Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehabilitation Salud

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe sanitary environment and assist in the prevention, development, and transmission of communicable disease and infection for all facility residents and the facility staff failed to utilize appropriate droplet precaution signage for (4) four of (6) six residents identified for droplet precautions, Resident #2, Resident #16, Resident #32, and Resident #48 and the facility staff failed to utilize appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for (2) two of (6) six residents on droplet precautions, Resident #16 and Resident #22 and the facility staff failed to utilize appropriate PPE during a medication pass and pour observation, Resident #48. The survey team informed the facility on 3/5/26 at 10:50 AM of the Immediate Jeopardy situation regarding Resident #2 due to the facility failing to: (1) prevent Resident #2 from eating breakfast in a common area with other residents while on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included enhanced barrier precautions for one of 22 current residents in the survey sample, resident #1.The findings included:Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which include, but not limited to colostomy, Parkinson's Disease and Dementia. The most recent admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/18/2026, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was moderately cognitive impaired. Section GG revealed functioning level of non-ambulatory, and wheelchair-bound, incontinent and colostomy, requiring assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 3/3/2026 10:40 am revealed an enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) sign posted near the door for Resident #1, along with gloves and gowns to be used during high contact care. Review of revised Care Plan dated 1/9/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 22 current residents in the survey sample, Residents #48. The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan (CCP) when the resident was placed on droplet precautions. Resident #48's diagnoses included dementia, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and anxiety. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #48's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/22/25 was coded to indicate the resident had problems with long-and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. During initial tour Resident #48 was identified by the facility staff as being positive for the flu. A droplet precaution sign and personal protective equipment (PPE) were observed outside of Resident #48's room. Resident #48's clinical record included a progress note transcribed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow provider orders for two of 22 residents in the survey sample, resident #3 and resident #31. 1.For Resident #3 the facility staff failed to follow a medical provider order for 1/2 side rails. Resident #3's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, muscle spasm, psychotic disorder with delusions, insomnia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, difficulty in walking, and repeated falls. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/23/26 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating Resident #3 was cognitively intact. On 3/4/26 at 10:40 AM, Resident #3's bed was observed to have 1/4 bilateral side rails in place and up on both sides of the bed. A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 2 of 22 current residents in the survey sample, Residents #9 and resident #31. The findings included: 1. For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to ensure the medications Parlodel and Lansoprazole (Prevacid) were available for administration. Resident #9's diagnoses included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, epilepsy and gastro esophageal reflux disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #9's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/21/26 was coded to indicate Resident #9 had problems with long-and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #9's clinical record included provider orders for Parlodel give 1.25 mg via J-tube two times a day for dystonia and Lansoprazole oral suspension give 10 ml via J-tube one time a day for heartburn. A J-tube is a type of enteral feeding device placed through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure laboratory results were reported to the provider for 2 of 22 current residents in the survey sample, Residents #6 and #31. The findings included: 1. For Resident #6, laboratory tests obtained on 01/29/26 and 02/06/26 were not reviewed by the provider until 03/05/26. Resident #6's diagnoses included vascular dementia, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/21/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating Resident #6 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #6's clinical record included provider orders dated 01/26/26 for a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1C, vitamin B12, lipid panel, vitamin D, and magnesium. The exact same laboratory tests were ordered again on 01/31/26. During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate the results for these…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0775 — isolated
  Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to file provider ordered laboratory test results in the clinical record for 2 of 22 current residents in the sample, Residents #6 and #31. The findings included:1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to ensure provider ordered laboratory results were filed in the clinical record. Resident #6's diagnoses included vascular dementia, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/21/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating Resident #6 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #6's clinical record included provider orders dated 01/26/26 for a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1C, vitamin B12, lipid panel, vitamin D, and magnesium. The provider ordered the exact same laboratory tests on 01/31/26. During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to find the results for these…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate for 1 of 22 current residents in the survey sample resident #10. The findings included:For resident #10 the facility staff failed to ensure the Durable Do Not Resuscitate (DDNR) order was complete and accurate in the medical record.Resident #31's diagnoses included but were not limited to vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, venous insufficiency, heart failure, and hypertension.The admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/20/26 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7/15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS also indicated that resident #10 had a condition or chronic disease that may result in life expectancy of less than 6 months and resident was receiving hospice services.The physician's orders were reviewed. Resident #10 had an active order for do not resuscitate documented.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer education for the declination of a pneumococcal vaccine for (1) one of (5) five residents sampled for immunization review, Resident #57. The findings included:Resident #57's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with rest pain, right leg, allergic rhinitis, polyneuropathy, and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system. The most recent admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/28/26, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #57's pneumococcal vaccination history disclosed the resident received the Prevnar 13 vaccine on 05/16/2022. No evidence could be located on the clinical record that Resident #57 was offered a PCV20 (Prevnar 20) or PCV21 (21-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide privacy for 4 Residents (Resident #31, 20, 1, 29) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #31, the facility staff failed to protect his personal privacy by leaving him unclothed and visible from the hallway wearing only an incontinence brief. On 12/13/22 at 12:03 PM, during tour, Surveyor C observed Resident #31 from the hallway. Resident #31 was observed lying in bed, no clothes on, wearing an incontinence brief and a urinary catheter was noted. Upon entry of the room, Resident #31 was interviewed but did not respond to Surveyor C. On 12/14/22, on numerous occasions throughout the day, Resident #31 was observed lying in bed with no clothes on and no covers. He was able to be observed from the hallway to have only an incontinence brief on. On 12/16/22 at 11:30 AM, Resident #31 was observed lying in bed with a blanket covering him. Upon further review, it was noted that there was no privacy curtain that could be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow standards of nursing practice affecting 4 Residents (Resident #1, 20, 41 and 262) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1 the facility staff crushed an extended-release medication that is not to be crushed. On 12/16/22 at 7:54 AM, RN D, the nursing supervisor, was observed during medication administration of Resident #1's medication. RN D removed a Venlafaxine ER capsule 150 mg and a Venlafaxine ER capsule 75 mg from the pharmacy bag which was labeled and indicated Do Not Crush. RN D opened both capsules emptying the contents into a plastic bag along with other medications for Resident #1 and crushed them all. RN D then mixed the crushed medications into apple sauce and entered the room of Resident #1 and administered the medications. Following the medication administration observation, Surveyor C asked RN D how she knew which medications to crush…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$71,915 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $71,915 — penalty dated 2026-03-06
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-06 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA