Crestpark Forrest City, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 86% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 40.4 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to report suspicion of sexual abuse within the two-hour allotted time frame per Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse discovered on 04/27/2026 at 10:15 AM and was reported on 04/28/2026 at 11:45 AM. The findings include: A review of an admission Record revealed that the facility admitted Resident #2 on 04/10/2025 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, obesity, altered mental status, dementia, and hearing impairment. A review of a re-entry Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2026, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #2 was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and upper and lower body dressing. Resident #2 required supervision touch assistance with rolling from left to right. Other mobility skills…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report alleged violations involving abuse and misappropriation to the proper state agency within the allotted time frame for three (Resident #18, Resident #39, and Resident #43) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: Resident #18 Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/2025, revealed Resident #18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated no pain medication was received scheduled or as needed . No pain medications were listed on the MDS. Review of Resident #18's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses which included contracture of right knee, chondromalacia patellae (degeneration of the cartilage under the knee cap causing knee pain), and intentional self-harm by firearm discharge. Review of Page 73 of the Narcotic Book on 12/19/2025 at 12:40 PM, revealed on dates 09/29/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure immediate protective measures were implemented and maintained until a thorough investigation was initiated. The facility also failed to immediately report to the Office of Long-Term Care (OLTC) to enable the state agency to provide the necessary oversight of the facility's efforts to investigate and protect residents from potential harm for one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #43 with diagnoses that included type II diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (narrowing or blocked blood vessels), absence of right and left legs above the knee, osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow) and sepsis (the body's negative response to infection.) Review of an admission MDS with an ARD of 08/27/2025, revealed Resident #43 had a BIMS Score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed the resident required partial to moderate assistance with toilet transfer and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Five Rights of Medication was performed by nursing staff before giving a resident's family/representative the incorrect medications upon discharge from the facility and failed to ensure the discharge instructions were confirmed with resident's family/representative upon discharge effecting two (Resident #42 and Resident #12 ) of two residents reviewed. The findings include: A review of Facility Reported Incident indicated on 05/01/2025 at 2:45 PM, it was discovered that Resident #12's medication that included medicine for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Dementia, high cholesterol and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat) was given to a family/representative of Resident #42 upon Resident #42's discharge on [DATE]. The facility reported/submitted to the state Office of Long-Term Care (OLTC) on 05/06/2025 at 6:42 PM. The incident report indicated Resident #42's family/representative contacted the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 ice machines in the facility, one in the kitchen and one on the 400 Hall were maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverage contamination; dairy products stored in the refrigerator were sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired dairy products and food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; kitchen ceiling tiles were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation. The failed practices had the potential to affect 46 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 48), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Manager #11 on 08/06/2024. The findings are: 1. On 08/05/2024 at 9:46 AM, the ice machine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated narcotics were stored in a permanently affixed storage box to prevent misappropriation of resident medications. The findings are: On 8/07/2024 at 9:30 AM, during an observation of the medication storage area, the surveyor observed the red controlled medication lockbox was not secured inside the refrigerator. The box contained controlled medication. On 8/07/2024 at 9:45 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13, when asked why it is important to secure the box inside the refrigerator, LPN #13 admitted it would be very easy to conceal the medication box due to the size and remove it from the facility. Reviewed the facility's undated policy (received on 8/07/2024 at 10:39 AM from the Administrator) titled, Controlled Medication (Schedule II, III, IV, &V) Receiving, Recording, Storage, Accountability, and Disposition Of stated under the section labeled Storage, that narcotics will be kept in a locked container affixed inside a locked cabinet, inside the medication room.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to 3 affect residents who received regular diets from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by Dietary Manager #11 on 08/06/24 at 9:33 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/05/24, the noon meal menu documented the residents who received regular diets were to receive 4 ounces of fried chicken. 2. On 08/05/24 at 12:16 PM, during the noon meal service Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 served 2 fried chicken legs to 6 residents and 2 chicken wings to 5 residents. 3. On 08/05/24 at 12:36 PM, the surveyor asked Dietary Aide (DA) #4 to weigh the same amount of chicken legs served to the 6 residents for lunch, and the same amount of chicken wings served to the 5 residents for lunch. She did and the 2 legs weighed 2.5 ounces and the 2 wings weighed 1.2 ounces, instead of 4 ounces of fried chicken as per the menu. DA #4 stated, We should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of hot products and at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 24 residents who received their meal trays in the dining room, 12 residents who received their meal trays in their rooms on the 100 Hall and 200 Halls, and 8 residents who received their meal trays in their room on the 700 Hall, as documented on a list provided by Dietary Manager #11 on 08/05/24 at 9:33 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/05/24 at 11:34 AM, Resident #23 stated the food is cold by the time it gets to us. 2. On 08/05/24 at 12:30 PM, an unheated food cart that contained 17 lunch trays was delivered to the dining room by Dietary Aide (DA) #3. At 1:08 PM, immediately after the last residents received their trays in their rooms in the dining, the temperatures of food items on a test tray were checked and read by DA #4 with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 2 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are. 1. On 08/05/24 at 10:30 AM, a bowl that contained pureed strawberry cake was observed on the counter. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 stated, That is pureed strawberry cake, she covered the bowl with a lid and placed it in refrigerator to be served to the residents who required pureed food items. The consistency was runny, lumpy, and not smooth. There were pieces of strawberries in the mixture. 2. On 08/05/24 at 11:37 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #3, used a 4 ounce spoon to place 2 servings of English peas into a bowl with its juice from a pan on the steam table. 3. On 08/05/24 at 11:38 AM, DA #3 poured 2 servings of English peas into a blender and pureed. At 11:40 AM, DA #3 poured the pureed English peas into a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and state requirements, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment as evidenced by not adhering to the facility's policies and procedures after an accident/fall for 2 (Resident #48 and Resident #251) of 2 residents reviewed for a fall with serious injury. The findings are: On 08/06/2024 at 8:35 AM, observed Resident #48 during medication administration. Noticed extensive bruising to the resident's face. When asked what happened, Resident #48 stated, I rolled out of bed, and fell on the floor. I'm always doing that. When asked if she hurt herself, the resident stated, My left hip hurts. I'm afraid to get up and walk. On 08/06/2024 at 8:45 AM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 stated she received report this morning and was told Resident #48 fell out of bed, but no injuries were noted. LPN #12 stated [LPN #14] notified the family but did not notify hospice or the provider to determine need to have resident evaluated. Nurse initiated neuro checks but did not advise on coming…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CRESTPARK — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in AR