St Paul's Towers

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 29.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for safety when: 1. A braising pan, a rolling pin, three storage bins, a citrus juicer, a kitchen drawer, and a juice dispenser machine had black particles/residue or chipped paint, 2. Nine balsamic dressing containers, cut lettuce, cut tomatoes, mayonnaise, bag of bread, mozzarella cheese, burrata cheese, and a bag of prosciutto had no use-by date or had beyond use-by-dates, 3. Three compartment sink's pipe had a leak and a toilet plunger was stored under the three-compartment sink (a sink with three compartments that allows kitchen staff to wash, rinse, and sanitize dishes), and 4. Gloves used to wash dishes in the three-compartment sink were stored on top of the left corner of the three-compartment sink wastewater tank (a wastewater tank stores and treats wastewater from the sink in the tank before releasing the wastewater to the environment). These failures had the potential for contamination of food resulting in food borne illness for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse properly when the dumpsters were not closed and a laundry bin was used as garbage receptacle. This failure had the potential of harborage and feeding of pest. Findings: During an observation on 9/9/24 at 11:10 a.m., with Environmental Services Manager (ESM), three dumpsters located by the side of the facility were full of trash bags and were not closed or covered. A laundry bin designated for use of the residents' soiled laundry was filled with bags of trash. During an interview on 9/09/24 at 10:53 a.m., with ESM, ESM stated the dumpsters should be covered. ESM stated the laundry bin for soiled laundry should not be used as a garbage receptacle. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 1:37 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated the garbage dumpsters' lids should be closed to prevent pests and rodents' infestation. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Nutrition Services, revised August 2022, the P&P indicated, . The SNF (skilled nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards of professional practice were maintained during medication administration for one of two sampled residents (Resident 80) when licensed nurse left Resident 80's Oxycontin tablet (a controlled substance used to treat moderate to severe pain) on top of the medication cart unattended. This failure had a potential for unauthorized access to the medication that could lead to harm or drug diversion (occurs when a medication is taken for use by someone other than whom it is prescribed). Findings: During a record review of Resident 80's admission Record (AR) dated 9/12/24, the AR indicated Resident 80 had multiple diagnoses including intervertebral disc disorder of lumbar region (a disease that can cause low back pain) and scoliosis of lumbar region (a condition that caused by abnormal side-ways curve of the spine in the lower back causing pain and discomfort). During a record review of Resident 80's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 9/1/24 to 9/30/24, the MAR indicated Resident 80 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 82) was free from unnecessary drug when Resident 82's PRN (pro re nata [a Latin phrase], meaning as needed, or as necessary) order for Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (a controlled substance used to help relieve moderate to severe pain) had no clear indications when to give one tablet versus two tablets. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen medication without proper indication, placing Resident 82 at risk for adverse side effects and health safety issues. Findings: During a record review of Resident 82's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/1/24 to 8/31/24 and 9/1/24 to 9/30/24, the MAR indicated Resident 82 had an order of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 milligrams/mg (Oxycodone with Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain take one tab to two tabs for pain with start date of 8/18/24. During a record review of Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) Medication Regimen Review (MRR, includes review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 10) was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (medications that are capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) when Resident 10's PRN (pro re nata [a Latin phrase], meaning as needed, or as necessary) order for Temazepam (used on a short-term basis to treat difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep) had no end date and rationale for continued use beyond 14 days. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary prolonged use of a psychotropic medication, placing Resident 10 at risk for adverse side effects and health safety issues. Findings: During a record review of Resident 10's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/20/24, OSR indicated, Temazepam Oral Capsule 15 milligrams (mg) . Give 1 capsule by mouth every 24 hours as needed for insomnia related to primary insomnia The OSR further indicated, Communication Method - Prescriber Written, with Order Status that indicated Active, and Start Date of 5/15/24. The OSR End Date was blank. During a record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage practices when: - The High temperature dishwasher was not within the required temperature range - Kitchen floor tiles had brownish residual discoloration - Juice dispenser had a brownish substance around the nozzle - Food prep refrigerator had brownish debris at the bottom shelf area. - One 5 LB (pound) can of creamy peanut butter was past the used-by-date 9/22/22 - Food steamer with brownish substance and crumbs at the bottom shelf area. These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness and did not ensure sanitary conditions. Findings: During the initial observation tour of the kitchen on 10/10/22 at 9:36 a.m., accompanied by the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) and Registered Dietician (RD), showed the following: Kitchen floor tiles had brownish black residual discoloration, Juice dispenser with brownish substance around the nozzle, prep Refrigerator had brownish debris at the bottom shelf area, one can of creamy peanut butter was past the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 23) who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment as follows. 1. Resident 23's toenails were long and had jagged edges. This failure had the potential for toenail trauma and foot complications related to diabetes (blood sugar disorder). 2. Resident 18 did not receive podiatry services (services provided by a foot specialist doctor) for the resident's long, thick, and yellowish toenails as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for toenail trauma. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 23's admission Record indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, dementia (memory and decision-making capacity is impaired affecting ADLs) and need for assistance with personal care. During an observation on 10/10/22 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 23 had long toenails and some toenails had jagged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of one (Resident 76) investigated for accident hazards, the facility failed to ensure Resident 76's environment was free from accident hazards when personal belongings were not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in another fall episode. Findings: Review of Resident 76's admission record indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal resulting in pain, numbness, and muscle weakness) and osteoporosis (bone disease that leads to decrease in bone strength and increases the risk of fractures). Review of Resident 76's Baseline Care Plan with Summary dated 10/6/22 indicated Resident 76 was alert and oriented, able to understand, and communicated easily with staff. Review of Resident 76's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 76 was identified as having a moderate risk of falling. Review of Resident 76's IDT (Interdisciplinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 10/2/22, 10/8/22, and 10/9/22. This deficient practice had the potential to cause delayed delivery of necessary assessment and treatment services for residents day-to-day care. Findings: Review of the nursing staffing assignment and sign-in sheet dated 10/3/22, 10/8/22 and 10/9/22 indicated facility did not use the services of an RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day. During an interview and record review of the October staffing schedule on 10/11/22 at 10:59 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there are some days the facility did not have an RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on weekends. DON stated the facility had tried to recruit RNs, but did not have RN coverage on 10/2/22, 10/8/22, and 10/9/22. The Facility Assessment Tool updated 9/13/22 indicated, the purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of five residents (Resident 78) observed for medication pass administration, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services when calcium-citrate-magnesium tablets were not available for medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in low blood calcium levels for Resident 78. Findings: Review of Resident 78's Order Summary Report for October 2022 indicated an order for calcium citrate-magnesium-mineral tablet one tablet by mouth one time a day. During an observation and concurrent interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) on 10/11/22 at 9:30 a.m., LVN 2 did not administer calcium citrate-magnesium-mineral tablet to Resident 78. LVN 2 stated the medication order would have to be clarified with the Attending Physician (AP) because the way it was written was confusing. LVN 2 pulled out all the drawers in the medication cart and could not show a bottle of calcium citrate. During an interview and concurrent review of Resident 78's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONT PORCH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $328K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA