South County Eden Operations LLC DBA Lakeside Nurs

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident ID #1 who sustained 2nd degree burns (A partial-thickness burn. This type of burn affects both the epidermis and the second layer of skin, which is called the dermis. It may cause swelling and red, white or splotchy skin) from an electric baseboard heating unit. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/14/2024 revealed Resident ID #1 was found with his/her foot hanging out of the bed and resting directly on the electric baseboard heating unit. Further review revealed the resident sustained a 2nd degree burn to his/her heel. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 70, the National Electrical Code, Article 424, Fixed Electric Space-Heating Equipment, states in part, .424.13 Spacing from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify each resident, or resident representative, that receives Medicaid benefits when the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit for 3 of 4 residents reviewed who had $4000 in personal needs funds handled by the facility, Resident ID #s 42, 45, and 93.Findings are as follows:Record review of Title 210-Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Chapter 50-Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) under section 2.4 (G) of the Uniform Accountability Procedures for Title XIX Resident Personal Needs Funds in Community Nursing Facilities, ICF/DD Facilities, and Assisted Living Residences requires that the facility shall: .(10) The nursing facility must notify the resident in writing when his/her balance reaches $200.00 less than the resource eligibility guideline, that Medicaid eligibility is jeopardized if the account exceeds the guideline [4,000] .a) Review of Resident ID #42's quarterly statement dated 7/1/2025 through 9/30/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) System within 14 days of completion for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS records over 120 days old, Resident ID #s 50, 71, and 106. Additionally, the facility failed to complete and transmit a Significant Change MDS Assessment for 1 of 2 hospice residents reviewed, Resident ID #75 and they failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS Assessment for 1 of 3 discharged residents reviewed, Resident ID #94. Findings are as follows:Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual last revised in October 2025 states in part, .Completion Timing: For all non-admission assessments.the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). For the other comprehensive MDS assessments, Significant Change in Status Assessment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents reviewed who required non-invasive positive airway pressure therapy, including Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP-a medical device that uses mild air pressure to keep the airways open during sleep) and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP-a medical device that delivers higher pressure during inhalation and lower pressure during exhalation to keep the airways open during sleep), Resident ID #s 6, 7, and 35.Findings are as follows:Record review of the ResMed manufacturers guidelines for Replacing CPAP supplies and equipment dated 2026, reveals ResMed recommends the following standard replacement schedule: - Disposable filters and silicone mask cushions/nasal pillows- 1-2 Times per Month - Mask frame and tubing - Every 3 Months - Mask headgear, chin straps, and the humidifier water chamber - Every 6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification, including the reason for the room change, before the residents room or roommate in the facility is changed, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of room or roommate changes, Resident ID #'s 3 and 59.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled Room Changes dated 10/15/2020, states in part, .Procedure: 1. Residents will receive written notice of a room or roommate change.4. The notice will be delivered to the resident in a reasonable amount of time prior to the planned change.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was readmitted to the facility in March of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia.Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan relative to 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long flexible tube inserted into a vein in the arm that reaches a large central vein near the heart, used for long term intravenous treatments), Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Review of the resident's record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in April of 2026 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus (an infection caused by bacteria entering the bloodstream requiring the use of intravenous antibiotics).Record review revealed the following physician's orders:-4/19/2026, change the PICC line dressing every week on Sunday, measure external catheter length, as needed for dislodgement.-4/26/2026, change the PICC line dressing every week, measure external catheter length at bedtime…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a medication with parameters, Resident ID #6. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease and hypertension.Record review revealed a physician's order for metoprolol succinate (an antihypertensive) 25 milligrams one time a day on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday for hypertension with parameters to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP; top number/pressure when the heart beats) is less than 110.Review of the May 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed that the metoprolol was administered to the resident when the resident's SBP indicated it should be held based on the parameters on 2 out of 8 opportunities:-5/1/2026, 100/48-5/8/2026, 102/74During a surveyor interview on 5/15/2026 at 8:33 AM with Certified Medication Technician, Staff B, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who requires assistance with ambulation, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, difficulty in walking, generalized osteoarthritis and muscle wasting. Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicates a Brief Interview for Mental Status score is 15 out of 15, indicating s/he is cognitively intact. During a surveyor interview on 4/14/2025 at 1:19 PM with the resident, s/he revealed that s/he wants to walk. When asked how many times a day that s/he walks, the resident stated, zero absolutely zero. Record review revealed the resident received Physical Therapy from 1/3/2025 through 1/24/2025. Additional review of the Physical Therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0699 — pattern
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 3 of 3 residents reviewed with a history of trauma, Resident ID #s 20, 51, and 83, and for 6 of 9 residents reviewed who failed to receive a comprehensive trauma screen that were admitted to the facility within the last year, Resident ID #s 11, 20, 51, 80, 89, and 294. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy dated 11/29/2022 titled Trauma Informed Care states in part, .1. A trauma screening assessment will be done on each resident by the social worker as part of the admission social history. When it is not practical or possible to interview the resident, information will be obtained from family members, previous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from unnecessary drugs, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed with recommendations made by the psychiatric consultant, Resident ID #89. Findings are as follow: Record review for Resident ID #89 revealed a Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation Report dated 3/4/2025, which indicates that the resident was assessed following a recent medication change. Review of the report revealed the resident continued to have agitation and was difficult to redirect despite consistent attempts by staff. The report further revealed that the resident was currently receiving the following medications: -Trazodone (a medication prescribed to treat depression, insomnia, and/or anxiety) 50 milligrams (mg) at bedtime, and 25 mg every 8 hours as needed -Seroquel (a medication prescribed to treat several mental health conditions) 50 mg twice daily and 75 mg at bedtime -Lorazepam (a medication prescribed to treat anxiety) 0.25 mg twice daily Further review of the report revealed in part, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public relative to food contact surfaces and non-food contact surfaces of equipment for 1 of 1 juice dispenser and 1 of 2 microwaves observed. Findings are as follows: Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 4-601.11 states in part, .(A) equipment food contact surfaces .shall be clean to sight .(B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT .shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NON-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris . 1. During a surveyor observation on 4/14/2025 at 8:35 AM, of the main kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the juice dispenser nozzle was noted to have an accumulation of dried, dark red and brown residue. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above-mentioned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI