Dove Healthcare - Superior
1800 New York Ave, Superior, WI 54880 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (715) 394-5591 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.4% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.6% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.83 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 39.4–63.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.2–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility did not prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety which had potential to affect all 58 residents. -Foods items in kitchen not labeled with an expiration or use-by date.-Thermometers in 3 kitchen freezers were not functioning properly.-Cook K washed dishes, contaminating [NAME] K's clothes while prepping/serving food.-Cook M touched food with contaminated gloves while preparing ready to eat food.-Cook K prepared lunch meals without taking the temperature of all foods before serving.This is evidenced by: Example 1 Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements dated last revised 02/26 which states: .1. B. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including growth of microorganisms. 3. Facility staff should inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper storage. c. Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include i. monitoring food temperatures and functioning of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage in dumpster was covered. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse dated last revised 06/13/25 which states: .7. Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded so insect/rodent attractions are minimized. During the kitchen tour and observation of garbage dumpsters with [NAME] K on 05/11/26 at approximately 9:28 AM, two dumpsters for garbage were located at the backside of the building with their lids opened. Surveyor interviewed [NAME] K and asked if garbage dumpsters were supposed to be covered. [NAME] K reported to Surveyor dumpsters are to be covered but it is hard to keep the neighboring apartment complex from using dumpsters and leaving lids open. [NAME] K reported to Surveyor other staff also utilize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain mechanical and/or electrical equipment in safe operating condition, having the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. Surveyor observed top of a freezer in the kitchen broken with orange duct tape and being held shut with syrup bottles to keep the lid closed. Findings include: On 05/11/2026 at 9:38 AM, Surveyor toured kitchen with [NAME] K. Surveyor observed 3 freezers sitting in an extra room down the hall from the kitchen. [NAME] K walked Surveyor into room and explained the 3 freezers are for kitchen use in storing frozen food for all residents in the facility. Surveyor observed the middle freezer to have orange duct tape taped to the bottom of the freezer lid which had 2 big heavy syrup bottles on top to hold the freezer lid closed. Surveyor asked [NAME] K to open the freezer. Surveyor observed the top of the freezer lid sagging with orange duct tape holding the freezer lid in place. Surveyor observed ice build-up along the sides at the entrance of the top of freezer lid around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, [NAME] K did not follow a recipe to make pureed and mechanical soft chicken and noodles for 8 of 8 residents who receive pureed and mechanical soft diets out of 58 residents. This resulted in the potential for 4 residents (R22, R46, R54, and R58) not receiving the nutrients necessary at lunch meal to meet nutritional needs and 4 of 15 residents (R14, R29, R53 and R25) verbalized food was not palatable. Findings include: According to the National Food Service Management Institute, recipes will ensure that nutritional values per serving are valid and consistent - nutrients per serving for a recipe can be altered significantly when a recipe is not followed. Example 1 On 05/11/2026 at 11:16 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] K take chicken pieces out of the oven and place them in a blender. [NAME] K walked over to kitchen sink and filled blender with a little bit of water and [NAME] K started blending chicken with water to make puree. Surveyor observed [NAME] K finish the mixing of chicken and water and then poured mixture into a pan. [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which had the potential to affect all 29 residents on the first floor.-Personal soaps and shampoos were in the basket hanging in the shower.-A disposable razor was present in the basket hanging in the shower.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Shower, last revised 01/2025, includes .Assist the resident to the shower room and bring all necessary supplies .Help the resident back to their room and return personal hygiene products to their designated spot.On 05/11/26 at 11:03 AM, Surveyor observed personal body soaps, shampoo, and a disposable razor present in the basket hanging in the shower on the 112-127 hall shower room. On 05/12/26 at 8:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J about what should be done with resident's personal shower toiletries upon completion of a shower. CNA J reported the supplies should be put away when done using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 15 residents (R5) stored medication safely and securely. R5 was observed to leave nicotine lozenges on the dining room table and not stored safely or securely.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, last revised 02/2026, includes: The intent of the policy is to support residents who are evaluated as capable of administering their medications while ensuring resident safety, proper oversight, and regulatory compliance.When determining if self-administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should at a minimum consider the following.the resident's ability to ensure that medication is stored safely and securely.The following conditions are met for bedside storage to occur.the manner of storage prevents access by other residents.On 05/11/26, Surveyor reviewed R5's electronic health record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R5's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement policy and procedures related to screening employees for a prior history of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Cook O) of 8 employees reviewed. The facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented when one employee's (Cook O) background information disclosure (BID) was not obtained before employee started working at facility. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property policy dated 08/24 indicates, Pre-employment background screening is mandated for all facility employees. On 05/12/26 at 2:45 PM, Surveyor reviewed 8 staff BIDs, which were selected randomly. [NAME] O was hired on 01/15/26. Surveyor was reviewing a BID for [NAME] O. The form was dated 01/15/26 with the question, Have you resided outside the state of Wisconsin in the last 3 years. The box was marked yes and stated in Minnesota. Surveyor reviewed the BID and found no BID was completed for the state of Minnesota. On 05/12/26 at 3:03 PM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one resident (R10) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility did not develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address R10's dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) needs. R10's care plan did not include alternative interventions or monitoring guidelines to address R10's choice to not comply with speech therapy recommendations to reduce risks of choking/aspiration. Findings include:R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified schizophrenia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, avoidant personality disorder and dysphagia. R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03/15 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R10's care plan, last revised 09/09/2025, with a target date of 05/211/2026, states, Self-care deficit related to weakness, impaired mobility, impaired cognition. [R10]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for mobility/positioning (R34).-R34 requested a trapeze for bed mobility assistance, and it was not addressed timely.-R34 has a trapeze in place with no assessment conducted or documentation of R34 having a trapeze.-R34 had a decrease in bed mobility during Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment dates of 10/31/25 to 01/26/26.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Use of Assistive Devices, last revised 04/2026, includes: Facility staff will provide appropriate assistance to ensure hat the resident can use the assistive devices safely. This may include assessment, education, or therapy sessions for training on the use of the device, set up assistance, supervision, or physical assistance as needed.On 05/11/26 at 9:48 AM, Surveyor interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision to prevent choking for 1 (R10) of 15 residents reviewed. R10 was assessed to require supervision with meals due to choking risk. R10 did not have supervision in place and observations were made of R10 coughing with meals.Findings include:R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses of unspecified schizophrenia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, avoidant personality disorder and dysphagia. R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03/15 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R10 does not have a documented care plan for risk of choking or aspiration related to dysphagia. On 05/08/2026, a Nutritional Risk Assessment (NRA) done by a Registered Dietician (RD) Q stated, Nutritional risk related to recent incidence of swallowing difficulty with dysphagia diagnosis. A therapy referral was placed by RD Q for a speech therapy screening to be done related to swallowing difficulties on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that an alleged abuse of R1 was reported to the State Agency (SA).The facility did not report the alleged abuse of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D hitting R1 on the buttocks to the SA.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and Exploitation Prevention Program revised October 2025 states in part, .7. Reporting and Response: The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment. are reported per Federal and State laws. Reporting allegations immediately: a. But no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse .R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and pain.Most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 1/20/26, indicated that R1 required assist with ambulation, no behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation was conducted when receiving a report of alleged physical abuse.The facility did not thoroughly investigate to rule out abuse of a Resident (R1). No interviews were conducted with other residents to ensure there had been no further incidents of abuse, a thorough physical exam/skin assessment or a psycho-social exam were not conducted. The acting administrator was not notified of the incident. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and Exploitation Prevention Program revised October 2025 states in part, .5. Investigation- A thorough investigation is an investigation that adequately addresses the circumstances of the allegation. The facility will promptly and thoroughly investigate reports of abuse that includes mistreatment. Designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately and will collect information that corroborates or disproves the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected 1 out of 3 residents (R) reviewed. (R4) Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) E did not doff contaminated gloves after emptying urine from catheter into graduate before continuing R4's cares. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised January 2025, states:.4. High contact resident acre activities include:e. Changing linens.f. Changing briefs or assisting with toileting.g. Device care or use. Urinary catheters.Surveyor reviewed R4's record, which indicated R4 is on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for history of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in the urine and R4 has a suprapubic catheter. On 08/26/25 at 3:15 PM, Surveyor followed CNA E into R4's room. Surveyor observed CNA E don Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before entering R4's room. CNA E pushed R4 into a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. -The facility did not have a water management program to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. -Facility surveillance does not provide adequate evidence of tracking and monitoring infections. -Residents with known infections were not placed on precautions or placed on incorrect precautions. -Bins for discarding personal protective equipment (PPE) were placed in the hallways. Soiled PPE was hanging outside of the bins and exposed. -Clean linens were not covered during transport. Clean linens were stored in shower rooms inside shower stall and on shower bench. -Staff did not sanitize mechanical lifts between use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide written notice of transfer to the resident or their representative and did not send a copy of the notice of transfer to the hospital to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 6 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for hospitalization. (R58, R68, R10, R25, R57, and R41) Findings include: Example 1 R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08/15, indicating R58 had moderate cognitive impairment. The record identified R58 had a legal guardian who was responsible for R58's medical decision-making. The record showed R58 was hospitalized on [DATE] and on 02/04/25 after falls at the facility. On 03/10/25 at 1:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed R58's legal guardian who reported the facility did call before transferring R58 to the hospital, but the guardian did not remember receiving anything in writing. Surveyor reviewed R58's medical record and was not able to find a written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide written notice of bed-hold policy to the resident or their representative for 5 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for hospitalization. (R58, R68, R25, R57, and R41) Findings include: Example 1 R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08/15, indicating R58 had moderate cognitive impairment. The record identified R58 had a legal guardian who was responsible for R58's medical decision-making. The record showed R58 was hospitalized on [DATE] and on 02/04/25 after falls at the facility. On 03/10/25 at 1:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed R58's legal guardian who reported the facility did call before transferring R58 to the hospital, but the guardian did not remember receiving anything in writing about a bed-hold policy. Surveyor reviewed R58's medical record and was not able to find a written bed-hold notice for the hospitalizations. Surveyor requested copies of the written bed-hold notice for the two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. The facility did not ensure staff followed transfer precautions and supervision when needed to prevent accidents which had the potential to affect 21 out 62 residents. -Surveyor observed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) U bathe R57 in bath house without a call system in place for emergencies during bath/shower cares. -R41 was at risk for falls. Facility did not implement new interventions put into place post falls. -Staff ambulated R41 without gait belt in place during ambulation transfer process. -R58 had a history of frequent falls with major injury and the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of interventions to prevent further falls. Findings include: Example 1 Facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated reviewed on [DATE], states in part: .#6. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: a. Assess the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided for the third floor to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident (R). This has the potential to affect all 14 residents residing on the third floor. Residents on the third floor have had multiple falls with injuries. A resident (R19) had an unwitnessed fall and no staff responded to calls for help until Surveyor intervened. R9 who is frequently incontinent of urine did not receive assistance with repositioning or toileting for 4 1/2 hours. Findings include: Facility Assessment, dated 02/03/25, stated in part: .Information About Our Staffing Patterns section stated Average Nurse Aide/Resident Ratio (Direct Care Staff) Average about 1 Nurse Aide to 10 Residents . Surveyor reviewed the daily staffing postings and nursing schedules for the past month. The schedule showed one nurse and one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medication reviews were completed for 5 out of 5 residents (R) reviewed (R65, R17, R53, R41, and R61) for unnecessary medications. Medication reviews were not completed at least monthly by a licensed pharmacist and documentation of review was not maintained in the resident's medical records. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports IIIA1: Medication Regimen Review revised December 2019, states in part, .B. The consultant pharmacist the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly . H. At least monthly, the consultant pharmacist reports any irregularities to the attending physician, medical director and the director of nursing, at a minimum . The policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports IIIA2: Documentation and Communication of the consultant Pharmacist Recommendations revised December 2019, states in part, .A. A record of the consult pharmacist's observations and recommendations is made available in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that snack/nourishment refrigerators on the first floor and third floor were maintained with the proper temperatures and food items are dated and labeled to prevent the potential for food-borne illness. This has the potential to effect all residents on the first floor and third floor. Findings include: According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022: Annex 3-123 .Date marking is the mechanism by which the Food Code requires active managerial control of the temperature and time combinations for cold holding. Industry must implement a system of identifying the date or day by which the food must be consumed, sold, or discarded. Date marking requirements apply to containers of processed food that have been opened and to food prepared by a food establishment, in both cases if held for more than 24 hours, and while the food is under the control of the food establishment . According to the US FDA Food Code 2022: Annex 3-164 to 165: .A permanent temperature measuring device is required in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 16 sampled residents (R7). -R7 was not provided a wheelchair to allow her to get out of bed while residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, reads in part .To ensure that all residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services and outside of the facility. 3. The facility will provide care to the resident in a manner and environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life. 5. Equal access to quality care will be provided to each resident regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include left sided paralysis, stage 1 pressure ulcer to back, buttock and hip, bi-polar disorder, and anxiety. Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/25/25 included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 16 sampled residents (R10). R10 reported her dissatisfaction with male caregivers providing personal care assistance after the facility identified R10's preference for female caregivers only. Findings: The facility policy titled, Resident Rights, reads in part .To ensure that all residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility. 1. The facility will protect and promote the right of each resident . 3. The facility will provide care to the resident in a manner and environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life . 10. The facility will assist residents in exercising rights in regards to autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care . R10 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing medical and nursing needs. This occurred for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (R25). -R25 did not have a care plan identifying interventions for controlling and preventing the spread of infection related to Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Findings: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, read in part . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and align with the resident's cultural identity, as indicated. 6. The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to [NAME] the resident's needs and identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. According…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident who required substantial assistance for repositioning and toileting received timely assistance for 1 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) (R9). R9 who is frequently incontinent of urine did not receive assistance with repositioning or toileting for 4 1/2 hours. Findings include: R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses in part, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, unspecified urinary incontinence, leg pain, and osteoarthritis. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/06/25, identified R9 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment further identified R9 had no behaviors of rejection of cares and required substantial or maximal assistance for all mobility and toileting. The MDS assessment also indicated R9 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 16 residents (R) reviewed for quality of care (R58). R58 had a witnessed fall and was transferred from floor to bed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) before a Registered Nurse assessed the resident for injuries. Findings include: R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses in part, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, age-related physical debility, osteoporosis, unspecified visual disturbance, weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R58 had a fall risk assessment score of 20 on 02/20/25 which indicated R58 was high risk for falls. R58 had two recent falls resulting in a left humerus fracture and and a left femoral neck fracture. On 03/13/25 at 6:41 AM, Surveyor observed the ambulance team arrive on 3rd floor with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (PI) for 1 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (R36). -R36 was at risk for development of pressure injuries and was not repositioned to reduce pressure for greater than 4 hours. Findings include: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2019, page 115, . Repositioning and mobilizing individuals is an important component in the prevention of pressure injuries. The underlying cause and formation of pressure injuries is multifaceted; however, by definition, pressure injuries cannot form without loading, or pressure, on tissue. Extended periods of lying or sitting on a particular part of the body and failure to redistribute the pressure on the body surface can result in sustained deformation of soft tissues and, ultimately, in tissue damage . According to Wound Care Education Institute (WCEI) 2018, for immobile or bed bound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with limited mobility received services to maintain or prevent further reduction in mobility for 1 of 1 resident (R) R23. R23's walking program was not developed to maintain or prevent reduction in mobility. Facility staff were not providing assist of 1 with front wheel walker and gait belt walking program. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Program- Superior, dated April 2007 states: Maintenance Restorative Program Definition: This program is designed for those residents who through assessment require interventions with the goal to maintain present functioning. Due to the resident's physical or cognitive condition the assessment is that the resident will not progress and may be expected to decline. Example: The resident ambulates well but cognitively is unable to safely ambulate alone. If the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) or other nursing staff will be carrying out the interventions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with indwelling foley catheters received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent complications or urinary tract infections (UTI) from the catheter for 1 of 1 resident (R) R25 reviewed for catheter. -Urology recommended foley be removed when R25's strength increased; facility removed foley the following day. -No monitoring after removal of foley catheter. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Use & Removal, reads in part .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that indwelling urinary catheters that are inserted or remain in place are justified or removed according to regulations and current standards of practice .Monitoring for excessive post void residual, after removing a catheter that was inserted for obstruction or overflow incontinence .Verify practitioner's order .Assess for first voiding post-catheter removal .Document procedure . R25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed who required oxygen and respiratory care was provided such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan, and physician orders (R2). -On 03/11/25, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) S did not connect portable oxygen tank to R2 when CNA S placed R2 in dining room for breakfast. -Facility did not attempt a weaning schedule R2 off of oxygen as able. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration Policy, dated reviewed on December 2024 states in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: #1. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. #3. Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy. #4. The resident's care plan shall identify the interventions for oxygen therapy, based upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensured the accurate acquiring, dispensing, administering, storage, and disposal of all drugs and biologicals. The facility did not ensure controlled medications were disposed of timely and per appropriate standard of practice or agency policy for 1 out of 1 resident (R) 60. Findings include: The Statute DHS 132.65 Pharmaceutical Services refers to the handling of medication in Wisconsin facilities, including hospitals and nursing homes. It states in part, .(c) Destruction of medications. 1. 'Time limit.' Unless otherwise ordered by a physician, a resident's medication not returned to the pharmacy for credit shall be destroyed within 72 hours of a physician's order discontinuing its use, the resident's discharge, the resident's death or passage of its expiration date. The facility policy titled Medication Destruction, dated [DATE], states in part, All unused, contaminated, or expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional practice. This had the potential to affect 6 out of 6 residents (R) (R2, R34, R36, R40, R62, R69) for proper storage. 7 new unopened insulin pens, 1 unopened injectable solution, 1 unopened vaccine, and 1 unopened oral suspension that are temperature sensitive were found in an out of temperature range refrigerator on second floor. On second floor refrigerator, temperature logs are incomplete for 4 out of the 5 last months. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Medication Storage, dated 8/7/2015 states: a. All medication requiring refrigeration are stored in refrigerators located in the pharmacy and at each medication room. b. Temperature are maintained within 36-46 degrees F. Charts are kept on each refrigerator and temperature levels are recorded daily by the charge nurse or other designee. The Wisconsin Pharmacy Chapter 6 titled, Pharmacy Licenses and Equipment states: (e) Refrigerator means a place in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have documentation included in the resident's medical record that the resident either received or did not receive the pneumococcal and/or the influenza vaccination for 2 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for immunizations (R41 and R53). -R41's record does not include evidence resident was offered pneumococcal vaccination. -R53's record does not include evidence resident was offered influenza or pneumococcal vaccination. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine Series, read in part .2. Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it is contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized. 4. The resident/representative retains the right to refuse the immunization. The facility will document in the clinical record the reason for the refusal or the medical contraindication of the immunization. The facility policy titled Influenza Exposure Control, read in part .2. The current season's influenza vaccine will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an incident of a resident-to-resident altercation, when a resident (R) R5 grabbed wrist of R4, resulting in R4 being transferred to emergency room for x-rays and acquiring bruising to wrist, to the State Survey Agency or police department, immediately upon learning of the incident and did not submit the 5-day completed investigation within 5 days as required. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for abuse (R4). This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and Exploitation Prevention Program last reviewed October 2024, states in part under section 7. Reporting/Response, To whom to report - To the Administrator, State survey agency, local law enforcement. An Adult Protective Services; and when to report, Immediately but not later than two hours after forming the suspicion and if no seriously bodily injury report not later than 24 hours . Report results of all investigations of alleged violations within 5 working days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct an investigation of a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 10/05/24, wherein resident (R) R5 grabbed wrist of R4, resulting in R4 being transferred to emergency room for x-rays. Immediately upon learning of the incident, the facility did not conduct an investigation, staff and residents were not interviewed, interventions and monitoring were not put into place to prevent reoccurrence until 10/09/24. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for abuse (R4). This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and Exploitation Prevention Program last reviewed October 2024, states in part under section 7. Reporting/Response, Dove healthcare must report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property and report the results of all investigations to the state survey agency, and other proper officials such as law…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the preparation of food in a clean and sanitary environment with the potential to affect all 71 residents in the facility. Staff did not consistently monitor or document cooked food temperatures. Staff did not consistently date or label food items when opened. Staff did not consistently test or document parts per million (PPM) of the quaternary sanitizing solution. Staff did not consistently document refrigerator temperatures. Staff observed touching ready to eat food with contaminated gloves. Findings: Monitor/document food temperatures: The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at section 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding .Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food shall be maintained: (1) At 57° Celsius (C) (135°Fahrenheit (F)) or above, except that roast cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in 3-401.11 (B) or reheated as specified in 3-403.11 (E) may be held at a temperature of 54°C (130°F) or above; (2) At 5°C (41°F) or less. On 10/08/24 at 11:24 AM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 resident (R) R10, reviewed for wandering and elopement potential. Findings: The facility policy titled, Elopement and Wandering Residents, last reviewed March 2024, states in part: Policy: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms to help avoid elopements. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, indicating R10's cognition was intact. R10 had diagnoses of alcohol dependence, bipolar, dementia, and senile degeneration of the brain. R10 was the only resident noted on the 1st floor as an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 3 residents (R) (R2, R7), reviewed for respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. R2 and R7 require oxygen and have a physician's orders to change oxygen tubing weekly. These were not changed as ordered. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include emphysema, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2 utilizes continuous oxygen. On 10/08/24 and 10/09/24, Surveyor observed R2's oxygen tubing which was dated 9/26/24. R3's physician orders state in part, Oxygen: Change oxygen tubing weekly. Example 2 R7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include hypertension, rhinitis, dysphagia and a history of pneumonia. emphysema, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R7 utilizes oxygen as needed. On 10/08/24 and 10/09/24, Surveyor observed R7's oxygen tubing which was dated 9/14/24. R7's physician orders state in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food that is palatable. 3 of 11 sampled residents expressed concerns about the palatibility of their food. R3, R8, and R9 reported issues to surveyors with the quality of their food. This is evidenced by: On 10/08/23 at 12:35 PM, Surveyor sampled a test tray for palatability, The pumpkin bar that was served was approximately 1/8-1/4 inch thick; it was very dry and difficult to cut with a fork. The bar tasted dry, hard and bland. Surveyor observed R8 a short time later; she was speaking to another resident about the pumpkin bar. R8 stated, It's hard as a rock. A short time later she said to the other resident, Be careful you don't break a tooth. On 10/08/24 at 12:36 PM, during dining observation on 2nd floor, R3 wheeled up to Surveyor in a wheelchair and said, The breakfast here is either warm or rotten. On 10/08/24 at 2:40 PM, Surveyor spoke with Dietary Manager (DM) F about the above observations. Surveyor asked if DM F ever performs test trays to ensure the food is palatable, DM F stated No. On 10/09/24 at 11:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of a reportable incident for 1 of 1 resident (R2). The facility was unable to provide a clear and concise timeline of events. The facility completed limited staff interviews, resulting in a conflicting timeline of the incident. Findings: The facility's abuse policy states, in part, Investigation: All investigations will be thorough, well documented, and immediate to determine if mistreatment occurred and, if so, to what extent. A thorough investigation may include: -Identifying staff responsible for the investigation. -Interviewing alleged victims and witnesses. -Interviewing accused individual allegedly responsible for mistreatment or suspected of causing an injury of unknown source. -Interviewing staff who worked on the same shift as the accused to determine if they ever witnessed any mistreatment by the accused. -Interviewing staff who worked previous shifts to determine if they were aware of an injury or accident. On 03/18/24, the facility submitted an Alleged Nursing Home Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (R) (R1, R10) observed during transfers and 1 of 1 resident, (R1) observed during incontinence cares. *Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene during incontinence cares for R1 or after incontinence care before touching R1's bedding, pillow, and remote control. *Staff did not sanitize EZ stand after transferring R10 from chair to bed. *Staff did not sanitize Hoyer lift after transferring R1 from chair to bed. Findings include: Example 1 On 03/05/24 at 8:30 a.m., Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J and CNA K transfer R10 with an EZ stand from R10's wheelchair to R10's bed. CNA J and CNA K washed their hands and donned gloves. R10 was then lifted with the lift to a standing position with the remote control and then wheeled over to the bed. CNA J lowered the lift so R10 could sit on the bed, the strap…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 78 of the 78 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The facility did not have a clear water management process or plan in effect to prevent transmission of Legionella infection. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) T picked up R74's nasal oxygen tubing from the floor and placed the contaminated tubing in R74's nose. Meal tray delivery was observed in which staff did not wash or sanitize their hands from one resident to the next. Insulin administration was observed in which staff did not sanitize or glove prior to administration of the medication. Findings include: Example 1 Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled, Water Management Program, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not obtain written consent, explaining medication risks and benefits, options, and alternatives when psychotropic medications were initiated and every 15 months thereafter. The facility practices affected 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (R35, R21, R51, R39). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication with date implemented 11/04/2023. The policy in part reads: ~Residents and/or representatives shall be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use . ~The written, informed consent of any patient shall first be obtained . ~Informed consent means written consent voluntarily signed by a patient who is competent and who understands the terms of the consent or by the patient's legal guardian . ~The time period for which the consent is effective, which shall be no longer than 15 months from the time the consent is given . Example 1 Surveyor reviewed R35's record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not involve residents and/or their representatives in the care planning process when changes were made during the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment periods. The facility practice affected 4 of 19 sampled and supplemental residents (R35, R21, R51 and R5). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Care Planning-Resident Participation with date implemented 08/02/23. The policy in part reads: ~The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals for care. ~The facility will discuss the plan of care with the resident and/or representatives at regularly scheduled care plan conferences and allow them to see the care plan, initially at routine intervals, and after significant changes. Example 1 Surveyor reviewed R35's MDS assessments and noted they were completed as follows: 03/17/23 Annual assessment 06/16/23 Quarterly assessment 07/17/23 Significant Change in Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not distribute fluids in a manner to prevent contamination. The facility practice has the potential to affect 11 of 25 sampled and supplemental residents who are served meals in their rooms on the second floor (R38, R70, R12, R40, R53, R21, R68, R60, R57, R55 and R30). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and received the facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements with a date implemented 9/01/23. The policy in part states: ~Food Distribution means the process involved in getting food to the residents. ~Food safety practices shell be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with deliver of food to the resident. ~Foods and beverages shall be distributed and served in a manner to prevent contamination . Example #1: Surveyor observed lunch service on 01/21/24 and breakfast service on 01/22/24 on the second floor. Surveyor observed staff to pour beverages and transport them to residents on their meal tray to their rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with a dignified existence by providing privacy while Resident (R31) was toileting and appropriate clothing was worn when R36 was in dining room. This occurred for 2 of 20 sampled and supplemental residents (R) R31 and R36. Findings include: Example 1 R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include polyosteoarthritis, congestive heart failure, scoliosis and age related osteoporosis. On 01/23/24 at 10:35 am, Surveyor was walking down the hallway and walked past R31's room. The door was open. Surveyor observed from the hallway R31 sitting on the toilet with the bathroom door open. Anyone walking past R31's room would have been able to see R31 sitting on the toilet in the bathroom with R31's pants down around ankles. Surveyor stood across the hall. About 4 minutes later, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G walk past R31's room. LPN G did not stop to provide privacy for R31. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (R12 and R15) within 30 days of admission to ensure individuals with a serious mental disorder received care and services in the most integrated setting possible. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, with a date implemented of 09/01/23, reads in part The Level II resident review must be completed within 40 calendar days of admission. Example 1 Surveyor reviewed R12's record and noted R12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive order. R12's orders include: 11/04/23: divalproex sodium 2 tablets once a day for major depression 11/05/23: fluoxetine 40 mg once a day for major depression Surveyor reviewed R12's record and could not locate a Level 1 PASARR. On 01/22/24 at 1:11 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (R3) has a comprehensive individualized care plan for peripheral catheter, multiple drug resistant organisms (MDRO), or transmission based precautions (TBP) to meet the needs of the resident. This is evidenced by: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include spina bifida, post-surgical malabsorption, ileus, neurogenic bowel, resistance to vancomycin, neurogenic bladder, sepsis due to unspecified organism, sepsis due to enterococcus, sepsis due to other specified staphylococcus, calculus of kidney, and terminal atrophy of kidney. R3 has a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in right chest for intravenous (IV) fluid access and lab draws. R3's physician orders state, change PICC dressing every Thursday in the afternoon, with order active on 08/10/23 and Heparin Sodium Lock Flush Intravenous Solution 100 UNIT/ML Use 5 ml intravenously in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, Friday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan, for 1 of 18 sampled residents (R), R432, for increased pain/pain management or changes in activities of daily living (ADLs) for fractures of right and left humerus. Findings include: R432 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (original admission) and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following hospitalization with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified fracture of humerus left arm, unspecified fracture of shaft of right arm, multiple myeloma without having achieved remission, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] discharge-return anticipated indicates Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 0 out of 15, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R432 required substantial/maximum assistance with eating, dependent with transfers, personal hygiene, and dressing. R432 sustained a fall on 01/02/24 with pain in right arm. On 01/04/24, x-ray of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care, consistent with standards of practice, to prevent pressure injury, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure injuries from forming for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for pressure injuries. (R36) -R36 was not repositioned or offered repositioning per care plan. -Facility failed to provide adequate cushion for wheelchair for resident with stage 3 pressure injury. -Facility failed to provide appropriate hand hygiene, glove changes, order of treatment, sanitizing table and lying down barrier for work area during wound care. Findings include: Repositioning: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2019, page 115, . Repositioning and mobilizing individuals is an important component in the prevention of pressure injuries. The underlying cause and formation of pressure injuries is multifaceted; however, by definition, pressure injuries cannot form without loading, or pressure, on tissue. Extended periods of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-03 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to employ a full time dietary manager with the appropriate certifications. This has the potential to affect all 79 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 01/02/24 at 1:55 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Dietary Manager (DM) D and asked how often the dietician is in the facility. DM D stated DM D saw the dietician twice in two months. DM D stated DM D communicates with the dietician via email. Surveyor asked DM D if DM D was certified or enrolled in a course. DM D stated DM D was working on it. On 01/03/24 at 11:00 a.m., Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and asked if DM D was certified or enrolled in a course. NHA A stated DM D was not certified but the facility would be enrolling DM D in a dietary manager course, but have not enrolled DM D as of this point. Surveyor asked NHA A how long DM D has been in the position of dietary manager. NHA A stated DM D has been the dietary manager since 10/27/23. NHA A stated a certified individual was supposed to start working at the facility on 01/08/23 but then did not take the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident receives food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance, and the food is palatable, attractive for 10 of 10 residents (R4, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14), and 1 of 1 test trays. Evidenced by: On 01/02/24 at 10:20 a.m., Surveyor interviewed R4 and asked about the food at the facility. R4 stated the food was awful. Tasted bland, and it was not always hot enough. On 01/02/24 at 10:42 a.m., Surveyor interviewed R6 and asked about the food at the facility. R6 stated R6 does not like the food. R6 stated the food is tasteless and if you mention you like something, they give it to you day after day. R6 stated the food is cold. On 01/02/24 at 11:05 a.m., Surveyor interviewed R7 and asked about the food at the facility. R7 stated the food is horrible and it has no flavor. R7 said, The presentation is poor. It looks like someone had the runs. On 01/02/24 at 11:35 a.m., Surveyor interviewed R8 and asked about the food at the facility. R8 stated the food is not good. R8 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day and when over 14 hours did not ensure a nourishing snack were served at bedtime to 11 of 11 residents (R) (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14). This is evidenced by: On 01/02/24, Surveyor reviewed the facility mealtime hours. Breakfast is at 7:30 a.m., lunch is at 12:00 p.m., and dinner is at 5:00 p.m. On 01/02/24 at 5:00 p.m., Surveyor observed dining service for the dinner meal. On third floor the dinner cart was delivered to the floor at 5:12 p.m. and all dinner trays were delivered to the residents by 5:25 p.m. On second floor the dinner cart was delivered to the floor at 5:26 p.m., and all dinner trays were delivered to the residents by 5:37 p.m. On first floor the dinner cart was delivered to the floor at 5:42 p.m. and all dinner trays from the first cart were delivered to the residents by 5:49 p.m. The second dinner cart was delivered to the first floor at 5:53 p.m., and all dinner trays were delivered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not provide a sanitary and comfortable environment for residents who had dirty bathrooms, dirty floors, overflowing garbage for 13 of 55 residents (R) (R9, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, and R10). This is evidenced by: On 01/02/23 between 11:50 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., Surveyor toured facility third floor. R9's room *Urine in toilet *Dried feces on toilet bowl *Brown and dried stain on floor next to the toilet *Bathroom sink filled with mouth wash bottle, emesis basin, and wash basin *Dried sticky substance on floor next to bed R16's room *Feces on toilet bowl *Feces on toilet riser *Garbage in room wastebasket full *Floor in resident room dried dirty shoe prints on floor R17's room *Resident room floor dirty with crumbs, floor filmy *Resident room wastebasket full R18's room *Dried feces on toilet R19's room *Dried dark spill on floor in front of recliner chair *Resident wastebasket not emptied Room of R20 and R21 (Shared bathroom) *Debris on floor, dirty: Not swept *Floor not mopped *Light not working in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all incidents involving potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for unexplained bruising for 1 of 3 residents, (R) reviewed (R27). This is evidenced by: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy dated 10/01/23, revised 10/13/23 states: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when the resident had a significant change for 1 of 1 resident (R) 8 reviewed for MD notification. R8 eloped from the facility; the physician was not consulted about this event. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Notification of Changes, dated 10/02/22, states in part The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to spastic hemiplegia affects right dominate side, diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, depression, other seizures, and epileptic syndrome with complex partial seizures. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that R8 scored a 08 out of 15 for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicates R8's cognition is moderately impaired. On 09/09/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R), R8. R8's care plan was not updated after an elopement on 09/09/23. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Elopements and Wandering Residents, dated 09/01/22, states in part: .The resident and family/authorized representative will be included in the plan of care . R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that include spastic hemiplegia affects right dominate side, diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, depression, other seizures, and epileptic syndrome with complex partial seizures. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that R8 scored 08 out of 15 for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicates R8's cognition is moderately impaired. On 09/09/23 at about 11:30 AM, a family member of another resident stated to the 1st floor nurse that they saw a person in a wheelchair with their foot bandaged, wheeling themselves northbound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported in accordance with state law for 1 of 3 residents (R) (R5). The facility did not report alleged violation of abuse to law enforcement when R5 slapped R2 across the face. Findings: Facility policy entitled Abuse prevention/vulnerable adult plan - Wisconsin, revised 02/02/23, states in part: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, intended to inflict injury, psychosocial harm, harassment, humiliate, threaten, or frighten a resident. The designated person will notify the designated agency, local law enforcement, . as soon as possible after reviewing the investigation. Administration or other designated staff will report the results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include new developed interventions for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R5) of 3, whose care plans were reviewed, R2 and R5's care plans were not updated to reflect additional interventions put into place to prevent resident to resident altercations. This is evidenced by: On 08/22/23, Surveyor reviewed a facility reported incident investigation that identified R2 yelling at another resident, when R5 approached R2 and slapped R2 in the face. Staff intervened and separated residents and placed on 15-minute checks for three hours and then moved to one-hour checks for the remaining 24 hours. Social services coordinated efforts with R2 and R5 to reduce the amount of time spent together in proximity. Care Plan was not updated to indicate new interventions. On 08/22/23 at 1:30 pm, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H regarding the resident to resident altercation. CNA H stated awareness of the incident but is not aware of new interventions made to the care plans. On 08/22/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DOVE HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDSTAR - DIVINE HOLDING SUPERIOR, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/28/2023 |
| DIVINE SUPERIOR HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/28/2023 |
| GOLDSTAR CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/28/2023 |
| GOLDSTAR WISCONSIN ASSOCIATES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/28/2023 |
| MARKOVITS, ISAAK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/28/2023 |
| RICHLAND, ILAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/28/2023 |
| BUKER, MACEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/28/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $473K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.