Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to a norovirus outbreak and COVID-19, Resident ID #'s 2, 4, 6, 11, 16, 21, 29, 33, 37, 43, 47, 51, 60, 65, 70, 132, 135, 136, 137,138, and 238. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a facility provided policy titled Isolation states in part, if equipment must be shared remove from the room it must be adequately disinfected before another use . According to the CDC document provided by the facility titled Key Infection Control Recommendations for the control of Norovirus Outbreak [Norovirus is a very contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea] in Healthcare Settings states in part, .disinfection of patient care areas and frequently touched surfaces during outbreaks of norovirus gastroenteritis .disinfected .using EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]-approved products [products that are approved to kill specific bacteria,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to physician's orders for laboratory testing, Resident ID #s 1 and 2.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, which states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, a history of acute pulmonary edema (the buildup of fluid in the lungs).Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident has intact cognition.During a surveyor interview on 3/2/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a certified food protection manager was available during the preparation of all meals. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 3.501.16 states in part, .Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding .shall be maintained at .5 degrees (°) C [Celsius] (41°Fahrenheit [F]) or less . During surveyor observations of the lunch meal tray service on 3/17/2025 at 11:49 AM in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) the following was revealed: - [NAME] bean salad on a tray set in ice, with a cold holding temperature of 53 °F. - Turkey salad sandwiches on a tray set in ice, with a cold holding temperature of 49.3 °F. Following the above observation, the surveyor asked the FSD if there were any other sandwiches. The following food items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents' right to personal privacy for 1 of 1 resident observed relative to his/her weight, Resident ID #10, and for 1 of 1 resident observed during a wound dressing change, Resident ID #52. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a policy titled POLICY/PROCEDURE PRIVACY states in part, .The resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records . Surveyor observations of Resident ID #10 revealed his/her name and weight was posted at the entrance of his/her room, which was visible from the hallway on the following dates and times: - 3/17/2025 at approximately 9:30 AM and 2:00 PM - 3/18/2025 at 9:15 AM During a surveyor interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:11 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services, she acknowledged that Resident ID #10's weight was posted at his/her doorway and visible to anyone who walked by. 2. Additional record review of the policy titled POLICY/PROCEDURE PRIVACY states in part, .Personal privacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician's orders relative obtaining laboratory test panels for 1 of 3 residents receiving Atorvastatin (a medication prescribed to treat high cholesterol, without proper monitoring Atorvastatin can lead to liver and kidney damage), Resident ID #52. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the MRR dated 12/18/2024 had recommendations made by the pharmacist to consider an annual lipid panel (a blood test that measures the levels of various fats in the bloodstream) and a hepatic function panel (a blood test that assess liver health and function) to monitor for therapeutic effects and side effects of Atorvastatin. Additional review of the report indicated the provider signed in agreement on 1/3/2025. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/13/2025, to obtain a laboratory test for the lipid panel and hepatic function panel. Record review failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving antibiotics via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC; a long flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded through a larger vein leading to the heart, used to administer intravenous (IV) fluids and medications), Resident ID #125. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility pharmacy policy titled, IV Site Care and Maintenance Flush Chart, indicates that a 10 milliliter (ml) IV flush with a normal saline solution (a sterile fluid containing salt and water) is required before and after using the PICC line. Additionally, the policy indicates minimum intervals for flushing each lumen (an internal tube within the catheter that allows for the administration of fluids and medications) with 10 ml of saline, every 8 hours and as needed. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, relative to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC; a long flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded through a larger vein leading to the heart, used to administer intravenous (IV) fluids and medications) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a PICC, Resident ID #125. Findings are as follows: According to the Lippincott Nursing Procedures Ninth Edition (2023), states in part, .Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use .Use a sterile measuring tape or the incremental markings on the catheter to measure the external length of the catheter from hub to skin entry to make sure that the catheter hasn't migrated .Troubleshooting a PICC .if external PICC migration [unintended movement from it's intended position] is greater than 3/4 inches (2 [centimeter] cm), notify the practitioner. Obtain an order for an X-ray or other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and 2 of 2 kitchenettes observed. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, Section 3-501.17 states in part, .READY -TO-EAT-TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius or 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1 . During the initial tour of the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), on 4/8/2024 at 8:15 AM, the following was observed in the main kitchen: - A 1.5-quart pan containing approximately 12 muffins, individually wrapped in plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the use of insulin, Resident ID #65. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that Resident ID #65 was admitted to the facility in January of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and urinary tract infection. Review of the care plan dated 2/5/2024 revealed that s/he is at increased risk for hypo/hyperglycemia (low or high blood sugar) with an intervention which includes, but is not limited to, administer medication as ordered. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 2/3/2024 for insulin glargine-yfgn (a long-acting type of insulin that works slowly), insulin pen to administer 5 units subcutaneously daily. Review of the Medication Administration Report from 3/20/2024 through 4/10/2024 revealed the follow days the insulin was not administered and was held: - 3/21/2024 - 4/6/2024 - 4/7/2024 - 4/8/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident ID #32. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pressure-induced deep tissue damage (pressure ulcer) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection (multidrug resistant organism). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 3/26/2024 to cleanse the resident's left posterior calf unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by yellow, tan, gray, green, brown, or black tissue in the wound bed) pressure ulcer with Dakin's (wound cleanser) solution apply skin prep to the area surrounding the wound followed by medi-honey (wound treatment)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives appropriate assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #44. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near your brain that can happen after a head injury) with loss of consciousness and down syndrome. Record review of the progress notes revealed the following: - 2/4/2024: The resident was ambulating without assistance in hall outside of day room. S/he leaned over to give a staff member a hug, sustained a loss of balance, resulting in a fall. - 2/24/2024: While in the bathroom with a staff member the resident sustained a fall with a head strike and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation resulting in the resident being readmitted to the hospital. S/he returned to the facility on 2/26/2024. - 3/17/2024: The resident ambulated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI