August Healthcare At Iliff

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

21.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 105.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.77 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-03-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that a Resident who received a indwelling (Foley) catheter after admission, was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible for 1 Resident (#'s 21) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. This is harm. The findings included: 1. For Resident #21, the facility staff failed reassess the need of an indwelling (Foley) catheter after Resident #21 had one episode of urinary retention. The resident experienced Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) that required antibiotics. This is harm. On 3/21/23 at 9:25 AM Resident #21 was observed in her bed with eyes closed resting, the Resident had a Foley with a dignity bag cover in place. On 3/22/23 a review of the clinical record revealed the following: 12/28/2022 -4:46 PM-Nursing Progress Note Text: Charge nurse observed patient not voiding throughout this shift. Assessment done. Denied pain, abdomen soft, non-distended. I/O done, collected 550 cc clear urine. MD notified. Gave an order to insert 16F Foley catheter. RP [name…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address skin impairment for one resident (Resident #2) in a survey sample of four residents. The findings included;For Resident #2, the staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to identify and address a skin impairment that was present upon admission. Resident #2 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included but were not limited to; Post infectious Viral encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, acute cerebral edema, intracranial space occupying lesion, persistent vegetative state, ventilator dependence, and an unstageable coccyx (later called sacrum by staff) pressure sore. Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) documented the Resident as completely dependent on 1-2 staff members for all Activities of Daily Living care. The Resident was incontinent of bowel and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to treat a pressure sore for one Resident (Resident #2) of the four (4) residents in the survey sample. The findings included;For Resident #2, the staff failed to provide a baseline treatment for what would reveal itself to be an unstageable sacral pressure sore from 12-30-24 through 1-3-25 (5 days). Resident #2 was originally admitted on [DATE]. The Resident was discharged to the hospital on 1-14-25 and did not return. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included but were not limited to; Post infectious acute Viral encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, acute cerebral edema, intracranial space occupying lesion, persistent vegetative state, ventilator dependence, and an unstageable coccyx (later called sacrum by staff) pressure sore. Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) documented the Resident as completely dependent on 1-2 staff members for all Activities of Daily Living care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the professional standards of quality regarding medication administration for one resident (Resident # 2) in survey sample of 6 residents.Findings included:Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Parkinson's Disease, Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Chronic Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension. Resident # 2 was discharged from the facility on 4/20/2025.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was an admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/21/2025. The MDS coded Resident # 2 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 13 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The assessment also coded Resident # 2 as requiring assistance of one to two staff persons with ADLs (activities of daily living.)Review of the closed electronic clinical record was conducted on 2/3/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 Resident (Residents # 2 ) in a survey of 6 residents. Findings included:Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Parkinson's Disease, Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter, Chronic Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension. Resident # 2 was discharged from the facility on 4/20/2025.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was an admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/21/2025. The MDS coded Resident # 2 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 13 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The assessment also coded Resident # 2 as requiring assistance of one to two staff persons with ADLs (activities of daily living.)Review of the closed electronic clinical record was conducted on 2/3/2026 - 2/5/2026.Review of the Nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and safe environment for all of the Resident room floors and common hallway located on the entrance hall of the facility. The findings included: On 8-15-23 at 11:00 a.m., Initial tour of the facility was conducted. Beginning at room [ROOM NUMBER], surveyors found crusted food debris, what appeared to be cracker or cookie crumbs, a pink gelatinous substance, tan droplets, and wet patches lining the entire hallway of Resident's rooms with no wet floor signs deployed. The hallway floor was sticky under foot, and in the individual resident rooms the floors were slick and slippery with a greasy substance which caused the surveyor to slip twice. House keeping carts were noted in the hallway with staff attending them, however, staff were in conversation with each other at the carts, and not engaged in employing the equipment for the purpose of cleaning. Bathrooms were observed to be dirty. Toilets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide fresh drinking water for two residents (Resident #3, and #4) in a survey sample of 4 residents. For Resident #3, and #4, there was no fresh drinking water in the room from 11:00 a.m., until 3:00 p.m. The findings included: On 8-15-23 during initial tour of the facility, the Resident #3's room was observed, and an attempt to interview the Resident was conducted. The Resident had garbled speech but did shake his head to signify yes and no to questioning. The Resident was not able to ask for water. There was no fresh drinking water in the room for the Resident, and when asked if he was thirsty he signified yes by nodding his head. The room and Resident were observed again at 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m., 2:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m., no fresh drinking water was in the room at any of those times. The Resident's clinical record was reviewed and indicated a swallowing evaluation was conducted by Speech Therapy on 7-25-23, and denoted that the Resident would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity when they failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 14) of 35 sampled residents did not have a thick growth of chin hair and one (R160) of 35 sampled residents' urinary bag was covered. Findings include: 1. An observation on 03/21/23 at 1:00 PM, revealed R14 had a thick growth of hair on her chin. Another observation on 03/22/23 at 1:05 PM, revealed R14 still had a thick growth of facial hair. Review of R14's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R14 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to: dementia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis affecting the right side. Review of R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 indicating R14 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R14 required extensive assistance with dressing and toileting. During an interview on 03/22/23 at 1:07 PM, Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, for 1 Resident (#32) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #32, the facility staff failed accommodate 1) an electrical outlet or a power strip available on the right side and 2) family pictures where the Resident could view them. On 3/21/23 at approximately 10:00 AM, Resident #32 was observed sitting upright in her bed watching TV. Resident #32 stated that due to physical limitations of her condition she needed to have the electrical outlet or a power strip available on the right side so that she could charge her phone. Resident #32 also stated that the facility put her family pictures up where there were already hooks in the wall; however it was not located where she could view them. When asked if she had asked the facility for assistance with these issues, she stated that she had told them a few weeks ago but had heard nothing about it. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provided services that meet professional standards care for 1 Resident (#21) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #21 the facility staff failed to follow physician orders after a Foley catheter was ordered for 1 week and a voiding trial was to be started the following week. On 3/21/23 at 9:25 AM Resident #21 was observed in her bed with eyes closed resting, the Resident had a Foley catheter with a dignity bag cover in place. On 3/22/23, a review of the clinical record revealed the following: 12/29/22 - 9:00 AM - MD/NP/PA -Progress Note - #Urinary retention: 12/28 resident with urinary retention and Foley inserted. She denies any urinary burning, difficulty urinating, bladder pressure, fever. Stated never had a UTI in the past. Foley draining clear yellow urine. - send urine for U/A & C&S, verbal orders given to nurse. -voiding trial next week. 3/9/23 10:45 AM -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that the Residents have an environment free from accident hazards to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 Resident (#20) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #20 the facility staff failed to identify potential hazard and implement interventions to reduce hazard and monitoring for proper functioning and effectiveness the wander guard bracelet. On 3/21/23 Resident #20 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room reading his bible. Attempts to converse with the Resident were unsuccessful in as resident does not speak English and has a diagnosis of dementia. A review of the clinical record revealed an order for checking the placement and function of wander guard every night. Excerpts from the care plan are as follows: INTERVENTIONS Check function of safety device as ordered by physician Reorient/validate and redirect as needed the resident needs activities that minimize the potential to wander while providing diversion and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUGUST HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA