Wedgewood Nursing Home
6621 Dan Danciger Rd, Fort Worth, TX 76133 · Government - Hospital district · 122 certified beds · (817) 292-6330 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $31,778 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-31)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.5% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 34.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who received nutrition by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for enteral feeding. 1. RN G failed to contact the physician and obtain orders before using a de-clogger (a device designed to clear obstructed feeding tubes) to unclog Resident #67's g-tube (Gastrostomy tube, tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) on [DATE]. The facility had de-clogger tools onsite, even though they did not train nurses on their use, and it was not an approved method for de-clogging a g-tube. 2. The facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident 67's enteral feeding tube to be flushed with 100 ml of water every 2 hours. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on [DATE] at 8:42 AM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 9:00 AM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing services to care for residents' needs and ensure resident safety, in accordance with professional standards of practice necessary for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nursing competencies. The facility failed to ensure LVN C was competent in medication administration when LVN C failed to ensure Resident #1 was administered nitroglycerin (medication used to prevent or relieve chest pain caused by coronary artery disease by relaxing blood vessels), as ordered by the physician on 02/04/24. LVN C dispensed an entire bottle of nitroglycerin, which consisted of 25 (0.4 mg) tablets, to Resident #1 when the physician order was for 1 (0.4 mg) tablet resulting in Resident #1 being sent to the emergency room. Resident #1's initial blood pressure at the ER was 86/42. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 02/04/24 and ended on 02/05/24. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for significant medication errors. On 02/04/24, LVN C failed to ensure Resident #1 was administered nitroglycerin (medication used to prevent or relieve chest pain caused by coronary artery disease by relaxing blood vessels), as ordered by the physician. LVN C dispensed an entire bottle of nitroglycerin, which consisted of 25 (0.4 mg) tablets to Resident #1, when the physician order was for 1 (0.4 mg) tablet. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room, his initial blood pressure at the ER was 86/42. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 02/04/24 and ended on 02/05/24. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in a decline in health, hospitalization, or death. The findings included: A record review of the American…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident bedside was adequately equipped to allow all residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that would relay the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 3 of 5 residents (Resident#43, Resident#79, Resident#92) reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed on 04/21/2026 to ensure the call light system was adequately equipped, the call light string was hanging down from the wall, away from the residents. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they needed support for activities of daily living.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #43's MDs assessment dated [DATE] reflected he was a [AGE] year old male with an admission date of 12/06/2014, diagnoses included Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left dominant side (severe paralysis of one side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #22, Resident #48, Resident #57, Resident #79, Resident #87) of 18 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #22, Resident #87 had their fingernails trimmed and cleaned on 04/28/2026. Resident #48, Resident #57, Resident #79 had their fingernails trimmed on 04/28/2026. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life.1. Record Review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] as a [AGE] year-old male with admission date of 2/10/2025 to the facility. His pertinent diagnoses included: Stroke (occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked causing brain cells to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for the facility's only kitchen observed for food service safety . The facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen were appropriately covered on 04/21/2026. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. Findings included: Observation of the facility's dry storage on 04/21/2026 at 10:18 AM revealed about 3/4th Packet of tortillas left open exposed to air in a cardboard box. Observation of facility's walk-in refrigerator on 04/21/2026 at 10:22 AM revealed a cardboard box with about 5-6 heads of lettuce open to cold air. In an interview on 04/22/2026 at 1:30 PM with the Dietary Manager revealed stated that her expectation was that all food items in the kitchen be covered at all times. She stated that everyone working in the kitchen, including cooks, dietary aides, and herself, was responsible for ensuring food items were properly covered. She stated that the risk of not appropriately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 9) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 9 was assisted with eating in a dignified manner on 04/22/26, CNA I stood while feeding the resident. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, quality of care, and self-esteem. Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/11/26, reflected the Resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) (a medical emergency where blood flow to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving tissue of oxygen and causing brain cells to die), and muscles weakness. Resident#9 had a BIMS score of 00/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. His Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 (100/200 hall nurses' cart) of 5 medication nurse cart reviewed for pharmacy services in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN F removed medications in unsecure containers from the 100/200 Hall nurses' cart This failure could affect residents resulting in diminished effectiveness, and not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medications, and place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion.Observation on 04/22/26 at 1:19 PM, of Nurses' Cart Hall 100/200, with LVN F revealed the blister pack for Resident #29's Temazepam 15 mg cap (controlled medication used for pain) had 2 blisters seal broken with pills still inside the broken blisters. One of the blisters had a tape over. Interview on 04/22/26 at 1:19 PM, LVN F stated the count was done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #9) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA E performed hand hygiene, and proper use of gloves, while providing incontinent care to Resident #9 on 04/22/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for development of infection.Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/11/26, reflected the Resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscles weakness. Resident#9 had a BIMS score of 00/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed bladder continence indwelling catheter, and bowel continence frequently incontinent. Record review of Resident #9's care plan, dated 01/29/26, reflected Focus: [Resident#9] has a urinary catheter and is at risk for urinary tract infections and injury. Urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 or 2 meals (06/18/25 lunch meal) reviewed for food meeting residents' needs. The facility failed to prepare and serve pureed rice pilaf as a pudding consistency for residents who required pureed diets during the lunch meal on 06/18/25. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving meals that meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the facility's menu for 06/18/25 reflected the following: Beef Hamburger Steak (80/20), [NAME] Beans, [NAME] Pilaf- TX, Dinner Roll Buttered, Sherbet Orange. Observation and interview of the sample tray on 06/18/25 beginning at 1:07 PM with the DM revealed the test tray included pureed beef hamburger steak, pureed vegetables, pureed rice, and pureed bread. The pureed rice had chunks of rice grains in it and was not fully pureed. The DM said [NAME] A had prepared the pureed food items for the lunch meal today (06/18/25). The DM said the pureed rice should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's clinical record was complete and accurate when the resident experienced a change in condition on 02/02/25. LVN A did not accurately and completely document Resident #1's blood sugar monitoring, medication administration, and contact with the NP or EMS. These failures could place residents whose records are maintained by the facility at risk for delays and errors in their care and treatment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 1 Diabetes, (body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin), Major Depressive Disorder, End Stage Renal Disease, (kidneys can no longer function adequately to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility with more than 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one Social Worker reviewed for qualifications. The facility, licensed for more than 120 beds, had not employed a full-time, qualified Social Worker since 09/26/24. This deficient practice could result in residents' social service needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of the facility's license revealed the facility had a licensed capacity of 128 residents. Record review of the facility's Department Heads list revealed no Social Worker. Record review of the Social Worker's electronic file revealed she was hired on 03/01/24 and was terminated 09/25/24. During the confidential resident group interview 10 of the 10 residents in attendance revealed the facility had not had a social worker in months. Residents stated they were being told that the facility was actively looking for a social worker. Record review of Resident Council Meeting for the months of October 2024 revealed Social Services: Resident mentioned that we need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure full visual privacy for four (Residents #3, #46, #47, and #61) of twelve residents reviewed for privacy curtains. The facility failed to provide privacy curtains that assured each resident had full visual privacy. This failure could cause anxiety to residents during personal care. Findings included: Observation and interview on 01/14/25 at 10:10 AM revealed Resident #3 had a privacy curtain between the beds that was hanging by 4 hangers, the rest of the curtain hung down to the floor. Resident #3 stated she did not like not having privacy during incontinent care and the staff never bothered pulling that curtain. She stated anyone could walk in and see her when she was exposed. Record review of Resident #3's undated admission Record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included emphysema, dementia, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #10) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's fingernails were kept trimmed. These failures could place the residents at risk of infections or injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's undated admission Record reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myopathy (muscle weakness and involuntary muscle movement), reflux, unsteadiness on feet, and failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS Assessment, dated 12/16/24, reflected a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her Functional Abilities assessment indicated she required assistance for her personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for contracture management The facility failed to provide equipment/services for Resident #25's right hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles). This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, worsening of contractures, and a decline in physical capabilities. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). The MDS further reflected Resident #25 has memory problems. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure there was a physician order for Resident #67's tracheostomy care, suction tubing, and emergency trach kit. This failure could place residents with a tracheostomy requiring tracheostomy care at risk for respiratory distress, hospitalizations, and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's admission Record dated 01/16/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected his diagnoses included cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 or 2 meals (lunch) reviewed for food meeting residents' needs. The facility failed to prepare and serve pureed mash potatoes as a pudding consistency for residents who required pureed diets during the lunch meal on 01/15/25. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving meals that meet their needs Findings included: Record review of Week-At-A-Glance Texas 4 Week 4 menu revealed the menu for the lunch service was . Boiled Potato . Observation on 01/15/25 at 11:16 AM of the Dietary Manager pureed mashed potatoes with a hand whisk, was observed removing the potato skins and then proceeded to place it on the steam table. The Dietary Manager did not check the consistency or ensure it was all blended to have a pudding consistency. Observation of the test tray on 01/15/25 beginning at 12:55 PM with the Dietary Manager, the test tray included the regular textured menu items and the pureed menu items.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two resident (Residents #5 and #60) of five residents reviewed for infection control. MA D failed to sanitize a re-useable blood pressure cuff between uses on Resident #5 and Resident #60. This failure could place the residents at risk of exposure to infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's undated admission Record reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart failure. Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/20/24, reflected a BIMS score of 12 indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Assessment indicated he required assistance with all of his ADLs. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 4 of 5 rooms (Rooms 221, 225, 229, and 231) reviewed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to maintain Rooms 221, 225, 229, and 231 in a safe and sanitary condition. The failure placed residents at risk for infection and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 10/01/24 at 10:56 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a vent cover measuring approximately 10 inches by 10 inches on the ceiling was covered with dark debris. When looking through the vent, it appeared to have thick black dust and debris. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a silver ceiling rail hanging from the ceiling. Observation on 10/01/24 at 11:21 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a vent cover measuring approximately 10 inches by 10 inches on the ceiling over resident bed revealed the vent was completely covered with black debris identical to mold, dust and dirt. When looking through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 assistance with timely incontinence care. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth, skin breakdown, and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/01/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included stroke, hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral artery disease (disorder that causes abnormal narrowing of the arteries), hemiplegia (loss of the ability to move one entire side of the body), dementia (general decline in ability to perform everyday tasks), seizure disorder (uncontrolled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 4 (Medication Cart 1) medication carts reviewed for storage of medication. The facility failed to ensure that medications were secured inside the medication cart on 100 halls on 04/30/24. This failure could place residents at risk of overdosing and drug diversions by staff and visitors. Findings included: In an observation on 04/30/24 at 9:20 AM, the medication cart on the 100 halls was unlocked and unattended. Resident #3 was observed sitting in her wheelchair next to the unlocked medication cart, and Resident # 1 was observed independently propelling in his wheelchair a total of 3 times within 12 inches of the unlocked medication cart at 9:25 AM. The surveyor supervised the medication cart until assigned staff returned. At 9:28 AM the assigned medication person had not returned. The surveyor called for CNA L to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Care Plan was reviewed and updated quarterly, based on record reviews made on 04/30/24. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/30/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Cerebral infarction (stroke), age related nuclear cataract (age related condition affects the lens of the eye), Depression (mental state of low mood), anxiety (fearful, worrying). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and implement policies addressing resident admission to the facility for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for admissions. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with an admission packet upon admission. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not being aware of what services the facility is providing. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's facesheet printed on 03/14/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (heart attack), aphagia (difficulty speaking), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), need for assistance for personal care, and seizures. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed she was discharged from the facility on 02/05/24. Interview on 03/13/24 at 10:25 AM with Resident #1's family revealed when Resident #1 was admitted to the facility, they were not asked to fill out any type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accuracy of records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wound care was documented on the TAR for 01/13/24, 01/14/24, and 01/21/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's wound care was documented on the TAR for 01/15/24 and 01/29/24. This deficient practice could result in misinformation about professional care provided. The findings included: Resident #1 A record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 01/31/24, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old man, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnosis included unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic (long-lasting) autoimmune disease that mostly affects joints), and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reveiw, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a safe, clean, and comfortable and homelike environment for 13 of 25 rooms (Rooms #120, 121, 123, 125, 127, 130, 131, 216, 219, 220, 221, 223, and 231) reviewed for homelike environment. 1.The facility failed to ensure Rooms #120, 121, 123, 125, 127, 130, and 131 were supplied with warm water to the resident's sinks. 2. The facility failed to ensure Rooms #216, 219, 220, 221, 223, and 231 were provided with clean air vents. These failures could place the residents at risk of discomfort from not having warm water to wash their hands. Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/18/23 at 9:10 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the resident's sink hot water tap supplied lukewarm water after the water ran for 3 minutes. Observation on 12/18/23 at 9:15 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the resident's sink hot water tap had no water flow, and water was only available from the cold water tap. Observation on 12/18/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, revealed the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with new evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 2 (Residents #20 and #68) of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. 1. The facility failed to refer Resident #20 who had a diagnosis of PTSD to the local authority. 2. The facility failed to refer Resident #68 who had a positive PASRR Level I to the local authority. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving possible specialized services available to them. Findings included: Review of Resident #20's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, PTSD, mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety. Review of Resident #20's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/21/23, revealed a BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #23, #40, and #53) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The DON failed to ensure Resident #23's care plan was updated to include her use of an indwelling catheter. 2. The Treatment Nurse failed to ensure Resident #40's care plan was updated to include his wound and wound care. 3. The Treatment Nurse failed to ensure Resident #53's care plan was updated to include his wounds and wound care. These failures could place the residents at risk of deterioration of their wounds and not receiving proper care with indwelling catheters. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's undated admission Record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (stage 4), urethrocele (urethra pushed down into the vaginal canal), presence of urogenital implants (devices that support the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #75 and Resident #72) reviewed for respiratory care, in that: 1. The facility failed to date the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle when not in use for Resident #75 as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #72 orders for oxygen administration were being accurately provided. This deficient practice placed residents that received oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate care and respiratory infection. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #75's face sheet dated 12/21/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #75's active diagnoses included tracheostomy status (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests for 2 (North and South Stations) of 2 stations, 1 of 1 conference room and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for pests. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented to prevent the presence of gnats throughout the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and/or disease spread by pests. Findings included: Multiple observations between 12/18/23 at 9:15 AM and 12/20/23 at 4:00 PM revealed gnats in the North Station and South Station, Conference Room and Common Dining Rooms. Observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:04 PM revealed Resident #3 lying in her bed. Resident #3 stated she was doing well. She stated her room was cleaned almost every day; however, she had been having issues with gnats in her room. Observed about 3-4 gnats in Resident #3's room. Resident #3 stated the gnats annoyed her. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #23) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to promote Resident #23's dignity by not covering her urinary catheter collection bag with a privacy bag. This failure could place residents with catheters at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (stage 4), urethrocele (urethra pushed down into the vaginal canal), presence of urogenital implants (devices that support the urethra and bladder neck when you exert pressure) , retention of urine, calculus of kidney (kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide for the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's call light was accessible. This failure placed the resident at risk of falling, further injury, and unnecessary pain from not being able to call for help. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and 01/26/20 with diagnoses that included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, history of falls, unspecified incontinence and unspecified convulsions and seizures. Review of Resident #11's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure at the time each resident was admitted , the facilty had a physician order for the resident's immediate care for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #60) reviewed for residents receiving necessar care and services upon admission. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #23 had a current order for use of indwelling catheter after readmission to the facility. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #60 had a current order for dialysis after readmission to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care as ordered by the physician. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #23's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (Stage 4), urethrocele (urethra pushed down into the vaginal canal), presence of urogenital implants…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. Resident #36's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly for dialysis treatment when she was not receiving dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 12/21/2023 indicated Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #36 had a diagnoses of essential hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic pain, muscle wasting and atrophy and stiffness of unspecified joint. Review of Resident #36's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact. The MDS Assessment for Resident #36 revealed Special Treatment for Dialysis. Review of Resident #36's care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's pain control was maintained at a level acceptable to the resident. This failure could place the resident at risk of a decrease in quality of life due to pain. Findings included: Review of Resident #10's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, decreased mental cognition, and chronic pain related to osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/25/23, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Status indicated his mobility was via electric wheelchair, he required maximal assistance with his ADLs. Review of Resident #10's care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area, for 2 of 83 residents (Residents #45 and #65) reviewed for call lights. The facility did not adequately equip Resident #45 and Resident #65 with a call light to allow residents to call for assistance. This failure could place residents who rely on the call light system to have a delayed response or no way contact staff to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #45s Face sheet, dated 12/21/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of essential hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/15/23, revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs, for one Resident (Resident #1), of 12 residents reviewed for services and needs in that: The facility did not assist Resident #1 to get out of bed when multiple requests were made due to not having a wheelchair available for her. This failure could place all residents who are bedfast at risk of not having their needs and preferences met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: disruption of external operation surgical wound. Record review revealed Resident #1 did not have a completed admission MDS assessment. Record review revealed Resident #1 did not have a completed care plan. Record review of Resident #1's Progress Note by LVN C, dated [DATE] at 10:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for one (Resident #1) of twelve residents reviewed for admission physician orders. The facility failed to have complete and accurate admission physician order for Resident #1. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk for not receiving the appropriate care, medication, and treatment services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/23/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: disruption of external operation surgical wound. Record review of the EHR revealed Resident #1 did not have a completed admission MDS assessment. Record review of the EHR revealed Resident #1 did not have a completed care plan. Record review of Resident #1's Progress Note by LVN R, dated 10/16/23 at 9:35 PM, revealed The resident is diabetic and requires monitoring and management to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of four staff (CNA A) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's door was closed while being on isolation for COVID-19. 2. CNA A failed to don proper PPE prior to entering Resident #1's room, who was on isolation for COVID-19. 3. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene when passing out lunch trays for residents on the North Hall. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections such as COVID-19. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/08/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included Wernicke's encephalopathy (memory disorder),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Hospitality Aide D failed to transfer Resident #2 with the assistance of another staff person during a Hoyer transfer. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease, non-Alzheimers dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic pain. The MDS further reflected Resident #2 required total assistance of two or more staff. Review of Resident #2's, undated, care plan revealed the resident had a performance deficit related to cognitive impairment, functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$31,778 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-01-31
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-02-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-05 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RUBY HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.9 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALO PINTO COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2014 |
| KORKMAS, ROSS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/06/2019 |
| ADVANCED HCS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2014 |
| LICHTSCHEIN, TEDDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MEISNER, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455572. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.