Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehabilitation Sanders

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 173 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.93 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.81 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-07-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent Resident #19 from abusing one resident (Resident #148) in a sample of 21 residents. This is harm. The Findings included: For Resident #148, the facility staff failed to protect him from abuse. Resident #148 was assaulted by Resident #19 resulting in a hip fracture. Resident #148 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #148's diagnoses included Cardiomyopathy and Alzheimer's Disease. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] was reviewed. Resident #148 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On [DATE], a review of Resident #148's clinical record was conducted, revealing nurses notes. According to the notes, Resident #148 was pushed by Resident #19 and he sustained a fall. Resident #148 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] at 6:30 P.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to properly store, label and date food items, and clean the floors within the facility's main kitchen. This failure had the potential to affect all 51 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to cover stored food and discard expired milk located in walk-in Refrigerator #4. On 7/18/23 at approximately 10:45 AM, observations during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed 2 clear plastic tubs which held approximately 4 dozen ears of shucked corn on the cob located in walk-in Refrigerator #4. The tubs were labeled and dated, however there was no lid or covering to protect the exposed corn from any potential contaminants. There was also an unopened gallon of milk with an expiration date of 7/16/23 sitting on the shelf with other gallons of milk that were not expired. On 7/18/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, an interview and kitchen tour was conducted with the facility's Dietary Director (DD) who confirmed he was in charge of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care directing measurable goals and interventions related to pain for one (Resident (R) 6) of two sampled residents reviewed for pain in a total sample of 20. This failure placed the resident at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Planning, dated 07/01/23 revealed, .The facility must work with the resident and their representative, if applicable, to understand and meet the resident's preferences, choices, and goals while they are at the facility. The facility must establish, document, and implement the care and services to be provided to each resident to assist in attaining or maintaining his or her highest practicability quality of life. The facility must develop care plans that describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs and preferences and how the facility will assist in meeting these needs and preferences. Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Recreational Therapy Director's job description, the facility failed to consistently provide a program of meaningful activities in accordance with the resident's preferences as identified in the resident assessment for two (Residents (R)39 and R27) of four residents reviewed for activities in a total sample of 20. This failure placed the residents at risk of a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of an undated Recreational Therapy Director job description, provided by the Administrator, revealed, .Implements, and evaluates activity programs which provide leisure opportunities that will meet the interests and needs of the resident, adapted to his/her medical limitations .Contributing to and/or directing/delegating the contribution to the comprehensive care plan goals and approaches that are individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident . 1. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0574 — isolated
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required postings, including a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers for State Agencies and advocacy groups which are accessible and understandable for the resident population for one of three buildings ([NAME] 2). The findings included: During this surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 3-1-22 observations included all resident rooms and common areas of one of three all inclusive neighborhood buildings. No posting which listed the required names, addresses, and telephone numbers for State Agencies and advocacy groups which are accessible and understandable for the resident's could be found. LPN B (Licensed Practical Nurse) was asked where the posting could be found, and she stated it had fallen off of the wall and broken, and it had not as yet been replaced. When asked how long ago that happened, she stated she could not remember, and further stated it was awhile ago. On 3-2-22 the LPN unit Manager was asked about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to continue skilled care services following the issuance of a SNF ABN (skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice), when the Resident's representative selected to continue services and they would pay for them, for one Resident (Resident #15) in a sample of 3 Residents selected for review of ABN notices. The findings included: Resident #15, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for skilled care services following hospitalization. On 12/15/21, Resident #15's responsible party (RP) was issued an ABN notice to notify them that skilled care services, to include physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT), would be ending. This notice also informed Resident #15 that as of 12/18/21, the Resident would no longer qualify for skilled care. The RP for Resident #15 selected option 2 on the ABN. This option read, I want the care listed above. I understand that I may be billed now because I am…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to perform handwashing, and gloving during medication pour and pass observations to prevent the spread of infection, for two Residents (Resident #31, and #19) in a survey sample of 15 residents observed receiving medications. The findings included: 1) LPN B filled a syringe and administered oral liquid Morphine pain medication without applying gloves. 2) LPN B did not wash her hands for a sufficient amout of time to prevent the spread of infection, 3) turned off the water faucet of the sink with ungloved bare hands which had been turned on with soiled hands. 4) LPN B then handled the now recontaminated oral syringe with bare hands placing it back in the medication cart and continued to prepare medications for the next resident. Resident #31's diagnoses included; second story fall with Paralysis, pain, and stage 4 pressure ulcer. Resident #19's diagnoses included; Osteoarthritis and pain. Resident #31 was observed on 3-1-22 at 11:30 AM. laying on an alternating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a qualified activities director for one of three units. The findings included: 1. For Facility Unit #1, the facility staff failed to provide a qualified activities director and develop an activities program. On 07/11/2019 at approximately 9:35 AM, an interview with Employee K was conducted. When asked about her role, Employee K stated she was a social worker but also planned activities for residents living in Facility Unit #1. On 07/11/19 at 01:07 PM, Employee K verified her credentials as social worker and also stated she has not received any training in activities. A copy of the Activities Department policy was requested and the DON verified there was no Activities policy. On 07/11/2019 at approximately 4:30 PM, the administrator and DON had no further information or documentation to offer.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for four residents (Resident #97, Resident #27, Resident #31, Resident #297) in a sample size of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #97, there was an active physician's order for Do not Resuscitate but the code status was listed as Full Code on the baseline care plan and on the Patient Summary page in the electronic health record. Resident #97, an [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to cerebral infarction, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, and mild cognitive impairment. Resident #97's admission Minimum Data Set was in progress. On [DATE] at approximately 09:30 AM, Resident #97's clinical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated [DATE] documented, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. Ensure DNR [do not resuscitate] on file. A Durable Do Not Resuscitate Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have quarterly QAA/QAPI (Quality Assessment and Assurance/ Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) meetings for 3 of a possible 4 quarters The findings include: On 07/11/19 at 12:06 PM, a review of the facility's QAA/QAPI program was conducted. When asked for the attendance logs of QAPI meetings since the last survey, the administrator presented two attendance records. One document was dated 05/30/2019 and the other was dated 06/26/2019. The administrator verified he did not have attendance logs or meeting minutes as evidence QAA/QAPI meetings were held quarterly. Also, the attendance log dated 05/30/2019 did not have the Medical Director in attendance. The facility provided a copy of their policy entitled, Quality Management Systems. In Section III, Part (a), under the header, Facility on page 5, it was documented, Conduct quarterly facility-specific Quality and Performance Improvement meetings. On 07/11/2019 at approximately 4:30 PM, the administrator and the DON had no further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity for one resident (Resident #97) in a sample size of 21 residents. The findings included: For Resident #97, a facility staff member was standing over him in the dining room while coaching him to eat his breakfast on 07/10/2019. Resident #97, an [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to cerebral infarction, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, and mild cognitive impairment. The Minimum Data Set was in progress. On 07/10/19 at 08:07 AM, Resident #97 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room receiving assistance to eat breakfast. Employee C, a speech therapist, was standing to the left of Resident #97 and coaching him throughout the mealtime. On 07/10/19 at 08:22 AM, an interview with Employee C was conducted. When asked if it was her routine process to stand next to residents when assisting them through mealtimes, she stated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 32% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA