Puget Sound Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 294 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 95.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medication orders were incorrectly transcribed, not reconciled and incorrectly administered for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for significant medication error. This caused harm to Resident 1 when the resident was administered potent medications not prescribed and had a serious change of condition requiring hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications, change in health conditions and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, dated 07/2015 and revised 11/2023, showed: admission orders will be obtained/approved through the Provider as soon as possible following or prior to the resident admission/re-admission to the center . Staff will review medication orders and assure standards of practice with orders to include the following: - Right route, dosage, frequency. - Stop dates for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for ongoing neglect and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Record review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation or Resident Property dated August 2025, showed When allegations that meet the definition of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are received, the center shall:(1) Ensure that all alleged violations are reported immediately. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long term care services. The 5-day Minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 03/14/2026 indicated Resident 1 was moderately cognitively impaired.Review of the facility's incident/accident logging records dated for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 8, 4 & 25) reviewed for constipation, failed to follow physician's orders for insulin administration and dressing change for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a flexible tube inserted in the vein, and near the heart for long-term antibiotics administration) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 25) and failed to obtain weekly weights for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 36) reviewed for quality of care. These failures placed residents at risk for discomfort, health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Constipation Record review of the facility policy, titled, Management of Constipation, updated, November 2023, documented: When a resident is identified with No/small Bowel Movement (BM) documented for 64 hrs [hours], the LN [Licensed Nurse] will assess the resident and determine if the bowel protocol will be initiated. -The Clinical Alert…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to convey the trust account for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 107) reviewed for trust funds. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for loss of funds. Findings included.Resident 107 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 107 had a trust account while a resident in the facility. Resident 107 expired on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Resident Statement Landscape, from [DATE] to [DATE], indicated Resident 107 had a balance of .03 cents. The account was closed on [DATE], 53 days after Resident 107 expired.During an interview on [DATE] at 10:50 AM, Staff L, Business Office Manager, said trust accounts were supposed to be conveyed no longer than 30 days after discharge or death. Staff L said she just recently closed out Resident 107's account. Reference WAC 388-97-0340 (5)

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 36 & 78) reviewed for bed rails. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Record review of facility policy, titled, Safety Device Application, date revised 04/07/2023, documented, 1. Verify the following: . d. Safety device is documented on the Safety Device Care Plan.Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 01/10/2026, showed Resident 36 was moderately cognitively impaired. In an observation on 01/20/2026 at 9:44 AM, Resident 36's bed was observed with quarter length bed rails on the upper left and right sides of bed. In an observation on 01/21/2026 at 11:04 AM, Resident 36's bed was observed with quarter length bed rails on the upper left and right sides of bed. Record Review of Resident 36's Comprehensive Care Plans, initiation date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect care needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 11) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include diabetes mellitus (DM, a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired resulting in elevated blood sugar levels). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 11/07/2025, documented Resident 11 was cognitively intact and had diabetes mellitus. Record review of Resident 11's physician orders, dated 08/04/2023, documented, Diabetic Nail Care every day shift every Sat [Saturday] for DM LN [Licensed Nurse] to do nail care.Record review of Resident 11's ADL care plan, revised on 02/20/2025, showed an intervention, Bathing: Clean and trim nails on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen humidification (providing warm and moistened oxygen with water vapor preventing dryness, sore throats, and thickened mucus caused by long-term use of dry oxygen) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 78) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed residents at risk of respiratory complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including malignant pleural effusion (excessive fluid build up in the lungs caused by cancer cells). The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 01/11/2026, showed resident 78 was moderately cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 78's physician's order, dated 01/09/2026, documented, O2 [oxygen] @[at] 2 Liters via Nasal Cannula w[with]/ humidification to keep O2 sats >[greater then] 90%[percent] and/or SOB[shortness of breath]/Comfort every shift for Respiratory failure w/hypoxia [low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a bed rail physician's order, use of bed rail consent, and evaluation for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 36 & 78) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Record review of facility policy, titled, Safety Device Application, date revised 04/07/2023, documented, 1. Verify the following: a. Safety Device Data Collection completed and evaluated for the need of a safety device.b. Physician's order obtained for safety device.c. Safety Device Data Collection, Evaluation, and Information evaluation completed and reviewed with the resident or resident representative.Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 01/10/2026, showed Resident 36 was moderately cognitively impaired. In an observation on 01/20/2026 at 9:44 AM, Resident 36's bed was observed with quarter length bed rails on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to secure medications in 1 of 1 residents' room (Resident 41) reviewed for medication access and storage. This failure placed residents, staff and visitors at risk for accessing unauthorized medication, injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 12/09/2025, Showed Resident 41 was alert and oriented. In an interview and observation on 01/21/2026 at 9:46 AM, Resident 41 was observed laying in bed. Resident 41 was observed to have three bottles of medication on her bedside table. The labels/names on the on the bottles were Azo Cranberry, Centrum Women's and Azo Urinary Defense. Resident 41 stated she had been taking the medication for some time. When asked Resident 41 if staff knew she had the medications in her room, she stated I keep them there (pointing at her bedside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices when a resident ingested a medication that fell on the floor for 1 of 2 staff observed (Staff G) for medication administration; and failed to ensure staff properly donned (putting on) personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 5 sampled resident rooms (Room B33) reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents at risk for the spread of infection transmission in the facility and a diminished quality of life.Findings Included. In an observation and interview on 01/22/2026 at 9:46 AM, Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN), was observed standing at the A wing nurse's station beside the medication cart. A resident was sitting in her wheelchair next to the nurse's station counter. Staff G was observed to set a cup of pills and a cup of water on the counter beside the resident. The resident took pills out of the cup and started to swallow them. One white pill dropped onto the floor when the resident was taking the pills. Staff G…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen practices. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness, and the potential for experiencing a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, titled, Sanitation, dated January 2018, showed, The Nutrition Services team maintains clean and sanitary kitchen centers and equipment. Walls, floors, ceilings, equipment, and utensils are clean and/or sanitized, and in good working order. The Nutrition Services team will practice good infection prevention and control procedures and habits. Employees will be clean and well-groomed and will handle food properly to prevent contamination. In an observation on 06/16/2025 at 10:46 AM, during a general tour of the kitchen area after the morning meal , food crumbs and dried food were visible on the steam table. The serving bowls and lids were covered with unknown food crumbs. The stove cooking area had visible leftover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-03-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CALDERA CARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $743K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA