Huntingdon Health & Rehabilitation Center
635 High Street, Huntingdon, TN 38344 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (731) 986-8943 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $52,156 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-14)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 14.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.0% | 6.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.8% | 13.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.8% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.3% | 16.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.7% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.7% | 79.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.9% | 22.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.87 | 1.67 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.44 | 1.56 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 35.0–66.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.8–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
18 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, hospital documentation review, observation and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed. On [DATE] during group activities, the Former Activities Director (FAD) observed Resident #1 display unwanted behaviors towards Resident #4, leaning against him during conversation, putting her arms around him and touching him affectionately. The FAD intervened and reported the inappropriate behaviors to the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC). The SDC notified Medical Doctor (MD) T on [DATE] and obtained orders for medication to be given for hypersexual behaviors. There were no interventions implemented to monitor Resident #1's hypersexual behaviors pending medication administration with evaluation of medication effectiveness. On [DATE], 2 days after the FAD reported Resident #1's inappropriate behaviors, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2021-10-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was at least one Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certified staff member on each shift to perform CPR for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #161) reviewed as full code status (residents that could require CPR). The facility failed to have at least one current CPR certified licensed staff member working on each shift, which had the potential to affect the 36 full code status residents residing in the facility. The facility's failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when Resident #161 was found without a pulse or respirations and CPR uncertified staff members performed CPR. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Administrator, Regional Director of Operations, and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2021-10-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, and interview, the facility Administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable well-being of the residents. Administration failed to provide oversight to monitor and evaluate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification status when licensed staff members' CPR certifications had expired. The failure of the facility to ensure each shift had CPR trained personnel placed 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #161) in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #161 was found unresponsive, without a pulse, and untrained and uncertified staff members provided CPR. The facility's failure could have affected the 36 full code status residents (residents that could require CPR) residing in the facility. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the providers noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2021-10-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, nursing schedule review, Quality Assurance (QA) meeting sign in sheet review, and interview, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program that identified opportunities for improvement related to nursing staff maintaining a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification. Failure of the QAPI committee to ensure the CPR certifications remained current allowed the facility to operate without at least one CPR certified staff member working on each shift. Resident #161 went into Cardiopulmonary Arrest, CPR uncertified staff members performed CPR, and Resident #161 expired. The facility's failures could have affected the 36 full code status residents (residents that could require CPR) residing in the facility. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes (a plastic tube inserted into the stomach to administer medications, supplements and liquid food) when staff failed to ensure the enteral feeding (liquid nourishment) and the flush solution (water used to flush the peg tube) were replaced in a timely manner and properly labeled for 1 of 2 (Resident #28) sampled residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Feeding Tubes, dated 10/15/2024, revealed .Feeding tubes will be maintained in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Gastrostomy Status, Diabetes, Seizures, and Dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to obtain and follow Physician's Orders for the use of oxygen for 2 of 3 (Resident #42 and #62) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 6/23/2025, revealed .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences.Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician.Infection control measures include.Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Interstitial Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of the Physician's Order dated 4/3/2025, revealed .Oxygen: RUN @ [at] [2]L/MIN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when a medication was left in residents rooms for 2 of 2 (Resident #217 and #267) sampled residents, and failed to ensure that all medications were labeled and dated for 2 of 11 (Nurse's Station 1 Medication Room and Nurse's Station 2 Medication Cart) medication storage areas. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated 1/17/2023, revealed .Medications are administered .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection .Wash hands prior to administering medications .Observe resident consumption of medication . Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated 1/30/2024, revealed .During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications .all medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to calibrate the thermometer, failed to ensure resident's food was labeled and dated in 2 of 2 resident nourishment refrigerators, and failed to ensure staff beverages were not stored in 1 of 2 resident nourishment refrigerators. The facility had a census of 64 residents with 63 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, State Food Safety Resources revealed .A thermometer that is even five degrees off can lead you to .serve food that is not safe to eat .You can only rely on a thermometer if you calibrate it . Review of the facility policy titled Food: Preparation, dated 9/2017, revealed .All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures .Temperatures for TCS [Time/Temperature Control for Safety] foods will be recorded at time of service, and monitored periodically during meal service . Review of the facility's policy titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors dated 1/1/2022, revealed .All food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect as evidenced by 1 of 63 (Resident #62) residents not receiving their meal tray timely with the other residents seated at the table in the main dining room. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Meal Service dated 1/1/2022, revealed .Each resident shall receive the correct diet .shall receive prompt meal service and appropriate .assistance .Nursing personnel will ensure that residents are served the correct food tray .Nursing personnel will evaluate food .intake in residents with, or at risk for, significant nutritional problems . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Neurocognitive Disorder. Review of the Care Plan dated 3/20/2024, revealed .Resident is at risk for altered nutritional status related to low body mass index,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment as evidenced by a floor in a resident's room had 2 straws, white powdery substance and torn salt packet on the floor in 1 of 7 (Resident #8 ) resident rooms, and 3 dried dark brown spots on the floor, dried brown substance on the outside of the toilet, back of the toilet tank and on the door frame in 1 of 4 (Resident #12) observed bathrooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, 7-Step Daily Washroom Cleaning, revealed, .Clean and Sanitize Commode .includes the tank, the seat, the bowl and the base .Spot Clean the Walls .Damp Mop the Floor . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, 5-Step Daily Room Cleaning, revealed .Dust Mop .entire floor .especially behind dressers and beds .All corners and along the baseboards must be dust mopped to prevent buildup .Damp Mop .most important area .to disinfect is the floor . 2. Observation and interview on 7/17/2024 at 7:58 AM, Resident #12 asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided related to incontinent care, bathing, and grooming for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #8, #47 and #57) reviewed for ADL care. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), revised date of 12/28/2023 revealed, .The facility takes measures to minimize the loss of residents functional abilities, including activities of daily living .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes, Arthritis, Depression, and Anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #34) reviewed for transmission- based precautions, failed to provide a clean barrier while administering medications for 4 of 9 residents, (Resident #13, #16, #21 and #32) and used a contaminated alcohol wipe to clean a resident's cheek (Resident #13), and failed to observe Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 2 (Resident #32) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, dated 12/27/2023, revealed .The facility will have PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] readily available near the entrances of the resident's room. Staff .will don appropriate PPE before or upon entry into the environment of a resident on transmission-based precautions .Contact Precautions .Intended to prevent transmission of pathogens that are spread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, policy review, medical record review, daily working schedule, employee time detail reports, employee screening logs, observation, and interview, 2 of 4 staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and #8) failed to perform hand hygiene for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #4 and #21) observed during medication pass and 28 of 75 staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, and #12, Dietary Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, Housekeeping Staff #1, and #2, and Therapy Staff #1, #2 and #3) failed to complete the screenings log for COVID-19 prior to working 9 of 9 days (9/11/2021-9/19/2021) reviewed. This could have affected the 61 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 5/7/2021, revealed .Hand Hygiene Table .Between resident contact .After handling contaminated objects .Before applying and after removing personal protective equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-06 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of emergency transfers for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #19, #26, and #52) reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA [Against Medical Advice]), dated 7/28/2020, revealed .A copy of the notice shall be provided to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Depression, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, and Hypertension. Review of the Progress Notes dated 6/7/2021, revealed .Resident left facility for [Named Hospital]-emergency room [ER] at 1600 [4:00 PM] via [by] EMS [Emergency Medical Services]/ambulance . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner when 3 of 9 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10, #13, and #14) failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), failed to perform hand hygiene, placed dirty meal trays on the cart with unserved trays, and failed to clean bedside tables for 9 of 61 sampled residents (Resident #4, #5, #6, #10, #14, #31, #32, #48, and #159) during dining observations. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 5/7/2021, revealed .Hand Hygiene Table .Between resident contact .After handling contaminated objects .before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves .before and after handling clean or soiled linens .When in doubt . Observation in the resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]/27/2021 at 11:49 AM, revealed after meal tray setup, CNA #14 exited Resident #48's room and placed the dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 9 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and #2) provided care for a resident in a manner that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and #6) observed during dining. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 10/30/2020, revealed .All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights . Observation in Resident #1's and Resident #6's room on 9/27/2021 at 12:15 PM, revealed both CNA #1 and CNA #2 stated, .we have one more feeder on the cart in [Named Room number] . Observation in the common area on the Memory Care Unit on 9/28/2021 at 6:13 PM, revealed CNA #1 stated, .we have 3 feeders left . During an interview on 9/28/2021 at 6:18 PM, CNA #1 stated, .I never been trained on what to say .all I know is feeders .I have always heard feeders . During an interview on 9/29/2021 at 11:08 AM, CNA #2 confirmed she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess a pressure injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #58) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Treatment Management, dated 1/1/2021, revealed .Characteristics of the wound .Pressure injury stage .Size .Condition of the tissue in the wound bed .The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound . Review of medical record, revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Benign Neoplasm, Schizoaffective Disorder, Diabetes, Mood Disorder, COVID-19, Hypertension, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for decision making and the resident was not coded for pressure ulcers. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured in 3 of 8 medication storage areas (Unit 1 Cart, D Hall Cart, and the Treatment Cart) when internal and external medications were stored together, and Medication and Treatment Carts were unlocked and unattended. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication, revised 10/30/2020, revealed .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments .During a medication pass, medication must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart .External Products: Disinfectants and drugs for external use are stored separately from internal .Internal Products: Medication to be administered by mouth are stored separately from other formulation . Observation of the Unit 1 Medication Cart on 9/27/2021 at 10:16 AM, revealed a bottle of hand sanitizer, 3 boxes of rivastigmaine transdermal patches, and a bottle of melatonin 3 milligrams (mg) tablets in the top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$52,156 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $52,156 — penalty dated 2025-05-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/31/2019 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/31/2019 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/31/2019 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/31/2019 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2007 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/20/2014 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2019 |
| NORTHPOINT REGIONAL LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2007 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $489K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445210. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.