Park View Care Center
3301 View St, Fort Worth, TX 76103 · For profit - Corporation · 179 certified beds · (817) 531-3616 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $290,829 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.3% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 129.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had the right to be free from abuse when Resident #2 physically assaulted him on 07/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse. Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 07/15/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 06/04/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. His active diagnoses included depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest), heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), and coronary artery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had the right to be free from abuse when Resident #2 struck him in the face on 02/18/25. This failure could place residents at risk of injury and anxiety. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, stroke, and amputation of left leg. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected Resident #1 had no issues with verbal or physical aggression. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 11/20/24, reflected he had cognitive impairment, visual impairment, and ADL self-care deficit. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator did not verbally abuse Resident #1 when he cursed at him during a conversation. This failure could affect the residents at the facility and place them at risk for physical, verbal, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/17/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/05/24. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/03/24, reflected he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's active diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body caused by a problem with the spinal cord or nerve) and hyponatremia (a condition where the sodium level in your blood is too low). Review of Resident #1's care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse per the policy when the Administrator verbally abused Resident #1 when he cursed at him during a conversation. This failure could place residents at risk for physical harm, psychosocial harm, unsafe environment, and further abuse. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy revised 09/06/24, and titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation reflected: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Definitions: 'Staff' includes employees .who provide care and services to residents .'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Supervisor did not verbally abuse Resident #3 on 12/10/23. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 02/01/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure the necessary level of assistance was provided to safely care for Resident #1 during incontinence care. CNA B provided incontinence care without assistance, resulting in Resident #1 falling out of bed and dislocating her finger. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injuries or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy of multiple sites and post-laminectomy syndrome (continued pain after back surgery). The resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11. She had impairment to her upper and lower extremities on both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests and rodents for 2 of 3 nurses' station (North Station and Central Station) and 2 of 3 dining rooms (North Dining Room and Central Dining Room), for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) reviewed for pest control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the North Station nurses' desk and North Dining Room were free from flies. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Central Station nurses' desk and Central Hall dining room were free from flies. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life.Findings included:1. During an observation of North Station on 05/27/26 at 9:22 AM, Resident #1 had flies circling in his room and landing on his personal items. Resident #1 was not able to be interviewed due to cognitive impairment.During an observation of North Station nurses' desk on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment to include housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for environmental conditions.The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains for Resident #2 and Resident #3 were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner free of dried vomit. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary, unsafe environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included:During an observation and interview on 05/27/26 at 11:12 AM, the privacy curtain in Resident #2's and Resident #3's room had several areas with a dried black substance. Resident #3 stated it was from when his roommate, Resident #2, vomited and had been like that for the past couple of days. He stated he told the nurse and maintenance. He stated he had to get housekeeping to come change the curtain. During an interview on 05/27/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 15 residents (Residents # 1,2,3, and 4) reviewed for infection control when CNAs A, B, C, and D were serving meals. During lunch meal delivery to Hall 100 CNAs A, B, C, and D delivered trays to Residents #1,2,3, and 4, without using hand sanitizer. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure and/or possible transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Observation on 03/05/26 at 12:19 PM, revealed:- CNA-A and CNA-B knocking on doors prior to entering the rooms and taking meal trays into the rooms, they were not observed sanitizing their hands prior to passing out meals to Resident #1 and Resident #2. -At 12:23 PM, CNA-C walked out of the shower room and started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment to include housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 3 of 32 residents (Residents #95, #86 and #14) and 1 of 3 shower rooms (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environmental conditions.1. The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains for Residents #95, #86 and #14 were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner free of dried brown substances.2. The facility failed to ensure the walls in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] were properly maintained and free of cracked and missing tiles. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary, unsafe environment and a diminished quality of life. 1. Observation and interview on 02/10/26 at 10:55 AM of Resident #95's room revealed the privacy curtain had several dried brown substances on it. Resident #95 stated housekeeping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 4 of 32 residents (Residents #12, #27, #81, and #86) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure nail care, to include trimming and cleaning, was provided to Residents #12, #27, #81, and #86. The failure placed the residents at risk of hygiene and safety risks such as nail tearing, injury, and functional difficulties. Findings included:Record review of Resident #12's admission Record, dated 02/12/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with original admission date of 07/02/2025 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #12's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for restorative care. The facility failed to obtain a physician order and care plan for the use of a splint for Resident #86's left hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles).This failure could place residents at risk of increased contractures, not receiving care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being and decline. Findings include:Findings include: Record review of Resident #86's annual MDS assessment, dated 11/24/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #86's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (loss of blood flow to part of the brain), encephalopathy (disturbance of brain function), contracture (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #72) reviewed for dialysis documentation. The facility failed to ensure nurses documented ongoing assessments of Resident #72's condition and monitoring complications before and after dialysis treatments. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of complications from dialysis due to the lack of documentation between the facility and dialysis center in the event of a medical event. Findings include: Record review of Resident #72's face sheet, dated 02/12/2026, revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #72's admitting diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher's chemical concentration and temperatures were logged.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness.Findings included: Observation and interview on 02/12/26 at 8:59 AM, Dietary Staff M ran a cycle of the dishwasher and used a test strip to check the chemical sanitizer. She stated she checked the temperature and chemicals once a day before washing dishes . The test strip was dark purple and read 100 parts per million and was within the correct concentration of 50 to 100 parts per million. Record review of facility's Low-Temperature Dish machine Sanitizer Log for February 2026, revealed no water temperature or chemical concentration checks for the following dates:- 02/03/26 - evening- 02/04/26 - midday and evening- 02/05/26 - midday and evening- 02/06/26 - midday and evening- 02/07/26 - morning, midday and evening- 02/08/26 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 3 of 3 dumpsters. (Dumpsters #1, #2, and #3)1. The facility failed to ensure the doors were completely shut on dumpster #1 2. The facility failed to ensure the lids were closed on dumpsters #1 and #3.3. The facility failed to ensure used incontinent briefs and other garbage were not on the ground surrounding the dumpsters. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsanitary environment and could attract pests, rodents and other animals. Findings included:Observation of the dumpster area on 02/10/2026 at 9:12 AM, revealed the following:- both doors were open on dumpster #1 exposing trash, - Used incontinent briefs, and a clear trash bag with soiled incontinent briefs was lying on the ground next to dumpster #1,- Dumpsters #1 and #3's lids were not closed. Interview on 02/12/2026 at 9:58 AM, the Dietary Manager stated kitchen and environmental services staff were responsible for taking trash outside. She stated the dumpster doors were supposed to be closed, and the area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and functional essential kitchen equipment in the facility's only kitchenThe facility failed to ensure the seal on the walk-in freezer door was replaced properly.These failures could place residents at risk of not having essential equipment maintained and in working order. Findings included:Observation on 02/10/2026 at 8:55 AM, revealed ice buildup was accumulated along the door frame, threshold, and floor of the walk-in freezer. Interview on 02/12/2026 at 9:58 AM, the Dietary Manager stated Maintenance was responsible for ensuring the freezer was clean. She stated she noticed the ice buildup 3 months ago and someone put a new seal, but it was not done properly. She said the risk was someone could trip and fall. The Dietary Manager said kitchen staff had a communication book for repairs and the Maintenance Director would come to check. Observation on 02/12/2026 at 10:13 AM, revealed ice buildup was still accumulated along the door frame and threshold of the walk-in freezer.Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who received nutrition by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for enteral feeding.The facility failed to follow physician's orders of providing Resident #14 with her 16 hours of her enteral feeding intake from 02/10/26 to 02/11/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in health or adverse effects due to inappropriate management of G-tube care.Findings included:Record review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/13/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #14's diagnoses included gastrostomy status (surgical opening (stoma) in the stomach), dysphagia (difficult swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition). Resident #14's BIMS score was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 medication rooms (North medication room) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to remove expired Bisacodyl suppositories, with an expiration date of 01/21/26 and Acetaminophen suppositories, with an expiration date of 01/09/26, from the North medication room refrigerator.This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were ineffective. Findings included: Observation on 02/11/26 at 3:10 PM of the North medication room refrigerator with LVN A revealed four 10mg Bisacodyl suppositories (medication administered rectally to treat constipation) with an expiration date of 01/21/26, and 11- 650mg Acetaminophen suppositories (medication administered rectally for pain and fever reduction) with an expiration date of 01/09/26. Interview on 02/11/26 at 3:16 PM, LVN A stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for infection control practicesThe facility failed to ensure CNA C performed hand hygiene prior to and during incontinence care for Resident #45. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's Face Sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident's diagnoses included: Cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain), Degenerative disease of nervous system (disease that causes the brain or nerves to slowly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account nonsmoking residents for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #11 and #72) reviewed for smoking.The facility failed to ensure the quarterly smoking assessments were completed to determine Resident #11 and Resident #72 for capability and safety.This failure could place the residents at risk for unsafe smoking causing harm. Findings include:Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #11's admitting diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbances, Psychotic Disturbances, Mood Disturbances, and Anxiety (decline in cognitive functioning); Peripheral Vascular Disease (a slow-progressing condition involving narrowing blood vessels outside the heart - usually in the legs); and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure full visual privacy for each resident in 6 rooms of 30 rooms (Rooms # 12, # 15, #23, # 71, #72 and #77) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to maintain functional window blinds to provide privacy for the residents of Rooms #12, # 15, #23, # 71, #72 and #77. This failure could place residents at risk for exposure and decreased sense of dignity. Findings included:Observation on 12/22/25 at 9:45 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the window blinds had 8 slats that were broken, allowing visualization of the bed from outside the facility. Observation on 12/22/25 at 9:53 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the window blinds had 4 slats that were broken, allowing visualization of the bed from outside the facility.Observation and interview on 12/22/25 at 10:00 AM in Room # 77 revealed the window blinds had 12 slats that were broken, allowing visualization of the bed from outside the facility. The resident stated the blinds had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after being hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for bed hold. The facility failed to re-admit Resident #1 after he was hospitalized for having shortness of breath. Emergency services attempted to return Resident #1 on 12/18/25 and again on 12/19/25, and the facility sent him back to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of not getting the care and services required. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's nursing home discharge MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility originally on 08/18/21, readmitted [DATE] and again on 12/09/25. Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar levels), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not having enough oxygen in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung diseases that obstruct airflow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 resident of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to address Resident #2's wound, and her non-compliance with care in her care plan.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care they require. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a stroke that affected her left side, poor circulation, and nicotine dependence. Her BIMS score was 11, indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Her Functional Abilities assessment revealed she was totally dependent on staff for her ADLs. She had no pressure ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that clinical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional health information management standards and practices were accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to code Resident #1's oxygen treatment on his MDS. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and treatment for oxygen. Findings included:During a record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/13/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included: acquired absence of unspecified leg below knee; Schizophrenia (chronic mental health illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings and behaviors); major depressive disorder, single episode (chronic mental health condition charactered by multiple episodes of major depression); age- related osteoporosis without current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1of 3 shower rooms (located on Central Station) reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to ensure a shower room on the Central Station had two working shower curtains, a working shower head, and a clean toilet. The failure placed residents at risk for illness and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Observation on 10/07/25 at 11:40 AM of the shower room revealed the toilet was blocked by equipment inside the shower room. The toilet had a dark substance with an odor. The shower on the right side had a curtain that was torn resulting in limited privacy for showering. The shower on the left side did not have a shower curtain resulting in residents not having privacy for showering and the shower head hose had holes which resulted in the water leaking out the side of the hose. Interview on 10/07/25 at 11:47 AM with CNA E revealed she had worked on Central Station for some time providing showers in this shower room; she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests for 3 of 3 hall locations (North Station, Central Station, South Station), nurse's stations, Central Station dining room and 1 of 1 biohazard closet reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to ensure North Station, Central Station, South Station, and nurses' stations, Central Station dining room, and the biohazard closet were free from gnats. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Observation on 10/07/25 at 11:50 AM of Central Station shower room revealed gnats circling the shower room. Observation on 10/07/25 at 12:00 PM at the Central Station nursing station revealed gnats and flies flying. Interview on 10/07/25 at 12:03 PM, with Resident #2 revealed Flies and gnats are bad here. I try to keep my door closed to keep them out of my room. According to Resident #2, residents were seen swatting flies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who was on enhanced barrier precautions for ESBL, received tracheostomy care via sterile technique. This failure placed all residents at risk for the spread of infections and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/30/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], re-admitted [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her DX included, malignant (cancerous) neoplasm (tumor) of upper lung lobe, hemiplegia (paralysis on one entire side of the body), cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medically related social services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's colonoscopy referral was followed-up on to ensure an appointment was scheduled for her to receive the procedure. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for their medical needs not being met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 04/24/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/11/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Her active diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) observed for infection control. The Wound Care Nurse failed to wear a gown while providing care for Resident #1, who was on enhanced barrier precautions. This failure could lead to the resident being exposed to infections from other residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/22/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/28/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. His active diagnoses included cellulitis of right lower limb (a common, potentially serious bacterial skin infection), lymphedema (tissue swelling caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for dental care. The facility failed to assist Resident #3 obtain a follow-up appointment with the Dentist for a root canal by failing to ensure payment was made to the Dentist. This failure could cause the resident unnecessary dental pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vehicle accident causing a brain bleed and subsequent build up of fluid in the brain, seizures, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 7 indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. His Functional Ability assessment indicated he was independent with his ADLs. Record review of Resident #3's care plan, dated 01/12/25, reflected he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not given psychotropic medications unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for psychotropic medications. The Psychiatric NP prescribed Resident #25's seroquel for a medical condition the resident did not have. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving psychotropic medications unnecessarily. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, stroke, and unspecified psychosis. Resident #25 had no diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder. Record review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 13 indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Status assessment indicated he required limited assistance with his ADLs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of roaches for 6 of 15 residents (Residents #56, #62, #99, #106, #114 and #121) reveiwed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of roaches. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation and interview on 12/03/24 at 11:34 AM revealed there were roaches along the baseboards in Resident #56 and Resident #99's room, and there were roaches behind Resident #99's dresser. Resident #56 was lying in Bed A, Resident #99 sitting on the side of her bed (Bed B). Resident #56 stated she had concerns with roaches in her room. She and Resident #99 had reported the roaches several times to aides, nursing staff, housekeeping, and to the maintenance department. According to Resident #99, she liked to get ice water in the mornings and have found 4-5 roaches in her cup on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #82 and #109) reviewed for feeding assistance. 1. CNA A failed to maintain Resident #82's dignity and respect by standing while feeding the resident her lunch meal on 12/03/24 at 12:39 PM. 2. LVN B failed to maintain Resident #109's dignity and respect by standing while feeding the resident her lunch meal on 12/03/24 at 1:00 PM. The failure could negatively affect the mental and psychological well-being of all residents who required the assistance of staff with eating. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #82's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following nontraumatic intracerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #26 and #34) reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's call light was placed within reach. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's call light was placed within reach. These failures could place residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 12/05/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #26's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/24/24, reflected her BIMS was not completed due to the resident was rarely/never understood. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #102) reviewed for oxygen orders. The facility failed to administer oxygen for Resident #102 as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support, resulting in a decline in health. Findings included: Review of Resident #102's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (when the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into blood preventing the organs from properly functioning). Resident #102 had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 13. He required oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #102's Care Plan initiated on 04/24/24 reflected a care plan addressing respiratory illness with a goal that reflected: Resident will have no signs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 (Resident #26)residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. LVN D failed to follow the facility policy for flushing Resident #26's gastrostomy tube with 5-10 mL (or prescribed amount) of water before, between, and after medications, when she administered Vitamin D 125 mcg, Magnesium Oxide - mg supplement, and Sodium Chloride table 1 gm to the resident. These failures could put residents who received medications via gastrostomy tube at risk for overload and aspiration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 12/05/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #26's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/24/24, reflected her BIMS was not completed due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (5%) or greater, 3 errors of 33 opportunities for errors leading to 6.06% medication error rates, for one of five staff (LVN D) observed for medication pass. The facility failed to ensure LVN D administered all the crushed medication in the medication cups without leaving residue for Resident #26 and failed to mix prior to administration. These failures resulted in a 6.06% medication error rate and could put residents at risk who received medications via g-tube for tube occlusion, not receiving the correct dose of medication, and those that took orally not getting intended therapy. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 12/05/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #26's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/24/24, reflected her BIMS was not completed due to resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #124) reviewed for equipment safety. The facility failed to provide Resident #124 with a bed that had functional wheel locks. This failure could place residents at risk of falls due to unsafe equipment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #124's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke affecting her speech, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #124's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Her Functional Status assessment reflected she required extensive assistance with her transfers. Record review of Resident #124's care plan, dated 11/26/24, reflected she was a high risk for falls due to right sided weakness. Observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 (the Main Dining Room and the North Station Dining Room) of 3 dining rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure that chairs were in good condition and not in need of repair in the Main Dining Room and North Station Dining Room. This failure could affect residents and the staff by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: Observation on 09/17/24 at 8:56 AM of the Main Dining Room revealed there were six chairs total which all had ripped, cracked, and frayed seat cushions that were indented inwards. Some of the chairs had exposed foam from the cushion. Observation on 09/17/24 at 9:00 AM of the North Station Dining Room revealed there were five chairs total which all had ripped, cracked, and frayed seat cushions that were indented inwards. Some of the chairs had exposed foam from the cushion. Observation on 09/17/24 at 11:40 AM of the Main Dining Room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for daily living in 4 resident rooms (Rooms #40, #50, #51, and #76) of 10 resident rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms, Rooms #40, #50, #51, and #76, were maintained and in sanitary condition. This failure could place all residents at risk for a reduced quality of life and unsanitary and hazardous living conditions. Findings included: An observation on 02/27/24 at 10:15 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed roach traps along the wall, debris on the floor, and an open bag of tortillas on the floor. There were no observations of roaches in the room. An observation on 02/27/24 at 2:04 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a lunch tray with food on the bedside table, debris and food particles splattered on the floor, and an opened pack of crackers on the floor. There were no observations of roaches in the room. An observation on 02/27/24 at 2:07 PM in room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public in 2 dining rooms (North and Central Dining Rooms) of 3 dining rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the North and Central Dining Rooms were maintained and in sanitary condition. This failure could place all residents at risk for a reduced quality of life and unsanitary and hazardous living conditions. Findings included: An observation on 02/27/24 at 1:58 PM in the central dining room revealed trash, debris, food particles on the floor, and food particles on tables. An observation on 02/27/24 at 2:12 PM in the north dining room revealed debris, trash, and food particles on the floor. In an interview on 02/27/24 at 10:45 AM, the Maintenance Director stated he worked at the facility for 5 years. He stated the facility had issues with pests and roaches and was on a weekly services contract with a pest control company. The Maintenance Director stated the weekly treatments were for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. CNA F and Housekeeper G failed to immediately report an instance of abuse on 12/10/23 when the Housekeeping Supervisor verbally abused Resident #2. 2. Social Worker A failed to immediately report an allegation of misappropriation of property on 11/20/23 when Resident #3 alleged some of her money was missing from her bank card. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of the facility's policy, dated 10/24/22, and titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation reflected: .VII. Reporting/Response; A. The facility reports abuse and abuse allegations that include: 1. Reporting allegations involving staff to-resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect and exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, which included the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #1 reported allegations of abuse with 2 hours. 2. The facility did not report the allegation of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 7 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: Observation and interview on 10/24/23 beginning at 3:00 PM, during a confidential resident group meeting with 7 residents, revealed the meeting was held in the dining room. There were doors that closed off the space from one hall to another hall; however, in between the hall there was the DON's office, the Administrator office, the HR office, and the Staffing Coordinator's office. There were no signs posted to indicate that a confidential meeting was being held; however, multiple staff walked through the space to get from one hall to the next hall. The Surveyor asked the Administrator if they had a private space for the meeting to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #46, #109, and #132) reviewed for safe clean homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #46, #109, and #132 had toilet paper to maintain hygiene. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #132's bathroom was cleaned daily. 3. The facility failed to ensure the floor of the COVID unit was cleaned daily. These failures could place residents at risk of infection and decreased sense of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #132's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included tumor on the brain, depression, and stroke. Review of Resident #132's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. His Functional Status revealed he required not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 7 of 7 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure there were organized activities provided to the residents during the COVID-19 outbreak according to 7 residents who attended the confidential group interview. The failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, isolation, lack of stimulation, and a decline in mental status. Findings included: Review of facility's current October 2023 Activities Calendar, revealed on 10/24/23 the planned activities were as follows: 10:00 AM Coffee and Convo 11:00 AM Today's headlines 2:00 PM Bingo 3:00 PM Resident Council Meeting 4:00 PM Ice Cream Pass 7:00 Movie Night Observation on 10/24/23 from 10:55 AM - 2:50 PM non-COVID positive residents were observed in their rooms either sleeping or watching television. Observations of the dining areas located in the North, Central and South sections revealed about 6-8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #244, #132, and #136) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to elevate Resident #244's bilateral (affecting both sides) lower extremities as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #132 received his medicated cream for his facial rash. 3. The facility failed to schedule a follow-up appointment with a Neurosurgeon for Resident #136 according to discharge orders by a physician at the local hospital after the resident was seen for generalized weakness due to a traumatic brain injury. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening of their conditions. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #244's face sheet dated 10/26/23 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a medication error less than 5 percent resulting in an error rate of 18.18% for four of eight residents (Residents #22, #48, # 93, and #132) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensuure LVN A and MA D administered medications appropriately for Residents #22, #48, # 93, and #132. This failure could place residents at risk of a worsening of their medical conditions by not receiving the therapeutic effects of medications prescribed for them. Findings included: Review of Resident #22's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, depression, stroke affecting his left side, and placement of a pacemaker. Review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. His Functional Status indicated he required limited assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. The facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #85) and 2 of 3 medication rooms observed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to secure the locked medication rooms on Central and North Stations. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 did not have 1 bottle of nasal spray and two bottles of saline stored at the resident's bedside table not locked in a lock box, or secured in the medication cart or medication room. These failures could place residents at risk of accessing medications not prescribed for them. Findings included: Record review of Resident #85's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #85's diagnoses included acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen 1. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the freezer was properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher had an appropriate level of sanitizer. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food borne illness. Findings included: Observation and interview on 10/24/23 at 9:00 AM, during the initial tour through the kitchen, in the freezer with the Dietary Manager, revealed a clear bag of rectangular frozen items measuring about 2 x 3 inches without proper label or date. According to the Dietary Manager, the food items were Barbeque riblets. One big clear bag of slices of bread, and several clear packages of bread slices were observed without proper labels or dates. According to the Dietary Manager, the food items were French Toast. Another large sealed meat item was observed to not be properly labeled or dated. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 (Residents #54, #64, #95, #137, #134, and #345) of 35 residents reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to test and isolate Resident #137 when she was symptomatic for Covid. 2. The facility failed to clean and disinfect Resident #95's room after he tested positive for Covid placing his roommate at risk for Covid. 3. The facility staff failed to use proper personal protective equipment when entering a positive Covid room to provide lunch to Residents #54 and # 64 These failures could place residents at risk of exposure toCovid. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 7 (Rooms 22, 24, 25, 46, 50, 51, and 61) of 25 rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to maintain total visual privacy by allowing the window blinds for rooms 22, 24, 25, 46, 50, 51, and 61 to be missing several slats. This failure placed residents at risk of a lack of privacy, feeling insecure, or uncomfortable in their rooms. Findings included: Observation on 10/24/23 from 11:12 AM - 1:45 PM of the North station revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] and 24's window blinds were broken and were missing several window blind slats, rooms 25 had a broken slat. Observation on 10/24/23 at 1:35 PM of Resident #38 revealed he was lying in bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. An attempt was made to interview resident. However, the resident would not respond to questions. Interview on 10/26/23 at 10:38 AM with LVN N revealed she was the nurse for North Station. LVN N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each employee received instruction in HIV, falls, restraints, resident rights, dementia, and ANE (abuse, neglect, and exploitation) competency-based training as part of orientation and annually, for 5 of 12 staff (MA, CNA, RN, LVN, and Hospitality Aide) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure Reference Checks and Trainings-Resident Rights, Dementia, HIV, Falls, Restraints, and ANE (Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) were completed during orientation and prior to start date. These failures could place residents at-risk for abuse and neglect due to lack of training. Findings included: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the MA W was hired on 03/14/17. Record review of the MA W's training history revealed MA W had not completed fall training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed CNA X was hired on 12/23/19. Record review of CNA X's training history revealed CNA X had not completed restraint training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to personal privacy for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for dignity. CNAs E and G failed to use the privacy curtain or close the door when Resident #26 was lying in bed with no clothes on from the waist down. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 10/24/2023, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, morbid obesity, schizophrenia, and down's syndrome. Record review of Resident #26's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/12/2023, revealed Resident #26's BIMS score was 5 , indicating a low cognitive ability. The MDS assessment revealed Resident #96 needed extensive assistance of two or more persons physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up with the State mental health authority for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #137) reviewed for preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. The facility failed to follow up with the State mental health authority after Resident #137 was found to have a mental illness after admission to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services deemed necessary by the State mental health authority. Findings included: Review of Resident #137's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke affecting her left side, depression, and high blood pressure. On 08/24/23 a diagnosis of Bipolar disorder was added. Review of Resident #137's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, and metabolic abnormalities in that they failed to ensure physician orders were followed for one resident of two residents (Resident #107) reviewed for enteral nutrition. 1. LVN S failed to check for tube placement and residual volume prior to the 9:00 AM bolus feeding as ordered by the physician. 2. LVN S failed to provide Resident #107 his 1:30 PM bolus feeding as ordered by the physician. These failures could affect all residents who receive enteral feeding and place them at risk for metabolic abnormalities, medical complications, or a decline in health due to not following appropriate procedures. Findings included: Review of Resident #107's face sheet, dated 09/28/23, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Residents #69) reviewed for oxygen. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #69 orders for oxygen administration were being accurately provided. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69 concentrator was with water. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and ineffective treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet, dated 10/26/23, revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (body is not getting the oxygen it needs), Dementia, lack of coordination, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area, for 2 of 144 residents (Resident #10 and #23) reviewed for call lights. The facility did not adequately equip Resident #10 and Resident #23 with a call light to allow residents to call for assistance. This failure could place residents who rely on the call light system to have a delayed response or no way contact staff to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #10's Face sheet, dated 10/26/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of essential hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/15/23, revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated the resident's cognition was cognitively intact. The MDS further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes the measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to implement in Resident #1's care plan about his complaints about not getting medications. The facility failed to develop interventions and goals for seizure and psychotropic medications for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life and not having their needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly secure medications in a locked compartment for 1 (East Side) of 2 nurse medication carts on the facility's South Hall. RN A left prescribed nasal spray medication on top of the unlocked and unattended East Side medication cart on the facility's South Hall, for an unknown amount of time. LVN B left the East Side medication cart on the facility's South Hall, unlocked and unattended for an unknown amount of time. These failures placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to the medication cart and consumption of harmful medications. The findings included: An observation on 8/21/2023 at 12:50 PM revealed the medication cart's lock to be in the unlocked position, on the facility's South Hall. A container of nasal spray was on top of the medication cart. The drawers on the cart were facing outward to the hall and residents were passing by. No staff were observed in the hall or near the medication cart. An observation and interview with RN A on 8/21/2023 at 12:55 PM revealed RN A coming down the hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted as required each day for four (10/24/23, 10/25/23, 10/26/23, and 10/27/23) of four days reviewed for nursing services and postings. The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 10/24/23, 10/25/23, 10/26/23, and 10/27/23. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. Findings included: Observation on 10/24/23 at 11:00 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was not posted anywhere in the facility. Observation on 10/25/23 at 8:50 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was not posted anywhere in the facility. Observation on 10/26/23 at 10:30 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was not posted anywhere in the facility. Interview on 10/26/23 at 4:35 PM with the Staffing Coordinator revealed the nursing staffing information was placed on each nurse's station.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$290,829 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $43,592 — penalty dated 2025-07-16
- $26,481 — penalty dated 2025-02-20
- $17,160 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
- $97,760 — penalty dated 2024-02-01
- $105,836 — penalty dated 2023-10-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RUBY HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2014 |
| BEAMAN, FRANK | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2014 |
| ADVANCED HCS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| LICHTSCHEIN, TEDDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| SHELBY, JACK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455606. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.