Southeast Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
4302 E Southcross Blvd, San Antonio, TX 78222 · Government - Hospital district · 116 certified beds · (210) 333-1223 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,631 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.78 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 14 residents (R #57) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. The facility failed to monitor R #57 while he was on the secure unit patio. R #57 eloped from the facility between 6:45 p.m. to 7:10 p.m. on 3/29/26 and was found approximately ninety-six feet away from the facility near a busy two-lane road. This failure resulted in the identification of an IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) on 4/2/26 at 5:00 p.m. While the immediacy was removed on 4/3/26 the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to install an extension of the patio fence, complete training of PRN staff, hire an activity assistant for the secure unit, and monitor the implementation and effectiveness of its Plan of Removal. This failure could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect, in that: The facility failed to develop and implement systems to properly treat Resident #1's arterial wound to his left foot great toe from [DATE] until [DATE] which resulted in hospitalization, sepsis, gangrene, necrosis and amputation. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:31 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 11:54 a.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity of harm with a potential for more than minimal harm due to facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of psychosocial harm, infection, a decline in health, amputation and death. The findings were: Record review of a facility self-report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care in that: The facility failed to assess and treat resident #1's left foot great toe when the resident developed a wound to his LLE from [DATE] until [DATE] which resulted in a decline in health, a worsening of the wound including the toe turning black, infection, necrosis, gangrene, sepsis, hospitalization, and amputation. The facility also failed to identify and treat a wound to Resident #1's sacrum. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:31 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 11:54 a.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity of actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm due to facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal. This deficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) and for 4 of 6 licensed staff (Wound Care Nurse, RN D, LVN B and LVN II) reviewed for competent staff, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the Wound Care Nurse had completed training for a license violation and remediation and failed to ensure she was competent to perform skin assessments, wound assessments, obtain and implement physician orders and document her finding in the medical record resulting in Resident #1 becoming septic and the amputation of the resident's big toe. 2. The facility failed to ensue RN D had the competencies to identify a resident change of condition, obtain and implement physician orders for wound care, assess wounds and document her findings in the medical record resulting in Resident #1 becoming septic and the amputation of the resident's big…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's primary care provider when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility failed to notify the wound care physician and primary care provider (physician) when Resident #1's left foot great toe had a worsening of the wound and turned black. An IJ was identified on 08/18/2023 at 11:15 a.m. after review of the evidence. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/18/2023 at 11:15 a.m. While the IJ was removed on 8/19/2023 at 6:46 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm due to facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their primary care provider informed when there is a change in condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. The trash can next to the hand-washing sink had a lid that was closed and was not operated via foot petal.2. Freezer #1 contained approximately 1/4 inch of ice at the bottom and on the sides, a section of the lower part of the freezer was loose and hanging approximately 1 inch from the freezer, and water was dripping from the top of the inside of the freezer onto the food items below.3. Freezer #1 contained frozen garlic bread. The garlic bread was stored in a plastic bag which was open and was in a cardboard box which was also open. The surveyor was able to reach in the box and bag without moving either and touch the exposed food item.4. Freezer #1 contained frozen meat patties. The meat patties were stored in a plastic bag which was open and in a cardboard box which was also open. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and visitors for two resident halls (B Hall and E Hall) and the Dining Room, in that: 1. The biohazard storage room located on resident B Hall was unlocked, accessible by residents, staff, or visitors, and contained biohazard material.2. The housekeeping closet on resident E Hall was unlocked, accessible by residents, staff, or visitors, and contained potentially hazardous chemical cleaning materials.3. The maintenance closet on resident E Hall was not fitted with a door that locked, was accessible by residents, staff, or visitors, and contained a hammer, power tools, and insect spray.4. A dietary storage closet in the Dining Room was unlocked, accessible by residents, staff, or visitors, and contained approximately 25 individual cans of portable food warming mechanisms which were each labeled, harmful or fatal if swallowed.5. The activities closet on B Hall was unlocked, was accessible by residents, staff, or visitors, and contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 out of 8 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 108), reviewed for quality of life. Rooms 107 and room [ROOM NUMBER] had no toilet paper in the secure unit. This failure could affect residents that use the secure unit's commodes to suffer a decline in quality of life and experience a denial of respect and dignity.Findings were: Initial tour observation on 3/31/26 at 9:34 a.m., reflected there was no toilet paper in rooms 107 [R #17 resident in the room] and 108 [R# 57 and #64 resided in the room] in the secure unit. During an observation on 3/31/26 at 11:55 a.m. reflected the housekeeping staff placing toilet paper in residents' bathrooms in the secure unit. During an interview at 11:52 a.m., the Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for one of three residents (Resident #18) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure LVN F locked the computer, which exposed Resident #18's morning medication list after he walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet, dated 4/1/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 had diagnosis that included: Dementia (is a syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities), Osteoarthritis (is a chronic, degenerative joint disease that causes cartilage breakdown, leading to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents, staff, and visitors for one resident halls (B Hall), in that: The resident shower room at the front of B Hall contained soiled towels in on the floor. This deficient practice could result in residents living within, staff working within, and the public visiting within an environment that is not safe, clean, and/or homelike. The findings were: Observation on 03/31/2026 at 10:57 a.m. revealed the resident shower room at the front of B Hall contained soiled towels in the floor. During an interview with Medication Aide I on 03/31/2026 at 10:57 a.m., Medication Aide I confirmed the resident shower room at the front of B Hall contained soiled towels in the floor. Record review of the facility policy, Homelike Environment, dated 04/24/2025, revealed, A homelike environment is essential for promoting the comfort, dignity and quality of life of residents.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility failed to return Resident #1's identification card, social security card and debit card upon request. This deficient practice could contribute to residents believing staff do not care about their wishes. The findings were:Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/6/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Major Depressive Disorder (Clinical depression causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that you used to enjoy) and Hemiplegia (paralysis) unspecified affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances. LVN B failed to follow the grievance process when Resident #1 reported a concern against staff. This deficient practice could result in the resident's concerns not being resolved and to the continuation of poor resident care. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/6/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Major Depressive Disorder (Clinical depression causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that you used to enjoy) and Hemiplegia (paralysis) unspecified affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 10/10/25, revealed her BIMS score was 15 out of 15 reflective of no cognitive impairment, she required substantial to maximum assistance with ADL's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health, the facility must: (i) Provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition(s) for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to ensure they referred Resident #1 for podiatry care. Resident #1's toenails were long and her right great toenail had discoloration. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to a decline in the resident's health status. The findings were:Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/6/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Hypertensive Heart Disease (a number of complications of high blood pressure that affect the heart.) and Enterocolitis (inflammation of both the small intestine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the menu for 1 of 2 days of observation (1/6/26) for the lunch meal service. Dietary Staff failed to follow the lunch menu on 1/6/26 which included fried chicken, spinach, mashed potatoes, sugar cookies and buttered dinner roll. This deficient practice could contribute to resident dissatisfaction. The findings were: Review of the monthly calendar, week at a glance revealed the lunch menu for Tuesday, 1/6/26 included fried chicken, spinach, mashed potatoes, sugar cookies, buttered dinner roll. Observation on 1/6/25 at 12:07 PM of the written menu posted outside the dining room read: Lunch: fried chicken, spinach, mashed potatoes, sugar cookies and buttered dinner roll. Observation on 1/6/26 at 12:10 PM revealed some residents were served gravy with their mashed potatoes, some were served egg noodles, but not all. Further observation revealed and interviews with Resident #2 and Resident #3 revealed Resident #3was served gravy with the mashed potatoes and Resident #2 was not served gravy. Resident #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets prescribed by the attending physician to 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #2) whose records were reviewed for therapeutic menus. Dietary staff failed to serve Resident #2 a renal diet according prescribed by her primary care physician. This deficient practice could result in a decline in the resident's health status. The findings were: Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/26/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Diabetes (refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose). Further review revealed Resident #2's BIMS score was 13 of 15 reflective she had minimal cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan revised on 4/1/25 read Nutritional Status: Resident is on a CCHO Renal diet, Regular texture, THIN LIQUIDSconsistency. One of the goals was to Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q meal. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dietary requirements. The DM did not have the appropriate certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This deficient practice could place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. The findings included: During an interview on 02/09/2025 at 10:50 AM, the DM stated he was not a certified dietary manager or certified food service manager, he did not have an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, and he had not been a dietary manager in a long-term care facility for over two years. This was his first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to store plastic bowls to allow for air-drying in the dish room. 2. The facility failed to use the correct log to record the dish machine wash cycle temperatures and chlorine sanitizer concentrations, resulting in no record of chlorine sanitizer concentrations recorded. 3. The facility failed to properly store an opened package of cream cheese and pre-packaged hard-boiled eggs in the reach-in cooler. 4. The facility failed to discard hard-boiled eggs past their use-by date. 5. The facility failed to ensure the tabletop can opener blade and base were free of grime and debris. 6. The facility failed to ensure an opened bag of powdered sugar was properly sealed in the dry storage room. 7. The facility failed to remove a dented #10 can of beans from the rack of canned goods in the dry storage room. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #10 and #14 ) reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, in that: 1. The bed-side dresser of Resident #10 was broken with drawers that would not stay closed. 2. Resident #14's bathroom did not have any toilet paper, and her waste basket was filled with used paper towels that she stated she had been using because she had no toilet paper. This failure could result in psychosocial harm due to diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 2/12/25, revealed the [AGE] year female resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Parkinson's disease ( a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movements), type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 2 of 6 resident hallways (Hallway A and Hallway F) reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms #104 and #107, located on hallway A, had back lids covers for the toilet bowl and room [ROOM NUMBER], also located on hallway A, did not have a 2 foot strip of floor baseboard molding attached to the wall. 2. The facility failed to ensure the bottom half of the bathroom door in room [ROOM NUMBER], on hallway F, was repaired and did not have numerous horizontal linear scrapes and a jagged opening near the door hinge where the outer cover of the door was partially missing, and failed to ensure the wall opposite the toilet inside the bathroom did not have numerous scrapes and small holes in the wall. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #175) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #175's signature on his Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH DNR) was properly witnessed as Resident #175's signature was dated [DATE], and the two witness's signatures were dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed against their wishes. The findings included: Record review of Resident #175's admission record, dated [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man who had an initial admission dated of [DATE] with re-admission on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 5 (the most advanced stage of chronic kidney disease and indicates the kidneys are no longer able to perform their essential function), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #42) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to include oxygen treatment in Resident #42's comprehensive care plan initiated 02/10/2022. This deficient practice could affect residents who received oxygen and could result in residents receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and could result in a decline in health. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #42's admission record dated 02/09/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man initially admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #42) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were stored properly and that the humidifier bottle or tubing were dated on 02/09/2025 and 02/11/2025 This failure could affect residents on respiratory therapy by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's admission record dated 02/09/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer); and dementia (a general term to describe loss of memory, thinking, language and ability to perform daily activities). Record review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical eservices (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. Inspection on 02/11/2025 of the facility medication storage room revealed two expired vials Lorazepam 2mg/ml for Resident #50. This failure could place resident at risk of residents not receiving appropriate therapeutic effects from their medications. The findings include: Record review of Resident #50's admission record dated 01/12/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man initially admitted on [DATE] with re-admit on 09/12/2024 and with diagnoses which included: Dementia (a condition that causes memory loss and other cognitive decline); Epilepsy (seizure disorder); and Anxiety Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry anxiety, or fear strong enough to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with correctly accepted professional principles reviewed for 1 of 4 medication carts (E-Hall Nurse's medication cart) reviewed for secure storage. The facility failed on 02/11/2025 to ensure LVN G secured Resident #'13's Fiasp Insulin (a synthetic form of rapid-acting insulin used to treat diabetes mellitus), when it was left unattended on top of the Nurse's medication cart when LVN G entered Resident #13's room and the medication cart remained outside the room out of line of sight from LVN G. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion or misuse of medications. Findings include: Observation on 02/11/2025 at 11:44 a.m. revealed LVN G removed from the medication cart all the supplies she would need to do an accu-check on Resident #13, and also removed Resident 13's Flex Touch pen of FIASP insulin, placing it on top of the medication cart. LVN G then gathered up the accu-check supplies, entered Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed a to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The facility failed to ensure the sliding doors on both sides of the dumpster were completely closed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: Observation on 02/11/2025 at 12:13 PM revealed the sliding doors on both sides of the facility's dumpster were completely open, exposing bags of refuse reaching approximately halfway up the inside of the dumpster. During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 12:14 PM, the Regional DM stated the doors on the sides of Dumpster #1 were both open and should not have been. It was important for the doors to be completely shut to prevent pests from entering the dumpsters and potentially spreading foodborne illness. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator and DON stated the facility had a resident with a behavior of frequently opening the dumpster doors when they were shut, as he believed this made the staff's job easier.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for infection prevention. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and used when LVN B provided Enteral feeding via a G-tube (a gastrostomy tube - a flexible tube inserted through abdominal wall and into stomach to provide a direct route for delivering food and medications) to Resident #43. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for spread of infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #43's admission record dated 02/10/2025 revealed a [AGE] year old man, with an initial admission date of 12/30/2022 and re-admit on 12/17/2024. Resdient #42 had diagnoses which included: Cerebral Palsy (a congenital disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one (Resident #14) of 8 residents reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's call light system was working properly. This failure could place resident at risk for delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 02/09/2025 revealed she was a [AGE] year old woman originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with re-admit on 08/24/2020 and with diagnoses which included: Conversion Disorder with Seizures (a psychiatric condition where psychological stressors manifest as physical symptoms that can't be explained medically); Dementia (general term for impairment of brain function such as memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 89 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, in that: In Resident #38's room, the cord for the window blinds was broken and cold air was entering the room via the window. This deficient practice could result in a loss of quality of life due to living in an uncomfortable home environment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 01/12/2024, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Major Depressive Disorder, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Unspecified Dementia. Record review of Resident #38's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #38's care plan, revised 09/10/2020, revealed, Visual Function (Impaired): [Resident #38] has impaired vision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 6 resident halls (F Hall) reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: 1. The shower room on the F Hall was unlocked and accessible to residents and had insulation in the floor from a hole in the ceiling. 2. A pipe emanating from the wall to the right of the kitchen's back door was leaking and resulted in standing water outside the back door of the kitchen. These deficient practices could lead to accidents and/or injury. The findings were: 1. Observation on 01/09/2024 at 2:10 p.m. revealed the shower room on F Hall was unlocked and accessible to residents. Further observation revealed there was a hole in the ceiling and insulation in the floor. During an interview with CNA V on 01/09/2024 at 2:20 p.m., CNA V stated the shower room was not currently in use due to repair work in progress. CNA V confirmed the presence of insulation on the floor and confirmed the door was unlocked, leaving the material accessible to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. The ice machine cover was loose and was soiled on the outside. 2. The air fryer was soiled with crumbs inside the machine and contained oil which was dark in color and soiled with crumbs. 3. A staff member's personal jacket was hanging on the corner of a food storage rack in the pantry. 4. The freezer to the right of the door inside the pantry held two cases of frozen hamburger patties which were open, leaving the patties exposed to contaminants and frost. 5. The freezer to the left of the door inside the pantry help a case of frozen cookies and a case of missed vegetables which were open, leaving the patties exposed to contaminants and frost. 6. The drink machine had a sticky residue on the outside. The front sections and handles of each door of both freezers inside the pantry and the large refrigerator inside the kitchen were soiled with sticky residue. 7.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 facility, reviewed for infection control in that: Staff of multiple disciplines were not utilizing appropriate PPE over multiple days and various shifts while the facility was experiencing a COVID outbreak. These failures placed all residents at risk for the spread of infection through cross-contamination of pathogens and illness which could result in a decline in health and well-being or even death. Findings included: Record review of COVID Positive Residents, dated 1/09/2024 provided by the DON, revealed 17 residents and 8 staff as COVID positive. In an observation on 1/09/2024 between 12:12 PM and 12:23 PM, CNA VV exited COVID positive room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA VV did not change PPE gown, gloves or N95 mask and CNA VV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for call light (Residents #13 and #19) reviewed for reasonable accommodations, in that: 1. Resident #13's call light was on the floor of the resident's room and not within the resident's reach on 01/10/2024. 2. Resident #19's call light was on the floor on the resident's room and not within the resident's reach on 01/10/2024. This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 01/10/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Peripheral Vascular Disease] a disorder of narrowed peripheral blood vessels resulting from a buildup of plaque, [Muscle atrophy] is the wasting or thinning of muscle mass, and [Muscle weakness] occurs when total effort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: Resident #40's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOHDNR) was not dated by the resident and the physician at the time it was signed, and did not have the resident's name printed, rendering the document invalid. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings include: Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with a recent admission of [DATE] and diagnoses which included: atherosclerotic heart disease (narrowing or hardening of coronary arteries), tachycardia (heart rate that exceeds the normal resting rate), dysphasia with oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD, systemic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #93) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that: Resident #93's PASRR Level 1 assessment did not accurately capture the resident's diagnosis of mental illness. These failures could place residents with an inaccurate PASRR Level 1 Evaluation at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #93's Face Sheet dated 1/10/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: [bipolar disorder] disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs,[Post-traumatic stress disorder] mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety and [Periodontal disease] condition that's the result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: Resident #66's care plan did not address the resident's psychological care and wound care being provided by the facility with goals or interventions. This deficient practice could result in a loss of quality of life due to residents receiving improper care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 01/12/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Senile Degeneration of Brain, Dementia, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 06, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident #66's care plan, revised 10/24/2023, revealed a problem, Resident has a behavior problem as evidenced by self-inflicted wounds on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) for care plan revisions, in that: Resident #8's care plan was not revised to reflect the resident's change to DNR status after [DATE]; the resident's care plan still indicated the resident was Full Code. This failure could place residents at risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with a recent admission of [DATE] and diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Further review of Resident #8's face sheet, revealed under the section, ADVANCE DIRECTIVE: DNR: Do Not Resuscitate Order in Place. Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for ADLs, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 received or documented baths or showers between 12/21/2023 and 1/12/2024. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #37 was a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #37's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/09/2023, revealed primary medical condition category for admission was coded as medically complex conditions related to diabetes mellitus [a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time]. Further review revealed the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinent bladder residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #28 and #57) reviewed for indwelling catheters and perineal/incontinent care, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 indwelling catheter was attached to prevent pulling or tugging to the urethra. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57 foreskin was pulled back during perineal care. These failures could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma (injury to the duct in which urine is transported out of the body from the bladder), and urinary tract infections due to improper care. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident # 28's face sheet, dated 01/11/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Hypospadias] birth defect in boys in which the opening of the urethra…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #85 was administered Cinacalcet [used to treat increased amounts of a certain hormone in people with long-term kidney disease who are on dialysis] as ordered 14 times between 08/21/2023 and 09/06/2023. This deficient practice could place all residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of medications as their ordered by their physician resulting in diminished health and well-being. The findings were: Record review of Resident #85's admission record, dated 01/12/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #85's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/27/2023, revealed the resident was admitted for medically complex conditions with other active diagnoses that included: renal insufficiency,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 28%, based on 7 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved (Resident #37) and 1 of 2 staff (LVN C ) reviewed for medication administration, in that: LVN C failed administered medications to Resident #37 on 01/18/24 according to the physician's orders and per professional standards, which resulted in a 28% medication administration error rate. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings are: Record Review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 01/11/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/21/23 with a diagnosis that included: [Hypertension] when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high, [Dysphagia] is a medical term for difficulty swallowing, and [Atrial fibrillation] is an irregular and often very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart for Halls B & E) reviewed for medication storage, in that; The Medication Cart for Halls B & E Cart was not locked when it was left unattended in the common area of the 100 hallway. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings were: Observation on 01/10/2024 at 6:31 AM, LVN I was preparing insulin administration and LVN I parked the Medication B & E Cart in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Further observation revealed LVN I left the Medication B & E Cart unlocked and unattended in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] to obtain a blood glucose reading from a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. LVN I returned to the cart, documented the reading, reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed, in that: There were a number of varied pieces of furniture and large durable medical equipment were haphazardly stacked near the portable storage units in the facility's back parking lot. This failure could lead to loss of quality of life due to and environment fostering the presence of insects and/or rodents. The findings were: Observation on 01/12/2024 at 11:00 a.m. revealed there were four wheelchairs, one bedframe, three overbed tables, one dresser, all in various states of disrepair, and assorted other refuse stacked near the portable storage units in the facility's back parking lot. During an interview with the Dietary Manager and Floor Technician W on 01/12/2024 at 11:04 a.m., the Dietary Manafer and Floor Technician W stated the assorted broken items had been in the back parking lot for, about a week. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 2/20/2021, revealed, 8. Safe Environment. The resident has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: 1. Resident #78's allergies were documented incorrectly to include acetaminophen [an over-the-counter medication to alleviate pain or fever]. 2. Resident #78's bathing assistance was listed as extensive assistance when he was independent or set up assistance. These deficient practices could affect place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care through inaccurate documentation possibly resulting in deterioration in condition, exacerbation of disease process, undermedication, or a delay in assessments and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #78's admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE], and under the heading, Other Information, the resident's allergies were listed as acetaminophen, and propoxyphene [one of the active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week for 5 days out of 30 (11/5/23, 11/12/23, 11/23/23, 11/25/23, and 11/26/23) reviewed for nursing services, in that: The facility did not utilize the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week on 11/5/23, 11/12/23, 11/23/23, 11/25/23, and 11/26/23. This deficient practice could place all residents at risk of not receiving adequate care. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Daily Staffing Posting revealed the following: 11/05/23 - 1 RN Manager for the 6 am - 6 pm shift and 0 RNs for the 6 am - 6 pm shift 11/12/23 - 0 RN Managers for the day and 0 RNs for the day 11/23/23 - 2 RN Managers for the day and 0 RNs for the day 11/25/23 - 0 RN Managers for the day and 0 RNs for the day 11/26/23 - 0 RN Managers for the day and 0 RNs for the day Record review of the facility's Daily Punches revealed the following: 11/05/23 - No RN punches for the day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 of 4 Residents (Residents #5, #3, #4, and #6) reviewed for residents rights, in that: 1. Resident #5 was not served his lunch meal while other residents including his table mate ate and finished his meal. 2. Residents #3 and #4 received their trays after most of the tables in the dining room had received their trays and were already eating for a few minutes. 3. Resident #6 was not provided with a sack lunch before leaving the facility for a dialysis appointment. These deficient practices could affect residents self-esteem and feelings of dignity. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, 10/13/23, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dementia in Other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Resident #1's care plan failed to address that the resident was exit seeking and a wander risk. These deficient practices could affect residents with comprehensive care plans and could result in missed or delayed continuity of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/12/2023 revealed Resident #1 had an initial admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive order, cognitive communication deficit, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (recurrent irritable or angry mood and severe temper outbursts that interfere with their ability to function at home, in school, or with their friends), vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: LVN A and LVN B did not document the administration of Invega Sustenna to Resident #1 for April, May, and June 2023. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/15/17, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Unspecified dementia [loss of cognitive functioning], other schizophrenia [disorder affecting the ability to think, feel and behave clearly], major depressive disorder (severe, with psychotic symptoms) [disorder that causes persistent depressed mood], anxiety disorder [disorder that causes feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #5 and #6) reviewed for privacy, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #6 had a privacy curtain between the two beds in a shared bedroom. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident 5's face sheet dated 8/03/2023 revealed an admission date of 4/18/2023 with diagnoses which included: chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease and major depressive disorder recurrent, mild. Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMs of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 8/03/2023 revealed an admission date of 6/11/2021 with a readmission date of 6/18/2021 with diagnoses which included: unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies that prevent abuse for 5 of 12 Residents (residents #7, #8, #9, #10, #12) reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility administration failed to immediately remove staff who were accused of by residents of verbal abuse, from working in the facility with residents. These failures could place residents at risk by leaving suspected abusers in contact with facility residents. The findings included: Record review of facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 10/24/2022 revealed: It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Definition of verbal abuse, means that use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect were reported not later than 2 hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or neglect with serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency immediately or no later than 2 hours after staff discovered Resident #1's left foot great toe bandage had not been changed and wound care orders were not implemented and resulted in Resident #1 requiring hospitalization and treatment for sepsis and amputation. This failure could place the residents at risk of abuse and neglect allegations being uninvestigated. The findings included: Record review of TULIP revealed the facility self-reported an allegation of neglect to Resident #1 on [DATE] at 4:51 p.m. Record review of Resident #1 face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) for care plan revisions, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Care Plan was revised to include wounds and wound care to his left foot great toe. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care according to their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 face sheet dated 7/25/23 revealed an admission date of 3/21/2022 with readmission date of 9/18/2022 with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, protein-calorie malnutrition (undernutrition), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIM's score of 8 which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment was coded for no ulcers, wounds, or skin problems. Record review of a Doctor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for complete and accurate medical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments, wound assessments, physician orders were entered into Resident #1's permanent medical record. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 face sheet dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of [DATE] with readmission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, protein-calorie malnutrition (undernutrition), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes with interventions to include: inspect feet during bathing and as needed for open areas, sores, pressure areas, blisters, edema and redness and report to the nurse. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,631 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,631 — penalty dated 2026-04-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RUBY HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.9 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/29/2024 |
| MESQUITE HC SNF LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2024 |
| SOUTHEAST HC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2024 |
| BEASLEY, GENETTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/29/2024 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/29/2024 |
| ELLENBOGEN, MOSS | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| 434 PAZA DRIVE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| AYSAN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| BRASS TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| CAPE HOME HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| GOLD TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| RED BRASS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| SILVER TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| PRASAD, JYOTSNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $235K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675883. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.