Brookdale University Park SNF (al)

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 208 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, review of the the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and review of a facility policy titled Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal the facility failed to ensure two garbage dumpsters had lids for closing and the area outside of the laundry room was free of debris on the ground and pests flying around and on trash. This affected two of two garbage dumpsters and the area outside of the laundry room; and had the potential to affect 62 of 62 residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of The 2022 U.S. FDA Food Code included the following: . 5-501.13 Receptacles. (A) . receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . and for use with materials containing FOOD residue shall be durable, cleanable, insect- and rodent-resistant, leakproof, and nonabsorbent. 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles. (A) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . with materials containing FOOD residue and used outside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. (B)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, and Departmental (Environmental Services)-Laundry and Linen the facility failed to ensure resident laundry was handled in a manner to prevent the spread of infection and failed to ensure: 1) The sink in the linen laundry room was clean. 2) The linen laundry area was clean and free of flies. 3) The soap dispenser above the sink in the linen laundry room was in working order. 4) Laundry Staff (LS) wore protective gear while folding clean linens. 5) LS washed or sanitized hands after moving between the dirty and clean sides of the linen laundry room. 6) LS washed or sanitized hands after handling soiled linen from the trash can and before handling clean linens. 7) The facility had a designated separate area for clean and dirty items in the facility laundry room. 8) Dirty clothes and dirty linen were not stored outside without covering near the facility laundry room. This had the potential to effect all resident's residing in the facility. Findings include: A facility policy titled Departmental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, a review of the facility's pharmacy policy titled, 8.2 Disposal/ Destruction of Expired or Discontinued Medications, the facility failed to accurately account and periodically reconcile controlled medication records. The facility failed to ensure (RI) #12's controlled medication record for Lorazepam was complete and failed to ensure RI #12's Lorazepam was accounted for on [DATE]. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048012. This deficient practice had the potential to affect RI #12, one of 16 sampled residents, and affected two of four medication carts observed during this survey. Findings include: On [DATE] the State Agency received an Online Incident Report from the facility alleging Abuse-Missappropriation of Resident Property for RI #12 when Charge Nurses performing count of controlled medications noticed a card containing two tablets of Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) was missing. A facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Resident Medication Rights, and the facility investigative file for Resident Identifier (RI) #107, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff notified the Medical Doctor (MD) or the Nurse Practitioner (NP) when RI #107 refused or missed wound treatment on 04/03/2024, 04/04/2024, and 04/05/2024. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00047486 and affected RI #107, one of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: On 04/06/2024 the State Agency received an Online Incident Report from the facility alleging RI #107's wound dressing had not been changed for a couple of days. A facility policy titled Resident Medication Rights last revised 01/01/2013 documented: . Procedure: . 3. Facility should notify Physician/Prescriber of a resident's refusal of treatment . 4. Facility should notify Physician/Prescriber of a resident's refusal of medications/treatment for periods…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation Policy, and the facility's abuse investigative file, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #12 was free from misappropriation of controlled medication on 05/30/2024 when two tablets of Lorazepam belonging to RI #12 was missing and could not be located. The facility's investigation determined Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 and Registered Nurse (RN) #3 failed to count controlled medications when LPN #16 gave RN #3 keys to the medication cart where RI #12's medications were stored. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048012 and affected one of 16 sampled residents. Findings include: On 05/30/2024 the State Agency received an Online Incident Report from the facility alleging Abuse-Misappropriation of Resident Property for RI #12 when Charge Nurses performing count of controlled medications noticed a card containing two tablets of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Procedure: Wound Care, and review of the facility investigative file for Resident Identifier (RI) #107, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff followed Resident Identifier (RI) #107 physician's orders to provide daily surgical wound treatment. RI #107 did not receive the daily treatment on 04/03/2024, 04/04/2024, or 04/05/2024 prior to being discharged from the facility. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00047486 and affected RI #107, one of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: On 04/06/2024 the State Agency received an Online Incident Report from the facility alleging RI #107's wound dressing had not been changed for a couple of days. A facility policy titled Procedure: Wound Care last revised 04/2024 documented: . The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. General Guidelines 1. Verify that there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy titled Psychotropic Drug Management Policy the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #12 did not receive three doses Lorazepam (Ativan), a psychotropic medication, without a physician's order. RI #12 had orders for Lorazepam that was discontinued on 05/22/2024. The CONTROLLED DRUG RECORDs for RI #12's Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) indicated doses were administered on 05/25/2024 and 05/28/2024. The CONTROLLED DRUG RECORD for RI #12's Lorazepam 1 (one) mg indicated a dose was administered on 05/30/2024. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048012. This affected RI #12, one of six residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medication use. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled Psychotropic Drug Management Policy with a last revised date of 10/2022 documented: Policy Overview . Psychotropic is defined as any drug that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy titled Medication Errors the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #12 was free from significant medication errors when the staff administered three doses Lorazepam (Ativan) without an active physician's order. RI #12 had an active order for Lorazepam that was discontinued on 05/22/2024. The Controlled Drug Record for RI #12's Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) indicated doses were administered on 05/25/2024 and 05/28/2024. The Narcotic Log for RI #12's Lorazepam 1 (one) mg indicated a dose were administered on 05/30/2024. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048012. This affected RI #12, one of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: The facility policy titled Medication Errors with a revised date of 10/2016 documented: Policy Overview A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs . which is not in accordance with Health Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, review of a facility policy titled, Labeling, and review of the 2017 U.S. (United States) Public Health Service Food Code, the facility failed to ensure: 1. open food items were labeled with a use by date prior to storage in the walk-in cooler; and 2. outdated food was not stored in the walk-in cooler. These failures had the potential to affect 54 of 54 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The facility policy titled, Labeling, with a last revised date of 5/10, included, . All food items . must have a date marked before putting in any storage . A review of the 2017 U.S. Public Health Service Food Code revealed: . 3-5 LIMITATION OF GROWTH OF ORGANISMS OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN . 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . (B) . FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT and if the FOOD is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, review of a facility policy titled, Documentation of Medication Administration, and review of facility Daily Staffing Sheets and Time Detail Reports, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff documented administration of Resident Identifier (RI) #98's and RI #199's IV (Intravenous) antibiotics on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This deficiency affected two of three sampled residents reviewed for IV antibiotic administration. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Documentation of Medication Administration revealed: Policy Statement The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. A Nurse . shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). 2. Administration of medication must be documented immediately after . it is given . 1) RI #98 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $73K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL