Greystone Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 107.5 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, police report review, facility investigation review, and interview the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse and physical abuse by another resident for 4 of 14 (Resident #11, #17, #18, and #5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On 6/25/2024, Resident #9 was observed with his hand on Resident #11's pelvic region and Resident #11 was observed shaking his head no. On 11/26/2023, Resident #18 grabbed Resident #17's arm resulting in a scratch to her finger and Resident #17 scratched Resident #18 on the face when Resident #18 entered Resident #17's room. On 3/15/2024, Resident #6 hit Resident #5 with a soda can in her chest area. The facility's failure to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse resulted in actual harm for Resident #11, #17, and #18. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 1/10/2024, revealed .it is the policy of this facility to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's right to retain personal possessions for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Tracheostomy, Dependence on Ventilator, Gastrostomy Status, Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 revealed a Discharge return anticipated MDS assessment was completed on 1/29/2025 and an entry MDS assessment was completed on 3/18/2025. Review of nurse's progress notes for Resident #1 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/29/2025 and returned to the facility on 3/18/2025. Review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 scored a 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's right to retain personal possessions for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Tracheostomy, Dependence on Ventilator, Gastrostomy Status, Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 revealed a Discharge return anticipated MDS assessment was completed on 1/29/2025 and an entry MDS assessment was completed on 3/18/2025. Review of nurse's progress notes for Resident #1 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/29/2025 and returned to the facility on 3/18/2025. Review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 scored a 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review, observation, and interview the facility failed to use a disinfectant according to the manufacturer's instructions on 1 of 3 hallways observed for disinfectant use to prevent the spread of candida auris and other infectios organisms. The findings include: Review of facility undated document titled, Healthcare SEVICES GROUP, revealed .PURPOSE: To teach environmental Services employees the proper cleaning method to sanitize .any area in a healthcare facility .when using cleaning products always refer to the manufacturer's recommended dwell time. Dwell time .is how long a chemical needs to be in contact with the surface in order to effectively sanitize or disinfect . Review of facility undated document titled .VIRASEPT . revealed .is a .Detergent-Disinfectant .Effective in 4 minutes .Apply Virasept with a coarse trigger sprayer, cloth .or by soaking to thoroughly wet surface .Allow surface to remain wet for at least 4 minutes . During an observation on 4/2/2025 at 2:30 PM, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily staff posting information included the resident census, the facility name, and actual number of hours worked by Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) on 3 of 3 days reviewed for staff postings. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Facility Required Postings, revised on 1/1/2022, revealed .The facility will post required postings .staffing information . Review of the Daily Staffing Sheets dated 10/28/2024-10/30/2024 revealed the following: The resident census and facility name was not listed for 3 days on the Daily Posted Staffing Sheets from 10/28/2024-10/30/2024. The RN hours, LPN hours, and CNA hours were not documented on the Daily Posted Staffing Sheets for 3 days from 10/28/2024-10/30/2024. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 8:45 AM, the Staffing/Central Supply Coordinator confirmed the Daily Posted Staffing Sheets on 10/28/2024-10/30/2024 did not include the resident census, the facility name, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition, ensure spices were properly sealed, and failed to discard expired food which had the potential to affect 92 of 95 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Environment, revised 9/2017, revealed .Dining Services Director will ensure kitchen is maintained in a clean sanitary manner, including floors, walls . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage: Dry Goods, revised 2/2023, revealed .packaged .foods items will be kept .properly sealed . During an observation of the food preparation area on 10/28/2024 at 10:15 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), revealed the following: 1. 12-ounce bottle of salt and pepper seasoning salt was not sealed and available for use. 2. An unopened container of mild wing sauce, with an expiration date of 12/13/2023, available for use. 3. The area behind the deep fryer contained a greasy film with food particles. 4. The pipe under the dirty sink area actively dripping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Durable Power of Attorney (POA) documents were entered into the medical record for 2 residents (Residents #23 and #86) and failed to provide education regarding Advance Directives on admission for 6 residents (Residents #7, #8, #18, #37, #342 and #343). The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Seizures, Dementia, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, and Psychosis. Review of Resident #23's admission document dated 10/18/2018, titled, Advanced Directives and Other Legal Documents, revealed the resident had previously formulated a Durable Power of Attorney (POA) prior to admission to the facility and also revealed the POA signed legal documents on the behalf of the resident. Review of the resident's undated document titled admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in 3 of 3 dumpsters. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Environment, revised 9/2017, revealed .trash will be properly disposed of in external receptacles (dumpsters) and the surrounding area will be free of debris . During an observation and interview on 10/28/2024 at 12:00 PM, the CDM confirmed the outside dumpster area contained three dumpsters for waste disposal and was observed with scattered refuse including used gloves, plastic medicine cups, plastic drinking cups, used wipes, drinking straws, plastic spoons, clear plastic bag filled with trash and was not maintained in a clean sanitary condition.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility document review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to offer 8 residents (Residents #33, #8, #34, #1, #63, #70, #292, and #24) with hand hygiene assistance before a lunch and breakfast meal on 2 of 3 hallways observed for meal service. The findings include: Review of the facility's document titled, Validation Checklist Hand Hygiene, undated, revealed .Purpose .to validate staff and residents are following hand hygiene protocols .Residents are offered hand hygiene prior to meals . During an observation on 10/28/2024 at 12:40 PM, on the 300 Hallway, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F delivered the lunch meal tray to Resident #33 and did not offer hand hygiene assistance to the resident, prior to setting up the meal tray. During an interview on 10/28/2024 at 12:44 PM, CNA F confirmed hand hygiene assistance was not offered to Resident #33, prior to setting up the lunch meal tray. During an observation on 10/28/2024 at 12:52 PM, on the 200 Hallway, CNA G delivered the lunch meal tray to Resident #8 and did not offer hand hygiene assistance, prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, review of resident council minutes, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' grievances related to adding more fresh fruits to meals and staff yelling and cursing in the hallways were promptly acted upon for 12 of 12 residents who attended the 10/29/2024 resident council meeting. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assistance Procedure, revised 10/30/2023, revealed .The facility will provide a designated staff person who is approved by the resident or group .responsible for responding to written request .The facility will consider the views of a resident or family group and act upon .recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility . Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 8/16/2024, revealed .staff yelling and cursing in the hallways .would like new options on the .menu .tired of tropical fruit . During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 2:00 PM, residents participating in the resident council stated the prior concerns of staff disruptive yelling and cursing in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide 3 of 3 residents (Resident #12, Resident #400, and Resident #401) an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) after therapy services were discontinued, the resident remained in the facility for long-term care services, or was discharged from the facility. The facility's failure resulted in residents not being informed of the cost of therapy services if continued therapy services were desired which did not allow the residents to have an informed choice. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices, revised 10/30/2023, revealed .It is the policy of the facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage .A notice of Medicare Non-Coverage .shall be issued to the resident/ representative when Medicare covered service(s) are ending, no matter if resident is leaving the facility or remaining in the facility . Medical record review revealed Resident #12 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,041 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,041 — penalty dated 2024-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $719K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN