Cedarwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
951 Washington Avenue, Tyrone, PA 16686 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (814) 684-0320 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,909 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.8% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 37.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 33.9–57.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 3.9–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.54 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 96.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.555 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in harm due to a fall with fractures. This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation dated January 30, 2025, indicated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The nursing facility will implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situations by adequately preparing staff for caregiving responsibilities. admission paperwork for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of investigation reports and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2) who required two staff for bed mobility, resulting in a fall with fractures. This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: admission paperwork for Resident 2, dated April 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after having fallen at home and suffering a hip fracture, which required surgery on March 30, 2025. The resident was alert with slight confusion and required extensive assistance from two staff members for care, including bed mobility. The resident's care plan, initiated April 4, 2025, revealed that the resident required two staff members for bed mobility. An incident note for Resident 2, dated April 7, 2025, revealed that the resident was receiving care from Nurse Aide 1 while in bed. Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely of a change in condition, resulting in hospitalization and death for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding physician notification, dated February 23, 2023, indicated that the physician would be notified in a timely manner when a change in condition involving the resident occurred. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated September 29, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required only supervision for daily care tasks, and was continent of bowel and bladder. A nursing note for Resident 1, dated November 1, 2023, at 2:00 a.m., revealed that the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was found getting herself off the floor. She refused to be assessed at that time. A nursing note, dated November 2, 2023, at 2:36 p.m., revealed that the resident was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act, facility policies, residents' clinical records, and a resident's hospital records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was assessed after a change in condition for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in a delay in sending the resident to the hospital for a serious medical condition. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's policy regarding changes in a resident's condition, dated February 23, 2023, indicated that the nurse will notify the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a fall to rule out abuse or neglect for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding accidents and incidents - investigating and reporting, dated January 27, 2026, revealed the nurse supervisor/charge nurse and the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. Incident accident reports would be reviewed by the safety committee for tends related to accident or safety hazards in the facility and to analyze any individual vulnerabilities. The report should include the circumstances surrounding the accident or incident, the names or witnesses and their account of the incident, and other pertinent data as necessary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated February 15, 2026, revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals.An annual Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 24, 2026, indicated that the resident w as cognitively intact, had a stage 4 pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissues, caused by prolonged pressure)Physician's orders for Resident 1 dated March 10, 2026 included an order for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding homelike environment, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 43, dated December 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required minimal assistance for care needs, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and colon cancer. Observations of Resident 43's room on February 2, 2026, at 11:10 a.m., revealed that there were multiple quarter-sized to half-dollar-sized areas of chipped and peeling paint on the two walls around the resident's bed. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate, ongoing activities designed to meet the needs of the residents. Findings include:Review of the activity calendar for the month of February 2026 revealed that there is one activity scheduled for a Sunday evening and it is for the super bowl. There were no other organized weekend activities. There were also no organized activities on the calendar after 2:00 p.m. for any unit other than the dementia unit. At 4:00 p.m. there is an activity on the dementia unit called tray pass. There were no other organized activities for the other units on the calendar after 2:00 p.m.Interview with a group of residents on February 2, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. revealed that they would like to have organized activities on the weekends and in the evenings. They stated that the organized activities end at 2:00 p.m. everyday and that there are no organized activities on the weekends. They stated that they have asked for weekend activities, but have been told that there is not enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management for two of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 7 & 48).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding pain management, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that the physician would order appropriate medication interventions to address the resident's pain. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated December 26, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was usually understood, and could usually understand, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and received scheduled pain medication. The current care plan for pain indicated that Resident 7 had chronic back pain and medications were to be administered as ordered.Physician orders for Resident 7 dated December 24, 2025, included an order for her to receive one Lidocaine 4% patch (an over-the-counter medication patch used for the temporary relief of minor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable. Findings include:Interview with a group of residents on February 2, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. revealed that the food delivered to the resident rooms and the dining rooms on their floors was served cold. Interview with Resident 48 on February 2, 2026 at 1:57 p.m. revealed that the food is cold.Interview with Resident 103 on February 2, 2026 at 11:42 a.m. revealed that the food is often cold and tastes bland.Observations in the kitchen for the lunch meal service on February 3, 2026 and 11:56 a.m. revealed that a test tray left the kitchen and arrived on the third floor at 12:14 p.m. The lunch meal on February 2, 2026, consisted of spaghetti and meatballs, vegetable blend, strawberry cake, milk, and juice. Trays were passed to the residents in their rooms and the last resident was served and eating at 12:28 p.m. The test tray on February 2, 2026 at 12:28 p.m. revealed that the temperature of the spaghetti and meatballs was 127.0 degrees Fahrenheit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and store ice under sanitary conditions for one of four ice machines (third floor pantry). Findings include:Observations of the ice machine in the third floor pantry room on February 4, 2026 at 10:41 a.m. revealed that there was no air gap for the drain pipe. The drain pipe traveled down and directly into the drain hole with no air gap present.Interview with the Maintenance Director on February 4, 2026 at 11:05 a.m. confirmed that the drain pipe coming from the ice machine in the third floor pantry was in direct contact with the floor drain, that there was no air gap, and that there should have been an air gap between the end of the pipe and the floor drain.28 Pa. Code 207.4 Ice Containers and Storage. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policy, clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 92).Findings include: A facility policy for charting documentation dated January 27, 2026, revealed that a complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to care, signs, symptoms, and the progress will be documented and will be concise, accurate, complete, and use objective terms.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 92, dated January 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had a peg tube (a tube placed directly into the stomach to provide nutrition).Physician's orders for Resident 92 dated October 11, 2025, revealed 240 cubic centimeters of 1.5 Juven (a specialized nutrition power to support healing a build lean body mass) three times a day if the resident ate < 50% of the meal.Review of nurse aide task documents for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for three of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 9, 11, ). Findings Include:The facility's policy regarding the use of psychotropic medications, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that the staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternatives.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated November 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received antipsychotic medications (a psychotropic medication), and had diagnoses that included depression and bipolar disorder (a chronic mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative regarding a fall (change in condition) for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding notification, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of change in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated October 23, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 29 dated January 31, 2026, revealed that the resident slid out of her electric wheelchair and onto the floor. There was no documented evidence that daughter was notified after fall. A special notification banner in Resident 29's electronic health record indicated that her daughter was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 58 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 39, 43, 97). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days (admission date + 13 calendar days) following admission.An admission MDS assessment for Resident 6 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on December 27, 2025, which was 2 days after admission.An annual MDS assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 114). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding falls, dated January 27, 2026, revealed that resident's identified as fall risks will have interventions in place to prevent further falls.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 88, dated January 21, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance for daily care. Resident 88's care plan, dated December 14, 2025 indicated that the resident was at risk for falls. Fall interventions included keeping her personal belongings within reach, and that she would have a reacher tool (used to grab objects that are beyond your reach).Observations of Resident 88 on February 5, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. revealed that she was sitting in her wheelchair beside her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in one of three medication carts reviewed (second floor cart), failed to discard expired medical supplies, and failed to permanently affix a narcotic storage box to the refrigerator.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage and labeling, dated [DATE], revealed that the facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial.Observations in the second floor medication cart on February 4, 2026 at 10:32 a.m. revealed that there was one Insulin Lispro Subcutaneous Solution pen (medication used for diabetes) that had expired on [DATE], and there was one Novolog injection Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct and/or maintain compliance with quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) for the annual survey ending January 10, 2025 and a complaint survey ending March 5, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 5, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to safety/accidents, labeling and storage of medications, palatable food, and sanitary food practices. The facility's plans of correction for deficiencies regarding safety/accidents, cited during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 103).Findings include:CDC guidance on suspected or confirmed Clostridioides (C. diff, a germ that causes infectious diarrhea and colitis). Facilities were to isolate and initiate contact precautions (infection control measures designed to prevent the spread of germs transmitted through direct or indirect contact with a patient or their environment).The facility's policy regarding isolation and initiating transmission based precautions, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that the transmission based precautions would be utilized when a resident meets the criteria for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of personnel files as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required In-Service Training was completed for one of four nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 6).Findings include:Review of Nurse Aide 6's personnel file revealed that she was hired on March 28, 2017. Review of her continuing education transcript revealed that she did not have the required 12 hours of Nurse Aide training per year.Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 4, 2026 at 3:33 p.m. confirmed that Nurse Aide 6 failed to complete the necessary 12 hours of training. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe and comfortable environment was maintained for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8, 9) who were in the day room with temperatures above 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment, last reviewed January 30, 2024, indicated that the facility reflected a homelike setting to provide comfortable and safe temperatures between 71 degrees F and 81 degrees F. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated June 9, 2025, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was sometimes understood and was sometimes able to understand others, was dependent of staff for care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 8, dated March 24, 2025, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was rarely understood and was rarely able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the residents' rooms. Findings include: Manufacturer's instructions for the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC - a heating and cooling system designed to be mounted through a wall to control room temperature) indicated that the air filters are to be cleaned every two weeks, or more often if necessary. Observations in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], on May 15, 2025, at 10:22 a.m. revealed that the room had a PTAC unit. The Maintenance Director was able to remove the filter from the unit and it was covered with a gray-brown layer of removable debris. Observations in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on May 15, 2025, at 11:51 a.m. revealed that the room had a PTAC unit. The Maintenance Director was able to remove the filter from the unit and it was covered with a thick, gray-brown layer of removable debris. Interview with the Maintenance Director at May 15, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dental appointment was scheduled for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A facility policy for dental care, dated January 30, 2025, revealed that the facility is to provide routine and emergency dental care for residents including follow-up dental appointments. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 6, dated May 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required staff supervision with care, and had her own natural teeth. A physician's order for Resident 6, dated October 10, 2024, revealed that the resident was to see the oral surgeon for tooth extraction. An interview with Resident 6 on May 15, 2025, at 11:44 a.m. revealed that she has an extremely sensitive tooth on her right side, and she believed that she was to have a tooth pulled and has not had it pulled. As of May 15, 2025, there was no documented evidence that Resident 6 saw the oral surgeon to have her tooth pulled. An interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. A dental summary note, dated August 2, 2024, revealed that Resident 1 was present for the insertion of lower complete denture. Denture care and wearing instructions were given to the resident. Observations and interview with Resident 1 on May 15, 2025, revealed that he had no natural teeth and was not wearing any dentures. He said he did not have any dentures right now, because they broke. He said he wanted dentures because some of the foods are difficult to chew. Review of nurse aide task documents for February, March, April and May 2025 revealed that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for three of three resident refrigerators. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food and snacks kept on nursing units, dated January 30, 2025, revealed that all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be labeled with the resident's name and use-by dates, and all food items are to be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observations of the second floor resident refrigerator on March 5, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed a white plastic bag dated February 17, 2025, with Resident 1's name, that contained a piece of fried chicken between two paper plates and a plastic container of barbequed ham. Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on March 5, 2025, at 9:43 p.m. confirmed that the food should have been discarded within three days. Observations of the resident refrigerator on the third floor on March 5, 2025, at 9:47 a.m. revealed a salad in a plastic bowel with lid and pizza in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 99). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 99, dated November 25, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of renal failure requiring dialysis (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). Physician's orders from the dialysis center for Resident 99, dated December 24, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 210 milligrams (mg) of Auryxia (treats anemia) five times a day with meals and snacks. Review of Resident 99's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated January 2025, revealed that the resident was receiving Auryxia three times per day and not the ordered five times per day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for enteral feedings were followed for three of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 16, 54, 67). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding enteral nutrition, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered, and is monitored the by the dietician who makes recommendation for interventions for nutritional adequacy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 16, dated November 18, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance from staff for care, and had an enteral feeding tube (feeding through a tube inserted directly into the stomach). Physician's orders for Resident 16, dated January 6, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive Jevity 1.5 (a type of enteral feeding) at a rate of 60 milliliters (ml)/hour. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable. Findings include: A facility policy for food preparation and service, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that food should be distributed and served in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices with hot foods above 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview with a group of residents on January 8, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. revealed that the food delivered to the resident rooms was served cold. Observations in the kitchen for the lunch meal service on January 10, 2025, at 11:31 a.m. revealed that a test tray left the kitchen and arrived on the fourth floor at 11:32 a.m. The lunch meal on January 10, 2025, consisted of ground sausage and noodles, broccoli, rootbeer float dessert cup, milk, and coffee. Trays were passed to the residents in their rooms and the last resident was served and eating at 11:50 a.m. The test tray on January 10, 2025, at 11:52 a.m. revealed that the temperature of the ground sausage and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food and snacks kept on nursing units, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be labeled with the resident's name and use-by dates, and that beverages are dated when opened and discarded after 24 hours. Observations in the kitchen on January 7, 2025, at 9:27 a.m. revealed a box of frozen 1.5 ounce egg patties that were open to air and dated December 31, 2024. Interview with the Dietary Manager on January 7, 2025, at 9:40 p.m. confirmed that the box of egg patties were open to air. Observations of the resident refrigerator on the second floor on January 7, 2025, at 12:33 p.m. revealed two opened and undated one-pint containers of 2 percent milk labeled with a resident's first name, one opened half-gallon of 1 percent milk that was three quarters full, without a name, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, investigative reports, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 95). Findings include: The facility's current policy regarding abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation indicated that the residents are to be protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property by anyone, including facility staff. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 95, dated December 12, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance from staff for transfers, and had diagnoses that included arthritis (a chronic condition that causes joint inflammation, pain, stiffness, and swelling), and had a total knee arthroplasty (a surgical procedure that replaces the knee joint with artificial parts). The resident's activities of daily living care plan, revised on December 6, 2024, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, responsible party, and Ombudsman, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 67). Findings include: A annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated November 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 19, dated June 6, 2024, at 12:59 p.m., revealed that the certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) reviewed lab results and wrote an order to send Resident 19 to the hospital for evaluation. The resident's responsible party was also notified and was agreeable for the resident to be transported to the hospital. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 19's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's responsible party and the Ombudsman regarding the reason for transfer. A quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate parties were notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 67). Findings include: A facility policy for Bed Holds, dated January 25, 2024, included that residents and/or representatives are informed in writing of the facility and state bed-hold policies. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated November 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 19, dated June 6, 2024, at 12:59 p.m., revealed that the certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) reviewed lab results and wrote an order to send Resident 19 to the hospital for evaluation. The resident's responsible party was also notified and was agreeable for the resident to be transported to the hospital. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized care regarding the use of an anti-coagulant (blood thinner) for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 99). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 99, dated November 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and that she was medicated with an anti-coagulant. Physician's orders for Resident 99, dated January 2, 2025, included an order for the resident to take 5 milligrams (mg) Eliquis (anti-coagulant) every 12 hours. Review of Resident 99's Medication Administration Record, dated January 2025, revealed that the resident was medicated with Eliquis twice daily. There was no documented evidence that Resident 99's care plan included a care plan for the use of an anti-coagulant. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 10, 2025, at 1:14 p.m. confirmed that Resident 99's care plan was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 91). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 91, dated November 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance with care needs, and was receiving an intravenous antibiotic (when the antibiotic is given through the vein). Review of Resident 91's intravenous access care plan, dated November 24, 2024, indicated that the resident had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in her right upper arm for administration of antibiotics. Physician's orders for Resident 91, dated December 10, 2024, included an order for the PICC line to be removed. Observations on January 7, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that the resident did not have a PICC line in her right upper arm. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 59). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect, complete, and review ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 59, dated November 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood, could understand others, and was cognitively impaired. Physician's orders, dated January 8, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 10 mg of Lexapro (a medication used to treat depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 79, 95). Findings include: The facility's policy for using a lifting machine, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that staff must be competent in the use of mechanical lifts per manufacturer's instructions. Manufacturer's instructions for the Maxi Move mechanical lift revealed that the breaks were to be engaged when lifting and lowering a patient. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 79, dated October 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs including transfers, and had diagnoses that included spondylosis (a chronic condition that involves the breakdown of the spine's joints and disks). A care plan, dated September 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired insulin pens in two of three medication carts reviewed (second and third floor long hall medication carts). Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated [DATE], indicated that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed, are dated and discarded within 28 days unless manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial, and discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration date. Manufacturer's directions for use of Lantus Solostar u100 Insulin pen (a long acting insulin), dated [DATE], indicated to discard Solostar Lantus after 28 days out of cool storage. Manufacturer's directions for use of Humalog u100 Insulin pen (a short acting insulin), dated 2023, indicated to discard a 3 milliliter single patient use Humalog pen after 28 days once opened and in use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies and written menus, as well as observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: A facility policy, dated January 24, 2024, indicated that menus shall be written in advance and posted in resident areas. Any menu substitutions or deviations from the posted menu shall be made in an emergency situation only and recorded on the substitution log. An interview with a group of residents on January 7, 2025, revealed that they do not always get what is on the menu. The facility's written and printed menu for the lunch meal on January 7, 2025, indicated that the residents were to receive chunky cheeseburger casserole, glazed sweet carrots, garlic bread, a lemon brownie, and choice of beverage. Observations in the kitchen on January 7, 2025, at 9:17 a.m. revealed a yellow cake in the walk-in cooler for the lunch meal. Observations of the lunch meal in the Third floor dining room on January 7, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that the facility served a blonde brownie and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 8, 2024, and complaint investigation surveys ending June 4, 2024; July 22, 2024; September 17, 2024; and December 11, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 10, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to creating and implementing care plans, revision of care plans, quality of care, meeting professional standards, free of accidents, menus made in advance and followed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide comfortable temperatures for one of three dining rooms in the facility (fourth floor Dining Room). Findings include: Observations in the fourth floor dining room on January 7, 2025, at 11:40 a.m. revealed that there were five residents waiting for lunch. The temperature in the dining room was 64 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations in the fourth floor dining room on January 9, 2025, at 12:16 p.m. revealed that there were five people eating there and the temperature ranged from 60 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview with the Maintenance Director on January 7, 2025, at 11:40 a.m. revealed that the doors to the fourth floor dining room were closed and the heat was not circulating into the dining room from the hallways. He indicated that when the doors were open, the dining room was warm. At 2:20 p.m. the temperature in the fourth floor dining room was 73.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on January 9, 2025, at 2:18 p.m. with the owner of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's representative was notified about the need to alter treatment/new physician's orders for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding a Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse would notify the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. A significant change of condition was a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that would not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 3, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was incontinent of urine, and had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding cleaning and disinfecting, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that housekeeping was to remove visible debris from surfaces and that proper cleaning was necessary to reduce infection. A quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated November 18, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, heart failure, and asthma. Observations on December 10, 2024, at 11:02 a.m. revealed that the resident was lying in his bed with a stand-up fan blowing directly on him. The fan was noted to have a very heavy amount of visible dirt and debris accumulated on the blade cover. There were approximately four tendrils of dirt/debris flowing from the fan cover as the fan was blowing toward the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their abilities to ambulate and perform activities of daily living for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A facility policy regarding supporting activities of daily living, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences, stated goals, and recognized standards of practice. The resident's response to interventions will be monitored, evaluated, and revised as appropriate. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's investigation documents and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer techniques were used in accordance with their care plans for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 5) resulting in a fall. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated September 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of a fracture, anxiety, and depression. A [NAME] report (a nursing worksheet that includes a summary of patient information, such as devices/interventions, activities of daily living, behaviors/mood, mobility, bathing, bladder/bowel, positioning and toileting) for Resident 5, dated October 14, 2024, revealed the following safety measures for staff to follow: transfer with a stand-up lift (mechanical lift used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as recommended by the dietician for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2) who had a weight loss. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was clearly understood and able to clearly understand others, required substantial assist with care needs, had significant weight loss, and had diagnosis that included protein calorie malnutrition. A care plan for Resident 4, dated July 5, 2024, indicated that the resident had a risk for altered nutrition due to her history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weight loss, and need for a textured diet. A care plan intervention, dated July 5, 2024, indicated to periodically obtain the resident's weight, evaluate, and report to the registered dietician, physician, and family of significant weight changes. A dietician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was clearly understood and able to clearly understand others, required substantial assist with care needs, had significant weight loss, received oxygen, and had diagnoses that included pulmonary fibrosis (a lung disease that causing scarring and stiffening of lung tissue, making it harder to breathe), respiratory failure (blood does not have enough oxygen and causes difficulty breathing), asthma, rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disorder that affects the joints and organs), and protein calorie malnutrition. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated October 7, 2024, indicated that the resident was ordered to have bloodwork (calcium level, sed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, written menus, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: The facility's policy for menus, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that menus are served as written unless changed in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. In addition, deviations from the posted menus are recorded, including the reason for the substitution or deviation. The written lunch menu for the day of December 10, 2024, revealed that there was to be chunky cheeseburger casserole, glazed sweet carrots, garlic bread, and lemon brownies. Observations on Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 12:35 p.m. of Resident 4's lunch tray revealed that the lunch meal consisted of chunky cheeseburger casserole, glazed sweet carrots, a half of a hot dog bun broken in half with butter, and a chocolate brownie. There was no garlic bread or lemon brownie. Interview with Resident 4 on December 10, 2024, at that time revealed that the bread served was not garlic bread and that she never heard of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety by ensuring the food was served at the appropriate temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food preparation and service, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that the facility was to serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. A test tray was done during the lunch meal on December 10, 2024. The food cart carrying the test tray left the kitchen at 12:49 p.m., arrived on the second floor at 12:50 p.m., and the last resident tray was delivered and the test tray was tested at 1:02 p.m. The test tray consisted of chunky cheeseburger casserole, glazed sweet carrots, bread, brownies, milk, pink lemonade, and coffee. The food was then tasted and the following temperatures were obtained by the Dietary Manager and visualized by the surveyor. The cheeseburger casserole was 129.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F), glazed sweet carrots were 116.1 degrees F, coffee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hair restraints, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that all kitchen employees prepping or preparing food must wear hair restraints that are designed to effectively keep hair properly restrained. Observations in the kitchen on December 10, 2024, at 11:35 a.m. revealed that the Dietary Manager was stirring, temping, and plating food for residents. It was noted that the she had two to three inches of hair at the back of her head at her hairline and approximately one inch of hair on the side of her face that was not covered. Observations in the main kitchen on December 10, 2024, at 11:50 a.m. revealed that Dietary Worker 4 was placing desserts and lids onto the residents' meal trays, which already contained prepared plates of food. Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated June 26, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance from staff with personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a medical condition where blood vessels become blocked, reducing blood flow to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that admission orders were followed for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Resident 2's clinical record indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included frequent falls and congestive heart failure. admission orders for Resident 2, dated June 12, 2024, included orders for the resident to be weighed daily and to notify the physician of a weight gain of 1 to 2 pounds in one day or 5 pounds in one week. admission orders also included for the resident to receive 20 milligrams (mg) Lasix (diuretic) daily. A review of Resident 2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated June 2024, revealed that the resident did not receive the Lasix. Further review revealed that the resident was weighed June 13 at 121.4 pounds, June 14 at 122.4 pounds, and June 20 at 122.4 pounds. She was not weighed daily per the order, and the physician was not notified of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: According to Resident 2's clinical record she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after being admitted to the hospital for multiple falls and congestive heart failure. Hospital discharge instructions for Resident 2, dated June 12, 2024, included orders for the resident to have repeat lab work in one to two days after discharge from the hospital. There were no labs ordered or obtained for Resident 2 during her stay at the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 22, 2024, at 1:02 p.m. revealed that the admitting nurse and the nurse that reviewed the admission orders missed the lab order because it was in the narrative of the discharge summary and not included among the discharge orders. She confirmed that the labs should have been obtained and were not. 28 Pa. Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that insulin was administered timely for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 4), and failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy for medication administration, dated November 30, 2023, revealed that medications were to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated March 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated October 3, 2023, included and order for the resident to receive 15 units of Basaglar (insulin) subcutaneously (tissue just beneath the skin) one time a day and at bedtime, and a physician's order, dated May 7, 2024, included an order for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, residents' clinical records, and the facility's investigative documents, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a professional (licensed) nurse completed a timely assessment when changes in condition occurred for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding change in condition, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that a nurse would make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider when a change in condition has occurred. The facility's investigation, dated March 8, 2024, indicated that Resident 1 rang for the nurse aide around 1:00 p.m. and asked to see the nurse because she was not feeling well. She told Nurse Aide 2 that she was having chest discomfort and that she felt like she was getting COVID or pneumonia again. Nurse Aide 2 went to Licensed Practical Nurse 1 and told him that Resident 1 was not feeling well, that she was having chest pain, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advance directives decisions were documented in the clinical record for 10 of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 28, 37, 47, 55, 62, 64, 73, 78, 82). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding advance directives (instructions regarding the provision of health care when the resident is incapacitated), dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the resident has the right to formulate an advanced directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatments. Prior to or on admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his or her family members, and/or his or her legal representative about the existence of any written advance directives. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she desires to do so. Copies of these documents are obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address specific care needs for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 45, 73). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that individualized, comprehensive, person-centered care plans would be developed and implemented based on the resident's assessments. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 45, dated November 21, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion of one upper extremity, required moderate assistance from staff for dressing, toileting, and bathing, and had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (disorder that affects movement and balance). A care plan, dated December 6, 2023, for Resident 45 indicated that the resident had a contracture of her hand. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician that a medication was ineffective for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), for Resident 62, dated November 7, 2023, revealed that she was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included seizure disorder (sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated December 17, 2023, included orders for the resident to receive 0.5 mg of Xanax (a medication used to treat anxiety) every six hours as needed. The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide confidentiality of residents' personal health information during medication administration for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 242). Findings include: The facility policy regarding privacy of health information, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the facility was to protect the confidentiality of a resident's health information. Observations during medication administration on February 7, 2024, at 8:21 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 walked away from her medication cart to retrieve a blood pressure cuff without securing her computer screen. Resident 242's personal health information was visible on the computer screen, which was facing the hallway. Observations on February 7, 2024, at 8:29 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 entered Resident 242's room to administer medication and again left her computer unsecured on her medication cart with Resident 242's personal health information visible on the screen and facing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 62, 78). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated November 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance with care needs, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, was receiving an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection, and had diagnoses that included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), ventricular tachycardia (fast heart rate), congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood effectively). Review of Resident 23's cardiac care plan, dated December 8, 2022, indicated that the resident was to have pacemaker checks as ordered; however, the resident did not have a pacemaker. Interview with the Director of Nursing on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated December 27, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all care needs, and had a Stage 3 pressure area (full-thickness skin loss potentially extending into the subcutaneous tissue layer) to her left buttocks. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated October 30, 2023, included an order for the resident's left buttocks to be cleansed with soap and water and patted dry, zinc barrier cream applied to the area every shift and as needed, and to leave the wound open to air. Review of the December 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 48 revealed no documented evidence that the treatment to her left buttocks was completed on December 17,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nutritional supplements were provided as ordered for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 29) who were at risk for weight loss. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that the resident could rarely or never understand or be understood, and was dependent on staff for eating. The resident's care plan, dated December 22, 2023, indicated that the resident had an impaired metabolic status and to provide the diet as ordered. Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated August 2, 2023, included an order for the resident to be provided a sugar-free healthshake with breakfast, lunch, and dinner related to a risk for malnutrition. Observations of the lunch meal on February 5, 2024, at 11:36 a.m. revealed that Resident 11 was being assisted by Licenced Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 in the dining room. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen therapy was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 78). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 78, dated November 17, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was using supplemental oxygen, and had diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure (difficulty breathing) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic lung disease making breathing difficult). Physician's orders for Resident 78, dated November 30, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive oxygen at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute by way of a nasal canula (a small tube that delivers oxygen through the nasal passages). Observations of Resident 78 on February 5, 2024, at 10:35 a.m. and February 6, 2024, at 8:45 a.m. revealed that the resident was receiving supplemental oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 45, dated November 21, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact; required moderate assistance from staff for dressing, toileting, and bathing; and had diagnoses that that included depression and PTSD. A review of Resident 45's care plan, dated December 6, 2023, indicated that the resident had a history of PTSD after surviving a traumatic event. Interview with Resident 45 on February 5, 2024, at 11:38 a.m. revealed that a past boyfriend had physically hurt her. There was no documented evidence that a trauma-informed assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain labs timely for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated November 7, 2023, revealed that she was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included seizure disorder (sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). The pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review for Resident 62, dated June 23, 2023, recommended lab tests for Keppra (a medication used for seizures that must be regulated by routine lab testing), Basic Metabolic Panel (a blood test that measures eight different substances in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 37, dated November 14, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included chronic iron deficiency anemia due to blood loss. A Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner's (CRNP) progress note for Resident 37, dated November 3, 2023, at 2:04 p.m. indicated that the resident had recent bloodwork reviewed from October 10, 2023, showing a hemoglobin (measurement of protein in the blood that carries oxygen to body organs) of 7.4 (low) and a hematocrit (measures how much of the blood consists of red blood cells) of 24.7 (low). The results were reviewed by the physician on October 10, 2023, and the physician ordered the bloodwork to be rechecked in one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and failed to ensure that food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in three of three nursing unit pantry refrigerators (first, third, fourth floor pantries). Findings include: Observations inside the second floor pantry refrigerator on February 5, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. revealed a large spill of a brown, sticky, removable substance below the draws in the bottom of the refrigerator and several loose pieces of old, dried-up shredded cheese on the door of the refrigerator. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 5, 2024, at 10:21 a.m. confirmed that the spill and old cheese should have been cleaned up. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 53, 62). Findings include: A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 53, dated January 12, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included a stroke and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the left middle finger. Physician's orders for Resident 53, dated December 22, 2023, included an order for the resident's left middle finger to be cleansed with normal saline and patted dry, Bactroban 2 percent (an antibiotic ointment) applied to the wound base, secured with bordered gauze, and to be changed daily. Review of the January and February 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 53 indicated that the resident did not receive the treatment on January 23 and 27, 2024, or February 2, and 5, 2024. A witness statement from Licensed Practical Nurse 5 revealed that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for two of two hospice residents reviewed (Residents 32, 48). Findings include: An agreement between the facility and a hospice provider (provider of end-of-life services), dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the hospice provider would provide information to the facility to facilitate coordination of care that included the most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient and a hospice benefit of elections form (a form signed to indicate that the individual waives all rights to traditional Medicare Part A payments for treatment related to the terminal illness). Physician's orders for Resident 32, dated July 12, 2022, revealed that the resident was to receive hospice services from the facility's contracted hospice provider. As of February 8, 2024, there was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure that corrective plans to improve and/or correct quality deficiencies effectively addressed recurring deficiencies and ensured that the facility maintained compliance with nursing home regulations. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending December 1, 2023; June 30, 2023; and March 23, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 8, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to notification of changes, developing comprehensive care plans, updating and revising care plans, providing services to maintain adequate nutrition, ensuring that food was properly stored,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC - the national health protection agency) and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination related to Clostridioides difficile infection for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 38). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding isolation and transmission based precautions, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that contact precautions are implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces or resident-care items in the resident's environment. Staff and visitors are to don gloves and disposable gowns (also known as personal protective equipment or PPE) when entering the room and remove the PPE before leaving the room. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (required assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the residents' needs by failing to provide a communication board for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 27, 2023, indicated that the resident wore hearing aides and could hear adequately, had moderately impaired cognition, and was dependent for toileting and transfers. The resident's care plan, dated October 11, 2023, revealed that the resident wore hearing aides in both ears, and staff were to apply them in the morning and remove them at bedtime. An e-mail, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that the family requested a white board (communication board) due to her hearing deficits. However, there was no documented evidence that the resident received a communication board during her stay in the facility. Interview with the Director of Rehabilitation on November 21, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a therapeutic diet was provided as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding therapeutic diets, dated February 23, 2023, indicated that therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician as part of treatment for a disease, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated July 17, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for personal care needs and supervision with eating, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,909 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-04-17
- $19,551 — penalty dated 2023-12-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CENTURY HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTURY PENNSYLVANIA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2023 |
| CENTURY I TBD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| KULANU OC TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| DOBKIN, ARI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| KLEIN, EFRAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| STRIMBU, TINA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| BERDUGO, SHAI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2025 |
| LIGHTNER, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| SCHARF, BRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $334K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395393. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.