashed potatoes 182 degrees Fahrenheit and broiled half tomato 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The last cart, third floor cart left the kitchen at 12:30 PM and arrived on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$104,143 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $96,203 — penalty dated 2023-12-15
  • $7,940 — penalty dated 2023-09-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-15 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTURY HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTURY IV PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2023
CENTURY IV TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
KULANU OC TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
KLEIN, EFRAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
BERDUGO, SHAIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2025
FASCIANA, GUYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
MASCIOLI, KORYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$410K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 6%Other / private 9%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $410K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,968per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395564. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next