Bayshire Riverwalk Post-Acute
350 Calloway Drive, Building C, Bakersfield, CA 93312 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (661) 587-0182 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,668 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-02)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.7%CMS range 52.5–66.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.3%CMS range 6.1–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.0–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.67 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Follow the physical therapy (type of treatment that helps regain normal movement and ease pain after an injury, surgery, or a medical condition that limits the ability to function) recommendation for non-weight bearing status (limiting the amount of weight or pressure placed on a specific limb) on right upper extremity (RUE) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) instructed Resident 1 to hold onto the grab bars with both hands while in the shower room.2. Ensure Resident 1 was sitting in the shower chair while being undressed in the shower room for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).3. Ensure Resident 1 was standing on a dry non-slippery floor in the shower room for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).These failures resulted in Resident 1 slipping and falling on wet shower floor, which resulted in two skin tears (traumatic wound where the top layer of skin separates from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse (any intentional act causing injury or trauma to another person through bodily contact) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 hit Resident 1 on the right side of his face while CNA 1 and CNA 2 were changing Resident 1's adult brief. This failure resulted in Resident 1 crying and having redness on his face.Findings:During a review of the SOC-341 (Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse), dated 8/26/25, the SOC-341 indicated, A CNA (2) stated another CNA (1) slapped a resident (Resident 1) in the face while providing care.During a review of Resident 1's Summary of the Incident (SI), documented by Administrator, dated 8/31/25, the SI indicated, 08/26/25 0540 (approximately) . (CNA 2) and (CNA 1) entered (Resident 1's) room and attempted to change (Resident 1). (CNA 2) was positioned on the right side of (Resident 1's) bed (closer to the room door) and (CNA 1) was positioned on the left side of (Resident 1's) bed (next to the window).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature was taken for a cup of soup prior to serving it to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after being heated up, by the nursing staff, in the microwave. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a second degree burn (damages the epidermis (surface of the skin)) and dermis (thick layer of living tissue below the epidermis containing blood vessels, nerve endings, sweat glands, hair follicles and other structures) layers of the skin and is characterized by blistering, deep redness, swelling, and intense pain) to his left-hand pointer finger.Findings:During a review of Resident 81's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 81 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of acquired absence (loss of a body part) of right finger(s), polyneuropathy (damages many nerves in the body, causing a combination of symptoms like numbness, tingling, pain and muscle weakness), and rheumatoid arthritis (disease causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call lights were answered timely for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3's unmet care needs and emotional distress.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 1/21/26, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental processes that allow individuals to think, learn, and remember) score was 15 (13 to 15 points indicates the resident has cognitive intactness). The MDS indicated Resident 1 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for toileting hygiene (the ability to maintain perineal hygiene, adjust clothes before and after voiding or having bowel movement).During a review of Resident 1's care plan with the focus on (Resident 1) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living - basic self-care tasks like eating, bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals (a therapeutic substance, such as a vaccine or drug, derived from biological sources) were stored appropriately when: 1. Vaccines were not labeled after opening. 2. Expired medications were not disposed.These failures had the potential to result in residents being administered vaccines and medications that were expired and not receiving the intended therapeutic effect.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25, at 11:39 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Medication Room (2), a vial of (Tubersol (TB) is an infection that usually affects the lungs) for (Tuberculin skin tests (TST) are administered to detect the presence of Mycobacterium (type of germs) tuberculosis, the bacterium that causes TB) was opened with no open date. LVN 1 stated the vial should have been dated when opened.During a review of the facilities Immunization Report (IR) (undated), the IR indicated, the following TST's were administered to residents on 11/4/25, 11/8/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food service safety and sanitary kitchen conditions were followed when: 1a. Dry food items were not stored in airtight sealed containers.1b. Vegetables were retained that were not safe for consumption.1c. Cold food items were not covered to prevent spillage and cross-contamination.2a. Clean dishware was not covered to prevent debris contamination.2b. Clean Utensils were not covered to prevent contamination.3a. Pasta was not labeled with an opened date.3b. Dairy Creamer was not labeled with an opened date.3c. Individually pre-dished, cut-up fruit, vegetables, and baked desserts were not labeled with prepared and use-by dates.These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for residents.Findings:1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 9:21 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), in the dry storage room the following was found:An opened 25-pound (measurement of weight)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection control practices when the facility failed to:1) Follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on Infection Prevention and Surveillance when the facility's Infection Control Surveillance (ICS) binder did not contain information on infection trend tracker, changes and resolution, analyzation of trends identified, and educational program based on prevention.2) Ensure three of three dirty linen containers were in good repair.3) Ensure floors were disinfected (cleaned with chemical to destroy bacteria which causes diseases).4) Follow their P&P titled, ISOLATION TRAYS for one of five sampled residents (Resident 128).5) Assist two of five sampled residents (Resident 37 and Resident 84) with hand hygiene.These failures had the potential to spread infection to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1) During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/3/25 at 10:26 a.m. with Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the facility's ICS binder dated August 2025, September 2025, and October 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program (a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antibiotics/antimicrobials) for four of four sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 134, Resident 135, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential for residents developing antibiotic resistance (bacteria evolve defenses, allowing them to survive drugs meant to kill them, making infections harder to treat, this happens when bacteria change due to antibiotic use, creating superbugs, leading to longer illnesses, higher costs, and increased mortality) with the use antibiotic and experiencing adverse health outcomes. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/3/25 at 9:03 a.m. with Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), the facility's Infection Control Surveillance (ICS) binder dated August 2025, September 2025, and October 2025 were reviewed. The ICS indicated Resident 10 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 133) right to refuse was respected. This failure resulted in a violation of Resident 133's right to be treated with respect and dignity.Findings:During an interview on 12/1/25 at 7:54 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, CNA 5 stated Resident 133 had dried poop all over her bottom. CNA 5 stated Resident 133 did not want her brief changed; CNA 5 stated she could not leave Resident 133 in her brief because there was a lot of poop and Resident 133 was unstable. CNA 5 stated she cleaned and changed Resident 133's brief and Resident 133 was screaming during the brief change. CNA 5 stated, I should have left (Resident 133) because (Resident 133) was screaming. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 11:14 a.m. with the Administrator, Administrator stated during an interview with CNA 5, CNA 5 stated she was assisting Resident 133 in the restroom; Resident 133 was standing up and had a large bowel movement and CNA 5 was able to undo the brief and put a new one on but the whole…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was easily accessible for three of 46 sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 102, and Resident 62). This failure resulted in Resident 12, Resident 102, and Resident 62 being unable to call staff and to have unmet care needs.Findings:During an interview on 12/1/25 at 9:29 a.m. with Resident 12, Resident 12 stated his call light was not within reach. Resident 12 stated this made him feel very frustrated.During an interview on 12/1/25 at 9:30 a.m. with Resident 12's Family Members (FM) 3 and FM 4 at bedside, FM 3 and FM 4 had watery and teary eyes. FM 4 stated, When we get here, his [Resident 12] head is away from the bed and he [Resident 12] can't reach the call light, and he [Resident 12] doesn't have his phone near him, it makes me sad.During a review of Resident 12's Care Plan (CP), dated 11/10/25, the CP indicated, Be sure [Resident 12] call light is within reach.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 10:08 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 101) were provided with 72 hour written notification prior to receiving a new roommate. These failures resulted in a violation of residents' rights.Findings:During a review of Resident 37's Progress Note (PN) dated 11/9/25 at 10:32 a.m., the PN indicated, Room change update: Resident [37] was temporarily moved from 103-A to 107-A the evening of 11/8/25 due to incompatible roommate. Resident [37] will be moved to 121-B.During a review of the Action Summary (AR-report used to identify room changes that have been made) dated 12/2/25 at 1:16 p.m., the AR indicated (Resident 37) was moved from 103-A to 107-A on 11/8/25 and moved from 107-A to 121-B on 11/9/25.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 8:40 a.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), SSD stated when a new roommate was to be received, the notification was done informally, and nothing was documented.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 8:48 a.m. with admission Coordinator (AC), AC stated when a new roommate was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation Policy when allegations of abuse were not reported within 24 hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH-local state agency) and local ombudsman (representatives assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 133). This failure resulted in Resident 133's allegation of abuse not being reported to CDPH and the local ombudsman timely. Findings:During a review of the facility provided document titled, Re: Allegations of Abuse, dated 11/13/25, the document indicated, 11/06/2025 1500 [3 p.m.] - The [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5] . assist [Resident 133] to the restroom. [CNA 5] enters restroom with [Resident 133]. [Resident 133] pulls down her pants and brief to urinate and [CNA 5] noticed [Resident 133] had a bowel movement. [CNA 5] attempts to change [Resident 133's] brief and [Resident 133] does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation Policy, when the facility failed to investigate and protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 133) when allegations of physical abuse were made. These failures had the potential for Resident 133's allegation not to be investigated timely and Resident 133 not to be protected from further abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility provided document titled, Re: Allegations of Abuse, dated 11/13/25, the document indicated, 11/06/2025 1500 (3 p.m.) - The [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5] . assist [Resident 133] to the restroom. [CNA 5] enters restroom with [Resident 133]. [Resident 133] pulls down her pants and brief to urinate and [CNA 5] noticed [Resident 133] had a bowel movement. [CNA 5] attempts to change [Resident 133's] brief and [Resident 133] does not want to change brief. [Resident 133] exited the restroom and asks [Visitor] to take her to talk to someone. [Visitor] brings [Resident 133] to the [DCS]. [DCS] speaks with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) for one of 46 sampled residents (Resident 12). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 12 having an unrecognized change in condition and adverse health outcomes. Findings:During an observation on 12/1/25 at 9:29 a.m. with Resident 12, in Resident 12's room. Resident 12 was receiving intravenous (into the vein) Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN - a method of delivering complete nutrition directly into the blood stream via an intravenous when the person's digestive system can not absorb nutrients from food).During a review of Resident 12's CP, dated 11/25/25, the CP indicated, [Resident 12] with TPN orders with oral gratification.During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/25 at 11:56 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, Resident 12's clinical records was reviewed. Resident 12's clinical record indicated there was no record of monitoring Resident 12 receiving TPN. RN 2 stated they (staff) were not checking Resident 12's blood sugar and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 46 sampled resident (Resident 119) had dentures in place and assisted with meals. This failure had the potential for Resident 119 not being assisted with activities of daily living and not meeting her nutritional needs. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 12:54 p.m. with Resident 119, in Resident 119's Room, Resident 119's lunch was provided. Resident 119's dentures were in a container on her bedside table. Resident 119 stated she could not open and clean her dentures. Resident 119 stated her food was not cut up for her to eat. Resident 119 stated she needed help and there was no staff present to assist.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 12:56 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated Resident 119 needs help with her dentures to eat her lunch, Resident 119 said she can't do it, her lunch was just put on the tray without her dentures being in her mouth for her to eat. RN 1 was observed leaving the room without assisting Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and complete the Skilled Nursing Dialysis Center Communication Form (SNDCCF - a communication tool to be completed by the nursing home and sent with each resident hemodialysis [a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from your blood when your kidneys are failing] treatment) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 131). This failure had the potential for a change in condition to not be identified and delay in provision of care for Resident 131 who was receiving hemodialysis treatments.Findings:During a review of Resident 131's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated [DATE], the OSR indicated, Dialysis Evaluation Form Post Treatment every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday].During a review of Resident 131's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated, [Resident 131] needs hemodialysis. Interventions/Tasks: Monitor for redness, swelling, or drainage, tunneled dialysis catheter [flexible tube tunneled under the skin (usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a meal was served at a palatable and appetizing appearance for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 74). This failure resulted in Resident 74 not eating her meals and potential for not meeting her nutritional needs.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 12:44 p.m. with Resident 74, in Resident 74's room, Resident 74's meal tray was on her overbed table. Resident 74's food was untouched. The plate contained mixed green and brown food. Resident 74 stated, Would you eat that? [pointing to the plate with food]. It looks like someone had a sick stomach and threw up.During a review of Resident 74's Meal Ticket, dated 12/1/25, the Meal Ticket indicated, Broccoli Chicken Casserole.During an interview on 12/2/25 at 11:31 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), CDM stated the food could have been presented better. CDM stated, It's a casserole, when it scooped, it mixes, the food should be in a small boat [bowl] to look better. CDM stated the facility had no policy and procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (a detailed, written document created by facility staff that outlines all the medical, physical, emotional, and social care a resident will receive to improve or maintain their quality of life) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with visual hallucinations (the experience of sensing something that is not actually there, even though it seems very real). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's care needs to not be met and/or result in psychological harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 7/30/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily activities and decision-making, impacting core cognitive functions like memory, language, attention, reasoning, and social skills) unspecified severity with other behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation Policy, when: 1. The allegation of psychological/mental abuse was not reported timely to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH the state survey and certification agency) and local ombudsman (representatives assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to be protected from further abuse. 2. A 5-day investigation report (written report of the results of abuse investigation) was not sent to CDPH or local ombudsman within 5-days of the incident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for an incomplete investigation for Resident 1. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse, (SOC – a written report of suspected of abuse or neglect of elders or dependent adults) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility controlled medication (medications that have the potential for abuse and addiction and are therefore regulated by the government) drug record was accurate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for unaccounted for and/or diversion of controlled medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's, Physician Order Report (POR), the POR dated 1/12/25, indicated, Resident 1 had an order for Percocet (strong pain medication) oral tablet 5-325 MG (milligram) (Oxycodone w/ Acetaminophen) give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain 4-10/10 (pain level 0-10 when 10 is the worst). Acetaminophen NTE (not to exceed) 3gms (grams)/24 hours. During a review of the facility's Summary of Incident (SI) , dated 2/3/25, the SI indicated, . she [Resident 1] received an extra Percocet at the end of the previous week [1/23/25] . made a medication error and gave [Resident 1] a PRN [as needed] Percocet and did not document. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH-state agency) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in delayed investigation of the allegation of abuse and potential for continued abuse towards Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 11/7/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, fracture [broken] of thoracic [upper spine] vertebra [spine bone], muscle weakness and history of falls. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – assessment tool), dated 10/8/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - assessment of cognitive function) score was 15 (a score of 13-15 suggests resident is cognitively intact). During an interview on 11/05/24 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 1 and Resident 1's Family Member (FM) 1, Resident 1 stated she told her daughter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policies for cleaning, drying, and storing clean dishes. This failure had the potential for contaminating food placing residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 10:53 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, on the clean side of the dish washing area, there were two plastic bins without lids, filled with plastic dessert dishes. The dessert dishes were piled up in the bins and not upside down. One of the dessert dishes on top of the pile had some debris inside. Some of the dessert dishes had dark debris on the rims. CDM stated the dessert dishes had been through the dish washer and should be clean. CDM stated the dark color on the rims looked like it was from the blueberry dessert served the previous night. CDM stated the dessert dishes should have been air dried upside down then stored upside down in a clean area. CDM stated the dishes needed to go through the dishwasher again. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. The facility's policy & procedure (P&P) for hand hygiene was not followed when two staff members did not perform hand hygiene before entering and after exiting residents' rooms. 2. The facility's P&P for laundry and bedding was not followed when the cover to the clean linen cart was ripped and unable to cover the clean linen completely for transport. 3. The facility's P&P for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - measures to prevent infection which involves wearing gowns and gloves) was not followed for one of six sampled residents (resident 268) who had an indwelling foley catheter (flexible tubing that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag). These failures had the potential to spread infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/04/24 at 9:47 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3 was observed coming from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 364, Resident 33 and Resident 3) were assessed for self administration of medications. This failure had the potential for the facility not to identify and resolve any risks for self administration of medications for Resident 364, Resident 33, and Resident 3, and the potential to place mobile residents at risk for harm. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/04/24 at 11:34 a.m. with Resident 364, a box labeled Lidocaine Viscous 2% (medication used to numb the mouth) was on Resident 364's bedside table. Resident 364 stated he had thrush (fungal infection) in his mouth which made it painful to eat, so he used the Lidocaine Viscous to rinse his mouth before each meal. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 8:53 a.m. with Clinical Manager (CM) 2, CM 2 stated if a resident wanted to self administer medications a Physician's order for self administration of the medication would be needed. CM 2 stated a Self Administration of Medication Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper accommodations were made for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 269) when Resident 269 was given a call bell that could not be heard at the nurse's station. 2. Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Call System, Residents for 8 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 48, Resident 18, Resident 8, Resident 31, Resident 92, Resident 34, and Resident 67) when call lights were not answered within 5 minutes. These failures contributed to residents not being assisted timely which negatively affected their psychosocial and personal hygiene needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 269's admission Record (AR), dated 10/21/24, the AR indicated, Resident 269 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility after a fall that resulted in a right hip fracture requiring physical therapy and a leg brace to be worn 24 hours a day. Resident 269 also has diagnoses of abnormalities of gait and mobility with history of falling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of six sampled residents (Resident 93, Resident 414, Resident 76, and Resident 164) had an Advance Directive (AD- a legal document that provides instructions for medical care and only go into effect if the individual is unable to make decisions for themselves) in the medical record. This failure had the potential for responsible parties and/or medical professionals to not honor resident's healthcare wishes and to not provide appropriate treatment in the event of an emergency medical situation. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 93's Social Services Progress Notes (SSPN), dated 7/3/24, the SSPN indicated, There is a DPAHC [Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care- advance directive] in place. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/5/24 at 10:26 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD), Resident 93's medical record (MR) was reviewed. SSD stated there was no copy of DPAHC in Resident 93's MR. b. During a review of Resident 414's SSPN, dated 10/28/24, the SSPN indicated, There is a DPAHC in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five medication carts did not contain controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse and addiction) that were unaccounted for. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (illegal use of prescription drugs) and inaccurate documentation of controlled medication disposal. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:55 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, at nursing station medication cart 2, contained 18 sealed envelopes in the controlled medication drawer dated from [DATE] through [DATE]. RN 2 stated the envelopes contained wasted [not administered] controlled medications and should have been given to the Director of Nursing (DON) for disposal. RN 2 stated the wasted medications were not counted and documented each shift. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:11 p.m. with RN 1, at nursing station two medication cart 2, contained two sealed envelopes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic (range of powerful medications that kill bacterial infections) stewardship program (the practice of ensuring antibiotics are used appropriately and only when necessary) when antibiotic use was not monitored for three of three sampled residents (Resident 414, Resident 164, and Resident 57) . This failure had the potential for unnecessary use of antibiotics which could contribute to negative health outcome for residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Order Listing Report (OLR-list of residents on antibiotic), dated 11/6/24, the OLR indicated, [Resident 414] Order Summary: Vancomycin HCl Intravenous Solution [strong antibiotic to treat infections] Use 750 gram intravenously [medications administered through the veins] two times a day related to Urinary Tract Infection [bladder infection]. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 1:35 p.m. with Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN), IPN stated Resident 414's antibiotic use is not currently on her tracking sheet (log for monitoring the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled resident's rooms (Resident 10, Resident 51, Resident 56) were maintained in good repair. This failure had the potential to impact residents' psychosocial needs and quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 11/5/24 at 11:06 a.m. in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 was lying in bed. The ceiling tiles in Resident 10's room had large round patches of brownish discolorations in four areas. During an interview on 11/5/24 at 11:44 a.m. with Maintenance Director (MD), MD stated he had not seen the large brownish round discolorations in the ceiling tiles of Resident 10's room. MD stated the large round patches of brownish discolorations were not reported and not listed in the computer for repairs. MD stated he does daily rounds with maintenance assistants (MA) but was not sure if they (MA) had seen it (large round patches of brownish discolorations in Resident 10's ceiling tiles). During a review of the facility's Tasks Due This Week (list of locations for maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 84) personal preference was honored when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 was assigned to care for Resident 84 after Resident 84 requested CNA 2 not be assigned to her care. This failure resulted in Resident 84 experiencing emotional distress. Findings: During an interview on 11/05/24 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 84 and Resident 84's family member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated CNA 2 was rude to Resident 84. FM 1 stated on 10/30/24 a request was made for CNA 2 not be assigned to care for Resident 84. Resident 84 stated CNA 2 had continued to be assigned to care for her. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 10:37 a.m. with Clinical Manager (CM) 2, CM 2 stated Resident 84's FM 2 stated CNA 2 had an attitude and requested CNA 2 not be assigned to care for Resident 84. CM 2 stated on 10/30/24 he contacted Scheduler and requested CNA 2 be removed from caring for Resident 84. CM 2 stated it was expected that Scheduler would not assign CNA 2 to care for Resident 84 in the future. CM 2 stated he did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed and implemented for two of five sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 268). This failure resulted in Resident 18 and Resident 268 having unmet care needs. Findings: a. During an observation on 11/04/24 at 9:15 a.m. in Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was lying in bed without her legs elevated. During an interview on 11/05/24 at 12:25 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated, Resident 18's heel should be floated [legs elevated so heel does not touch surface] but they are not. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 8:29 a.m. with Resident 18, Resident 18 stated, I have pain in my feet. I'm supposed to have them elevated but they [staff] don't do it. My pain is constant, but elevating does help with the pain. During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool), dated 11/1/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - cognition assessment tool, 15-point scale: 13-15 cognitively intact) score was 14. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 1) received the necessary care and services to prevent the development and promote healing of pressure ulcers (open wounds caused by consistent pressure on the skin). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to experience development or deterioration of pressure ulcers. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/4/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 has diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus (DM- disease that causes abnormal blood sugars) with foot ulcer (an open sore that can be shallow or deep), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD- abnormal circulation to the extremities), difficulty in walking, and history of falling. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 11:55 a.m. with Resident 1 in resident's room, Resident 1 had multiple open sores on both of his legs, dried black colored wounds on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th left toes, black colored wounds on both sides of the left foot, and a black colored wound to bottom of his left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of five sampled residents (Resident 48) fall precautions were in place. This failure had the potential for Resident 48 to fall and sustain injuries. Findings: During an observation on 11/04/24 at 8:53 a.m. in Resident 48's room, Resident 48 was lying in bed and fall mat was folded up next to nightstand. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/04/24 at 3:03 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 48's room, one fall mat was folded and placed behind Resident 48's bed, and one (mat) was folded next to the nightstand. LVN 1 stated, they [fall mats] should be placed on the floor next to each side of the bed. During a review of Resident 48's Physician Order (PO), dated 9/1/23, the PO indicated, bilateral [both sides] floor matts [sic]. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Falls Prevention Policy, dated 8/2023, the P&P indicated, The safety precautions for high-risk residents may include, but are not limited to the following: review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled, Medication and Treatment Orders to ensure the physician orders for two of two sampled residents (Resident 164 and Resident 57) included the clinical condition or symptoms for its use. This failure had the potential for residents to be taking unnecessary medications with potential for experiencing adverse health outcomes. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 164's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/7/24, the MAR indicated, Meropenem [strong antibiotic to treat infections] Intravenous Solution Reconstituted [mixed with liquid] 500 mg [milligram] Use 500 mg intravenously [given via the veins] two times a day for Infection for 7 days. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 1:35 p.m. with Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN), IPN stated, The physician's order [for Resident 164] should have the type of infection. IPN stated she had not reviewed the antibiotic order. 2. During a review of Resident 57's MAR, dated 11/7/24, the MAR indicated, Cefepime [strong antibiotic to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 87) was free from significant medication errors. This failure had the potential for Resident 87 to have adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:51 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 at Station 1 Medication Cart 3 contained a bag labeled [Resident 87's name] Morphine Sulf [sulfate - MS - pain medication] 20mgs [milligrams]/1ml [milliliter] Sol [solution] Discard After [DATE] in the controlled medication (medications with high potential for abuse and addiction) drawer. Inside the bag were two syringes each with Resident 87's name, medication name, medication dose, and discard date. LVN 6 stated the label on each syringe indicated a discard date of [DATE]. During a review of Resident 87's [Facility name] Order Audit Report (OAR), dated [DATE], the OAR indicated, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 20mg/ml Give 5mg by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure dental services were provided for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 18). 2. Implement care plan interventions for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 18). This failure had the potential for Resident 18 to experience difficulty maintaining nutritional needs and could result in unintended weight loss. 1. During an interview on 11/05/24 at 12:23 p.m. with Resident 18, Resident 18 stated, my teeth are rotting in the back. I told them I needed to see a dentist at least 4 months ago. During an interview on 11/06/24 at 2:35 p.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), SSD stated Resident 18 had a dental consult sent on 9/12/24. No follow-up to this consult as of today (11/6/24). Resident 18 saw a dental hygienist on 9/4/24 for cleaning. She (Resident 18) gets referred to the dentist after a dental hygienist appointment. Last annual checkup from the dentist was on 5/7/24 (lost a tooth). I did not follow up. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 8:29 a.m. with Resident 18, Resident 18 stated, My teeth are hurting this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled resident's (Resident 269) meal tray ticket (MTT - guidance to staff on what to serve for a meal to a resident) was accurate and followed. This failure had the potential to result in a negative health outcome. Findings: During a review of Resident 269's admission Record (AR), dated 10/21/24, the AR indicated, Resident 269 had a diagnosis of Gout (inflammatory arthritis caused by high levels of uric acid [waste product created when the body breaks down a chemical compound]] in the body). During an interview on 11/4/24 at 10:11 a.m. with Resident 269, Resident 269 stated she gets a glass of tomato juice with every meal. Resident 269 stated, I have told staff several times I can't have it because I have Gout and can't have acidic juices but staff bring it to me anyway's. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 12:26 p.m. with Resident 269 in Resident's room, Resident 269 was eating lunch and got a glass of tomato juice with her meal. Resident 269 stated, See, I told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was working properly for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 269). This failure resulted in delayed care and unmet needs of Resident 269. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 10:07 a.m. with Resident 269 in Resident's room, a call bell was on Resident 269's bedside table. The call light was tested and not functioning. Resident 269 stated she does not have a call light that works and was given a call bell to ring instead. Resident 269 stated she can't reach it sometimes; staff can't hear the bell and it takes hours for staff to come. Resident 269 stated she has been without a call light for days. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 10:36 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated, Resident 269's call light has not been functioning for a few days and the staff gave her a call bell to use. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 10:40 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) impaired skin integrity were developed and implemented. This failure had the potential for worsening of Resident 1's impaired skin integrity. Findings: During an observation on 6/28/24 at 9:31a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying on his right side. During a review of Resident 1's TAR, dated March 2024, the TAR indicated, Skin care: Right hip – Cleanse, pat dry, & apply foam dressing Q [every] 7 days & PRN [as needed] to maintain skin integrity.Skin care: Cleanse redness on scrotum with soap and water pat dry BID [twice a day] and apply house supply skin protectant cream.Skin care: Right elbow -Cleanse, pat dry, & apply foam dressing Q7 days & PRN to maintain skin integrity. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/8/24 at 12:25 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's nursing care plans for March 2024, April 2024, and May 2024 were reviewed. DON stated, I don't not know why there are no care plans for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Routine Clinical Documentation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential not to meet the resident needs. Findings: During an observation on 6/28/24 at 9:31a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying on his right side. During a review of Resident 1's BD Braden Scale [BDBS – assesses the risk for pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) development], dated 5/22/24, the BDBS indicated, Score: 13 [Moderate risk: 13 to 14]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/8/24 at 11:03 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Documentation Survey Report [DSR], dated June 2024 was reviewed. The DSR indicated, Turned and Repositioned – Starting at midnight turn patient to right side. 2:00am turn resident to back, 4:00am turn resident on back, 6am turn resident to right side, 8am turn resident to back, 10am turn resident to right, 12pm turn to back, 2pm turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on weight management guidelines when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1's) weight was not monitored weekly as ordered. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to continue losing weight due to weight changes not being monitored and addressed in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/11/24, the OSR indicated Resident 1 had an order of Weekly wts [weights] x [for] 1 month. During a review of Resident 1's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), dated 6/5/24, the WVS indicated the following weight summary: a. 4/29/24 – 138.4 lbs. (pounds/unit of measuring weight) b. 5/5/24 –129 lbs. (Resident 1 lost 9.4 lbs. in 6 days.) c. 5/6/24 – 128.8 lbs. d. 5/12/24 – 126.2 lbs. There were no weights checked on 5/19/24 and 5/26/24 as indicated in the OSR to complete the weekly weights. e. 6/2/24 – 126.6 lbs. (Resident 1 lost 11.8 lbs. in 30 days from 4/29/24 to 6/2/24) During a review of Resident 1's Weight Change Note (WCN), dated 5/8/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the dry food storage room in the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary condition when lifeless roaches were found on the floor and the drain. 2. Ensure the clean water pitcher storage cabinets were cleaned and free from pest. These failures had the potential for contaminating the dry food and clean water pitchers, placing residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/24/24 at 10:41 a.m. in the kitchen, the dry food storage room drain had three lifeless roaches approximately 0.5 inches in size and two lifeless roaches approximately 0.5 inches in size, in the corner of the dry storage room. During an interview on 5/24/24 at 10:47 a.m., with Assistant Dining Supervisor (ADS), ADS stated she saw few roaches last week. ADS stated she reported it (roaches) to the maintenance (department). During an interview on 5/24/24 at 10:49 a.m., with Dietary Dining Supervisor (DDS), DDS went to see the lifeless roaches in the drain and in the corner of the dry storage room. DDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the physician order(s) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1's Sodium Chloride (salt-based solution to provide hydration) Intravenous (IV-medication administration route into a vein of a person's body) solution was not administered as ordered. 2. Resident 1's Amiodarone (antiarrhythmic medication-prevents and treats a fast or irregular heartbeat [arrhythmia] by slowing down overactive electric signals in the heart, which stabilizes heart rate and rhythm [strong sound]) was not administered as ordered. These failures had the potential to cause adverse health outcomes. Findings: 1. During an interview and record review on 3/18/24 at 4:58 p.m. with Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Resident 1's Medical Record (MR) was reviewed, the MR indicated the following: Physician Order [PO] dated 11/2/23 indicated, Start IV fluids Now: IV NS[normal saline] 0.9% @[at] 75 cc [cubic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Notify the physician of a change in condition and increasing oxygen administered for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s oxygen saturation (oxygen level in the blood) went below normal, and staff increased the oxygen without a physician's order. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 1's decline in health condition. 2. Follow their policy and procedure on Neurological Checks (assessment of sensory and motor responses, especially reflexes, to determine whether the nervous system is impaired) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the neurological check results were inaccurately documented. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having inaccurate clinical records and potential for unidentified neurological decline. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/24 at 4:34 p.m. with Director of Clinical Services (DCS), Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes, dated 2/24/24 at 11:45 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Call System and Door Alarm Response- EME-1 was followed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 2 to have a delay in positioning of his therapeutic knee pillow. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 1:18 p.m. with Resident 2, in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was in a side-lying position in bed with his knees bent, and a wall clock was noted across from his bed. Resident 2 stated he had contractures (the shortening or tightening of tissues that reduces movement affecting skin, muscles and often causes pain in addition to decreased range of motion) to his legs/knees and required positioning assistance with the use of a therapeutic knee pillow placed in between his knees to help with his painful contractures. Resident 2 stated on 2/6/24, he waited for A really long time felt like hours and expected his call light to be answered approximately within a few minutes. Resident 2 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered as ordered for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s delay in receiving his pain medication. Findings: During an interview on 2/13/24 at 12:55 p.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 stated on 2/6/24, he had back pain and was admitted to the facility from the hospital after he received an epidural (an injection in the back for pain relief) to help with his back pain. Resident 1 stated he did not receive his pain medications Dilaudid (Schedule II- controlled narcotic medication for the treatment of pain) and Morphine Sulfate (Schedule II- controlled narcotic medication for the treatment of pain) until 2/7/24 and was offered non-pharmacological care interventions which included repositioning. During a review of Resident 1's Medical Record (MR), Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated, Section C- Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS [Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on Resident Grievance Procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for grievances to go unresolved and result in negative consequences. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/12/23 at 2:59 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility grievance forms were reviewed. DSD stated on 11/27/23, she spoke with Resident 1 ' s family regarding him being left wet with urine throughout the previous night. DSD stated she spoke with the facility Administrator regarding Resident 1 ' s family concern and she was instructed to document in a grievance form. DSD reviewed the grievance form regarding Resident 1 and stated it was left blank. DSD stated she was not aware of the facility policy and procedure for grievances that indicated they must be addressed within a specific amount of time. DSD stated she was not aware of the expectation regarding grievance reports. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to change one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after an episode of urinary incontinence (inability to control urine or feces). This failure had the potential to result in infection, skin issues, wounds, and low self-esteem. Findings: During an interview on 12/12/23 at 8:38 a.m. with Complainant, Complainant stated the Monday after Thanksgiving (11/27/23) she had visited Resident 1 and noticed his room stunk like urine and feces. Complainant stated staff (unidentified) were in the process of changing Resident 1's brief. Complainant stated Resident 1 had a soiled brief of urine and feces. Complainant stated she spoke with Resident 1, and he stated he had not been changed since 4 p.m. the prior day. Complainant stated she gathered all the nurses (unidentified) (undisclosed time) in the area and let them know it was unacceptable. Complainant stated the nurses informed her the night shift nurses were lazy and the reason why Resident 1 was not changed. Complainant stated Resident 1 was dependent on care by staff to change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to feel undervalued, not cared for and have a negative effect on his self-respect. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- comprehensive assessment tool) under BIMS (Brief interview for mental status - an assessment tool for cognition), dated 11/22/23, the BIMS indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 out 15 (cognition is intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 12:18 p.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1's linen and pillowcases were noted to have red to brownish stains scattered throughout. Resident 1 stated he had scraped his right elbow three or four days ago in which it was bleeding. Resident 1 was observed to have a dressing on his right elbow with red to brownish stains on it. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 12:38 p.m. with Executive Director (ED) in Resident 1 ' s room, ED observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered according to physicians ' orders for six of nine sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6). These failures had the potential for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6 to have ineffective pain management. Findings: During an interview on 12/20/23 at 3:49 p.m. with Resident 6, Resident 6 stated she currently has 7/10 pain to her leg and back. Resident 6 stated she was requesting pain medications every six hours. Resident 6 stated she could not have her pain medications until 4 p.m. During an observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 4 p.m. with Resident 2 in Resident 2 ' s room. Resident 2 stated she currently has pain from her hip down to her leg and right now it is a 10/10. Resident 2 was observed wincing and moaning in pain. Resident 2 stated she was requesting pain medication every 4 hours and the medication brings her pain down to 5 or 6. Resident 2 stated the medication only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pain management for six of nine sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6). These failures had the potential for delay in the residents treatment and improper pain management causing discomfort to the residents. Findings: During an interview on 12/20/23 at 3:49 p.m. with Resident 6, Resident 6 stated she currently has 7/10 pain to her leg and back. Resident 6 stated she was requesting pain medications every six hours. Resident 6 stated she could not have her pain medications until 4 p.m. During an observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 4 p.m. with Resident 2 in Resident 2 ' s room. Resident 2 stated she currently has pain from her hip down to her leg and right now it is a 10/10. Resident 2 was observed wincing and moaning in pain. Resident 2 stated she was requesting pain medication every 4 hours and the medication brings her pain down to 5 or 6. Resident 2 stated the medication only last about 3 hours. During an interview on 12/21/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Controlled Substances Policy, for six of nine sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7). This failure had the potential for pain medications to be diverted and Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7 ' s pain to be ineffectively managed. Findings: During an interview on 12/20/23 at 3:14 p.m. with Interim Director of Nurse of Nursing (IDON), IDON stated the issue with controlled narcotic was brought to her attention yesterday (12/19/23). IDON stated she conducted a review of PRN (as needed medications) narcotics. IDON stated she found two nurses were documenting on Control Drug Record (CDR) but not documenting on Medication Administration Record (MAR). IDON stated the nurses had stated they signed the medications out on the CDR, but they were busy and just forgot to document on the MAR. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 3:34 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN 1), RN 1 stated he and the oncoming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was promptly assisted with toileting. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving timely assistance and not treated with dignity. Findings: During an interview on 10/19/23 at 11:47 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she cannot get out of bed to use the restroom, she uses a bed pan to go to the restroom. Resident 1 stated on Tuesday night she had to call the office; she stated she was left on the bedpan for about 30 minutes. Resident 1 stated on Monday night I was told if I had to go just go. She stated she felt like I wanted to get up and slapped her (staff) During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS – an assessment tool) dated 10/20/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 14 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). During a review of Resident 1's care plan with the focus on ADL [Activities of Daily Living] Self Care Preformance Deficit, initiated 10/17/23, the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) pain medication was administered timely. This failure resulted in Resident 1's pain to not be treated effectively and timely. Findings. During an interview on 10/19/23 at 11:47 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated pain medications can take anywhere from ten minutes to two hours to be administered. Resident 1 stated, Last night, I ring the bell informed the CNA [certified nursing assistant] and waited two hours, the Nurse stated the CNA never told her, so I don't know who dropped the ball on that one. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS – an assessment tool) dated 10/20/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status with a range of 0-15) score was 14 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan, (PC) initiated on 10/16/23, with the focus on risk for pain, the CP indicated, Interventions/Tasks Monitor/document/report to Nurse any s/sx [signs and symptoms] of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was effective for two of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4) when: 1. Resident 2 was crying and waited for more than one hour for pain medication to be given. 2. Resident 4's pain was not followed up after administering pain medication. These failures had the potential for residents suffering in pain affecting their quality of life. Findings: 1. During an interview on 10/31/23 at 10:10 a.m. with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated Resident 2 gets pain medication every four hours. FM 1 stated on 10/21/23, Resident 2 did not receive her pain medication (Norco -medication to treat moderate to severe pain) for 10 hours. On that day, the p.m. nurse gave Resident 2's pain medication at 4 a.m. and told her (Resident 2) that it (Norco) was her last pain medication, and the a.m. nurse would need to re-order her pain medication. FM 1 stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) told her Resident 2's room was shared with two medication carts and that is why the medication was taught to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) was free from a medication error when Resident 5 received a discontinued pain medication. This failure resulted in Resident 5 having sudden and unexpected inability to perform usual activities, onset of confusion, and hallucinations (perception of something not present) and potential for adverse unfavorable health consequences including death. Findings: During an interview on 11/14/23 at 3:52 p.m. with Resident 5, Resident 5 stated her care was awful . Resident 5 stated, The facility did not read the instructions from the ER [Emergency Room] and overdosed me with Morphine [medication to treat severe pain], twice. Resident 5 stated her family (Family Member/FM 3) realized she was overdosed. Resident 5 stated she was not good . During a review of Resident 5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 10/26/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 5 had a BIMS of 15 (score of 13-15 means cognitively intact). During an interview on 11/15/23 at 1:13 p.m. with FM 3, FM 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to ensure: 1. Physician's order was obtained for the left knee splint (LKS-device that hinders mobility causing atrophy [decrease in size of a body part] and range of motion [maximum amount of joint movement] loss) prior to applying on Resident 1's left knee. This failure resulted in Resident 1's above the left knee discoloration and unstageable (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer [damaged skin due to constant pressure] cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough a [dead tissue appearing as while/yellow in the wound bed that's needed to be removed to promote healing] or eschar [death of body tissue]) pressure injury (a localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical device) to the left side of his left knee. 2. Accurate Change of Condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to accommodate residents needs by not answering call lights timely for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive timely care and unmet care needs. Findings: During an interview on 7/13/23, at 5:57 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the call lights take anywhere from 30 minutes to three hours to be answered by staff. Resident 1 stated the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) answered the call light and say they will be right back but do not return for an hour sometimes three hours. Resident 1 stated she was taking a water pill, and usually calling because she needed to be changed, but she was not getting the help on time. Resident 1 stated she calculated the wait time by the clock on the wall. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set, (MDS – an assessment tool) dated 4/26/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status with a range of 0-15) score was 13 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Supporting Activities of Daily Living to provide grooming, personal and oral hygiene assistance for two of 31 residents (Resident 190 and Resident 239). This failure resulted in physical and psychosocial distress for Resident 190 and Resident 239. Findings: During an interview on 12/5/22, at 10:48 AM, with Resident 190, Resident 190 stated, she relied on the facility staff to assist her with showers. Resident 190 stated, she had not had a shower since 11/27/22. Resident 190 stated, her scheduled shower days were Tuesdays and Fridays. Resident 190 stated, on Tuesday 11/29/22, when she returned from therapy, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) told Resident 190 she had missed her shower time. Resident 190 stated, she asked for a bath every day and asked for a towel to try and clean herself, but she was never bathed or provided a towel to clean herself. Resident 190 stated, not being bathed for so many days made her feel yucky and uncomfortable. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) for securing the medication cart and medication. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access to medications by residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 12/7/22, at 9:55 AM, in the hallway outside Resident 28's room, an unattended and unlocked medication cart was observed. A bubble pack (pre-packaged medication) individualized for Resident 28, labeled glycopyrrolate (medication to decrease saliva) was observed unattended on top of medication cart. During an interview on 12/7/22, at 9:58 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated, she should not have left the medication cart unlocked and medication unattended at any time. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 1/13, the P&P indicated, 3.9 Facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended. 7. Facility should ensure that medication carts are always locked when out of sight or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Perishable Food when: 1. Condiments were not discarded by their use by date 2. All food was not covered in the refrigerator and freezer units 3. Opened products were not labeled with an opened date or a use by date 4. Refrigerator Temperature logs were not maintained. These failures had the potential to result in decreased food quality, loss of nutrients, and foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 12/5/22, at 8:23 AM, with Cook, in the kitchen, the labels on condiments in the refrigerator were observed. The following products and use by dates were observed: Italian Salad Dressing, use by 12/1/22 Thousand Island Salad Dressing, use by 12/1/22 Ketchup, use by 12/4/22 Ranch Salad Dressing, use by 12/4/22 [NAME] Real Mayonnaise, use by 11/29/22 Yellow Mustard, use by 12/1/22 Blue Cheese Salad Dressing, use by 12/1/22 Romaine Caesar Salad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three ice machines was maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. This failure had the potential to result in food-borne illness to residents and staff. Findings: During an observation on 12/7/22, at 10:28 AM, with Regional Director (RD), in Nurses' Station 1's ice machine room, the ice machine was observed with a puddle of water on a top ledge above the ice storage bin and water dripping from the left side of the ice machine at the bottom edge. An ice machine maintenance log, dated 11/25/22, was observed on the wall indicating the ice machine had been deep cleaned on 11/25/22. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/7/22, at 10:39 AM, with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and RD, in Nurses' Station 1's ice machine room, the ice machine was observed with a puddle of water on a top ledge above the ice storage bin. The front panel and evaporator cover, allowing observation of the water distribution system and ice curtain (where the ice cubes are made), were removed by MS. Drops of water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was easily accessible for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 239 and Resident 13). This failure resulted in Resident 239 and Resident 13 unable to call staff for assistance and unmet needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 239's admission Record (AR), dated 9/28/22, the AR indicated, Resident 239's primary admitting diagnosis was a Cerebral Infarction (Stroke- damage to brain tissue) with Hemiplegia (paralysis, muscle weakness) affecting the right dominant side of her body (resident was right handed). During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/6/22, at 11:05 AM, with Resident 239, at Resident 239's bedside, Resident 239 was unable to move her right arm and spoke in a whisper. Resident 239's call light was under the pillow next to the right side of her head. Resident 239 was searched with her left hand for the call light. Resident 239 stated, she could not find the call light and she did not know what she would do if she needed help. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 239) when drawers were missing in the chifforobe (closet-like piece of furniture over two drawers). This resulted in the potential for lack of storage for personal belongings and did not provide a homelike environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/6/22, with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), at 11:15 AM, at Resident 239's bedside, the room's chifforobe was missing the two drawers. The open space for the top drawer contained a plastic bag with Resident 239's belongings. MS stated, missing drawers in the facility's furniture did not promote a homelike environment. During an interview on 12/8/22, at 9:26 AM, with Resident 239, Resident 239 stated, it was important to her to have a homelike environment. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Quality of Life- Homelike Environment, dated 4/14, the P&P indicated, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide vision screening for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 36). This failure had the potential for Resident 36 to have worsening vision. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), readmitted [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 36's admission diagnosis included Diabetes Mellitus (disease that affect how the body uses blood sugar/glucose. When not treated effectively, can lead to blindness, heart disease, and other ailments). During an interview on 12/6/22, at 2:42 PM, with Resident 36, Resident 36 stated, he needed glasses. Resident 36 stated, he lost his prescription glasses and had been buying over the counter glasses at various places. Resident 36 stated, he could not remember when he was last seen by an eye doctor for glasses. During an interview on 12/7/22, at 2:06 PM, with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated, he was unable to provide written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from a medication error rate of greater than five percent for one of four sampled residents (Resident 26) when two medication errors occurred within 30 opportunities for errors. This failure had the result of the facility medication error rate of 6.67 %. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/7/22, the OSR indicated, Flurometholone Ophthalmic Suspension [[NAME]- medicated eyes drops] 0.1 % . Instill (to drop in) one drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes and Refresh Liquigel Gel [RLG - eye drops] 1% . Instill two drops in both eyes three times a day for Dry Eyes. During a medication pass observation on 12/7/22, at 9:40 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 instilled two drops of [NAME] in Resident 26's right and two drops of [NAME] in Resident 26's left eye. LVN 1 instilled one drop of RLG in Resident 26's right and one drop of RLG in Resident 26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,668 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $36,572 — penalty dated 2026-03-02
- $44,096 — penalty dated 2025-12-08
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-24 for 42 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-06 for 35 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROOKDALE GARDENS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/21/2006 |
| BAIER, LUCINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/09/2018 |
| BOWMAN, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| WHITE, CHADWICK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/09/2018 |
| LA MARRE, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/22/2017 |
| MUNOZ, ANNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $953K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555771. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.