Vierra Falls Church
2100 Powhatan Street, Falls Church, VA 22043 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (703) 538-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.9% | 14.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.7% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.1% | 15.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.2% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.9% | 14.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.0% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.03 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 422 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 282 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.1%CMS range 52.4–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.1–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.8–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 150.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure equipment used in the kitchen was clean when not in use; failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen's dry food storage, walk-in freezer, and refrigerator in the cooking area were dated with opened date and not expired; failed to ensure temperature of foods added to the steam table were checked before serving; and failed to ensure staff did not touch food and plate surfaces with their (gloved) hands while they were placing food on plates. These failures had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illness and infection for 138 residents. Findings include: 1. During the initial inspection of the facility's kitchen on 04/20/26 at 8:30 AM an accumulation of a dark substance was observed on the inside of the can opener device. In a concurrent interview with [NAME] 1, she observed the can opener device and when asked if it was dirty and needed to be cleaned, she said, Yes. During the initial inspection of the kitchen's refrigerator on 04/20/26 at 8:35 AM in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the trash dumpsters were not overfilled and were covered for three of three dumpsters and failed to ensure dumpsters had drain plugs for two of three dumpsters. These failures had the potential to attract rodents and insects and affect all residents in the facility.Findings include:During the initial kitchen inspection on 04/20/26 at 9:15 AM, three trash dumpsters outside the back door of the kitchen were observed with lids open and trash piled higher than the top of the dumpster. Two of the dumpsters did not have drain plugs, creating an opening at the bottom edges for rodents and insects to enter. During an interview with Dietary Aide (DA)1 on 04/20/26 at 9:15 AM, he observed all three dumpsters had open lids and trash piled higher than the top of the dumpsters and two of them did not have drain plugs. DA1 stated, I didn't know. During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 04/22/26 at 12:32 PM, she observed the dumpsters and all three of them had open lids, and two of the three did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a contracted wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) 2 recognized a change in wound status for one of one resident (R162) whose wound had exposed spinal hardware and possible infection in the sample of 31 residents. NP2 failed to ensure timely identification and escalation of a change in a resident's surgical wound. NP2 did not recognize or act upon a documented change in the wound, which contributed to a delay in further assessments and treatment. As a result, the resident experienced a delay in care, required transfer to the hospital for further evaluation, and was initiated on antibiotic therapy. Findings include:Review of R162's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 04/02/25 with a diagnosis of an unstable burst fracture of the first lumbar vertebra. Review of R162's EMR admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to offer advanced directive information for one of five residents (Resident (R)13) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 31. The failure to discuss advanced directive information with the residents and resident representatives could potentially affect their ability to make informed decisions about their care. Findings include:Review of R13's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record under the Profile tab identified that R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 06/30/25 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15 indicated R13's cognition was significantly impaired. Review of R13's undated SOCIAL SERVICES HISTORY & INITIAL ASSESSMENT indicated, Titled Advanced Care Planning.Does the patient have Advanced Directive.the answer was No.If No, was information about advanced directives offered.information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 9) and their resident representative (RR) reviewed for emergency hospital transfer out of a survey sample of 31 residents, was provided with a written transfer/discharge notice which contained the appeal process. This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their RR by not having the knowledge of how to appeal the transfer, if desired, and had the potential to contribute to the possible denial of re-admission and loss of the resident's home following hospitalization for the resident transferred to the hospital. Findings include:Review of R9's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 03/27/26. Review of R9's EMR admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/26 indicated a 'Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 which revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R9's EMR SBAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include comfort care for one of 31 sample residents (Resident (R) 110) reviewed for care plans. The failure had the potential to affect the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs not met causing an adverse reaction related to unnecessary cares given. Findings include: Review of R110's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/20/25 and located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) unable to perform which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypertensive heart disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage four, and palliative care. Review of R110's EMR comprehensive care plan located under the Care Plan tab with an initiated date of 03/14/25 did not include comfort care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, document review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided for two (Resident (R)22 and (R)161 of two residents reviewed in the sample of 31 residents. Specifically, R22 and R161's records lacked documentation of showers being provided according to the facility's shower schedule.Findings included1. During an interview on 04/20/26 11:24 AM, family member (FM) 1stated that resident is supposed to get two showers a week but last week the second week of his stay he did not get one shower. She said his shower days are on Monday and Thursdays in the morning. She said now it is Monday again and she will see if he gets one today. During an interview on 04/21/26 at 10:30 AM, R22 and FM1 stated that yesterday (Monday) no one came and asked him about a shower or if he wanted to have a shower. So, he missed his third shower in a row. FM1 stated that R22 may be going home on Thursday and maybe he could have a shower before he went home. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy to obtain the admission weight and then weekly weights for additional four weeks for one resident (Resident (R) 4) out of seven residents reviewed for nutrition out of a sample of 31. In addition, R4's weight was not obtained after the admission weight and prior to Registered Dietitian (RD)1 assessment of R4's nutritional needs in regard to the enteral tube feeding. The failure to obtain an initial baseline weights for residents could cause the facility to not accurately determine weight loss or gain during the resident's stay. Findings include:Review of R4's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, often caused by neurological disorders, Parkinson's, diabetes, and pneumonia. Review of R4's EMR titled Weights located under the Wts. (Weights) & Vitals tab failed to contain evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's policy and the manufacturer's service manual for the oxygen (O2) concentrators, the facility failed to ensure O2 concentrators were maintained in accordance with manufacturers' specifications for two of two residents (Resident (R) 38 and R87) reviewed for oxygen use. This failure had the potential to contribute to increased shortness of breath and respiratory infections for R38 and R87. Findings include: On 04/20/2026 at 10:32 AM, R38 was observed in his room receiving oxygen via nasal canula Observation of the O2 concentrator in R38's room revealed a build-up of grey debris on the external surface of the filter. On 04/20/26 at 10:50 AM, R87 was observed lying in bed in her room and the O2 concentrator had a solid layer of grey debris across the entire external surface of the filter. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 on 04/20/26 at 12:12 PM, he observed the O2 concentrator filters in R38's room and in R87's room and confirmed there was a build-up of grey debris on the filters and there should not be. When asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the provider responded to the consulting pharmacist's recommendation in a timely manner for one of five residents (Resident (R)11 reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 31. The failure to provide evidence of the physician's rationale for continued use of the medications at the current doses had the potential to result in unnecessary medication use.Findings include:Review of R11's undated admission record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed admission date of 08/11/25 with diagnosis und the Diagnosis tab of schizophrenia unspecified. Review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 04/05/26 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R11's cognition was intact. The MDS indicated no behavioral symptoms, no physical behavioral issues towards others, no verbal behaviors towards others, and no behavioral symptoms towards himself. Review of R11's EMR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical documentation was entered into the resident's medical records for one of one resident (Resident (R)162) in the sample of 31 residents. Specifically, pictures of R162's wound were not posted in the resident's record (EMR). This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care for R162 and to assist with the resident's treatment plan.Findings include: Review of 162's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 04/02/25 with a diagnosis of an unstable burst fracture of the first lumbar vertebra. Review of R162's EMR titled admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/08/25, located under the MDS tab indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated that the resident had an impairment on one side of her upper body but no impairment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, document review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer two of five residents (Residents (R) 25 and R51) reviewed for flu/pneumonia vaccinations and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the residents to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for residents to contract pneumonia.Findings include:1. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Patient Vaccination View/Audit indicated R25 was overdue on receiving the pneumococcal vaccine as of 01/25/2000. Review of R25's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 03/23/23. Review of R25's EMR titled quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/03/26 located under the MDS tab indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15 which revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to administer the physician prescribed dose of the IV (intravenous) medication Acyclovir (1). Instead, the facility staff administered ten times the prescribed dose. R1 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Acyclovir injection is used to treat herpes simplex (a herpes virus infection of the skin and mucus membranes), herpes zoster (shingles; a rash that can occur in people who have had chickenpox in the past), and herpes simplex encephalitis (brain infection with swelling caused by the herpes virus). This information was obtained from the website: https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a681036.html. A review of R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] that documented, Acyclovir Sodium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The findings include: For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (a gown) while administering IV (intravenous) medication to the resident. A review of R3's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 5/15/24 for enhanced barrier precautions for the resident's PICC (1) line on the left upper arm, and a physician's order dated 5/15/24 for Unasyn (2) three grams IV every six hours for empyema (3). On 6/4/24 at 8:26 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 was observed administering IV Unasyn to R3. LPN #2 did not wear a gown while administering IV medication to R3. A sign on R3's door documented, ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS. EVERYONE MUST: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote a resident's highest level of well being for three of four residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #1, and #4. The findings include: For Resident #3 (R#3), the facility staff failed to provide evidence of assessment, orders, and care for bilateral compression wraps on the resident's legs and failed to provide evidence of routine central venous access line care. 1.a. The facility staff failed to provide evidence of assessment, orders, and care for bilateral compression wraps on the resident's legs. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of congestive heart failure, lymphedema (swelling caused by an absence of lymph nodes), and right leg cellulitis (skin infection). On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was found to be oriented to person, place, and situation. On 2/21/24 at 9:16 a.m., R3 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications not administered to two of four residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #2. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications not administered on 11/23/23 and 11/24/23. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 11/26/23. A review of R1's physician orders revealed the following orders: 11/22/23 Apremilast Oral Tablet (1) 30 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for PSORIASIS. 11/22/23 Clobetasol Propionate E External Cream (2) 0.05 % (Clobetasol Propionate Emollient Base) Apply .TOPICALLY two times a day for PSORIASIS. 11/22/23 Procrit Injection Solution (3) 10000 UNIT/ML (Epoetin Alfa) Inject 1 ml (milliliter) subcutaneously one time a day every 7 day(s) for ANEMIA. 11/22/23 Sodium Bicarbonate Oral Tablet (4) 650 MG (Sodium Bicarbonate (Antacid))…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to formulate a baseline care plan to address the resident's basic needs for two of four residents in the survey sample, Residents #3 and #1. The findings include: For Resident #3 (R#), the facility staff failed to formulate a baseline care plan for bilateral compression wraps on the resident's legs and failed to formulate a baseline care plan for his central venous access line (1). 1.a. For Resident #3 (R#3), the facility staff failed to formulate a baseline care plan for bilateral compression wraps on the resident's legs. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of pneumonitis, sepsis, congestive heart failure, lymphedema (swelling caused by an absence of lymph nodes), right leg cellulitis (skin infection), and a history of rectal cancer requiring chemotherapy treatment. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was found to be oriented to person,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to treat a pressure injury for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The findings include: For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to implement interventions to treat a right toe pressure injury. On 2/21/24 at 9:16 a.m., R3 was observed sitting up in bed. He stated: I am fairly comfortable, well, as comfortable as I can be with these. R3 pulled the linens away from his lower body, exposing his legs. Both legs were wrapped with a thick compression wrapping extending from just below the knee to just below the ankle. Both feet had socks and a separate compression device. A review of R3's admission nursing summary dated 2/16/24 revealed, in part: Deep tissue injury on right heel, open area on (sic) under the right big toe with drainage. A review of R3's skilled nursing notes dated 2/16/24, 2/17/24, 2/18/24 and 2/19/24 all revealed, in part: Skin issue .Right toe(s). Wound odor: Yes. A review of R3's clinical record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide physician supervision of care for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The findings include: For Resident #3 (R3), the attending physician and wound NP (nurse practitioner) failed to provide supervision and care for the resident's bilateral leg compression wraps. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of pneumonitis, sepsis, congestive heart failure, lymphedema (swelling caused by an absence of lymph nodes), right leg cellulitis (skin infection), and a history of rectal cancer requiring chemotherapy treatment. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was found to be oriented to person, place, and situation. On 2/21/24 at 9:16 a.m., R3 was observed sitting up in bed. He stated: I am fairly comfortable, well, as comfortable as I can be with these. R3 pulled the linens away from his lower body, exposing his legs. Both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide medications for administration to two of four residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #2. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to provide medications for administration on 11/23/23 and 11/24/23. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 11/26/23. A review of R1's physician orders revealed the following orders: 11/22/23 Apremilast Oral Tablet (1) 30 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for PSORIASIS. 11/22/23 Clobetasol Propionate E External Cream (2) 0.05 % (Clobetasol Propionate Emollient Base) Apply .TOPICALLY two times a day for PSORIASIS. 11/22/23 Procrit Injection Solution (3) 10000 UNIT/ML (Epoetin Alfa) Inject 1 ml (milliliter) subcutaneously one time a day every 7 day(s) for ANEMIA. 11/22/23 Sodium Bicarbonate Oral Tablet (4) 650 MG (Sodium Bicarbonate (Antacid)) Give 1 tablet by mouth two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of four residents in the survey sample; Resident #1. The facility provided an acceptable plan of correction, having already identified the concern on 10/27/23. This is cited at past non-compliance. The findings include: The facility staff failed to implement the physician's order to provide orthopedic follow up aftercare for staple removal for Resident #1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/20/23 and had the diagnosis of but not limited to osteoporosis with current pathological fracture status post surgery with staples to the right hip. A review of the clinical record revealed the hospital discharge instructions dated 10/2/23 (from the hospital to the facility). These instructions included, Date of most recent surgery 9/21/23 .ORIF (Open reduction internal fixation) Please contact the office as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to arrange for the provision of follow up care for one of four residents in the survey sample; Resident #1. The facility provided an acceptable plan of correction, having already identified the concern on 10/27/23, therefore, this is cited at past non-compliance. The findings include: The facility staff failed to arrange follow up aftercare with the orthopedic surgeon per the physician's order. The resident was admitted on [DATE] with 24 staples in a right hip surgical incision. Multiple orders and notes documented the need to follow up with the orthopedic surgeon. The follow up was never obtained and the resident was discharged to home on [DATE] with 24 staples still intact. This was approximately one month after the surgery, which was 9/21/23. The facility policy, Special Needs documented, 3. If necessary, the facility will assist residents in making appropriate appointments with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to provide copies of the clinical record as per written request for one resident (Resident #3) in a survey sample of eight (8) residents. The findings included: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to complete a request for medical records timely and failed to provide all the requested records. On 09/06/2023 and 09/07/2023, a closed clinical record review of Resident #3's chart was conducted. This review revealed no documentation regarding a request from the family of Resident #3 for copies of the clinical record. On 9/6/23 at 11:21 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Employee. The medical records employee provided Surveyor C with a paper chart of Resident #3's documents. There was a second folder of documents that read, [facility name redacted] Copies of requested med rec by family 3/27/23 not completed as of yet and had Resident #3's name. Enclosed in this folder was a form entitled, Consent to Release Medical Information, which had been completed by Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify the family of a resident's change in condition in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #3) in a survey sample of eight (8) residents. The findings included: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to notify the family of the resident's expiration, the family came in to visit and found that the resident was deceased . On [DATE] and [DATE], a closed clinical record review of Resident #3's chart was conducted. This review revealed the following: A progress note dated [DATE] at 7:25 a.m. read, Around 07:15 am, Patient was found unresponsive to all stimuli, pupils fixed and dilated, no BP, Pulse, Respirations, Patient was pronounced dead at 07:20 am by Supervisor on duty. And family and Hospice will be contacted soon to notified them about patient passing [sic]. There was no indication that a call was made to the family until a note at 11:59 a.m. that read, Mortician picked up the body at 11:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care based on standards of nursing practice for two residents (Residents #3 and #5) in a survey sample of eight (8)residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to administer morphine and prednisone within accordance with physician orders. On 09/06/2023-09/07/2023, a closed clinical record review was conducted of Resident #3's clinical chart. It was noted that the resident went on hospice care on 03/16/2023. Resident #3 had several changes to his orders for morphine that increased the dosage and frequency. The medication administration records (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form were reviewed regarding the morphine. It was noted on several occasions the morphine was not given timely, in a few instances it was greater than 4 hours after the scheduled time being administered. On several occasions it was documented that the wrong dosage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete clinical record was maintained for two residents (Residents #3 and #5) in a survey sample of eight (8) residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate regarding the times and quantity of morphine administered. On 08/06/2023 and 08/07/2023, a closed clinical record review of Resident #3's chart was conducted. Review of the medication administration record (MAR), medication audit report and controlled drug receipt/record/disposition forms were conducted. Special attention was paid to the administration of morphine. There were three instances on 03/23/2023, that morphine was signed out on the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form and not documented on the MAR as having been administered. A review was conducted of the facility's Medication Administration policy. This policy read, . 15. Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-04 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespreadHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, representative interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff restricted resident rights for visitation for all Residents. The findings included: The CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) memorandum entitled, QSO-20-39 NH REVISED updated on 03/10/2022, documented the following excerpt: Visitation is allowed for all Residents at all times. On 08/02/2022 at approximately 11:30 A.M., a sign posted on the front door of the facility documented, Visting [sic] hours 11:00AM-6:00PM. The sign was observed on the front door on 08/03/2022 and 08/04/2022 as well. On 08/02/2022 at 1:45 P.M., the Responsible Party (RP) for Resident #16 was interviewed. When asked about visiting hours, the RP stated that visiting hours were from 11:00 A.M. until 6:00 P.M. Resident #16's RP also stated that they would like to have more liberal visiting hours and be able to have more time for visits. The RP added that it limits visitation for people who work during the day. On 08/04/2022 at approximately 8:45 A.M., the front desk receptionist,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-04 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to employ a dietary manager with the appropriate credentials. The findings included: On 08/03/2022 at approximately 12:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing provided the credentials for the dietary manager as requested. The Director of Nursing stated that the dietary manager does not have the right credentials because he did not complete the full course for certification. The credentials document provided was an identification (ID) card entitled, Northern Virginia Food Manager ID. On 08/03/2022 at 3:30 P.M., the dietary manager was interviewed. The dietary manager confirmed he was not a certified dietary manager. When asked about the ID entitled Food Manager, the dietary manager stated that he received that ID as a result of obtaining ServSafe certification. The dietary manager then provided a copy of his ServSafe certification dated 11/11/2019. On 08/04/2022 at approximately 3:45 P.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of findings.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain safe holding temperatures for 3 out of 3 cold beverages tested on [DATE]. The findings included: On 08/03/2022 at 11:45 A.M., this surveyor observed the facility staff on the tray line in preparation to distribute lunch to the Residents. There were trays lined up with cold beverages on them in preparation to be delivered to Residents. This surveyor observed the dietary manager check the temperature of the milk on one tray. The temperature was 57.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The dietary manager disposed of that milk. The dietary manager checked the temperature of another milk from a different tray. It was 55.4 degrees Fahrenheit and the dietary manager disposed of that milk as well. The dietary manager checked the temperature of a cup of apple juice from another tray and the temperature was 65.3 degrees. When asked about the expectation for holding temperatures for cold beverages, the dietary manager stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility record review the facility staff failed to implement a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. There were 17 empty spaces where one or both nurses did not sign off for the narcotic count between 7/3/22 and 8/3/22. The findings included: For the facility the facility staff failed to ensure the system of verifying narcotics was completed by the oncoming and off-going nurses both counting and signing the narcotic book. On 8/3/22 at 09:02 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN C who stated that he had already finished all of his medication pass for the morning. On 08/03/22 at 09:34 AM an interview was conducted with LPN B who was asked the process for signing off narcotics. LPN B stated the oncoming and offgoing nurses count together to be sure that the count is correct. They both sign the narcotic count sheet before the keys are handed over. A review of the Narcotic Book revealed that nurses were not signing off on narcotic counts together. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents are treated with dignity for 1 Resident (#53) in a Survey Sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #53, the facility staff referred to the Resident as A Feeder while speaking to the Surveyor as well in progress notes in his clinical record. On 8/3/22 at approximately 12:00 PM while observing medication administration for Resident # 53, LPN B stated she was unsure of how the Resident would take his medication. She stated she usually crushes the medications but she was not sure how he would take the capsule of neurontin. When asked how she usually does it, she stated that she usually opened the capsule, But I am not sure if I should do that or not. She further stated that Resident #53 is a Feeder and has trouble swallowing at times. Sometimes he does ok sometimes he doesn't. She then proceeded to get ice cream and put the whole pills in the ice cream. When asked what she meant by the term Feeder she stated that meant someone has to feed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure a clean comfortable homelike environment for 1 Resident (#8) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #8 the facility staff failed to assist her in cleaning and organizing her room as she is physically unable to do so, and they told her she could not hang up her personal artwork in her room. On 8/2/22 at approximately 12:00 PM the Surveyor E knocked on the door and was told to enter. Upon entering the room it was noted that the bed was filled with several large folded blankets and a box. A large display table with 2 levels contained various pieces of artwork pottery and ceramic masks, paintings were tucked between the table and the dresser. Resident #8 was sitting in a recliner chair and she greeted the surveyor. The Resident immediately apologized for the clutter on the bed and dresser. Resident #8 stated she had resided at the facility since 4/19/22 and was unhappy about a couple of things. Resident #8 stated that she had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview observation, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 Resident (#8) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #8 the care plan does not address Resident #8 sleeping in a recliner instead of her bed. On 8/2/22 at approximately 12:40 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #8 stated that she did not sleep in the bed. She stated that it is her preference to sleep in her recliner due to her mobility issues and pain. She further explained that no one Makes her bed. Resident #8 stated that they make the bed and change the sheets however she does not sleep in the bed. She stated the staff never fluff the pillows behind her or change the sheet under her (referring to recliner where she sleeps). Resident #8 stated that she can feel every wrinkle in the pad and sheet under her. She also stated that it has been a month since anyone has offered to make up recliner with fresh linens. She stated that she has been at the facility since 4/18/22 and has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, representative interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan for one Resident (Resident #16) in a sample size of 16 Residents. For Resident #16, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan to include a goal and interventions after Resident #16 pulled out her peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) on 06/24/2022. The findings included: On 08/02/2022 at 1:45 P.M., the Responsible Party (RP) for Resident #16 was interviewed. When asked if they were notified for changes in Resident #16's condition, the RP stated, Yes and explained that the facility staff called him when Resident #16 pulled her PICC line out. When asked what the facility staff implemented to mitigate that happening again, the RP stated that [Resident #16]'s arm is wrapped to prevent her from fiddling with it. On 08/03/2022, Resident #16's clinical record was reviewed. Resident #16's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff ailed to initial and date the PICC (peripherally-inserted central catheter) line site dressing as observed on 08/04/2022 for one residents (#16) in a survey sample of 16 residents. The findings include: On 08/03/2022, Resident #16's clinical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated 07/11/2022 documented, PICC-LINE DRESSING CHANGE EVERY 7 DAYS AND AS NEEDED PER PROTOCOL. every day shift every Tue[Tuesday] for IV Therapy for 8 Weeks. The Treatment Administration Record entry associated with this order was signed off as administered on 08/02/2022. On 08/04/2022 at approximately 9:35 A.M., this surveyor and Registered Nurse B (RN B) entered Resident #16's room to observe the PICC line site. The PICC line site was in the antecubital region (where the arm bends at the elbow) of the right arm and dressed with a transparent dressing. The transparent dressing was not initialed or dated. When asked about the expectation, RN B indicated that the PICC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide activities to meet the interests of the Resident for 1 Resident (#8) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #8 the facility staff failed to provide the Resident with painting materials, or craft projects. On 8/2/22 at approximately 12:00 PM, Surveyor E knocked on the door and was told to enter. Upon entering the room it was noted that the bed was filled with several large folded blankets and a box. A large display table with 2 levels contained various pieces of artwork pottery and ceramic masks, paintings were tucked between the table and the dresser. Resident #8 was sitting in a recliner chair and she greeted the surveyor. The Resident immediately apologized for the clutter on the bed and dresser. Resident #8 stated that she would like to have some form of Art Projects to do. When asked if she had expressed that to the Activities Director she stated that they had done an evaluation when she was admitted but no one has offered her more than Bingo, word…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, representative interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident potential for one Resident (Resident #16) in a sample size of 16 Residents. For Resident #16 (with a known behavior and history of pulling out the peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC)), the facility staff failed to ensure the intervention of wrapping the PICC line site was effective and in place. The PICC line was exposed and accessible to Resident #16 on 08/04/2022. The findings included: On 08/02/2022 at 1:45 P.M., the Responsible Party (RP) for Resident #16 was interviewed. When asked if they were notified for changes in Resident #16's condition, the RP stated, Yes and explained that the facility staff called him when Resident #16 pulled her PICC line out. When asked what the facility staff implemented to mitigate that happening again, the RP stated that [Resident #16]'s arm is wrapped to prevent her from fiddling with it. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 Resident (#2) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: Resident #2 was prescribed Remeron (an antidepressant) For appetite stimulation. On 8/2/22 at 12:43 PM Resident # 2, was observed in her room alone with the lunch tray in front of her head of bed elevated to 45 degrees. Resident #2 was eating a cookie from her tray. The sandwich, and juice untouched. The soup still covered in the bowl. A review of the clinical record revealed progress notes from the RD that read: 4/21/22 -Resident requires set-up and assistance with meals. Mechanical soft with pureed meats and thin liquids. On 8/3/22 during clinical record review it was discoursed that Resident #2 had an order that read as follows: Mirtazepine Tablet 15 MG [Trade name Remeron; an antidepressant] Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for appetite stimulant -Start Date- 04/06/2021 2000 On 8/4/22 at approximately 1:00 PM an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate clinical record for 1 Resident (#52) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 52 the facility staff failed to accurately assess Resident #52 for elopement risk. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] a review of the care plan revealed the following excerpt: FOCUS: The resident is an elopement risk. Date Initiated: 07/08/2021 Revision on: 08/18/2021 GOAL: The resident's safety will be maintained through the review date. Date Initiated: 07/08/2021 Target Date: 08/10/2021 INTERVENTIONS: Distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Resident prefers: (space left blank) Date Initiated: 07/08/2021 Provide structured activities: toileting, walking inside and outside, reorientation strategies including signs, pictures and memory boxes. Date Initiated: 07/08/2021 On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to adhere to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for the proper wearing/removing personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 Residents (Resident #3, Resident #53) in a sample size of 16 Residents. 1. For Resident #3, a known COVID-19 positive Resident on isolation precautions, the facility staff failed to do the following: a) doff (remove) their PPE before exiting the room on 08/03/2022 and b) properly wear their PPE while giving care on 08/04/2022. 2. For Resident #53, a known COVID Positive Resident who is on isolation precautions, the facility staff failed to properly wear PPE in the Residents room and failed to perform proper hand washing prior to exiting the room. The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, a known COVID-19 positive Resident on isolation precautions, the facility staff failed to do the following: a) doff (remove) their PPE before exiting the room on 08/03/2022 and b) properly wear their PPE while giving care on 08/04/2022. On 08/03/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, one facility unvaccinated staff member (staff 8), in a sample of 8 staff failed to wear a source control N-95 or higher respirator during the course of an active COVID-91 facility outbreak. The findings included; Staff #8 failed to comply with CDC (Centers for Disease Control) and CMS (Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services) guidelines for the prevention of COVID-19 infections. On 8-2-22 upon initial entrance the survey team was greeted by the Staff #8. Staff #8 was wearing a paper procedure mask. The survey team was told that the building was experiencing an active outbreak of COVID-19, and all other staff were wearing source control N-95 respirators. During the course of the survey it was determined that Staff #8 was not vaccinated against COVID-19, however, was being tested twice weekly. Staff #8 was seen in close contact with the Social Worker, Director of Nursing, Regional Corporate Registered Nurse, Maintenance Director, Surveyors, and other staff who work with, and were in close proximity to, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VIERRA COMMUNITIES — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FALLS CHURCH OPCO HOLDCO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2024 |
| DEREK R. VUCICH REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| VUCICH, DEREK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| GANNON, COLIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| VUCICH, JOSEPH | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| VUCICH, LOIS | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| FALLS CHURCH PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| FALLS CHURCH PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| JOSEPH GIFT DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| PARKWAY FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $735K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495432. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.