Willapa Harbor Care
1100 Jackson Street, Raymond, WA 98577 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (360) 942-2424 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.8% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.2% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.6% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.4% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.2% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.8% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.61 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 1.52 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.7%CMS range 45.5–59.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.1–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 3.0–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.8 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident and incident investigations. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect, inappropriate corrective actions, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, titled, Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated 08/2022, documented, Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Review and investigate all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of an unknown source, and misappropriations of resident property using the Risk Management electronic incident report in Point Click Care [electronic medical record system] and components of a thorough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators, reviewed for food storage. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .During an observation on 08/04/2025 at 10:03 AM, the kitchen refrigerator on the left, was observed with the following expired, opened items: 1. Metal Tupperware Jar of Butter Pasta- labeled with use by date of 08/03/20252. Metal Tupperware Jar of Meatballs - labeled with use by date of 08/02/20253. Metal Tupperware Jar of Diced Carrots - labeled with use by date of 08/03/20254. Plastic Ziplock bag of Bulk Ham- labeled with use by date of 07/25/20255. Plastic Ziplock bag of Deli Ham- labeled with use by date of 07/29/20256. Plastic Ziplock bag of Parmesan Cheese- labeled with use by date of 08/02/2025In an interview on 08/04/2025 at 10:05 AM, Staff M, Dietary Manager, said the items in the refrigerators should be kept until the use by date, and then disposed of. Staff M stated, they should be tossed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering a psychotropic medication (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and/or behaviors) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings Included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychoactive [a drug affecting the mind] Medication Management, revised 08/2024, documented, .10. Complete the Psychopharmacologic [drugs used to treat mental health conditions] Medication Information Evaluation with the resident/resident representative. a. Review the Psychopharmacologic Medication Information Evaluation with the resident/resident representative when psychoactive medication is prescribed. Resident 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive dental/oral assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 8) reviewed for dental status. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/17/2025, documented the resident was alert and oriented.Record review of Resident 8's oral/dental status MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2025, documented Resident 8 did not have broken or loose natural teeth. In an observation on 08/04/2025 at 10:48 AM, Resident 8 was observed to have broken and loose teeth.In a joint observation on 08/06/2025 at 10:44 AM, Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse, assessed Resident 8's mouth and stated, his teeth are loose, and he has broken teeth. Resident 8 was observed to be able to push his front teeth back and forth using his tongue. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 37) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs and inappropriate plans of care.Findings included.Record review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning Process, revised date 05/19/2023, stated the care plan must be reviewed and revised according to the RAI (resident assessment instrument) process at a minimum upon admission, quarterly and with significant change in condition and services provided or arranged must be consistent with each resident's written Care Plan.Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/25/2025, documented Resident 37 was dependent with oral care, and needed substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Resident 37 was moderately cognitively impaired.Review of Resident 37's ADL self-care performance deficit care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered activities that incorporated the resident's preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 37) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/25/2025, documented it was very important for Resident 37 to listen to music she liked. Resident 37 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of The Life Enrichment quarterly progress notes dated 02/15/2025 and 03/21/2025, documented music became more important to her. Review of Resident 37's care plan, revised date 02/12/2025, showed Resident 37 prefers the following TV channels: news, sports, drama, etc. Resident 37 sometimes joins in a JW (Jehovah's Witness) meeting on Zoom [a platform that provides video and audio conferencing and online meetings]. Review of Resident 37's Planned Activities task,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 3 of 6 residents (Resident 1, 3 & 30) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, titled, “Management of constipation,” revision date, November 2023, documented, “when a resident is identified with no/small BM (bowel movement) documented for 64 hrs (hours), the LN (licensed nurse) will assess the resident and determine if the bowel protocol will be initiated.” The facility policy outlined standard bowel protocol based on providers’ orders which included: “Milk of magnesia 30 ml (milliliters) PO (by mouth) HS (at hour of sleep) after eight shifts of no BM. Bisacodyl Suppository rectally if no results from the milk of magnesia. Fleets Enama rectally if no results from the Bisacodyl Suppository.” Resident 1 Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an order was in place prior to the administration of oxygen, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for respiratory services. This failure placed residents at risk for complications in respiratory health and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the Facility's Oxygen Management Policy, revised on 12/2022, documented, The center requires that a physician's order be obtained prior to the administration of oxygen. Resident 30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease making it difficult to breathe) and pulmonary fibrosis (condition in which scare tissue builds up in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe). The Medicare 5- Day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/22/2025, documented Resident 30 was alert and oriented. In an observation on 08/04/2025 at 1:06 PM, and at 3:23 PM Resident 30 was observed in bed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 20) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.Findings Included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 12/2024, documented, .15. Remain with the resident until all medication is taken. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The End of PPS (Prospective Payment System) Part A Stay Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/08/2025, documented Resident 20 was cognitively intact. In an observation and interview on 08/04/2025 at 10:47 AM, Resident 20 was observed lying in bed with no staff present in the room. A medication cup with 9 pills in the cup was observed in front of Resident 20 sitting on the bedside table. When Resident 20 was asked about the pills in the cup, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to distribute resident meal trays in a sanitary manner in 1 of 2 hallways reviewed for infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of infection transmission and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .In an observation on 08/04/2025 at 12:46 PM, Staff F, Certified Nurse Assistant, was observed carrying a meal tray from the food cart into room [ROOM NUMBER] and placed it on a bedside table. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an orange-colored sign at the room entrance indicating the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was on enhanced barrier precautions (infection control precautions). Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] declined the meal tray. Staff F proceeded to pick up the tray from the bedside table and returned it into the meal cart in the hallway which had other meals trays due to be served. In an interview on 08/04/2025 at 1:01 PM, Staff F was asked where she would keep residents meal trays if the resident refused it. Staff F stated, we typically put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe dining environment by ensuring the floorboard heater was not hot to the touch in 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for environment. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of burns and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 07/21/2024 at 12:45 PM, the dining room floorboard heater was observed radiating heat. The floorboard heater was hot to the touch and made this observer's hand move quickly away when touched. At 12:47 PM, Staff D, Maintenance Director, said the floorboard heater had to be manually turned on. Staff D touched the floorboard heater, removed his hand quickly and stated, It's pretty hot. At 12:51 PM, Staff D was observed using a thermometer which read 100 degrees. Staff D said it was hot and would be turned down. Reference WAC 388-97-0880 (1) .
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an evaluation assessment, consent, and physician order for full length bolsters on both sides of the bed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (7) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/16/2024, documented Resident 7 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 07/21/2024 at 3:28 PM, Resident 7 was observed lying in bed on an air mattress with bolsters on the upper and lower full length left and right side of the bed. On 07/22/2024 at 12:54 PM, Resident 7's bed was observed with an air mattress with bolsters on the upper and lower full length left and right side of the bed. At 1:47 PM, Resident 7 was observed lying in bed on an air mattress with bolsters on the upper and lower full length left and right side of the bed. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing wounds for 1 of 5 sampled residents (20) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for continued decline and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/17/2024, documented Resident 20 was cognitively intact and was at risk of developing skin breakdown. On 07/21/2024 at 3:08 PM, Resident 20 was observed lying in bed and had a darkened skin impairment to his left great toe. Resident 20's comprehensive care plan did not address the skin impairment on his left great toe. On 07/24/2024 at 10:17 AM, Staff E, Infection Preventionist and Licensed Practical Nurse, said Resident 20's electronic health record did not have a specific care plan for the left great toe skin impairment. At 2:07 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grooming assistance was provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents (12) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/22/2024, showed Resident 12 was cognitively intact and had an impairment on one side (left) of the upper extremity. Resident 12's care plan, dated 06/19/2023, showed Resident 12 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and did not have specific interventions for nail care. On 07/22/2024 at 11:31 AM, Resident 12 was observed to have long unkept fingernails on both hands. Resident 12 said it was her preference for her fingernails to be shorter. The electronic medical record did not reflect any nail care was offered and/or refused from 06/30/2024-07/22/2024. On 07/23/2024 at 10:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered activities incorporating the resident's preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (285) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 285 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/06/2024, showed Resident 285 was moderately cognitively impaired and had an activity preference of going outside to get fresh air when the weather was good. The May 2024, June 2024 and July 2024 Activity Participation reports did not have documentation Resident 285 had been offered, refused, or had gone outside while at the facility. On 07/22/2024 at 8:52 AM, Resident 285 said it would be nice to go outside. On 07/24/2024 at 9:25 AM, Staff C, Life Enrichment Director, said she did an initial assessment to learn Resident 285's choices. Staff C said she invited residents outside if the weather permitted. Staff C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents (12) reviewed for range of motion (ROM) and mobility. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/22/2024, showed Resident 12 was cognitively intact, had impairment on one side of the body, and did not show the resident was on a restorative therapy program. The care plan, dated 06/19/2023, showed Resident 12 had limited physical mobility related to stroke and weakness. There were no interventions for maintaining ROM or function in the care plan. The care plan showed Resident 12 required extensive assistance x2 (two person) for bed mobility, and repositioning, and transfers with 2 staff members with a mechanical lift. On 07/21/2024 at 11:31 AM, Resident 12 said her hand did not open, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) supervision was provided at least eight hours daily for 3 of 30 days reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving needed care and supervision of care. Findings included . The Aging and Long-Term Support Administration (ALTSA) Staffing Pattern, and the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Forms, showed the facility did not have an RN on duty for any of their three shifts (day, evening & night) on 06/30/2024, 07/07/2024 and 07/14/2024. On 07/24/2024 at 2:24 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said they were trying to hire nurses from using a hiring software; however, they mostly got Licensed Practical Nurse applicants. Staff A said if they were short on RNs they would pull from their management team and use staff from another facility whenever they could. Reference WAC 388-97-1080 (3) .
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff received dementia training and/or abuse/neglect training for 3 of 5 sampled staff (F, G & H) reviewed for nurse aids in-service trainings. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving necessary care from unskilled staff. Findings included . Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant, was hired on 06/18/2023. No training records or in-services provided showed Dementia or Abuse/Neglect training was completed since hire. Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant, was hired on 12/02/2022. No training records or in-services provided showed Dementia or Abuse/Neglect training was completed since hire. Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant, was hired on 11/07/2022. No training records or in-services provided showed Abuse/Neglect training was completed since hire. On 08/08/2023 at 3:15 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said staff should have at least one Dementia training per year. Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(b) .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consents were obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medications (medications affecting the mind) for 2 of 5 sampled residents (16 & 31) reviewed for rights to be informed about care and treatment related to unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of not knowing the effects of medications, medication side effects, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression. Resident 16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/26/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 06/19/2023, documented Resident 16 was ordered Trazodone, an anti-depressant medication. A physician's order, dated 06/20/2023, documented Resident 16 was ordered Venlafaxine, an anti-depressant medication. A physician's order, dated 06/20/2023, documented Resident 16 was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care conferences for 1 of 6 sampled residents (2) reviewed for participating in care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not belong allowed to be involved in care decisions and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/17/2023, showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The electronic health records (EHR) showed the facility's last Care Conference for Resident 2 was on 03/07/2023. On 08/08/2023 at 2:27 PM, Staff E, Social Services Director, said care conferences should be completed quarterly. After reviewing the EHR, Staff E said Resident 2's last care conference was in March 2023. At 2:44 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said care conferences should be completed quarterly for long-term residents. Staff A said if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were honored regarding a later wake-up time in the morning for 1 of 1 sampled residents (20) reviewed for self determination. This failure placed residents at risk of depression, fatigue, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 05/31/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 08/07/2023 at 11:11 AM, Resident 20 said her breakfast came at a time when the resident would rather be sleeping. Resident 20 said this would happen every day. A breakfast tray, uneaten, was observed on the residents bedside table positioned in front of the resident. On 08/08/2023 at 8:33 AM, Resident 20 said the facility staff woke her up for breakfast like they do every morning. On 08/09/2023 at 9:11 AM, Resident 20 said facility staff woke her up for breakfast, which she did not like. Resident 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 15 & 28) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/18/2023, documented Resident 28 was severely cognitively impaired. On 08/07/2023 at 2:45 PM, Resident 28's room was observed to only contain a bed, a TV, and one very small picture on the wall. No other personal items were present in the room. 2) Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 15 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 08/07/2023 at 2:24 PM, Resident 15's room was observed to only contain a bed, a TV, one very small picture on the wall, and a pair of shoes next to the bed. No other personal items were present…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans addressed dental and end of life for 2 of 2 sampled residents (16 & 32) reviewed for development and implementation of comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated [DATE], documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and had no natural teeth. Resident 16's comprehensive care plan did not address a dental care plan. On [DATE] at 2:14 PM, Resident 16's family member (FM) said the facility was trying to get the resident to a dentist. The FM said it was hard to communicate with the resident due to her not having any teeth. On [DATE] at 10:20 AM, Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said she used the [NAME] (a reference used to guide resident care) to understand the care needs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 1 of 1 sampled residents (7) reviewed for care plan timing and revisions related to hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/13/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 7's electronic medical record (EMR) documented the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR showed Resident 7 was diagnosed with a non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, a type of heart attack), respiratory failure (a serious condition making it difficult to breathe on your own), sepsis (a life-threatening bodily response to infection) and urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that provider orders were followed and/or completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (12) reviewed for services meet professional standards related to unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/09/2023, documented Resident 12 was cognitively intact. Resident 12's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented instances where the provider orders were not administered and/or completed over the previous 30 days. On 07/18/2023 and 07/26/2023 monitoring was not followed/completed for symptoms of depression/anxiety and monitoring pain, medication side effects, and edema. The incentive spirometer (a device to exercise/expand lungs) order was not completed on 07/14/2023. Resident 12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing neurological assessments (assesses the nervous system and identifies any abnormalities that affect function and activities of daily living) were performed for a resident after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (30) reviewed for quality of care related to accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of having unidentified injuries, a delay in treatment, worsening conditions, health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The incident report investigation, dated 03/06/2023 documented, resident was found lying with her head against table leg. The Neurological Observation sheet, dated 03/06/2023, was blank for q (each) 15 minutes 8:00 PM, q ½ hour 8:30 PM, q ½ hour 9:00 PM and q hour 10:00 PM. Blanks were also noted at 19th HR (hour)/q 4 hour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting the mind) medications by failing to monitor for medication side effects and adverse behaviors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (31) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk for medical complications, receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/05/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 06/28/2023, documented the resident was prescribed Sertraline, an antidepressant medication and Mirtazapine, an antidepressant medication. Resident 31's depression care plan, initiated 06/28/2023, documented an intervention to Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. COMMON ANTIDEPRESSANT SIDE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand sanitization was being performed to prevent the transmission of a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO), Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL, an enzyme resistant to antibiotics and is spread through contaminated hands and surfaces), for 1 of 2 sampled residents (2) reviewed for infection prevention and control related to Transmission Based Precautions (TBP). This failure placed residents at risk of transmission of a MDRO and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Center for Disease Control website, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/containment/PPE-Nursing-Homes.html, noted EBP included the need for everyone to clean hands before entering a resident's room and when leaving the room. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/27/2023, documented Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 2's electronic medical record (EMR), reviewed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to 3 of 5 sampled residents (16, 31 & 30) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed residents at risk for developing pneumonia with potential negative outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/26/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, the resident's pneumococcal vaccination was not up to date, and the pneumococcal vaccine was not offered. Resident 16's medical record did not show documentation of the resident's pneumococcal vaccine status. The medical record did not document if the resident was offered or received a pneumococcal vaccine. On 08/08/2023 at 1:25 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse, said residents were educated on the risks/benefits of a vaccination via the consent form. Staff B said a floor nurse would educate residents on the risks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-08-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were accurately posted and updated daily for 30 of 31 days reviewed for nurse staff postings. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census information.Findings included.Record review of the Daily Nursing Staffing Report postings, prior to being edited, from 07/05/2025 to 08/04/2025 were not provided for review. Review of the Daily Nursing Staffing Report postings provided by the facility, from 07/05/2025 to 08/04/2025, showed changes for every day, except for 07/21/2025, to columns titled Hours Scheduled, Staffing Total, and Actual Hours Worked daily.In an interview on 08/05/2025 at 11:05 AM, Staff H, Staffing Coordinator, said she had only done staffing since May and was still learning. Staff H said she had not been updating the staffing numbers for each shift on the posted Daily Nursing Staffing Report. Staff H said yesterday's updated staffing did not get added to the daily posting during the day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CALDERA CARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASHINGTON 3 PACK LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/20/2023 |
| ROP CARE AJH LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/20/2023 |
| ROP OPCO HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/20/2023 |
| HANDLER, ASHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/20/2023 |
| OSCHEROWITZ, RAPHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/20/2023 |
| WOLMARK, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/20/2023 |
| GOETTEL, TASHINA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/20/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $224K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505349. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.