Jefferson City Health And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 151.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, medical record review, manufacturer recommendations for administration of morphine extended release capsules and tablets, the facility's investigation, including witness statements, emergency medical services (EMS) records, police reports, hospital records and interviews, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 13 sampled residents. The facility failure occurred on 5/2/2024 when a staff nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN B) administered the wrong medications to the wrong patient, which included long-acting Morphine Sulfate (a potent opioid narcotic) 30 milligrams (mg) dose, extended release formula, Trazadone (an antidepressant) 200 mg dose, and Ativan 1 mg dose (a benzodiazepine, anxiolytic medication) in crushed form to Resident #6, not prescribed to Resident #6 in error. The error resulted in onset of mental status changes (severe sedation), which required emergency medical services (EMS) intervention and resulted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interview the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment as evidenced by undated, unsealed food observed in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and failed to ensure expired foods had been discarded in 1 of 1 dry storage areas, which had the potential to affect 142 of 142 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated 1/1/2022, showed .Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .Foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated . Observation of the dry storage area with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 10/30/2023 at 9:40 AM, showed the following: - Four 1-pound bags of marshmallows with an expiration date of 10/28/2023. Observation of the facility's walk-in freezer with the CDM on 10/30/2023 at 9:45 AM, showed the following: - One 5-pound bag of tater tots with 1/2 of the bag remaining, had not been sealed, labeled, or dated. During an interview on 10/30/2023 at 9:50 AM, the CDM stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 resident (Resident #132) related to discharge location, for communication needs related to interpreter services for 1 resident (Resident #92), and medication use for 1 resident (Resident #118) of 28 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Resident #132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of a Nurse Progress Note dated 9/8/2023, showed Resident #132 .discharged instructions discussed with resident and son .Resident and son signed discharge instructions with copy given to resident son. Resident reminded of her appointment .Resident escorted to car via WC [wheelchair] per staff and assisted into son's personal vehicle by staff CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] . Review of the Nurse Practitioner's Discharge summary dated [DATE], showed discharge home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screen was accurate after mental health diagnoses was identified for 1 resident (Resident #110) of 11 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, PASARR- Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review, dated 10/30/2023, showed, .facility must coordinate with pre-admission screening and resident review program .All residents are required to have a level I PASRR [PASSAR]screen prior to or upon admission . Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression and Psychosis. Review of the PASSAR dated 1/24/2023, showed Resident #110 had no mental health diagnosis, no psychotropic medication used, and no level II condition-level I negative outcome. Review of the Hospital Discharge Summary Report dated 3/17/2023, showed Resident #110 had orders for Alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to revise the care plan related to fall interventions for 2 residents (Resident #87 and Resident #116) of 28 care plans reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 6/30/2022, showed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive .care plan for each resident .The comprehensive care plan will be .revised by the interdisciplinary team . Review of the facility policy titled, Falls-Clinical Protocol, revised 10/26/2023, showed .Interventions should be .implemented per the assessed needs .Update the plan of care with the new or revised interventions . Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Difficulty in walking. Review of a fall investigation dated 7/26/2023, showed .Resident was returning to room from lunch.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in 2 of 4 dumpsters (dumpster #2 and #4). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 1/1/2022, showed .Garbage and refuse containers shall be durable, cleanable, and free from cracks or leaks .Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/ rodent attractions are minimized .receptacles for refuse shall be maintained in good repair . During an observation with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 10/30/2023 at 9:52 AM, the outside dumpster area had 4 dumpsters for waste disposal. The area around dumpster #4 had a plastic lid, 4 used disposable gloves, and a milk carton on the ground directly behind the dumpster. Dumpster #2 had a 2-foot gash with multiple small rust-corroded openings, of various sizes, to the bottom right panel of the dumpster. Dumpster #4 had a missing drain plug leaving a quarter sized opening to the back, bottom panel, which allowed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while delivering meal trays to residents on 1 hallway of 6 hallways observed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 1/1/2022, showed .All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to .residents . During an observation of meal delivery on 10/30/2023 at 12:06 PM, on the 600 hallway revealed the following: Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 retrieved a lunch tray from the meal cart, entered Resident #58's room, placed the tray on the overbed table, repositioned the resident, touched the bed control and raised the head of bed, positioned the overbed table, opened the food containers, and exited the room without washing or sanitizing the hands. CNA #1 retrieved a towel from the clean linen cart, re-entered Resident #58's room, placed the towel over the resident's shirt, opened and touched the straw with bare hands. Further observation showed CNA #1 retrieved another tray from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary infection control practices while delivering meal trays to residents on 1 of 5 hallways, of 5 total hallways observed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene reviewed/revised 2/2018, revealed .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to .residents .Employees must wash their hands .under the following conditions .after direct contact with residents .After contact with objects .in the immediate vicinity of the resident . Observation of meal tray delivery on 2/19/19 at 12:43 PM, on the 500 hallway, revealed the following: Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 retrieved a meal tray from the meal cart and entered room [ROOM NUMBER] A, the meal tray was served/set up and CNA #1 exited the room without sanitizing the hands.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-06-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $987K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN