Crestpark Wynne, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 41.0 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, the facility failed to provide Provider Enhanced Reporting Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), mandatory staffing data in a uniform format to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the 2nd Quarter 2025. The findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report was not available upon request during a recent annual recertification survey. The Administrator revealed the facility's PBJ data for January 2025, February 2025, and March 2025 was not submitted to the state, nor to CMS. According to CMS regulations, long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS, but no less frequently than quarterly. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 9:26 AM, the Administrator confirmed she was responsible for completing the staffing reports and sending the information to the state and CMS. She also verified she did not get the PBJ for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly covered, proper placement of meats, seasoning container lids were closed, and expired food items were promptly removed and discarded on or before the expiration or use by date, for one of one kitchen. The findings include: During a tour of the freezer on 07/21/2025 at 10:15 AM, this surveyor and the Dietary Manager (DM) observed the following: a. An open plastic bag with two beef patties was stored on a shelf, unsealed, exposing it to cross contamination. The DM stated, If it is not sealed, it could dry it out and it does not taste as good. b. A box of frozen fruit juice cups, with an expiration date of 05/05/2024, was on a shelf. c. A box of four-ounce chocolate shakes, with an expiration date of 06/11/2025was on a shelf. d. A bag of sausage patties was on a shelf, opened and unsealed. e. A bag of catfish was on a shelf, opened and unsealed. f. A box of pork steak was on a shelf, opened and unsealed. During a tour of the dry storage area on 07/21/2025, the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented for one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The findings include: Resident #11: During an observation on 07/24/2025 at 9:12 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 provide wound care to Resident #11. LPN #10 performed hand hygiene, prepare the supplies, then put on gloves, but failed to put on a gown prior to performing the wound treatment. This surveyor also observed there was no EBP signage or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) noted outside Resident #11's room. A review of Resident #11's Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 05/24/2022, with diagnoses which included a urinary tract infection, dehydration, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of Resident #11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were sealed after opening, food items were used prior to their use by date, equipment was maintained in good condition, and pans and other containers were stored in a manner to minimize the risk of contamination. The findings are: On 04/09/2024 at 10:27 AM, a carton of potato flakes was observed on the top shelf, above the worktable in the kitchen. The mouth of the carton was open, exposing the food product to air and contaminants. On the lowest shelf a container of paprika was observed with the top open exposing the product to air and contaminants. On 04/09/2024 at 10:35 AM, 1 package of hot dog buns and 1 package of hamburger buns were observed on the top tray of the bread rack with a use by date of 04/05/2024. On the second tray there were 4 full loaves of sliced bread with a use by date of 04/05/2024. On 04/09/2024 at 10:40 AM, 4 stainless steel mixing bowls, 5 skillets, 4 sheet trays, 7 large trays, 3 1/2 steam table pans, 2 1/4 steam table pans and 9 large steam table pans were stored…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was transmitted in a timely manner to promote individualized care for 2 (Residents #7 and #13) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: On 04/10/2024 at 11:10 AM, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #7 and Resident #13 were identified as being 120 days late. On 04/10/2024 at 01:30 PM, the MDS Coordinator was asked to review the last MDS assessments which were submitted for Resident #7 and #13. The MDS Coordinator reported Resident #7 had a Quarterly MDS which was submitted on 02/01/2024 and Resident #13 had a Quarterly assessment submitted on 02/21/2024. The MDS Coordinator describes the facility computer system as revealing the assessments were submitted and received. The MDS Coordinator displayed paper confirmation which confirmed the submission and receipt. The MDS Coordinator shared that another person was responsible for completion and submission of MDS assessments during the month of February. The MDS Coordinator verbalized her plan to look on the CMS website to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand rolls were applied to prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM) for 2 (Residents #13 and #28) of 3 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan dated 05/26/2023 did not document the contracture to the left hand. a. A review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2024 noted the resident was impaired on one side of the upper extremities. b. On 04/09/2024 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed at a fifteen (15) degree angle on his/her left side with legs elevated under the blanket. Resident #13 had a left hand contracture with no device present. c. On 04/09/2024 at 02:24 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying on his/her back in bed at a fifteen (15) degree angle. The left hand remained contracted with no device present. d. On 04/10/2024 at 12:58 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. The left hand was contracted with no device present. e. On 04/10/2024 at 01:04…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's individualized plan of care was revised to reflect the current needs of the resident and updated to include falls for 1 (Resident #13); oxygen therapy for 1 (Resident #19); and Hospice services for 1 (Resident #30) sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #13's Care Plan dated 05/26/2023 did not document the contracture to Resident #13's left hand. a. A review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2024 noted the resident was impaired on one side of both the upper and lower extremities and had had no falls. b. An Incident report dated 03/05/2024 noted Resident #13 was found lying on the floor next to the bed. 2. A review of Resident #19's Care Plan dated 05/19/2023 did not document oxygen use. a. A review of Resident #19's Physician Orders dated 02/06/2024 noted oxygen saturation QS (as frequently as needed) keep at or above 93%. No specific order for quantity of oxygen in liters. b. A review of Resident #19's Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were shaved to promote good personal hygiene for 2 (Residents #13 and #3) of 2 sampled residents and residents' fingernails were kept clean for 1 (Residents #3) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. A review of Resident #13's Plan of Care dated 05/26/2023 noted the resident required total assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). a. The facility provided a policy titled, 'Please Be Careful When Shaving Residents. Do Not Rush Through, As This Can Lead To Nicks & Cuts', dated 12/15/2023, which documented, Overview: Shaving may help a person feel good. b. A review of Resident #13's Physician Orders dated 02/09/2024 documented, Shower 6-2 bed baths daily may give shower if needed/ as tolerated. c. A review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2024 noted the resident was dependent for showers/baths. d. On 04/09/2024 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. The resident needed to be shaved. e. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand rolls were applied to prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM) for 2 (Residents #13 and #28 ) of 3 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan dated 05/26/2023 did not document the contracture to the left hand. a. A review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2024 noted the resident was impaired on one side of the upper extremities. b. On 04/09/2024 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. Resident #13 had a left hand contracture with no device present. c. On 04/09/2024 at 02:24 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. The left hand was contracted with no device. d. On 04/10/2024 at 12:58 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. The left hand was contracted with no device present. e. On 04/10/2024 at 01:04 PM, the Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 at Resident #13's bedside. CNA #3 confirmed the resident's left hand was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall mats at the bedside were properly positioned for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 sampled resident who required fall mats and call lights were maintained with no exposed wires for 1 (Resident #11) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and Convulsions. a. A facility in-service titled, 'Falls: Reduce the Risks' dated 05/19/2023 documented, .Intervention & Documentation Tickler for Falls . Padding on floor- landing mat(s) . b. The facility provided an Incident and Accident (I&A) Report dated 03/05/2024 that noted Resident #13 had fallen and hit the right side of their forehead on the floor. The twenty-four (24) hours follow up noted fall mat placed, staff re-educated to lower head of bed (HOB). c. Review of Resident #13's Care Plan dated 05/26/2023 did not document a fall. d. On 04/09/24 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CRESTPARK — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $57K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR