No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brookdale Carriage Club Providence

5804 Old Providence Road, Charlotte, NC 28226 · For profit - Corporation · 14 certified beds · (704) 365-8551 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (704) 365-8551 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.6 mi
4215 Providence Rd · (704) 366-3899 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4207 Providence Rd · (704) 365-6659 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5007 Providence Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5668 International Dr · (704) 367-1225

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.0%78.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission5.7%22.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%12.9%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.77U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.92hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.69hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.0%CMS range 56.3–79.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.0–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.4–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

3.49
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
8.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.41
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 14 beds and averages 7.9 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 3.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 9.14 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 3.93 to 2.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene between handling soiled and then clean dishes to prevent cross-contamination of the clean dishes. These practices had the potential to affect food served and distributed to 9 of 9 residents who received an oral diet. Findings included: A continuous observation of the skilled nursing satellite kitchen was conducted on 04/02/25 from 1:09 PM through 1:16 PM. Dietary Aide #1 was observed operating the dish machine and washing dishes. Dietary Aide #1 had gloves on both hands with left hand glove observed with large ripped in area over the palm. While waiting for the dish cycle to complete, she removed food debris from soiled plates in the sink area located to the right of the dish machine in the dish room and then moved to the drying area side of the dish machine wearing the same gloves. Dietary Aide #1 then opened the dish machine after the washing cycle was completed. She removed all the clean dishes which consisted of 8 bowls, 2 plates, 1 soup bowl, 4 ice cream scoops, 5 pieces of silverware, and 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat 1 of 3 sampled residents with dignity by performing care in a manner that the resident felt was rude and hurried (Resident #117). The findings included: Resident #117 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebra. A review of Resident #117's comprehensive care plan dated [DATE] revealed a focus area for alteration in musculoskeletal status related to the compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebra. The interventions included that she required the mechanical lift for transfers. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #117 was cognitively intact. An initial allegation report dated [DATE] revealed an allegation of abuse. The allegation indicated on [DATE] Resident #117 called the Administrator to her room to express concerns about NA #1 when she was providing her care the evening of [DATE]. Resident #117 told the Administrator that NA #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and nurse practitioner interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate advance directive information throughout the electronic and paper medical records for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advance directive (Resident #119). The findings included: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the nursing admission note dated [DATE] at 2:42 PM indicated that Resident #119 was alert and verbal. A review of Resident #119's electronic medical record revealed an order written by the nurse practitioner dated [DATE] for full code status. This order was created by the Director of Clinical Services. A review of Resident #119's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus area for advance directives initiated on [DATE] indicating Resident #119's code status was a full code. The goal was for Resident #119's wishes and directives to be carried out in accordance with her advanced directives through the next review date. An intervention was to honor resident choice for code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date leftover food items stored for use, discard dented canned goods stored for use, maintain a utility cart in clean condition that was used to transport clean dishware, keep a food storage area clean and orderly, failed to ensure a scoop was stored without the potential for cross-contamination, failed to dry metal prep pans and plastic plate covers prior to stacking, failed to ensure metal plate warmers were clean prior to use, and failed to maintain a hand washing sink in good repair. These practices occurred in the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, dry goods storage area, and had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: 1. An initial tour of the main kitchen occurred on 2/19/24 at 9:45am with the Dietary Manager (DM). The main kitchen served all buildings on campus. The following concerns were identified: a. Items in the walk-in refrigerator that were not sealed included: -cut pineapple in a metal serving pan not completely covered with plastic wrap with a prep date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and to monitor interventions that the committee had previously put in place following the recertification survey on 09/14/2022. This was for a deficiency in the area of food safety requirements (F812). The continued failure since the previous survey of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program. The findings included: This tag was cross referenced to: F812: Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date leftover food items stored for use, discard dented canned goods stored for use, maintain a utility cart in clean condition that was used to transport clean dishware, keep a food storage area clean and orderly, ensure a scoop was stored without the potential for cross-contamination, dry metal prep pans and plastic plate covers prior to stacking, failed to ensure metal plate warmers were clean prior to use, and maintain a hand washing sink in good…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to honor food choices for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #8, #10, #4) reviewed for preferences. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who received food from the kitchen. The findings included: a. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #8 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #8 needed partial or moderate assistance when eating. A review of Resident #8's care plan dated 1/29/24 revealed Resident #8 was at increased nutrition/hydration risk related to variable food intakes related to frequent nausea and was at risk for weight loss and malnutrition. The goal identified no significant weight change. Interventions included monitoring meal intake with each meal, offering supplements as ordered, and monitoring weights as ordered. An interview with Resident #8 on 2/19/24 at 11:37 a.m. indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain lighting, cabinets, and walls in good repair for 1 of 1 hall (resident rooms 214, 222) and 1 of 1 activity room nutrition area reviewed for clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The findings included: a. An observation on 2/19/24 at 11:18am revealed a brown, dried splatter on the wall across from the resident bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A second observation was conducted on 2/21/24 at 9:30am with the Administrator, Maintenance Director #1, and the Housekeeping Supervisor. The observation revealed a brown, dried splatter on the wall across from the resident bed. An interview with the Housekeeping Supervisor on 2/21/24 at 9:46am revealed that housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning rooms, bathrooms, dispensers, toilets, sinks, sweeping and mopping, wiping down televisions, beds, remotes, and bedside tables. The bathroom vent covers were to be cleaned during a deep cleaning session, not on a regular basis. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and Physician and staff interview the facility failed to provide a treatment as ordered by the physician to a non-pressure wound for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 214) reviewed for wound care. The findings included: Resident # 214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Care Plan dated 02/01/2024, revealed Resident # 214 had a potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. The Care Plan documented goal for Resident # 214 was to be free from skin breakdown. Resident # 214 interventions included, to evaluate skin condition on a daily and weekly basis, keep skin clean and dry, use lotion on dry skin and not apply to area of skin breakdown, wound, or between toes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #214's cognition was moderately impaired and she had no behaviors. The MDS documented Resident #214 had no refusal of care and she had no documentation of her skin tear noted. The physician's order dated February 2024, revealed Resident # 214 was to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to remove loose garbage, food, and debris from around 1 of 1 trash receptacle located outdoors behind the kitchen. This practice had the potential to impact sanitary conditions and attract pests/rodents. The findings included: An observation of the outdoor trash receptacle area on 2/19/24 at 2:20pm revealed a clear bag of trash on the ground outside of the receptacle and boxes of used COVID tests on the ground underneath the bag. The ground around the enclosure was littered with food scraps to include an apple, vegetable peeling, and labels from boxes and a dark brown sludge. During the observation the receptacle door was noted to be open and there was a broken dining tray cart on the left side of the dumpster and a discarded beverage serving cart on the ground outside of the receptacle enclosure. An interview with Dietary Manager (DM) on 02/21/24 at 10:46am revealed the kitchen staff was responsible for the outdoor trash area. An interview with the Administrator on 2/21/24 11:43am indicated she was not aware there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-05-07 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident census for the skilled unit was accurate on the daily nurse staffing sheets for 4 of 4 days of the recertification survey (5/4/2026 through 5/7/2026).The findings included:a. An observation on 5/4/2026 at 10:37 AM revealed a census of 17 on the posted nurse staffing sheet. Review of 5/4/26 census report for the skilled unit revealed a census of 5.b. An observation on 5/5/2026 at 8:30 AM, 3:46 PM, and 4:48 PM revealed a census of 1 on the posted nurse staffing sheet. Review of the 5/5/26 census report for the skilled unit revealed a census of 5. c. An observation on 5/6/2026 at 11:43 AM revealed a census of 17 on the posted nurse staffing sheet. Review of the 5/6/26 census report for the skilled unit revealed a census of 5. d. An observation on 5/7/2026 at 9:37 AM revealed a census of 17 on the posted nurse staffing sheet. Review of the 5/7/26 census report for the skilled unit revealed a census of 5. On 5/7/2026 at 1:33 PM an interview with the Scheduler revealed she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interview the facility failed to post a Registered Nurse (RN) on the daily staff posting sheet, accurately post licensed staff, and post daily resident census from December 2023 through February 2024 for 16 of 83 days reviewed for daily posted staffing (12/06/2023, 12/17/2023, 12/27/2023,12/31/2023, 01/04/2024, 01/08/2024, 01/18/2024, 01/19/2024, 01/20/2024, 01/21/2024, 01/24/2024, 01/27/2024, 01/28/2024, 01/29/2024, 02/02/2024, 02/06/2024). Findings included: Upon entering the facility on 02/19/2024 at 9:30am, an observation was made of the facility's daily posted staffing sheet. The daily posted staffing sheet was located on the ledge of the nursing station at the front entrance and revealed there was no RN coverage documented for the 7:00am to 7:00pm shift or the 7:00pm to 7:00am shift, for 02/19/2024. On 02/21/2024 a review of the daily posted staffing sheets from December 2023 through February 2024 revealed, there was no RN documented, inaccurate number of licensed staff and/or no resident census data listed on the following dates:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.8+2.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BKD FM HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/29/2011
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2023
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/26/2006
FEBC-ALT HOLDINGS INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2023
FEBC-ALT INVESTORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2023
KAESTNER, HENRYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2022
KUSSOW, DAWNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/30/2025
WHITE, CHADWICKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/09/2018
JONES LANG LASALLE MULTIFAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/31/2017
BOWMAN, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2021
STENGLE, NIKOLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/08/2025
ARC MANAGMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2007
CLONTZ, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/13/2025
HALL, GEORGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2025
LA MARRE, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2017
LEWIS, LAURAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/22/2025
MUNOZ, ANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/15/2024
RUTTER, DOUGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/22/2025
AMERICAN RETIREMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2025
ARCLP-CHARLOTTE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/26/1996
JONES LANG LASALLE INCORPORATEDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2025
LBMC PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WALTERS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
ASHER, JORDANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2020
DRAYTON, CLAUDIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2024
FIORAVANTI, MARKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2025
FREED, VICTORIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2019
HAUSMAN, JOSHUAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025
MACE, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2024
WARREN, DENISEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2021
WIELANSKY, LEEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense6% of expenses

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$219per resident / day
operating cost
$6,666per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$175per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345482. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next