The Oaks at Radford Hills Healthcare Center
725 Medical Dr, Abilene, TX 79601 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (325) 672-3236 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Dec 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $163,651 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.72 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.6%CMS range 40.6–69.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.0–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.0–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 51.1 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (Resident #54) reviewed were free from neglect. 1. On 11/17/24 at 7:03:01 p.m. Resident #54 left the building unnoticed by staff, despite the wander guard alarm alarming at the exit door. Facility failed to implement immediate action to prevent neglect due to lack of supervision of 6 cognitively impaired individuals with known elopement risk which could result in falls, injuries, dehydration, and death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/6/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:45 pm. While the IJ was removed on 12/7/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolation, because all staff had not been trained on door codes, what to in case of door alarms, and procedure for a resident elopement. These failures could affect residents who were identified as elopement risks and place them at risk of serious bodily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #54) reviewed were free from neglect. 1. On 11/17/24 at 7:03:01 p.m. Resident #54 left the building unnoticed by staff, despite the wander guard alarm alarming at the exit door. 2. Facility failed to follow policy for emergency procedure-missing resident. 3. Facility failed to implement immediate action to prevent neglect due to lack of supervision of 6 cognitively impaired individuals with known elopement risk which could result in falls, injuries, dehydration, and death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/6/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:45 pm. While the IJ was removed on 12/7/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolation, because all staff had not been trained on door codes, what to in case of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #54, Resident #52) of 6 residents reviewed. 1. The facility failed to provide supervision for Resident # 54, who had a history of exit seeking behaviors, to prevent her from eloping from the facility on 11/17/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure that smoking materials (lighters, cigarettes) were not stored properly for 1 (Resident #52) of 17 residents listed as smokers. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/6/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:45 pm. While the IJ was removed on 12/7/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of pattern, because all staff had not been trained on door codes, what to in case of door alarms, and procedure for a resident elopement. These failures could affect residents who were identified as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for multiple falls. The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions for Resident #1 to prevent 5 falls within 19 hours from [DATE] at 12:30pm to [DATE] at 7:30am, that lead Resident #1's Family Member B calling 911, which resulted in hospitalization with diagnoses of subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed) and L3 fracture (lumbar spine fracture) which resulted in death on [DATE]. The facility failed to identify fall risk or implement any interventions in the Plan of Care for Resident #2 who was a known fall risk and had falls on [DATE] and [DATE]. The facility failed to identify fall risk or implement any interventions in the Plan of Care for Resident #3 who was a known fall risk and had fall on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure food was sealed and labeled properly in the kitchen freezer.The facility failed to ensure food was labeled in the kitchen refrigerator. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses.The findings included:During an observation on 03/17/2026 between 10:00 AM and 12:45 PM revealed:Freezer #1-1 large, unsealed bag of what appeared to be frozen chicken was not labeled or dated.Refrigerator Mustard was dated as opened on 3/30 and a received date of 2/19.-1 large bag of thawing chicken, undated and unlabeled.-2 bags of chili thawing out, unlabeled and undated. During an interview on 03/17/2026 at 10:30 AM, the DM stated all food, even when removed from the original box, should have been labeled with the product name and dated when it was opened. She stated not doing so, it could have caused the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 medication carts (medication cart for Hall C) and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's Nitroglycerin (medication used to treat chest pain) was not expired and was on the medication cart for Hall C. The facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled in Medication cart for C Hall on 03/17/2026.The facility failed to ensure 3 vials of Hepatitis B vaccine were not expired and were in the medication room refrigerator. These failures could affect residents prescribed medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications, medication misuse, or receiving expired medications.Findings Included: During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 10:20 AM, the medication cart for Hall C contained a bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable and store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (medication cart for Hall C) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure medications were locked and labeled when unattended on Medication cart for C hall on 03/18/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications, leading to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings include: During an observation on 03/18/2026 10:47 AM, the medication cart for C Hall was found unlocked with a medication cup not labeled with six pills sitting on top of the cart. LVN-A was in a resident's room while cart was unlocked and out of sight. During an interview 03/18/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys during medication storage inspection for 3 (cart #1, cart #2, and cart #3) of 4 medication carts reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure medication carts #1, #2 and #3 were locked and secured while unattended. This failure could result in drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 09/24/2025 at 05:30 AM, medication carts #1 and #2 were observed to be unlocked with residents and staff within 10 feet of the cart or within eyesight with the medication drawers facing outward. These carts were observed to have the following medication:* heart medications (amiodarone, amlodipine, metoprolol), *depression medications (trazodone), * diuretics (metolazone), * antinausea (meclizine, ondansetron), * diabetes medications (glucagon, insulin), * inhalation medications (albuterol, ipratropium bromide, budesonide), * anti-yeast medications (nystatin powder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 3 of (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) 4 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #1 with dignity by not assisting resident with a brief change when asked on 11/22/2025. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Residents #1, #2, and #3 with dignity by not providing showers 3 times a week from 11/01/2025 until 11/30/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 12/02/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted into facility on 08/16/2025 with diagnoses to include: heart failure, urinary tract infection, diabetes, and diarrhea. Record review of Resident #1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and determined by considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population with accordance for 2 (11/01/2025 and 11/06/2025) of 4 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. The facility failed to maintain nurse staffing at the level indicated by the PPD budget on 11/01/2025 and 11/06/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of resident's needs, safety and psychosocial well-being not being met.Findings included: Record review of timesheets dated 11/01/2025 revealed 63.55 hours worked by direct care staff. Per facility PPD and census of 48 residents, 80.64 direct care staff hours were needed for 24-hour period. Record review of timesheets dated 11/06/2025 revealed 62.86 hours worked by direct care staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility staff did not report to the state agency that Resident #1 and Resident #2 had illegal drugs (meth) in the facility and were attempting to smoke them in the building on 04/04/2025. This failure could place the residents at increased risk for abuse and neglect or further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was revised following an incident where Resident #1 brought illegal drugs (meth) into the facility and attempted to smoke them. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan was revised following an incident where Resident #2 attempted to smoke drugs (meth) with Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the services needed to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in permanently affixed compartments during medication storage inspection for 1 (cart #2) of 2 medication carts reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure medication cart #2 was locked and secured while unattended. This failure could result in a drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 12/17/2024 at 11:29 am, the medication cart #2 was observed to be unlocked with residents and visitors within 10 feet of the cart and within eyesight. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 11:29 am, the ADMN asked was this medication cart left unlocked? He stated he had not known who was responsible for the opened medication cart. The ADMN stated it should have been locked at all times while not in use. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 11:32 am, LVN A stated she was responsible for the medication cart, and it should have been locked. She stated she had left the medication cart to go help a CNA with resident care and had forgotten to lock it. LVN A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview the facility failed to ensure the DON did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or more residents for 6 (11/02/24, 11/03/24, 11/09/24, 11/15/24, 11/16/24, and 11/17/24) of 20 days reviewed for DON coverage. The facility failed to ensure the DON did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or more residents on 11/02/24, 11/03/24, 11/09/24, 11/15/24, 11/16/24, and 11/17/24. This failure left residents without the nursing administrative oversight that only the DON can provide. Findings include : During an interview 11/20/24 at 01:57 PM, the DON stated she had worked the floor on 11/02/24, 11/03/24, 11/09/24, 11/15/24, 11/16/24, and 11/17/24 because the facility was short staffed. She stated she worked the floor a couple days a week. She stated the negative effect was that she could not perform her DON duties. She stated she was not aware of the regulation stating that she could not work the floor. She stated corporate told her it was her responsibility to make sure the floor was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to promptly resolve grievances for 12 of 12 confidential residents reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure grievance concerns voiced in a Resident Council meeting were addressed or that a resolution had been communicated back to 12 of 12 confidential residents. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: During a confidential interview on 11/19/2024 at 10:00 a.m., 12 of 12 confidential residents stated they did know how to file a grievance. They stated the AD wrote down grievances voiced in the Resident Council meetings, but the Resident Council members did not get told the facility's responses to their grievances. They stated they felt that management of the facility did address some of their concerns but not all of them. 1 of 12 confidential residents stated they no longer came to Resident Council meetings because they felt it did not do any good and nothing changed in the facility. Record review of Resident Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives that have the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Resident #6, Resident #30, Resident #68, and Resident #43) of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of nebulized breathing treatments for Resident #6. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of oxygen therapy for Resident #30. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of care needs with a resident who required trach maintenance and care for Resident #68. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and residents' choices during a confidential meeting for 12 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were not withheld resident wipes, which led to the staff having to use paper towels and toilet paper for resident care. This failure could put residents at risk of being unclean and skin sheer during direct resident care. Findings included: During an observation on 11/18/2024 at 10:00 AM, cases of resident wipes were being stored in the DON's office. The supply closets on Hall C and E were observed to have no wipes available. During an interview on 11/18/2024 at 10:00 AM, CNA-C stated the wipes were kept in the DON's office with only a few kept on one or two hall carts. She stated the DON locked them in her office storage closet. During an observation on 11/18/2024 at 10:09 PM there were no wipes on the linen carts of Halls D, E, F with only half of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and determined by considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population with accordance with 3 of 18 residents (Resident #30, Resident #37, and Resident #54) reviewed for sufficient staffing The facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing based off facility assessment. This failure could place the residents at risk of resident's needs, safety and psychosocial well-being not being met. The findings include: Record review of Resident #30's electronic face sheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted into facility on 10/18/2022 with diagnoses to include: fracture of left patella (left knee fracture), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. The facility failed to have record of Resident #30's medication regimen review for anti-psychotic medication since last survey on 10/19/2023. This failure could place resident as risk of not having their medications reviewed by pharmacy consultants for appropriate doses or pharmacy recommendations implemented. The findings included: Record review of Resident #30's electronic face sheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted into facility on 10/18/2022 with diagnoses to include: fracture of left patella (left knee fracture), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a mental health condition with a combination of symptoms including hallucinations, delusions, mania,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for the lunch meal on 11/18/24 and the supper menu on 11/19/24 for 2 of 2 meals (the lunch service on 11/18/24 and the supper service on 11/19/24) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility did not serve the lunch menu posted for Monday 11/18/24, but instead served the lunch menu posted for Tuesday 11/19/24 and did not inform the residents that the menu would be switched. The facility did not follow the supper menu for Tuesday 11/19/24 and did not inform the residents that a substitute would be served. These failures could affect all residents who ate food from the kitchen by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: Review of the weekly menu week 4 Monday lunch revealed roast pork, black-eyed peas, stewed okra and tomatoes, cornbread, and peanut butter pie. Further review of the weekly menu week 4 Tuesday lunch revealed Swiss steak, mashed potatoes, green peas, a garlic cheese biscuit, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standard or food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety in that: The facility failed to ensure all food items were labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used proper hand hygiene during meal preparation. The failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation of the freezer on 11/18/24 at 09:40 AM, revealed what the DM identified as 6 pork loins, 8 loafs of bread, 1 turkey pot roast, and 4 bags of tatter tots out of original boxes with no labels and no open dates. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 09:45 AM, the DM stated all food should have been labeled with what they were, when they expired, and when they were received. She stated not having food labeled could lead to serving expired food which could cause illness. During an observation of meal preparation on 11/18/24 from 11:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 (CNA-B, CNA-C and CNA-D) staff observed during incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA B, CNA C, and CNA D performed proper peri-care (incontinent care) and proper hand hygiene during peri-care for Resident #23 and Resident #12. These failures placed residents of the facility at risk of infections from improper incontinent care and hand hygiene while performing incontinent care. Findings included: Resident #23 Record Review of the Resident #23's Face Sheet dated 11/19/2024, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male. His original admission to the facility was on 2/08/2022 with his most recent admission on [DATE]. Resident #23 had a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction (stroke), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training effective communications mandatory training for 4 of 16 employees (DON, CNA B, LVN F, and RN I) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by the DON and CNA B during orientation. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by RN I and LVN F annually. These failures could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed no evidence that the following staff had completed effective communications training during orientation: DON hire date 6/24/2024 CNA B hire date 11/11/2024 Record reviews of the employees' files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed effective communications training annually: RN I hire date 9/27/2022 LVN F hire date 2/22/2023 During an interview on 11/18/2024 at 11:56 a.m., CNA B stated she had filled out hiring paperwork on the orientation app but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training on resident rights mandatory training for 2 of 16 employees (RN I and LVN F) reviewed for training requirements in that: The facility did not ensure resident rights training was completed by RN I and LVN F annually. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from staff who were insufficiently trained. The findings included: Record reviews of the employees' files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed resident rights training annually: o RN I hire date 9/27/2022 o LVN F hire date 2/22/2023 During an interview on 11/20/2024 at 6:16 p.m., the CHRL stated RN I and LVN F did not complete annual resident rights training. She stated each department head is responsible for making sure their staff have received all the required training. She stated there was a combination team work to monitor training performed due to HR cannot perform certain educational trainings. She stated Ultimately the ADMN should hold supervisors responsible for their staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property and dementia management for 2 (RN I and LVN F) of 19 employees reviewed for staff training. The facility did not ensure abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting training was completed by RN I and LVN F annually. These failure could place the residents at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation. The findings included: Record reviews of the employees' files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property and dementia management training annually: o RN I hire date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training an infection prevention and control program mandatory training for 4 of 16 employees (DON, CNA B, LVN F, and RN I) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure an infection prevention and control program training was completed by the DON and CNA B during orientation. The facility did not ensure an infection prevention and control program training was completed by RN I and LVN F annually. These failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or infections due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed no evidence that the following staff had completed an infection prevention and control program training during orientation: DON hire date 6/24/2024 CNA B hire date 11/11/2024 Record reviews of the employees' files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed an infection prevention and control program training annually: RN I hire date 9/27/2022 LVN F hire date 2/22/2023 During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training on compliance and ethics mandatory training for 4 of 16 employees (DON, CNA B, LVN F, and RN I) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure compliance and ethics training was completed by the DON and CNA B during orientation. The facility did not ensure compliance and ethics training was completed by RN I and LVN F annually. These failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed no evidence that the following staff had completed compliance and ethics training during orientation: DON hire date 6/24/2024 CNA B hire date 11/11/2024 Record reviews of the employees' files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed compliance and ethics training annually: RN I hire date 9/27/2022 LVN F hire date 2/22/2023 During an interview on 11/18/2024 at 11:56 a.m., CNA B stated she had filled out hiring paperwork on the orientation app but had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure before a resident was transferred or discharged that the facility notified the resident's guardian of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood and the facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility failed to provide Resident #54 ' s guardian written notice of the resident ' s transfer before Resident #54 was transferred to Facility B on 11/29/2024. The facility failure could affect residents who were discharged from the facility and could place them at risk of having their discharge rights violated. The findings included: Record review of Resident #54's, face sheet dated 12/9/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #59 had diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease, hypertension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure CNA B documented the accurate dinner meal intake for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss and a decline in health status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: epilepsy (a condition associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain that is marked by convulsions episodes of sensory disturbance, or loss of consciousness, hypertension (high blood pressure), and schizoaffective disorder ( a mental disorder that includes symptoms of schizophrenia such as delusions, and of mood disorders such as high and low mood swings). Record review of Resident #1's OSA MDS with an ARD date of 8/7/24 documented her BIMS score was 00,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to inform the resident representative of a significant change in the residents' physical status and the need to significantly alter the resident's treatment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's representative of hospital transfer on 09/16/2024 resulting in resident not having an advocate the make decisions at the hospital. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not having an advocate, delay in medical treatment, or decline in health. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with latest return on 09/19/2024 from hospital with diagnoses to include: diabetes, amputation of left leg, and altered status. Further review of face sheet revealed Resident #1's representative and responsible party was an assigned legal guardian. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 4 residents' rooms reviewed for homelike environment, in that: 1. Resident #2's bathroom tile was discolored and covered in multiple dried, dark brown stains, toilet base caulking and tile grout lines were covered in a dark black substance, and the cove base around the wall and floor between the toilet and inside wall had an indention and had pulled away from the wall, which exposed the drywall. Resident #2's floor in his room was wet and stained with dark streaks; a piece of toilet paper was observed on the floor with a wet, brown substance, and Resident #2's oxygen machine had a dried liquid stain that ran down the front of the machine and several dried splatter spots. 2. Resident #6's bathroom tile around the base of the toilet was broken, cracked, and exposed the bare floor. The toilet base that was caulked to the floor was cracked and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to send a transfer or discharge notice in writing to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #1 was discharged home on 7/14/23. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 7/3/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone), shortness of breath, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Record Review of Resident #1's Against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans as follows: Resident #1 did not have a care plan for going out on pass for personal needs. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their Individualized needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/2/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 2/15/24. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included respiratory failure, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] with a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] indicated BIMS of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 4/30/24 indicated Resident #1 does not show any plan for going out on pass for personal needs. Record review of facilities release of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure orders were provided for the resident's immediate care and needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure a physician order was put in-place/received to allow Resident #1 to go out on pass daily. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of not having their medical care supervised. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/2/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 2/15/24. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included respiratory failure, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] with a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] indicated BIMS of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's Orders indicated Resident #1 does not show any orders from the physician to allow Resident #1 to go out on pass daily. Record review of facilities release of responsibility for leave of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #4) of 10 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 had baseline care plan developed within 48 hours after being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4 had a baseline care plan developed within 48 hours after being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. These failures placed the residents at risk of not having continuity of care to safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 03/05/2024 with diagnoses to include: repeated falls, muscle weakness, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/20/2024, revealed BIMS score (09) which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives that have the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of risk for falls for Resident #2. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of risk for falls for Resident #3. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and not having their needs met. Findings include: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 03/05/2024 with diagnoses to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) out of 2 residents reviewed for administration of medications and maintaining a central line. The facility failed to ensure LVN A had the knowledge and skills to provide nursing services to 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) receiving intravenous medications. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening or spread of infection that could impact level function and/or physical health and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain) , high blood pressure, candida stomatitis (a fungal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that: The facility's kitchen staff failed to wear hair net during meal preparations. The facility failed to ensure open items in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry food storage were dated and labeled and free from expired foods. These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings included: During an observation on 10/17/2023 at 9:53 a.m. of the dry storage pantry revealed: 1 unsealed bag of a 24 oz Pink Lemonade Drink Mix with no open date. 1 10 oz container of Parsley Flakes with an expiration date of 05/22/2023, and 1 12 oz container of Poultry Seasoning with an expired date of 09/06/2023. During an observation on 10/17/2023 at 9:39 a.m. of the Refrigerator revealed: 1 large clear plastic container of what appeared to be Jell-O, not labeled, or dated. 1 clear plastic sealed package of what appeared to be bologna. 1 clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (ADMIN, DON, SW E, DM, RN F, LVN G, LVN H, LVN J, HSK K) personnel files reviewed for training. 1. The facility failed to train for Communications for SW E, DM, RN-F, LVN-SM, LVN-HP, and HSK K. 2. The facility failed to train for Resident Rights for SW E, DM, RN F, LVN G, and HSK K. 3. The facility failed to train for Infection Control for SW E and DM. 4. The facility failed to train for Compliance and Ethics for SW E and DM. 5. The facility failed to train for HIV either during orientation or annually for DON, DM, RN F, LVN G, LVN J, and HSK K. 6. The facility failed to train for Restrain Reduction during orientation or annually for ADMIN, DON, DM, RN F, LVN G, LVN H, LVN J, and HSK K. 7. The facility failed to train for Prevention of Falls during orientation or annually for DM, RN F, LVN G, and HSK K. 8. The facility failed to train for Dementia during orientation or annually for DON, RN F, LVN G, and HSK K. These failures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective communications training program for all new and existing staff for 6 of 15 (SW E, DM, RN F, LVN G, LVN J, and HSK K) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Communications for SW E, DM, RN F, LVN-G, LVN J, and HSK K. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: SW E-Hire date of 10/13/2023 - Had no Communications training. DM- Hire date of 09/22/2023 - Had no Communication training. RN F-Hire date of 9/27/2022 - Had no Communication training. LVN G-Hire date of 12/07/2021 - Had no Communications training. LVN J-Hire date of 5/18/2023 - Had no Communications training. HSK K-Hire date of 12/08/2021 - Had no Communications training. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. with HR M, she said she had not been with the facility for long and she had some difficulties getting some of the salary employee's information. She said the personnel files had been a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities training program for all new and existing staff for 5 of 15 (SW E, DM, RN F, LVN G, and HSK K) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Resident Rights for SW E, DM, RN F, LVN G, and HSK K. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: SW E-Hire date of 10/13/2023-had no Resident Rights training. DM- Hire date of 09/22/2023- had no Resident Rights training. RN F-Hire date of 9/27/2022 - had no Resident Rights training. LVN G-Hire date of 12/07/2021- had no Resident Rights training. HSK K-Hire date of 12/08/2021- had no Resident Rights training. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. with HR M, she said she had not been with the facility for long and she had some difficulties getting some of the salary employee's information. She said the personnel files had been a mess when she started, and she worked had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his person-centered plan of care for one (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed for person-centered plans of care. The facility failed to include Resident #64 in her Care Plan Conference. This failure could affect residents and place them at-risk by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #64's face sheet, dated 10/19/2023, revealed Resident #64 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting unspecified side (weakness or inability to move extremities after a stroke), Major depressive disorder (mood disorder that can cause feeling of sadness and loss of interest), Muscle weakness, Unsteadiness on feet, Lack of coordination, and Generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transmit an MDS for 1 of 3 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for closed records. Facility failed to transmit a Discharge MDS for Resident #13 on 6/08/2023. This failure could place residents at risk of facility not providing complete and specific information for payment and quality of measure purposes. Finding included: Record review of Resident #13's Face sheet dated 10/19/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/08/2023 to another SNF. Record review of Discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed it was complete but never submitted. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 1:30 p.m., with MDS, she said she started the first of June 2023 and was unaware that there was a finalized button that needed to be checked in the computer system to submit an MDS. She said she had since learned that she needed to check the finalized button in the computer system to submit an MDS. MDS said things were a mess when she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Infection Control training program for all new and existing staff for 2 of 15 (SW E and DM) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Infection Control for SW E and the DM. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: SW E-Hire date of 10/13/2023-Had no Infection Control training. DM- hired 09/22/2023- Had no Infection Control training. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. with HR M, she said she had not been with the facility for long and she had some difficulties getting some of the salary employee's information. She said the personnel files had been a mess when she started, and she worked had been working on them. HR M said staff did not do orientation prior to working on the floor, they usually waited for a group to do the orientation. She could not identify how long from hire to orientation would entail. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 4:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Compliance and Ethics training program for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (SW E, DM) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Compliance and Ethics for SW E and the DM. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: SW E-Hire date of 10/13/2023-had no Compliance & Ethics training. DM- hired 09/22/2023- had no Compliance & Ethics training. During an interview on 10/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. with HR M, she said she had not been with the facility for long and she had some difficulties getting some of the salary employee's information. She said the personnel files had been a mess when she started, and she worked had been working on them. HR M said staff did not do orientation prior to working on the floor, they usually waited for a group to do the orientation. She could not identify how long from hire to orientation would entail. During an interview on 10/19/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1, and Resident #2) reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #1 and Resident #2 with respect and dignity while removing care products from their personal space. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation. The findings included: Review of Resident # 1's face sheet dated 08/31/2023 revealed [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], with the following diagnosis: epilepsy, depressive disorder, and vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory, and other thought processes) Review of Resident # 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 11 (moderately impaired).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-03-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 8 of 13 (RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, HK-G, AD, Maint, and DOR) staff reviewed for training on dementia management, HIV, restraint reduction and prevention of falls. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F received required dementia management training upon hire. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured the DOR and HK-G received required dementia management training annually. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F received required HIV training upon hire. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured DOR and HK-G received required HIV training annually. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-E, and CNA-F received required restraint reduction training upon hire.The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-19 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff on the elements and goals of the facility QAPI program for all new and existing staff for 4 of 13 (RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-F, and AD) staff reviewed for training on QAPI. The facility failed to ensure that RN-A, CNA-D, CNA-F, and AD were educated on the facility's QAPI program as part of their mandatory training requirements. This failure could place residents at risk of their quality of care not being improved upon when a known issue had occurred from staff not being informed on the goals and various elements of the QAPI program. Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for RN-A reflected a hire date of 12/2022. RN A's personnel file showed no evidence she had completed QAPI training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for CNA-D reflected a hire date of 04/2024. CNA D's personnel file showed no evidence she had completed QAPI training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete MDS discharge assessment was electronically transmitted to the CMS System for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 resident records reviewed for closed records. include the discharge assessment was not transmitted to CMS within 14 days of completion. The facility did not ensure the discharge MDS assessment was completed and electronically transmitted as required for Resident #36. This failure could place residents at risk of facility not providing complete and specific information for payment and quality of measure purposes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's electronic face sheet revealed [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), hypokalemia (low potassium), malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer), and pain. Further review of the electronic face sheet revealed the resident was discharged on 08/05/2024 to another facility. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to utilize the services of an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 6 days out of 143 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to have an RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week on October 30, 2022, February 26, 2023, March 26, 2023, May 21, 2023, August 25, 2023, and October 1, 2023. These failures could place all residents at risk for their clinical needs not being met. Findings included: Review of the facility-maintained spreadsheet on RN Staffing Data revealed the facility did not have the services of an RN for eight consecutive hours on the following dates: October 30, 2022, February 26, 2023, March 26, 2023, May 21, 2023, August 25, 2023, and October 1, 2023. During an interview on 10/19/23 at 12:45 p.m., the ADMIN stated it was the Administrator's responsibility for ensuring the facility complied with RN coverage regulations. She stated she had only worked in facility for 3 months and did not have a response for the reason the failure occurred. The admin stated the effect on the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$163,651 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $15,099 — penalty dated 2024-12-09
- $148,552 — penalty dated 2024-04-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-07 for 1 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-03 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SLP OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EASTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2021 |
| HART-LINE ASSOCIATES LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| WRIGHT, LABAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/10/2021 |
| SLP ABILENE II LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| LEONARD, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| BOSWELL, DARREN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| EDEN, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| WHITWORTH, GARY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| MARTINEZ IRIZARRY, AXEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2023 |
| ZAHODNIK, MATHEW | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/20/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.