Claremont Manor Care Center
621 W Bonita Ave, Claremont, CA 91711 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (909) 626-1227 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.53 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.5%CMS range 50.4–69.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.3–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.1–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.48 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 92), who had a diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory and other mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life) and history of falling, received care and services to prevent a fall ( move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control, from a higher to a lower level) by failing to: a. Ensure Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) notified Resident 92's physician/medical doctor (MD 1) regarding Resident 92's increased agitation (unable to relax and be still) and confusion (unable to think clearly) when Resident 92 attempted to stand up unassisted from Resident 92's wheelchair (WC) multiple times on 1/20/2025 as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in Resident Condition. b. Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant 5 (CNA 5) did not wheel/take Resident 92 to Resident 92's room, placed Resident 92 in bed and left Resident 92 in Resident 92's bed, unsupervised, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's licensed staff failed to obtain informed consents (IC, the process, a form indicating a resident or responsible party voluntarily agrees to a medical treatment or procedure after understanding the risks, benefits, and alternatives) from two of two sampled resident's (Resident 35 and Resident 46) responsible parties by failing to:A. Obtain an IC from Resident 35 and/or the resident's responsible party prior to the administration of Mirtazapine 15 milligrams (mg-metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain an IC in a timely manner for the administration of Mirtazapine 30 mg when the dose was increased from 15 mg to 30 mg on 10/2/2025.B. Indicate the frequency (how often a drug should be given, times per day) for Mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication used mainly to treat major depression) 30 mg in Resident 35's IC dated 12/16/2025. C. Indicate in Resident 46's IC the reason…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective medication reconciliation (systematic collection and verification of a resident's complete and accurate medications during transitions of care, aims to identify and resolve discrepancies and can result in preventable adverse drug events [SE, undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication] and helps to identify the loss or potential diversion [illegal distribution of prescription drugs or their use for unintended purposes] of controlled medications [medications with high potential for abuse]) system in place for controlled medications for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 48, and Resident 49).This deficient practice resulted in unaccounted controlled medications for Resident 8, Resident 48, and Resident 49 and the potential for controlled medication diversion and misuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 8 admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 8 on 4/19/2006 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an advanced directive acknowledgement form (ADAF) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Advance Directives.This deficient practice had the potential to result in lack of knowledge regarding care and treatment decision making for Residents 1. Additionally, there was a potential to result in confusion among the healthcare providers in the event Residents 1 required immediate medical care and/treatment and the potential for Resident 1 to receive inadequate or medically unnecessary care and/or treatment or services regarding life-sustaining treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease in which the tissues in the joint break down over time) and macular degeneration (eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to notify Physician 1 and the responsible party of a change of condition (COC, an alteration in a resident's physical health that differs from their previous baseline) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17) when Resident 17 experienced a significant weight loss of 12 pounds (lbs., a unit of weight) within one week. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delated implementation of timely interventions and the potential to result in a physical decline to Resident 17.Findings:During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 11/25/2025, and re-admitted the resident on 2/21/2026, with diagnosis including, chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood over a long period, usually months or years), acute kidney failure (the sudden and rapid loss of kidney function, typically occurring within a few days or hours), and urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide transfer and bed-hold notification documentation for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Admission, Transfer, & Discharge Rules, when:Resident 42 did not receive a written notice of transfer-discharge (a document a nursing facility must give a resident and/or their representative before the resident is moved out of the facility, explaining why the resident is being transferred, where they are going, the effective date, their right to appeal, and how to contact the State Long Term Care Ombudsman [an advocate who helps protect the rights, safety, and well-being of residents in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities]) when Resident 42 was discharged on 2/15/2026.Resident 42 was not provided bed hold notification (a written notice a nursing facility gives a resident and/or their representative when the resident is sent to the hospital or leaves the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pressure ulcer-injuries (PIs, lesion/wound caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage of underlying tissue) preventive interventions for one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) by failing to:Encourage and offer to turn and reposition Resident 15 who preferred lying in bed on Resident 15's back.Float (healthcare practice aimed at preventing PIs by suspending the heels off the bed surface, thereby reducing pressure and friction on the skin) Resident 15's heels when Resident 15 was lying in bed.Ensure Resident 15's low air loss mattress (LAL, mattress that operates using a blower-based pump that was designed to circulate a constant flow of air) was set at the appropriate setting per the physician's order and not set on static (holds all air cells at the same inflation level, providing a stable, firm, and evenly distributed support surface for the resident) mode.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow fall prevention interventions for one of two sampled residents (Resident 23) when on 3/12/2026, Resident 23 did not have bilateral fall mats (a specialized, thick cushion designed to be placed alongside a bed or chair to absorb the impact of falls and reduce the risk of serious injuries like fractures or head trauma) on the ground alongside Resident 23's bed and while Resident 23 was in bed.This deficient practice had the potential to result in falls and injury to Resident 23. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee (a long standing, degenerative disease where the protective cartilage in the knee joint gradually breaks down over time), restless leg syndrome (condition that causes a very strong urge to move the legs) and age-related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Labetalol Hydrochloride (medication used to treat high blood pressure [BP], HCL, unit of measurement) was held in accordance with holding parameters for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5). On 3/11/2026, Resident 5's BP was 117/58 millimeters of mercury [mm Hg, unit of pressure measurement]), Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not hold the medication and administered 300 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) of Labetalol Hydrochloride to Resident 5.This deficient practice had the potential to result in dizziness due to a further drop in BP and a physical decline to Resident 5.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 8/23/2017 with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (when long-term high blood pressure [hypertension] makes it harder for the heart to pump blood making it more difficult for the heart muscle to relax) and cerebral infarction (stroke).During a review of Resident 5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two pill crushers were cleaned and the medication rooms were maintained free of food items.These failure had the potential to contribute to cross contamination of the residents' medications During a review of the facility's map, the map indicated the facility has two medication rooms located in nurses' stations 1 and 2.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/2026 at 8:35 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, in the nurses' station 1, the pill crusher had a reddish-brown color on the hinges and unidentified orange , white and yellow colored powder residue. LVN 3 stated the pill crushers are required to be cleaned daily at the end of each shift to prevent cross contamination of medications and avoid potential unintended chemical interactions.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/2026 at 12:45 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in the nurses' station 2, the pill crusher had a whitish powder residue. LVN 2 stated the pill crushers are to be cleaned daily at the end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify food preferences and offer food substitutes for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4).This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 4's nutritional intake, dining experience, and overall quality of life.During a review of Resident 4's face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 4 had an initial admission on [DATE] with the diagnoses but not limited to: wedge compression fracture (a break or discontinuity in bone tissue) of first lumbar vertebra( one of the bones that make up the spinal column), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic polyneuropathy (a common complication of long-term diabetes characterized by nerve damage affecting multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body),hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart, chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition in which the kidneys are damaged) and legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/2026 at 9:20 AM with the Kitchen Cook, five half gallon containers of milk with a best used by date of 2/26/2026 were found in the kitchen refrigerator. The Kitchen [NAME] stated expired milk should not be kept in the refrigerator, as it could be mistakenly served to the residents and potentially cause illness.During an interview on 3/11/2026 at 9:15 AM with the Director of Dining Services (DDS), DDS stated expired food items, including milk, must be discarded because retaining them in the refrigerators poses a potential health hazard to the residents.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Production, purchasing, storage, the P&P indicated all food and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination and maintain safety of the food for human consumption. The refrigerated storage life of food uses manufacturers expiration date and or milk should be plus three days after opening or by expiration date, if sooner.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices and ensure a safe, sanitary environment for two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 15).This deficient practice had the potential to cause healthcare associated infections that can cause pain and discomfort for residents.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 8/23/2017 with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (when long-term high blood pressure [hypertension] makes it harder for the heart to pump blood making it more difficult for the heart muscle to relax) and cerebral infarction (stroke).During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 12/3/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for showers/bathing self and toileting hygiene.During an observation on 3/11/2026 at 9:37 AM, Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from being verbally abused when Resident 2 threatened, cursed, and yelled at Resident 1.This failure resulted in Resident 1 being scared and angry and had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing feelings of decreased self-worth.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/10/2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that cause long-term breathing problems) and muscle weakness (a reduced ability of one or more muscles to exert force).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 5/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident1's cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was independent (the resident completes the activity by themselves with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (the Department) within two hours, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Adult Abuse, revised April 2018. This failure resulted in the delay of notification to the Department and had the potential for Resident 1 to be subjected to abuse while at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/3/2025, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), metabolic encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/10/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired in cognitive skills (the ability to make daily decisions). The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving abuse, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), was reported immediately but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the facility's administrator (ADM) and other proper authorities as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Adult Abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of notification to the State Agency (CDPH, California Department of Public Health) and the Ombudsman (an official, public advocate, helps to resolve issues between parties through various types of informal mediation) and had the potential to result in compromised safety to Resident 1 due to the facility's failure to take corrective actions to prevent further potential abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program, to prevent cockroaches in one of one kitchen for a facility licensed for a 59-bed count. This deficient practice had the potential to expose 38 residents currently residing in the facility to foodborne illness. Findings During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/25 at 1:15 p.m. while in the kitchen with the head chef (HC), HC stated he has only been employed at the facility for a few weeks. HC stated he doesn't know the last time the kitchen had a deep cleaning for the floors and all areas of the kitchen. HC stated the kitchen crew does daily sweeping and mopping two times (once during the day and once in the evening after dinner). During the tour of the kitchen, in the back of the cooking areas, there was grease and dirt build up observed on the pipes. The kitchen exhaust hood was observed with grease and dirt build up on the overhead fire sprinklers. During an observation on 2/11/25 at 1:40 p.m. while in the kitchen near the dishwashing area, 4 gray colored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan (CP), for four of four sampled residents (Resident 37, Resident 27, Resident 6, and Resident 5), as indicated in the the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), tilted, Care Plan, by failing to, a. Develop a care plan (CP) for Resident 37 when there was a change in skin condition on 1/11/2025. b. Develop a CP for Resident 27 for anticoagulant (class of medication that help prevent blood clots from forming in the heart and blood vessels) use when Resident 27 received Eliquis (medication used to prevent blood clots) tablet 2.5 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) by mouth twice a day. c. Develop a CP for Resident 6 for antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat symptoms such as hearing voices and hallucinations) use when Resident 6 received Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication to that helps regulate mood, behavior, and thoughts) 25 mg by mouth at bedtime for poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were at risk for skin breakdown and pressure injuries (PIs, localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue, usually occurring over a bony prominence or related to medical devices) received treatment and services to prevent skin breakdown for two of three sampled residents (Resident 32 and Resident 37) who had PIs by failing to ensure, A. Resident 32's LAL mattress (LAL Mattress -air filled mattress used to relieve pressure) was set according to Resident 32's weight of 138 pounds (lbs.). Resident 32's LAL mattress was set at 550 pounds (lbs.). B. For Resident 37, 1.The facility did not Provide documented evidence to show Resident 37 was repositioned every two hours during the night shift (10:30 PM to 6:30 AM) from 12/26/2024 to 1/24/2024. 2. Perform weekly skin assessments as indicated in Resident 37's care plan (CP), dated 1/2/2025, for two weeks. 3. Perform treatment for the unstageable PI (UPI, pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy titled Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications for two of two sampled residents (Resident 27 and 28) by failing to: a. Document the correct drug allergies into Resident 28's electronic medical record (EMR) when Resident 28 had 12 drug allergies and received Ambien (medication used to treat insomnia [difficulty in falling asleep]) nine times in 12/2024 which was indicated as one of the 12 drug allergies. b. Document the correct drug allergies in Resident 27's EMR when Resident 27's EMR did not indicate Resident 27 was allergic to clindamycin (type of antibiotic) and Norco (prescription medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) and incorrectly indicated an allergy to prednisone and prednisolone (medications used to treat swelling, redness, itching, and allergic reactions). These failures had the potential to result in Resident 27 and Resident 28 to sustain an adverse reaction to medications, such as, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's infection prevention guidelines by failing to: A. Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs, bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics] in nursing homes) were followed during peri-care (washing the genitals [sexual organs located outside of the body] and anal [end of large intestine, allows feces to come out] area) in one of one sampled resident's room (Resident 4's room). B. Ensure a portable HEPA filtration system (filtration system designed to easily create a negative pressure isolation room) was in one of one sampled resident's room (Resident 190's room) per facility policy when Resident 190 tested positive for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19, highly contagious and infectious disease that spread quickly door was observed to be opened through droplets released when an infected person coughs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy on Advance Directives (AD, legal document that indicates wishes for medical care if unable to speak for self) by failing to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 27) code status was correct when Resident 27 had a Medical Doctor (MD) order for full code (when the resident's heart stops beating and/or the resident stops breathing, the resident or the resident's representative wish to perform all lifesaving procedures to keep the resident alive) and an emergency Medical Services Prehospital Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, medical order by MD to not provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure, consisting of a combination of chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth, or mechanical breathing [a device used to help someone breathe]) Form (EMSPDNR). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 27 to receive incorrect emergency services. Findings During a review of Resident 27's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) notified one of one sampled resident's (Resident 92) physician/medical doctor (MD 1) regarding Resident 92's increased agitation (unable to relax and be still) and confusion (unable to think clearly) when Resident 92 attempted to stand up unassisted from Resident 92's wheelchair (WC) multiple times on 1/20/2025 as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in Resident Condition. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a physical decline to Resident 92. Cross Reference F744 Findings: During a review of Resident 92's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's Disease (AD, a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to perform everyday tasks), and psychosis (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN, a form that informs residents/responsible parties [RPs] Medicare may not cover certain items or services) form was signed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 26). This failure had the potential to result in the resident or the resident's RP to not make informed decisions regarding possible denied medical coverage. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with doing everyday tasks), hearing loss, and visual loss. During a review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P, formal document of a medical provider's examination of a patient) dated 10/21/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 26 did not have the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan (CP) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 92 and Resident 5) when, A. Resident 92's CP for alteration in cognitive function related to Alzheimer's Disease (AD, a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to perform everyday tasks)/Dementia was not updated to include Resident 92's increased confusion on 1/20/2025. B. Resident 5's CP for depression was not updated to include use and current physician order for trazadone (medication used to treat depression [causes feelings of sadness and/or a loss of interest in activities]). These deficient practices had the potential to result in Residents 92 and 5 to not receive the necessary care and services in accordance with their specific needs. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 92's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy by failing to: a. Connect Resident 12's Nasal Cannula (NC, medical device that provides oxygen through a tube and into the nose) tubing to the oxygen concentrator machine when Resident 12's NC was observed to be disconnected and on the floor. b. Label and date Resident 12's humidifier bottle when opened. These failures had the potential to result in complications associated with oxygen therapy for Resident 12. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (damage to airways that limits the movement of oxygen), asthma (inflammation and tightening of muscles around the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and dependence of supplemental oxygen. During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a routine pain medication was available for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7). This deficient practice had the potential to result in pain and psychosocial decline to Resident 7. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 9/9/2017, with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture (broken bone) of the lower end of the left humerus (a long bone that runs from the shoulder and scapula [shoulder blade] to the elbow) with routine healing. During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/27/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 7's cognition (ability to understand and process information) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 7 had frequent pain and Resident 7 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen and was receiving prn (as needed) pain medication. During a review of Resident 7's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated active orders as of 1/24/2025. the OSR indicated an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic drugs (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) were not used unnecessarily for one of five sampled residents (Resident 32) by: 1. Ensuring that the use of Quetiapine (medication used alone or together with other medicines to treat bipolar disorder [depressive and manic episodes] and schizophrenia [a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave]) was clinically indicated and necessary for Resident 32. This deficient practice had the potential to result in use of unnecessary psychotropic drugs and could have led to side effects (injuries resulting from medication use including physical and mental harm, or loss of function) and adverse consequences to Resident 32. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 32 on 6/26/2024, and readmitted the resident on 10/30/2024, with diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis [complete or partial loss of muscle function] on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff stored and prepared food under sanitary conditions in one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an observation of Kitchen 1 on 1/21/2025 at 9:20 AM with the Sous-Chef (SC) (sous-chef-the second-in-command in a kitchen, responsible for helping the head chef run the kitchen smoothly) the following findings were observed: 1. Cook (CK) 1 was observed prepping rice with a ball cap (a soft hat with a rounded crown and a stiff front bill) and without a hairnet underneath the cap. 2. Four cottage cheese containers were stored in a walk-through refrigerator with a best if used by date of 12/29/2024. 3. One cake mix was stored in the dry foods area with a best if used by date of 1/10/2025. 4. Two dented cans of Marinara sauce were stored in the ready to use dry food area. Findings: During an interview on 1/21/2025 at 9:30 AM, with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay or the inability for Residents 4 to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 4 on 6/27/2019, and re-admitted the resident on 10/15/2024, with diagnosis including contracture (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, ligaments, or skin that limits movement in a joint) of muscle, hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis [complete or partial loss of muscle function] on one side of the body), and hemiparesis, and age-related osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D). During a review of Resident 4's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/23/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 4 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the state agency (California Department of Public Health, CDPH) and law enforcement no later than two hours for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2) and indicated in the facility's abuse prevention policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Adult Abuse,. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of notification to the state agency and had the potential for the residents residing at the facility to be subjected to further abuse. Cross Reference F610 Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 6/9/23 and readmitted Resident 2 on 6/16/23 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), muscle weakness (a lack of muscle strength), hypertensive heart disease (long standing elevated blood pressure), and acute diastolic heart failure (a sudden serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately remove a potential threat for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2). On 9/13/24, the facility received a report that indicated Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) squeezed Resident 2's brief around his genitalia (male or female reproductive organs) area to check if Resident 2's brief was wet. The facility failed to remove (CNA 1) from resident care duties and failed to make every attempt to prevent further potential abuse while the facility's investigation was in progress as indicated in the facility's abuse prevention policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Adult Abuse,. This deficient practice had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1 and for the residents residing at the facility. Cross Reference F609 Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 6/9/23 and readmitted Resident 2 on 6/16/23 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), muscle weakness (a lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged verbal abuse of one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) by Resident 3 within the required time frame to the State Survey Agency (SSA), Long-Term Ombudsman (LTO), and the local law enforcement (LLE). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse of Resident 2 and/or other residents related to the delayed investigation of alleged abuse and the necessary interventions to prevent abuse. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (FS 1, admission record), FS 1 indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 11/10/2023, with multiple diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (HHD, abnormal changes in the heart due to long-standing high pressure of the blood against the walls of the arteries), abnormalities of gait, and unsteadiness on feet. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS 1, a standardized resident assessment and care-planning tool), dated 2/16/2024, MDS 1 indicated Resident 2 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during a Coronavirus (COVID-19, a mild to severe respiratory illness that spread from person to person) outbreak (a sudden increase in occurrences of a disease when cases are in excess of normal expectancy for the location or season) in accordance with the Department of Public Health's (DPH) guidelines and the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to: 1. Conduct annual N95 mask (respirator, a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) fit testing (the use of a protocol to evaluate the fit of a respirator on an individual) for one (1) of four (4) sampled staff members 2. Notify all residents and family representatives about the facility's COVID-19 outbreak in a timely manner. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19 throughout the facility and the community and the potential to compromise the health of the residents, staff, and visitors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of two of two sampled residents (Residents 14 and 17): a. For Resident 14, facility staff failed to promptly respond to Residents 14's call light (a device used by a resident to signal his or her need for assistance from staff). Resident 14 felt rushed when staff provided care for Resident 14. b. For Resident 17, facility staff failed to promptly respond to Resident 17's call light during the night shift. These failures resulted with feeling frustration to Residents 14 and Resident 17 to felt like Resident 17 wanted to die. The failures had the potential to result in both residents to feel like their concerns were unheard and disrespected. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS, admission Record), the FS indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of two sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 37) by failing to ensure: a.A physician's order, that indicated continuous oxygen (O2, gas that the body needs to live) administration through a nasal cannula (NC, a device that gives you additional oxygen through your nose) two liters (L, measurement of volume) per minute (2L/min), was followed for Resident 35. On 1/8/24, Resident 35's NC was attached to an empty O2 tank. b.For Resident 37, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive weekly assessment and take vital signs monthly as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled, Assessment, Licensed Weekly Summary, and Vital Signs, Monitoring of. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 35 to experience shortness of breath and had the potential to result in a delay in treatment, a decline in physical, and overall wellbeing for Residents 35 and 37. Findings: During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistive hearing devices were available to maintain hearing for two of two sampled residents (Residents 34 and Resident 35). a. Resident 34 was hard of hearing (HOH) and was not provided with hearing aids during activities as indicated in the care plan, titled, Communication, Alteration in related to Hard of Hearing. b. Resident 35 was HOH and was not provided with audiology services to address Resident 35's hearing impairment nor provided with hearing aids. These failures resulted in Resident 34 looking frustrated, not being able to hear, and unable to participate in activities. The failures had the potential to result in further hearing loss and impact Residents 34 and Resident 35's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 34's Face Sheet (FS, admission record) the FS indicated, Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness (generalized), lumbago with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe food handling practices in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), by: a. Failing to label, and date opened food items stored in a refrigerator located in one of two kitchens (Main Kitchen). b.Failing to maintain one of one refrigerator's, in the Service Kitchen located by the Dining Room, temperature at or below 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit, a unit of measurement). These deficient practices had the potential to result in serious complications from food borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage) due to expired or potentially expired foods for all residents residing at the facility and who consumed meals by mouth. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/24 at 10:30 a.m. with the Executive Chef (EF) during the initial brief tour of the Main Kitchen located in the Building 1, the following were observed: 1. a loaf of 18 count Lemon Glazed Pullman bread was out on a cart and the loaf of bread was not labeled with an opened or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices for two of two sampled residents (Resident 96 and Resident 146) in accordance with the facility 's policy and procedures (P&P) by failing to: a.Ensure Resident 96's nasal cannula (NC, is a device to deliver oxygen or increased airflow to a person in need of respiratory help) was not touching the floor. b.Ensure Resident 146's dentures were labeled and stored properly when not in use. These failures had the potential to result in infections and physical declines to Residents 96 and 146. Findings: a.During a review of the Face Sheet Face Sheet (FS, admission record) the FS indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (when lungs cannot get enough oxygen to the heart), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that effects the lungs and heart) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During a review of Resident 96's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident 22 appropriate accommodations when Resident 22's call light cord was not with-in reach. This failure had the potential to result in delayed care and treatment to Resident 22 and Resident 22's needs not being met. Findings: During an observation, on 1/8/24 at 11:44 am, Resident 22 was observed sitting on a wheelchair positioned by the foot of the bed and Resident 22 was approximately 3 feet away from the bed. Resident 22's call light cord was observed on the middle of the Resident 22's bed and not within the resident's reach. During a review Resident 22's Face Sheet (FS, admission record), the FS indicated Resident 22 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included history of falling, Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors on hands), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 22's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/18/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) within 14 days after a resident's Discharge Assessment was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7). This failure had the potential to result in an inaccurate assessment of the facility's quality indicators and/or care area concerns for review. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's Face Sheet (FS, admission Record), the FS indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified fracture (broken bone) of T5-T8 (bones of the spine [backbone]) and history of falling. The FS indicated Resident 7 was discharged from the facility on 9/10/2023. During an interview on 1/11/24 at 1:56 p.m. with the MDS Nurse (MDSN), the MDSN stated Resident 7 was discharged from the facility on 9/10/23. The MDSN stated the Discharge Assessment had not been submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) since Resident 7 was discharged from the facility. The MDSN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for falls for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14), as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Fall Prevention and Management. Resident 14's care plan for falls was not updated to include additional or different interventions following Resident 14's fall at the facility on 10/10/2023. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to not receive appropriate care and interventions to prevent further incidents of falls. (Cross reference F689) Findings: During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS, admission Record), the FS indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed every shift/daily to prevent pressure injuries (PI, pressure ulcer, injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually present over a bony prominence) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 147) as indicated by Resident 147's care plan titled, Risk for Skin Breakdown, and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Assessment, Body. This deficient practice resulted in a facility acquired Stage 3 (the ulcer/injury has gone through all layers of skin into the fat tissue, exposing the patient to infection) PI on Resident 147's coccyx (tailbone) area on 1/3/24. Findings: During a review of Resident 147's Face Sheet (FS, admission record) the FS indicated, Resident 147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait (walk) and unspecified atrial fibrillation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of the resident) failed to assess a resident's fall risk and reassess fall prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14), as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P), titled, Fall Prevention and Management Program. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14 to sustain an injury and/or harm due to additional falls. (Cross reference F657) Findings: During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS, admission Record), the FS indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding ([also referred to as tube feeding] the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum) syringe was replaced after 24 hours for one of two sampled residents (Residents 5). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 5 to develop an infection and complications including but not limited to diarrhea and vomiting. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's Face Sheet (FS) the FS indicated, Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including contracture (occurs when your muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues tighten or shorten causing a deformity) of muscle, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (adult onset disease characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 5's Physician's Order (PO), dated 12/11/23, the PO indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a Registered Nurse (RN) at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 7 days a week for three out of 42 days reviewed for staffing assignments. This failure had the potential to result in a decline in residents' physical and/or psychosocial wellbeing due to insufficient monitoring, and coordination of care and services by an RN. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 2 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's, Daily Assignments, and Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-in Sheets (CDPH 530) were reviewed: The Daily Assignments, dated 8/13/23 indicated a RN was scheduled to work that day. The CDPH 530 dated 8/13/23, was not signed by the RN scheduled to work that day. The DSD stated the RN would have signed on the CDPH 530 if the RN worked. The DSD stated the facility did not have RN coverage on 8/13/23. The Daily Assignments, dated 9/24/23 indicated a RN was scheduled to work that day. The CDPH 530 dated 9/24/23, was not signed by the RN scheduled to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of one Daily Nurse Staffing Form, and post actual worked nursing hours at the start of each shift. This failure resulted in inaccurate nursing staff hours worked, the failure had the potential to result in residents and family members obtaining misleading information from the posted form that indicated projected hours and not actual hours worked. Findings: During an interview on 1/10/24 at 4 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), The ADM stated the facility did not have a Policy and Procedure (P&P) for posting the facility's nurse staffing data. During an interview on 1/11/24 at 1:24 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), The DSD stated the DSD posted the Daily Nurse Staffing Form on the unit daily in the morning. The DSD stated the DSD would post the Daily Nurse Staffing Form for Saturday and Sunday on Friday before the DSD left at the end of the day. The DSD stated the Daily Nurse Staffing Form only indicated the projected staffing hours for each shift and not the actual hours worked by the staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during a Coronavirus (COVID-19, a mild to severe respiratory illness that spread from person to person) outbreak (a sudden increase in occurrences of a disease when cases are in excess of normal expectancy for the location or season) in accordance with the Department of Public Health's (DPH) guidelines and the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to annually conduct N95 mask (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) fit testing (the use of a protocol to evaluate the fit of a respirator on an individual) for sixty three (63) of sixty eight (68) staff members. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19 throughout the facility and the potential to compromise the health of the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 10:29 a.m. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all treatments and services were provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to follow Resident 1's physician's order to obtain a neurology consult (a medical doctor who specializes, diagnoses, treats and manages disorders of the brain and nervous system [brain, spinal cord and nerves]). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not being seen and evaluated by an neurologist and had the potential to cause a negative impact on Resident 1's well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including myelodysplastic syndrome (a group of disorders caused by blood cells that are poorly formed or don't work properly) and asthma (a chronic [long-term] condition that affects the airways in the lungs). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical Examination (H&P) dated 3/10/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), adequate monitoring and supervision for Resident 1 who was at risk for elopement. On 8/4/2023, Resident 1 was found sitting on Resident 1's wheelchair located outside of the facility and on the facility driveway. This failure resulted in compromised safety to Resident 1 and had the potential to result in life-threatening injuries and/or death to Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (AR, admission Record), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of history of falling. A review of Resident 1's Physician Visit Note (PVN), dated 10/24/2022, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control and prevention practices in accordance with the local Department of Public Health's (DPH) guidelines and the facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P) to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus, an infectious disease that can cause mild to severe respiratory illness and is a virus that spreads from person to person) when one of two staff (Mobile Phlebotomist [MP] failed to remove (doff) PPE (personal protective equipment, protective clothing, helmets, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) prior to exiting Room A located in the red zone (a cohort or group of residents who are positive for COVID-19). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19, severe respiratory illness, hospitalization, and/or death amongst the facility's residents and healthcare staff. Findings: During an observation on 8/21/2023, at 12:20 p.m., Rooms A and B had signages posted outside of the room and indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold glipizide (a medication used to lower sugar in the blood) when the resident's blood sugar was less than 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL, concentration of sugar in person's blood) for seven of seven dates (from 8/1/23 to 8/7/23) per the Physician's Order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). Glipizide was administered to Resident 1 when the resident's blood sugar level was less than 100 mg/dL. This deficient practice had the potential to place the Resident 1 at risk for hypoglycemic (low blood sugar that can cause confusion) episode and cause unnecessary harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (admission Record), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included generalized muscle weakness, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) and abnormality of gait. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) with respect and dignity while providing care. On 8/7/23, Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) did not stop turning Resident 1 when Resident 1 asked CNA 1 to stop. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling bad and had the potential to affect Resident 1's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of a face sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness and abnormality of gait (walk). During a review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care-screening tool), dated 7/13/23, indicated Resident 1 had clear speech, had the ability to understand (clear comprehension), and made herself understood. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required extensive assistance from one person for bed mobility (how resident moved to and from laying position, turns side to side and positions body while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of financial abuse for one of three sample resident (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, the Department), Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement, within 2 hours, according to the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P). This failure resulted in untimely reporting and had the potential to result in Resident 1's money to be stolen or misused. Cross reference F943 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, updated 6/5/23, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal), pain in the right shoulder, and presence of cardiac pacemaker(medical device which sends electrical pulses to help your heart beat at a normal rate and rhythm). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper training on how to identify an allegation of financial abuse for three of five sampled facility staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 [LVN 1], the Director of Nursing [the DON], and Certified Nursing Assistant 1 [CNA 1]). LVN 1, the DON, and CNA 1 failed to identify Resident 1's claim of missing money as an allegation of financial abuse. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's money to be stolen or misused. Cross reference F609 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, updated 6/5/23, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including pain in the right shoulder, and presence of cardiac pacemaker (medical device which sends electrical pulses to help your heartbeat at a normal rate and rhythm). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 5/31/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FRONT PORCH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/31/2021 |
| DURANTEAU, NANCY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| FORTE, VINCENT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| HANDY, JOANNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| JACOBS, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| KROEKER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| MCGOVERN, MARION | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| SPENCER, PETER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2026 |
| TONNU, DIEMLAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| WESSON, OLIVER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| WHITTAKER, SUSAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/23/2018 |
| KELLY, SEAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/06/2023 |
| SALVADOR, EDUARDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/03/2017 |
| VRANICH, RACHEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/17/2022 |
| AKOPYAN, GEVORK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/12/2022 |
| BARTON, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/10/2023 |
| GADDIS, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| KASEM, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| MACANGO, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/04/2026 |
| MCMULLIN, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| OLSON, KARI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2001 |
| PARKS, DEIRDRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/03/2024 |
| SUMNER, CRAIG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/27/2026 |
| MERKIN, NICKOLAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| NELSON, HARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
| PENNINGTON, PAIGE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $619K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555085. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.