Sunny View Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 51.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent the elopement of a cognitively impaired resident. This failure placed the resident in a situation of Immediate Jeopardy, as the resident exited the facility, undetected with another resident's visitor, and remained unsupervised in the community for approximately six hours.During this time, the resident's whereabouts were unknown, placing the resident at risk for serious harm, injury, or death. The resident was not located until s/he arrived independently at his/her former residence, where his/her spouse currently resides. The spouse then notified the facility of the resident's presence. The resident was subsequently transported to the hospital for medical clearance. Additionally, upon the resident's return to the facility, the facility failed to test the wander guard device the resident was wearing at the time of elopement and instead discarded the device without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives assistive devices to prevent accidents relative to the placement of a TekTone device (a device that allows at-risk residents to move freely about a facility, while preventing them from exiting the facility) for 1 of 1 resident who successfully eloped from the facility and sustained a major injury, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled Elopement Assessment dated 10/27/2022 states in part, .It is the facility policy to maintain a safe and secure environment for all residents. In order to achieve this goal residents who are at risk for wandering/elopement need to be identified and a care plan developed with interventions to minimize or eliminate the risk as outlined below .Residents who are at risk for elopement include those with dementia, confusion .may warrant close watching .if the resident is assessed to be at risk for elopement, then the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident records are complete and accurately documented, relative to the monitoring of an elopement prevention device, a TekTone device (a device that allows at-risk residents to move freely about a facility, while preventing them from exiting the facility), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who eloped from the facility and sustained a hip fracture, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility's policy titled Wanderguard [TekTone device] System and Assessments checks states in part .The bracelet will be checked each shift to assure placement, the nurse will sign this as checked in the treatment record . Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department on Health on 6/16/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 was found in the rear parking lot of the facility by a staff on the overnight shift on 6/12/2025. S/he was noted to have a large hematoma above the left eye, his/her left leg was externally rotated and s/he complained of pain.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview if has been determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and failed to promptly identify and intervene during an acute change in a resident's condition, related to vomiting and an unknown cardiac event for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #38. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Change in Condition dated 10/17/2023 states in part, .Changes in condition require assessment by the RN [registered nurse] and notification to the MD [Medical Doctor] (both to be done timely). Timely depends upon the level/severity of the change and RN should use professional assessment and judgement to make that decision. Timely is certainly no later than the shift of the change . Record review of a closed record revealed that Resident ID #38, was admitted to the facility in July of 2020 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (emergency condition in which a blood vessel in the brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, surveyor observation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) for 1 of 2 nursing units and affecting Resident ID #s 1,2,3,4,5, 6 and 7. Findings are as follows: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Appendix A, Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings (2007) revealed precautions for RSV should include standard, droplet and contact precautions throughout the duration of the illness. Review of a facility policy titled, Isolation last reviewed 8/2015 revealed in part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent the spread of infection within the facility through the use of isolation precautions .Transmission Based Precautions, as defined by the CDC, will be employed for known or suspected infections for which the route of transmission/prevention is known . Review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 4 of 5 residents reviewed who indicated that participation in activities of choice were important to them on their Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, Resident ID #'s 5, 6, 15, and 44.Findings are as follows:Record review of an undated facility policy titled, Resident Related Care and Services states in part, .The interdisciplinary team is responsible to develop and carry out appropriate comprehensive care plans to allow for optimal outcomes.the team is to review the resident's assessment.in order to determine appropriate interventions and plans of care have been instituted. 1. Record review of Resident ID #5's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed s/he has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed that the resident indicated participation in his/her favorite…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing daily activity program to support residents in their choice of activities based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Specifically for 5 of 6 residents reviewed who indicated that participation in activities of choice were important to them, Resident ID #s 5, 6, 15, 44, and 50, although this failure affects all residents residing in the facility Findings are as follows:During a surveyor interview on 4/29/2026 at approximately 11:00 AM with the members of the Resident Council, the residents revealed that activities have not been offered in the evening or on the weekends since 3/31/2026, which was the Activities Director's last day of employment at the facility.Record review revealed the facility employed only one part-time Activities Aide for the month of April 2026.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was admitted to the facility in February of 2020.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff were competent to provide services to assure resident safety to attain or maintain the highest practicable wellbeing of each resident, as the facility's staff were unaware of and had not been educated on the facility's personal laundry procedures for 7 of 7 staff members reviewed, Staff A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. Findings are as follows:The facility failed to provide evidence of a policy and procedure related to residents' personal laundry to ensure staff handle, store, process, and transport all laundry in accordance with accepted national standards in order to produce hygienically clean laundry and prevent the spread of infection to the extent possible, potentially affecting all residents who reside in the facility.Review of the following staff member's completed education and competencies failed to reveal evidence that the staff were educated on the expected procedures for handling and processing of residents' personal laundry:- Nursing Assistant (NA) Staff A, with a hire…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications without adequate indication of use, Resident ID #8. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic mood disturbance, or anxiety.Record review revealed the following physician's orders: -Lexapro (a medication prescribed to treat used to treat depression and anxiety disorder) 10 milligrams (mg) tablet once daily initiated on 3/30/2026. -Mirtazapine (a medication prescribed to treat depression) administer 7.5 mg at bedtime initiated on 4/6/2026. -Seroquel (a prescribed antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder) administer 12.5 mg at bedtime initiated on 4/22/2026. -Trazodone (a medication prescribed to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who had an order to obtain a stool sample to rule out an infectious disease, Resident ID #57.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients .Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, functional diarrhea.Record review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is always continent of stool.Record review revealed a physician's order for loperamide tablet (a medication prescribed for loose stool), 2 milligrams, every 8 hours as needed for loose stool.Additional record review revealed the loperamide was administered in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who are assessed an an elopement risk, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was readmitted to the facility's semi-secure unit in March of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, mild cognitive impairment and muscle weakness. Record review revealed that a care plan was initiated on 6/9/2025 indicating the resident requires the use of a TekTONE elopement prevention bracelet related to episodes of attempting to leave the facility with approaches/interventions including, but not limited to, ensuring that the TekTone elopement prevention bracelet is in place and its functionality, providing visual checks/supervision for safety. Review of the quarterly MDS Assessments dated 2/26/2025 and 4/3/2025 section Restraints and Alarms failed to reveal evidence that the resident was coded as having a TekTone elopement prevention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for physician's orders, Resident ID #s 1 and 3. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/5/2025 alleged that Resident ID #1 was complaining of abdominal pain and was observed with large purple bruising extending from his/her upper chest to the upper abdomen. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, altered menial status and a fall. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 3/6/2025 to complete a weekly skin evaluation and document the findings under observations. Record review of the April 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to accurately maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with updated medication orders, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/19/2025, alleged that Resident ID #'s 1 medical needs have not been met. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (a condition in which the pancreas does not produce enough digestive enzymes, leading to problems breaking down food), orthostatic hypotension (a condition when the blood pressure drops significantly when a person stands up from a sitting or lying position), and repeated falls. A. Record review of a progress note dated 3/24/2025 authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff A, revealed in part, that the Nurse Practitioner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and the main dining room. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 3-501.17 states in part, .(B) .refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food .shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment .and: (1) the day the original container is opened in the food establishment shall be counted as Day 1; and (2) The day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 3/10/2025 at approximately 8:25 AM of the reach in refrigerator, the following was observed: -One, 8 pound (lb.) container of Cross Valley Farms Fruit Salad Deluxe in light syrup approximately ¾ full, open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to measure success and track performance of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) actions to ensure that problem areas are identified, and good faith efforts for improvements are achieved and sustained demonstrated by measurable objectives with statistical data documented. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility's 2025 QAPI plan states in part, .the QAPI Committee will utilize a formal and consistent methodology for planning, designing, measuring, assessing, and improving organizational performance and resident outcomes . Record review of the facility's 2024 and 2025 QAPI binder failed to reveal evidence of any actions, measurements, or tracking to ensure efforts for improvements of identified problem areas within the facility. During a surveyor interview on 3/12/2025 at approximately 12:30 PM with the Administrator, she acknowledged that the facility failed to develop actions, measurements, or tracking systems to measure and track performance of identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$90,716 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $15,883 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-03-25
• $58,032 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-16 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI