Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of Resident #1 who was newly admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was exhibiting signs of confusion and exit-seeking behavior. Resident #1 then eloped from the facility approximately 27 (twenty-seven) hours later on 07/20/25 between 7:45 PM and 8:00 PM. Staff were unaware of Resident #1's elopement when the facility was notified by a citizen of the community via telephone on 07/20/25 at approximately 8:15 PM that the resident had wandered to a nearby apartment complex and appeared confused. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 07/20/25 and ended on 07/21/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 10 of 19 residents in that: The facility failed to ensure staff were not on their personal cell phones while providing care, which included peri-care to residents. This could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings include: During an interview with confidential residents on January 12, 2026, at 10:00am ten confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs while performing care made them feel ignored, not a priority, embarrassed, concerned the CNA could make a mistake due to distraction by the cell phone conversation, and, most of all, their privacy was violated. During an interview on January 12, 2026, at 10:00am ten confidential residents stated the use of cell phones…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (1/11/26 lunch). This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss.The Findings included: During confidential individual interviews on an undisclosed date and time, 10 of 10 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability. They stated, the rolls were raw, and they could not chew them. They further stated, the vegetables are unrecognizable due to being cooked too long. The following dining observations were made during lunch meal on 1/11/26 that began at 12:22 a.m. and concluded at 1:03 p.m. Observation of the puree foods served for 6 of 6 residents on puree diet revealed, puree seasoned chicken thighs and pureed mac-n-cheese had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerators (2) and freezers (2), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to ensure the iced tea machine's outer surface was free from dirt and stains. 3) The facility failed to ensure the refrigerators (2) and freezers (2) outer handle surface were free from greasy stains. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. The findings included: During kitchen tour observations on 1/11/26 that began at 10:08 a.m. and concluded at 10:51 a.m., revealed the following: Iced tea machine, located inside the kitchen's beverage station, had dirt and stains. Reach-in refrigerator #1 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for the lunch meal on 1/11/26 for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch service on 1/11/26) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility failed to follow the lunch menu for 1/11/2026 and did not inform the residents that a substitute would be served. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. The Findings included: Record review of the weekly menu for week five's Sunday lunch revealed braised beef tips with gravy, steamed rice, roasted brussels sprouts, dinner rolls and frosted cake. During a dining observation on 1/11/2026 from 12:22 p.m. to 12:51 p.m., a handwritten message written on a whiteboard next to the kitchen entrance said, Lunch: seasoned chicken thighs, chicken gravy, mac and cheese, dinner roll, frosted cake. Only two food items, dinner rolls and frosted cake, were observed to be included in the lunch meal served. During a confidential meeting on an undisclosed date and time, ten of ten…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 (Resident #27) reviewed for wound care.RN A failed to change her gloves during wound care for Resident #27.This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.Findings included:Record review of Resident #27's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27 had a medical history of pulmonary embolism (a sudden blockage in a lung artery), respiratory failure, and heart failure.Record review of Resident #27's MDS, dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive Patterns, revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact.Record review of Resident #27's care plan, dated 12/10/2025, revealed (Resident #27) refuses or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 (Resident # 1) residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure MA A completed the medication administration for Resident #1 according to standard of practice when she placed the medications in Resident #1's mouth during the breakfast meal and left prior to observing that Resident #1 had swallowed the medications. Resident #1's medications were found in a cup beside the resident's breakfast tray by the resident's family member who assisted Resident #1 to finish taking the medications. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the full medication dosage or intended therapeutic benefit of ordered medications.Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for respect. CNA D failed to treat residents with respect and dignity when she told Resident #2 and Resident #3, she did not have to take them out to smoke, on an unknown date in July 2025. These failures could place the residents at risk of feeling disrespected.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a medical history of COPD (a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing difficulties), alcohol induce dementia (a type of alcohol-related brain damage), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], Section C-Cognitive Patterns revealed a BIMS score of 06, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for resident rights. CNA B failed to allow Resident #1 to call her Family Member when Resident #1 requested to make that call at approximately 2:30 AM on 01/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (inability of the body to use insulin properly), altered mental status (change in a person's awareness and alertness), major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for hygiene, in that. 1. The facility failed to provide incontinence care on three separate opportunities for Resident #1 on 1/26/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for skin breakdown and infections. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of nondisplaced fracture of third cervical vertebra (fracture of bones in the neck), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, type 2 diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic pain. Record Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Section C- Cognitive patterns a BIMS score of 13 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 10 (4/13, 4/14, 4/28, 5/18, 5/19, 5/26, 6/15, 6/16, 6/23, and 6/29/2024) of 91 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours a day for 10 days 4/13, 4/14, 4/28, 5/18, 5/19, 5/26, 6/15, 6/16, 6/23, and 6/29/2024). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Record review of the CMS report PBJ Staffing Data Report dated 10/23/24 reflected no RN hours for 4/13, 4/14, 4/28, 5/18, 5/19, 5/26, 6/15, 6/16, 6/23, and 6/29/2024. Record review of the facility''s employee survey roster undated reflected there were seven RNs employed at the facility. Record review of Schedule Sheet dated April 2024 reflected RN A was scheduled to work on (4/13, 4/14, and 4/28/2024). Record review of Schedule Sheet dated May 2024 reflected RN A was scheduled to work on (5/18, 5/19, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-09-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SLP OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX