Diboll Nursing and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 25.6 residents a day — about 31% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, psychosocial status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #35) of 8 residents reviewed for parameters to notify Physician of critical lab levels The facility failed to notify Resident # 35's primary care physician of critical low blood sugar readings of (46 mg/dl on 05/17/23 and 44mg/dl, on 05/21/23). The facility failed to train the staff of when to report changes to the physician. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 06/13/23 at 3:00 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:03pm. While the IJ was removed on 06/14/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents ' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #35), reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain orders for finger stick blood sugars for resident #35 and to follow their policy on Management of Hypoglycemia, (low blood sugar), when resident # 35's blood sugar reading was at critical levels of 46mg/dl on 05/17/23 and 44mg/dl on 05/23/23 and hold parameter for Insulin if blood sugar reading is at a critical level of below 70mg/dl. Resident #35 experienced sweating and shakiness when her blood sugar fell below 80mg/dl. Resident #35 had no orders for finger stick blood sugars and no parameters for holding Insulin for blood sugar levels below 70mg/dl. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 06/13/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:03pm,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 4 of 8 residents (Residents #9, #1, #4, and #21) reviewed for ADL care. 1.The facility failed to clean/groom Resident #9's fingernails that had a dark brown substance underneath them on 8/25/25 and 8/26/25.2.The facility failed to trim, clean/groom Resident #21's fingernails that were about 1/2 inch in length and had a dark, brown substance underneath them on 8/25/2025.3. The facility failed to trim, clean/groom Resident #4's fingernails that were about 1/2 inch in length on 8/25/2025 and 8/26/2025.4. The facility failed to trim, clean/groom Resident #1's fingernails that were about 1/2 inch in length and had a brown substance underneath them on 8/25/2025 and 8/26/2025. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation.The facility failed to ensure all foods stored in the refrigerators were not kept past their expiration dates and were labeled and dated.The facility failed to ensure all foods stored in the dry storage area were not kept past their expiration dates.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.Findings included: During an observation of the refrigerator on 8/25/2025 at 9:30 AM, the following items were observed:(1) 1 gallon container of unsweet tea dated 8/18/2025.(2) 1 gallon container of unsweet tea dated 8/19/2025.(3) 16 glasses of unsweet tea not labeled or dated.(4) 14 glasses of fruit punch not labeled or dated.(5) 2 glasses of orange juice not labeled or dated. During an observation of the dry storage area on 8/25/2025 at 9:30 AM, the following items were observed: (1) 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 residents (Resident's #1, #21, and #22) and 3 of 5 staff (CNA A, ADON and CNA E) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed gloves and washed or sanitized her hands when providing care to Resident #21 on 8/25/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure ADON wore a gown during wound care to Resident #1 who was on enhanced barrier precautions on 8/26/2025.3. The facility failed to ensure CNA E wore a gown during incontinent care to Resident #22 who was on enhanced barrier precautions, and she failed to wash or sanitize her hands on 8/27/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the resident received education on the influenza and the pneumococcal immunizations of 4 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #4, #7, and #21) reviewed for immunizations.The facility failed to document education was offered for the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to Residents #1, #4, #7 and #21.These failures could place residents at risk for contracting a viral disease that could spread through the facility and cause respiratory complications, and potential adverse health outcomes.Findings include: 1. Record review of a Face Sheet for Resident #1 dated 8/26/2025 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3 (wound a the bottom of the spine that extends through the skin and tissue), diabetes mellitus, and malignant neoplasm of upper lobe of lung (lung cancer). Record review of a comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 4 of 6 residents (Residents # 6, #22, #26, and #27) reviewed for resident call system.1.The facility failed to ensure Residents #6, #22, and #26 had a call light within reach on 8/25/25 and 8/26/2025.2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 had a call light that was functional. Resident #27 did not have a pull cord attached to the call box on 8/25/25.This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: 1.Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/26/25 for Resident #6 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of a Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment 1 of 3 halls (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment.The facility failed to repair the window in Resident #8's room [ROOM NUMBER] that had a broken frame that was frayed and splintered on 8/26/2025 and 8/27/2025.This failure could place the residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment.Findings include:Record review of a face sheet for Resident #8 dated 8/26/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of severe intellectual disabilities (delay in language, motor, and social skills), expressive aphasia (difficulty speaking), and hypotension (low blood pressure). Record review of the maintenance log dated 7/30/2025 indicated that the window frame in Resident #8's room was reported and initialed by Maintenance. Record review of a care plan for Resident #8 dated 7/23/2025 indicated she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care are provided care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #21).The facility failed to ensure the external filters of Resident #21's oxygen concentrators was free of dust build up from 8/25/2025-8/27/2025.These failures could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections, breathing in dust and allergens, decreased effectiveness of oxygen concentrators, and exacerbation of respiratory distress.Findings included:Record review of a Face Sheet for Resident #21 dated 8/26/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (paralyzed on left side of the body following a stroke), type 2 diabetes, heart failure (heart not able to pump effectively) and GERD (acid reflux).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and follow a policy to provide pharmacy services in accordance with State and Federal laws or rules of the Drug Enforcement Administration for 1 of 5 months (February 2025) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to have 2 witness signatures on attached page of controlled substances at time of disposal on 2/11/25.This failure could put residents at risk for misappropriation and drug diversion.Findings include:Record review of facility drug destruction records dated August 2024 through August 2025 revealed that on February 11, 2025, the attached page containing controlled substances was signed by the consultant pharmacist and one witness, the DON, and did not contain 2 witness signatures as required.During an interview on 8/27/25 at 11:15 am the DON said she was responsible for drug destruction. She said she was unsure how the witness signature was missed on the attached sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 2 of 5 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #3 and Resident #14).The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #3 did not contain expired cheddar cheese bars or canned sausage. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #14 did not contain expired pineapple tidbits, fruit cups or pineapple juice. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings include:1.Record review of Resident #3's electronic medical record and face sheet undated reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: radiculopathy, cervical region (pain, weakness or numbness), cellulitis and abscess of mouth (bacterial infection of the skin and the deeper tissues beneath the skin), psychotic disorder with hallucinations (severe mental illness with false perceptions of things not there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1. The Dietary Aide failed to properly wear hair net while in the kitchen on 7/15/2024. 2. Dietary Staff failed to check and log the dishwasher temperature and sanitation for month of July 2024. 3. Dietary Staff failed to properly label and dispose of leftovers from the refrigerator. 4. Facility staff failed to clean Resident #7's water pitcher. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation on 7/15/24 at 6:45 am the dietary aide had hair out of his hair net on his neck and had facial hair with no beard guard net. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 6:50 am there was a dishwasher temperature and sanitation log located on the side of the refrigerator. The log had no temperatures or sanitation levels listed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SLP OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX