Crestpark Marianna, L L C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 53% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 52.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Residents #1, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for abuse. The findings are: A policy titled, Protecting Residents During a Suspected Abuse, indicated, Any employee who suspects an alleged violation shall immediately notify the Administrator or his/her designee. The Administrator/designee shall also notify the appropriate state and local agencies immediately but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury. A review of Resident#1's Physician's Orders indicated Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia with behavior. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/05/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief interview for Mental Status Score of 00, which indicated Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's Plan of Care, dated 2/03/2025, indicated Resident #1 had a behavior problem as evidenced by fighting. Interventions indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded; kitchen utensils/equipment were clean and in good condition and staff washed their hands while preparing food. The findings are: 1. On 03/11/2024 at 11:04 AM, in the kitchen there was a milk crate of buttermilk in the cooler. The buttermilk cartons had an expiration date of 03/08/2024. 2. On 03/11/2024 at 11:11 AM, a wire rack hanging in the kitchen was covered in a shiny brown substance. The wire rack had clean pots and pans on it. 3. On 03/13/2024 at 10:21 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 put her hand in her pocket, took it out and stirred cabbage. DE #1 walked by another employee, and put her hand on the other employee's shoulder, then picked up the puree machine to move it to another area. DE #1 then opened the cabbage and stirred it again. DE #1 then took a sanitation bucket by the handle and moved it to another counter. DE #1 opened the drawer to get a marker, wrote on an item, then began to add milk to the cabbage to puree. 4. On 03/13/2024 at 10:33 AM, the Surveyor asked DE #1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect during incontinent care for 1 (Resident #40) of 2 sampled residents and when eating. The findings are: 1. Resident #40 had a diagnosis of Dementia with behavior disturbance. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/01/2024 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) and was dependent on staff for toileting, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. a. On 03/11/2024 at 02:38 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7, while performing incontinent care to Resident #40, called the resident by their first name. Resident #40 stated, Don't call me by my name. CNA #7 continued to call the resident by their first name during incontinent care after the resident requested multiple times not to be called by their first name. 2. On 03/11/2024 at 12:34 PM, during the noon meal a staff member was standing while assisting 2 different residents to eat.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. Resident #17 had diagnoses of Essential (primary) hypertension and a History of cerebral vascular accident with right sided weakness. The Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/27/23 documented a BIMS score is 00 (00-07 indicates severely cognitively impaired was dependent on staff for incontinent care. 2a. On 03/12/2024 at 09:45 AM, Resident #17 was lying in bed uncovered. CNA #3 straightened Resident #17's bedding and hospital gown. The door to the resident's room was open and the privacy curtain was not pulled. 2b. On 03/13/2024 at 02:06 PM, the Surveyor asked RN #3, Should the door be open or closed when providing care? RN #3 stated, Closed. The Surveyor asked, What is the reason that the door should be closed when providing care? RN #3 stated, Patient privacy. 2c. On 03/13/2024 at 02:46 PM, the Surveyor asked the DON, Should the door be open or closed when providing care? The DON stated, If the curtain is not pulled, then yes the door should be closed. The Surveyor asked, What is the reason that the door should be closed when providing care? The DON stated, To provide privacy. 2d.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector and Resident #34's geriatric chair were in good repair to create a safe homelike environment. The findings are: 1. On 03/11/2024 at 01:47 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector located on the bottom half of the door was busted and had multiple cracks in it with some of the material sticking out. 1a. On 03/12/2024 at 09:17 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector on the bottom half of the door was busted and had multiple cracks with some of the material sticking out. 1b. On 03/13/2024 at 10:29 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector on the bottom half of the door was busted and had multiple cracks with some of the material sticking out. 2. On 03/11/2024 at 03:31 PM, the left arm rest of Resident #34's geriatric chair was cracked and missing material where the resident's hand rests. 2a. On 03/12/2024 at 09:04 AM, the left arm rest of the resident's geriatric chair was cracked and missing material where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from restraints for 2 of 2 sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #17 had a medical diagnosis of History of cerebral vascular accident with right sided weakness . The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/2023 documented Resident #17 scored 0 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Mental Status Screening (BIMS) and was dependent on staff for care and did not use bedrails. The Care Plan with a review date of 12/28/2023 did not address bed rails. On 03/11/2024 at 03:15 PM, Resident #17 had 3/4 length side rails up, on both sides of the bed. On 03/13/2024 at 09:00 AM, Resident #17 had 3/4 length side rails up, on both sides of the bed. On 03/13/2024 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, Is there anyone with full bed rails on their beds and is that considered a restraint? She stated, Yes, [Resident #17], but it's not used as a restraint. I don't consider it a restraint. The Surveyor asked,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and groomed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 2 (Residents #17 and #30) of 2 sampled residents who were dependent on staff for fingernail care. The findings are: 1. Resident #30 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, Diabetes mellitus, and Chronic kidney disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/25/2024 documented the resident scored 00 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required partial to moderate assistance with bathing. The Care Plan with a review date of 01/26/2024 documented, .Problem: [Resident #30] requires minimal assistance with ADL's [Activities of Daily Living] .Goal: Resident will be appropriately dresses and groomed by staff qd [each day] .Approaches: NSG [Nursing] staff to provide all ADL care to ensure daily needs are met . On 03/11/2024 at 12:35 PM, Resident #30 was sitting in the day/dining room. The resident's fingernails were 1/8 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of potential accidents and hazards as evidenced by failure to ensure an order was followed for thickened liquids for 2 (Residents #34 and #40) of 2 sampled residents and 1 (Resident #35) of 1 sampled resident was assessed for smokeless tobacco. The findings are: 1. Resident #34 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, Hypertension, and Restless leg syndrome. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/29/2024 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) and had no speech with an absence of spoken words and a swallowing disorder. The Care Plan with a review date of 01/30/2024 showed Speech Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered and to order nectar thickened liquids. The Physician's Orders showed, goal is for speech therapy. Order Date: 02/26/2024. Speech Therapy to evaluate and treat per Nursing orders - Speech Therapy to treat 1 time a week for 4 weeks for dysphagia. Order Date:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the spread of infections as evidenced by not performing hand hygiene when feeding residents and after incontinent care; failed to inform the nurse of feces on a feeding tube; by placing contaminated trash next to clean items; emptying catheter bags into trash cans; and during medication administration. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 (Residents #1, #39 and #40) of 3 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. On 03/11/2024 at 12:27 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 was sitting at feeding table. She did not sanitize her hands before putting on gloves. After putting on gloves, she reached in the pocket of her uniform, put her phone on the floor and pulled her top down in the back, then proceeded to begin feeding the resident without changing her gloves or sanitizing hands. On 03/11/2024 at 12:34 PM, during observation of the noon meal a staff member was feeding two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained. The findings are: On 03/12/2024 at 11:26 AM, the bathroom next to the Director of Nursing (DON) office, in a high-traffic area, was unlocked and there was no call light inside. On 03/13/2024 at 02:57 PM, the bathroom next to the DON's office was unlocked and there was no call light inside. On 03/14/2024 at 10:38 AM, the bathroom next to the DON's office was unlocked and there was no call light inside. On 03/15/2024 at 11:09 AM, the bathroom next the DON's office was unlocked, and the door was slightly open and there was no call light inside. On 03/15/2024 at 11:13 AM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator if there was a call light in the bathroom. The Administrator stated, No. The Administrator confirmed the bathroom was unlocked and open.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CRESTPARK — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $184K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR