No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brookdale Santa Catalina

7500 North Calle Sin Envidia, Tucson, AZ 85718 · For profit - Corporation · 42 certified beds · (520) 742-6242 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (520) 742-6242 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Mariner1.1 mi
1715 E Skyline Dr Ste 131 · (520) 779-9156 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6370 N Campbell Ave · (520) 299-7390 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2805 E Skyline Dr · (520) 232-6340 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship
7281 N Skyline Dr · (520) 395-3900

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.8%10.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight38.1%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.2%21.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.3%20.6%21.2%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%87.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.0%23.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%10.4%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.88U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.48hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.6%CMS range 53.8–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.2–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.6–9.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
1.39
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
37.8%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 28.8 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure their Neglect policy was implemented in that an allegation of neglect was not reported to the SA within the required timeframe and the investigation of the alleged neglect was not documented. The deficient practice could lead to residents feeling unsafe and/or having their needs unmet while receiving care at the facility.Findings include:A facility self-report was submitted to the SA on April 20, 2026 at 11:51 A.M., which revealed that a Nursing Student had voiced an allegation of neglect to Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #2). The report further revealed that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/Staff #13) neglected the residents in her unit when she failed to provide cares to them.Review of the facility's 5-day report revealed that a Nursing Student had initially made an allegation of neglect on March 27, 2026 to Staff #2. The report indicated that upon receiving the initial allegation, Staff #2 then reported it to the facility's former…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the SA within the timeframes required by the facility's policy and federal regulation. The deficient practice could lead to residents feeling unsafe and/or having their needs unmet while receiving care at the facility.Findings include:A facility self-report was submitted to the SA on April 20, 2026 at 11:51 A.M., which revealed that a Nursing Student had voiced an allegation of neglect to Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #2). The report further revealed that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/Staff #13) neglected the residents in her unit when she failed to provide cares to them.Review of the facility's 5-day report revealed that a Nursing Student had initially made an allegation of neglect on March 27, 2026 to Staff #2. The report indicated that upon receiving the initial allegation, Staff #2 then reported it to the facility's former Administrator (Staff #9). The report further indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was thoroughly investigated and that the investigation was documented. The deficient practice could lead to residents feeling unsafe and/or having their needs unmet while receiving care at the facility.Findings include:A facility self-report was submitted to the SA on April 20, 2026 at 11:51 A.M., which revealed that a Nursing Student had voiced an allegation of neglect to Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #2). The report further revealed that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/Staff #13) neglected the residents in her unit when she failed to provide cares to them.Review of the facility's 5-day report revealed that a Nursing Student had initially made an allegation of neglect on March 27, 2026 to Staff #2. The report indicated that upon receiving the initial allegation, Staff #2 then reported it to the facility's former Administrator (Staff #9). The report further indicated that the facility made initial report of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#2) was properly transferred during a shower. The deficient practice could lead to serious injury. The Facility provided sufficient evidence that noncompliance was identified on March 27, 2026, and April 16.2026 prior to the survey, and was in substantial compliance at the time of the survey for F0684. A QAPI meeting minutes revealed the original date identified was April 16, 2026, and the meeting was conducted on April 19, 2026, education provided by the facility revealed evidence of staff education/training. Past non compliance was identified. Findings include: Resident # 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of 3rd lumbar, surgical aftercare, cauda equina syndrome, spinal stenosis, and need for assistance with personal care. A Care Plan initiated on April 10, 2026 revealed that Resident # 2 required assistance with bathing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered, stored and residents were assessed for self-administration of medication for 3 residents (#1, #7 and #24). The deficient practice could result in medications not being administered according to physician's orders and medications not being stored safely.-Regarding Resident # 7Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include fracture of the right femur, cognitive communication deficit, weakness, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated Resident #7 was cognitively intact. An observation was conducted on June 24, 2025 at 2:31 PM. A bottle of Chloride Nasal Spray was observed on a table next to Resident #7's recliner. A second observation was conducted on June 25, 2025 at 2:17 PM. A bottle of Chloride Nasal Spray was observed in the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure multiple infection control practices were being adhered to in the kitchen. The deficient practices could increase the risk of residents consuming food that is not being prepared in a sanitary manner. The facility ' s census was 27.Findings include:On June 25, 2025 at 12:18 PM, the tray line was observed in the 1st floor kitchen. The Sous Chef/Staff #23 was observed using a red knife to split open a baked potato. He then took a piece of cooked chicken, with tongs, and moved it from the pan on the tray line to a cutting board behind him. He then used the same red knife to chop up the cooked chicken. An interview was conducted with the Executive Chef/Staff #31 on June 25, 2025 at 11:02 AM. He explained that cross contamination of foods is when you ' re touching hot foods and raw foods with the same hands or utensils. He explained that the risk to the residents would be salmonella, bacteria, or possible food allergies. He indicated that he would consider using the same knife, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered, stored and residents were assessed for self-administration of medication for one residents (#1). The deficient practice could result in medications not being administered according to physician's orders and medications not being stored safely.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included pneumonia, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and urinary tract infection (UTI).Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.0, cognitively intact.During the survey's initial pool on June 24, 2025 at 10:55 AM, in Resident #1's room at the bedside table was a green covered top container which has Flonase label on it stored in a Ziplock bag and Resident stated that it is there to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observations, and facility documentation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were met regarding accurate documentation for one sampled resident (#15). The deficient practice could result in resident records not being accurate and complete.Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including: fracture of left patella, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, and major depressive disorder.An admission Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.An interview with resident #15 was conducted on June 24, 2025, at 10:27 a.m. Resident #15 stated that he had a beard-trimming kit that had gone missing since he arrived at the facility, and believed that other personal items had gone missing as well. Review of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#332) was free from preventable accidents including oral administration of Dakins solution. The sample size was 13. This deficient practice could result in an adverse event for the resident.Findings include:Resident #332 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, acute pulmonary edema, asthma, and dysphagia. A review of the 5-day MDS (minimum data set) dated April 14, 2025 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 13, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the progress notes revealed that on April 12, 2025 at 7:08 P.M. there was a noted in change in condition. It was documented that vitals taken April 11, 2025 between 9 and 10 P.M. showed an elevated systolic pressure reading of 147 while lying down, pulse, respirations and body temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review, review of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) Licensing verification system and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #29) had a valid license to practice in the State of Arizona. The deficient practice could lead to care provided to residents not meeting their needs safely and in a manner that promotes residents' rights, physical, mental, and social well-being. Findings include: Based on personnel record review, Staff #29 was hired by the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's records indicate Staff #29's Practical Nurse (PN) license was valid on [DATE] and the license originated in Texas. Review of the NCSBN licensing portal revealed that staff #29's PN license was revoked on [DATE]. Review of the facility's investigative report indicated that staff #29 informed the facility, on [DATE], that her license was revoked. The report further indicated that staff #29 was immediately removed from the schedule and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in resident care needs not being met. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including a displaced fracture of the left femur, pain in the left hip, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, dementia, and heart disease. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 11, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the baseline care plan initiated on June 17, 2024 revealed that resident #3 was noted to be a high fall risk and that the call light should be in reach, and that resident needs prompt responses to all requests for assistance, resident encouraged to wear appropriate footwear,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was appropriately monitored post fall. The deficient practice could result in residents being injured. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including a displaced fracture of the left femur, pain in the left hip, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, dementia, and heart disease. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 11, suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the baseline care plan initiated on June 17, 2024 revealed that resident #3 was noted to be a high fall risk and that the call light should be in reach, and that resident needs prompt responses to all requests for assistance, resident encouraged to wear appropriate footwear, occupational and physical therapy evaluations and treatment, cuing and supervision, bed lowered, mats on the floor by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#26 and #79) and their representatives were notified, in writing, of the reason for a transfer to the hospital. The deficient practice could result in residents being inappropriately transferred or discharged and not having a continuity of care once leaving the facility. Findings included: Regarding Resident #26 Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure, and unsteadiness on their feet. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note by social services dated February 14, 2024 at 11:01 A.M. revealed the resident's wife was contacted regarding the resident's behavior from the previous night. Review of physician order with a revision date of February 16, 2024 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocols were followed during medication administration for two residents (#179 and #6). The deficient practice could result in the development and transmission of infections. Findings included: An observation of a medication administration was conducted on April 30, 2024 at 7:30 A.M. with licensed practical nurse (LPN)/staff #35). Staff #35 dispensed resident #179's medications that included an aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) tablet, calcium with vitamin D tablet, colace 100 mg capsule, folic acid tablet, multivitamin with minerals tablet, omega-3 capsule (fish oil) 500 mg capsules, vitamin C 500 mg give tablets, bupropion tablet, duloxetine hydrochloride 60 mg capsule, hydrochloroquine sulfate tablet, isosorbide extended release half a tablet (15 mg), meclizine hydrochloride 25 mg tablet, and pregabalin 100 mg capsule into a medication cup. After dispensing the medications, staff #35 locked the medications cart and signed out of the computer. At approximately 7:50 A.M. staff #35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was in proper working order. Findings include: A review of the facility's Food Safety Inspection Report, dated January 13, 2024, indicated that the electric meat slicer plastic food contact plate was cracked. An observation was conducted on April 29, 2024 at 10:45 A.M. of the facility's kitchen and observed that the same plastic food contact plate was still cracked, the meat slicer was not covered, and did not have an out of order sign posted. A second observation was conducted on April 30, 2024 and the meat slicer was in the same condition as observed yesterday on April 29, 2024. On May 1, 2024 at 9:00 A.M. a copy of the work order was requested from the facility to determine what was being done to fix the machine. On May 1, 2024, the facility Administrator (staff #33) provided a copy of the work order dated May 1, 2024 at 9:15 A.M. An interview was conducted with the Administrator (staff #33) on May 1, 2024 at 10:10 A.M. The Administrator provided a purchase order, dated May 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#79) was given a bed-hold policy before a transfer to the hospital. The deficient practice may result in the resident and resident representative not being aware of the bed-hold policy and their right to return to the facility immediately after hospital discharge. Findings included: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, fracture of the right femur, and heart disease. Review of a bed hold agreement signed by the resident on admission dated April 4, 2024 revealed the resident agreed with bed hold in the event the resident was admitted to the hospital. A review of the 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note dated April 14, 2024 revealed resident #79 was sent to the hospital due to a surgical site assessed as red and hot.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#20) and their representative were provided with a summary of the baseline care plan. The deficient practice could result in residents and their representative not receiving a summary of their baseline care plan. Findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also noted that the resident participated in goal setting. Review of records revealed a comprehensive care plan was developed on April 4, 2024 and a collaborative care review was conducted with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on April 8, 2024. During an interview on 4/30/24 at 3:40p, with the social services director, she stated the interim…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that two of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA/staffs #35 and #8) were able to demonstrate competencies and skills necessary to provide care for residents. The census was 31. The deficient practice could result in inadequate care for residents. Findings include: Review of a personnel file for a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/staff #35) revealed a hire date of 04/17/19, for hourly employment. The personnel record contained no evidence of a comprehensive evaluation for nursing skills and competencies for 2020, 2021 or 2022. The personnel file for a CNA (staff #8) revealed a hire date of 06/17/20, for hourly employment. Review of the personnel file revealed no evidence of a comprehensive evaluation for nursing skills and competencies for 2022. An interview with the Human Resources Director (staff #84) was conducted on 01/05/23 at 10:33 a.m. She stated that the CNA skills sheets she had were dated 2021 and that she would ask the administrator if they had anything more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to implement a surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring of infection and failed to ensure an ongoing analysis of surveillance data and documentation of follow-up activity response. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infections in the facility. Findings include: During the entrance conference on January 3, 2023 at 8:09 a.m., the Administrator (staff #61) stated the facility currently had no COVID-19, and that the last COVID-19 outbreak was on November 7, 2022. Staff #61 stated that the facility does have a staff member assigned to be the infection preventionist (IP)and that this person is Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #6). Staff # 61 stated the IP is responsible for the facility's vaccination efforts, infection surveillance, and antibiotic stewardship. Record review of the facility's infection surveillance was conducted on January 4, 2022 at 1:57 p.m. with an infection preventionist/licensed practical nurse (LPN/ staff #6). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to conduct an ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship as required by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, and failed to review clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory reports to determine if antibiotics are indicated. The deficient practice could have the potential for residents to have adverse effects due to the lack of protocols and monitoring. Findings include: On January 3, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. the survey team entered the facility. At 8:09 a.m., an entrance conference was conducted with the facility administrator (staff #61). During the conference, staff #61 stated he has a full-time infection preventionist (IP), a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #6). Staff #61 stated the IP is responsible for the facility's vaccination efforts, infection control surveillance, and antibiotic stewardship. Record review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was conducted on January 4, 2022 at 1:57 p.m. with the IP (LPN/ staff #6). During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#140) advance directives were completed upon admission. The deficient practice could result in resident's advanced directives not being known or honored. Findings include: Resident #140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of pelvis, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and essential hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 99 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognitive skills and cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's physician orders conducted on January 3, 2023 revealed no order for a code status. Review of the advance directive paperwork revealed that it had been completed upon admission. Additional review of the clinical record revealed the advance directive was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#18) care plan was updated/revised to meet her changing needs. The sample size was 15. The deficient practice could result in inadequate care and/or not meeting the needs of the resident. Findings include: Resident #18 admitted to the facility 01/21/22 with diagnoses that included a pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage 4, polyneuropathy and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. The risk for falls care plan initiated 01/21/22 related to impaired mobility and cognition had a goal to not sustain serious injury. Interventions included lab monitoring. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident fell without sustaining injury on dates including: 02/23/22 and 03/04/22. However, the risk for falls care plan was not updated to indicate additional fall interventions had been put in place. According to the resident's record, she sustained additional falls on dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to convey the discharge summary information to the resident and/or authorized person, and failed to include reconciliation of all pre and post discharge medications for one resident (#33). The deficient practice could result in resident's not receiving the correct discharge information and medications. Findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, generalized muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder. A physician progress note dated November 6, 2022 at 3:01 p.m., stated the visit type was skilled nursing facility discharge visit. The note included an assessment plan that stated discharge today, and resident does not need new prescriptions. Further, the note stated home health nursing coming in the morning that was arranged by the family. Review of nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon personnel file review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete yearly performance reviews and provide regular in-service education based upon the outcome of the reviews for 1 of 2 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA/staff #35). The inadequate practice could result in insufficient and inadequate care for residents. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of a personnel file for a CNA (staff #35) revealed a hire date of 04/17/19, for hourly employment. Review of the file did not reveal a yearly performance review had been completed or any evidence of training reflective of the review. On 01/05/23 at 10:33 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (staff #84). She stated that training is monitored in the system and that managers are responsible to enforce that with their employees. She stated that it is her responsibility to get employee reports and to give them to the department heads. She stated that the department heads are responsible for ensuring the training is completed. She stated that she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacist recommendation was reviewed and acted upon for one resident (#5). The sample size was 5 residents. The deficient practice could result in medication irregularities that go unnoticed or are not acted upon. Findings include: Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia, major depressive disorder, recurrent and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. A Bupropion (antidepressant) care plan dated 09/28/22 related to a diagnosis of depression as evidenced by verbalizing anger over new placement in the skilled nursing facility had a goal to show adjustment to the placement. Interventions included to give medications as ordered by the physician and to monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. A Lorazepam (anxiolytic) care plan initiated 09/28/22 related to a diagnosis of anxiety as evidenced by worrying over his current health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#5) receiving psychotropic medications received consistent monitoring for behaviors and side effects and failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication had a duration of treatment. Five residents were reviewed for medication use. The deficient practice could result in unnecessary medication use and adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia, major depressive disorder, recurrent and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. A Bupropion (antidepressant) care plan dated 09/28/22 related to a diagnosis of depression as evidenced by verbalizing anger over new placement in the skilled nursing facility had a goal to show adjustment to the placement. Interventions included to give medications as ordered by the physician and to monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. A Lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation, interviews, policy, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed infection control training. The deficient practice could lead to unqualified staff acting as the IP and improper infection prevention practices within the facility. Findings include: During the entrance conference on January 3, 2023 at 8:09 a.m., the Administrator (staff #61) stated the facility currently had no COVID-19, and that the last COVID-19 outbreak was on November 7, 2022. Staff #61 stated that the facility does have a staff member assigned to be the infection preventionist (IP)and that this person is Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #6). Staff # 61 stated the IP is responsible for the facility's vaccination efforts, surveillance, and antibiotic stewardship. An interview was conducted on January 4, 2023 at 1:57 a.m. with IP (staff #6). Staff #6 stated the facility was utilizing her as the IP and had done so since November 15. 2022. She stated the she does not have formal infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interview and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (#140) received information regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations, and failed to offer the vaccinations according to their policy. The deficient practice could increase the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from influenza and/or pneumococcal disease. Findings include: Resident #140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of pelvis, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and essential hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 99 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognitive skills. Review of the clinical record revealed no documentation that the resident and/or the responsible party…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to COVID-19 vaccine exemption requirement for one staff (#33). Findings include: On January 3, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. the survey team entered the facility. At 8:09 a.m., an entrance conference was conducted with the facility administrator (staff #61). During the conference, a COVID-19 staff vaccination matrix for staff was requested from the administrator (staff #61). Review of the facility employee list provided on January 3, 2023 indicated staff #33 was an active employee. On January 4, 2023 the facility provided the facility staff COVID-19 vaccine log. Review of the facility document provided by staff #61, revealed one certified nursing assistant (CNA/ staff #33) was coded GN, indicating the CNA was granted non-medical exemption. On January 4, 2022 at 8:53 a.m., a document request was given to staff #61 related to staff #33's COVID-19 exemption documents including screening for eligibility, education, and declination form. On January 4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file reviews, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide evidence that 1 out 10 sampled staff (#36) was provided training for abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility census was 31. The deficient practice could result in inadequate recognition, prevention and reporting of abuse. Findings include: Review of a personnel file for a Dietary Assistant (staff #36) revealed a hire date of 08/06/13, for hourly employment. The personnel record contained no evidence of training for abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. On 01/05/23 at 10:33 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (staff #84). She stated that training is monitored in the system and that managers are responsible to enforce that with their employees. She stated that it is her responsibility to get employee reports and to give them to the department heads. She stated that the department heads are responsible for ensuring the training is completed. She stated she was not sure what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, interviews, and Federal guidelines, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA/staff #35) had no less than 12 hours per year of required in-service training to ensure continuing competencies. The facility census was 31. The deficient practice could result in inadequate care for residents. Findings include: Review of a personnel file for a CNA (staff #35) revealed a hire date of 04/17/19, for hourly employment. Per the 2022 User Learning records, staff #35 had completed 3 out of 25 required in-service courses. On 01/05/23 at 10:33 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (staff #84). She stated that training is monitored in the system and that managers are responsible to enforce that with their employees. She stated that it is her responsibility to get employee reports and to give them to the department heads. She stated that the department heads are responsible for ensuring the training is completed. She stated that she did not know what happened in regard to the CNA #35. An interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARCPI HOLDINGS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/30/2002
WHITE, CHADWICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/09/2018
KUSSOW, DAWNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/15/2024
LA MARRE, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/22/2017
MUNOZ, ANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
STENGLE, NIKOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/08/2025
CURTIS, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/22/2025
SCHILTZ, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/22/2025
STUMLER, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2026
WADLEIGH, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
ASHER, JORDANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
DRAYTON, CLAUDIAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
FIORAVANTI, MARKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
FREED, VICTORIAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
HAUSMAN, JOSHUAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
MACE, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
WARREN, DENISEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
WIELANSKY, LEEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
LBMC PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
OHI ASSET (AZ) TUCSON-7500 NORTH CALLE SIN ENVIDIA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2021
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2021
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2021
WALTERS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
RADEKA, NICHOLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense6% of expenses

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$188per resident / day
operating cost
$5,726per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$171per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Arizona Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035253. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next