Spring Lake Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 41.7 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.12 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, the enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention, primarily used in nursing homes, that involve the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the transmission of infection) were implemented for two out of two residents sampled for infection control (Residents 29 and 45 ) that had opened wounds.This failure could result in increased transmission of germs and increased risk of infections among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings:A review of Resident 29's face sheet (FS, front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves, causing pain, numbness, or weakness in the back, neck, or limbs) and trochanteric bursitis (painful swelling near hip joint).A review of Resident 29's progress note titled skin issues, dated 1/12 /26, indicated Resident 29 acquired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of two residents sampled for restraints (Resident 46) was free from physical restraints that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms when:1. No medical symptom identified that required the use of a pommel cushion (a specialized wheelchair or chair cushion with a raised section (pommel) between the legs; can be considered a restraint requiring careful assessment and physician orders for safe use);2. No physician order for the use of the pommel cushion; and3. No ongoing monitoring and evaluation for Resident 46's use of the pommel cushion.These failures could put Resident 46 at risk for movement restrictions and reduced functional independence.Findings:A review of Resident 46's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 7/2025 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait (the way a person walks) and mobility (ability to move) with a need for assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two out of two residents sampled for grooming (Residents 29 and 16) received care to maintain grooming when their fingernails were long with brownish material underneath.This failure could negatively affect the residents' sense of dignity and be an infection control concern.Findings:A review of Resident 29's face sheet (FS, front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves, causing pain, numbness, or weakness in the back, neck, or limbs) and trochanteric bursitis (painful swelling near hip joint).A review of Resident 29's care plan (CP, a detailed, written document that outlines a resident's individual needs, goals, and how their care will be managed) for focus .self care and mobility deficit., initiated on 12/01/25, indicated staff were to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to preserve skin integrity for one out of two residents (Resident 29) sampled for pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) when pressure ulcer preventative measures were not consistently implemented for Resident 29.This failure resulted in Resident 29 developing a stage 2 pressure ulcer (Partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) on her coccyx (tailbone) while at the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 29's face sheet (FS, front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves, causing pain, numbness, or weakness in the back, neck, or limbs) and trochanteric bursitis (painful swelling near hip joint).A review of Resident 29's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to immediately report an allegation of abuse, for one resident out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 notified staff of an allegation of abuse on 4/13/25 but was not reported to California Department of Public Health (the Department) until 4/15/245. This failure had the potential to leave Resident 1 vulnerable to further harm or abuse, delay the investigation and corrective actions to address the allegation of abuse. Findings: On 4/15/25, the Department received a report from the facility which indicated Resident 1 accused Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) of sexually abusing her. During an interview on 4/15/25, at 1:45 PM, the Administrator stated the incident was reported to him sometime around 4 PM on 4/14/25. During an interview on 4/15/25, at 3:10 PM, CNA A stated while he was taking care of Resident 1 with CNA C on 4/13/25, Resident 1 accused him of raping her. CNA A stated he reported the incident to Licensed Nurse B (LN B) but was not aware if LN B reported the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1 b. During a review of Resident 14's face sheet (demographics), the face sheet indicated, Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection) and urinary tract infection (bladder infection). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/25 at 4:06 p.m. with Resident 14, Resident 14 had an indwelling midline catheter (flexible tube inserted through the skin into a large vein in the arm used to administer IV antibiotics). There was no signage posted to alert staff that Resident 14 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Resident 14 stated that she was receiving Intravenous (IV) antibiotics (medicine that kills bacteria or stops their growth) for a urinary infection. During an observation on 2/10/25 at 4:10 p.m. in Resident 14's room, Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse (IP/RN) administered IV antibiotics through Resident 14's midline catheter. IP/RN was not wearing a gown during the observation. During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
  Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control training program related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP [Centers for Disease Control guidance to wear personal protective equipment when caring for residents with an indwelling medical device designed to reduce the spread of infections]). (cross reference to F880). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the facility's ability to maintain a safe environment to prevent the spread of infectious diseases among the 47 residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 2/12/25 at 2:13 p.m., with Infection Preventionist Registered Nurse (IP/RN) and the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the IP/RN and DSD stated they did not know what EBP was, therefore, they had not developed a policy and procedure or trained staff regarding EBP. During a review of the All Facilities Letter (AFL memo issued by the California Department of Public Health), dated 6/13/2024, indicated, skilled nursing facilities should implement EBP per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. Two kitchen staff did not wear hair nets while in the kitchen. 2. Five of five green cutting boards were not in good repair. 3. Dented cans were not discarded. 4. Six boxes of dry goods were stored directly on the floor. 5. Multiple food items were expired. 6. Multiple food items were unlabeled and undated. 7. Sanitizer for the vegetable wash was expired. These failures posed the risk for food borne illness in a medically fragile resident population of 47. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/25 at 4:02 p.m. with Executive Chef (EC)in the Kitchen, the Server entered the kitchen and loaded a cart with food items, without a hair net. EC stated, No, she needs a hair net immediately. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 10:13 a.m. with Certified Executive Chef (CEC)in the Kitchen, Dishwasher (DW) 2 was washing dishes, without a hair net. CEC stated, No, he needs a hair net. During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 29 and 37) needs and preferences were met when: 1. Resident 29's call light was not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 29 being unable to get assistance as needed. 2. Resident 37 did not recieve assistance to get out of bed and dressed earlier in the morning. This failure had the potential to adversely impact Resident 37's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 29's face sheet (demographics), dated 2/10/25, the face sheet indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that causes a gradual decline in memory, thinking skills and behaviors) and weakness. During an observation on 2/9/25 at 5:56 p.m., in Resident 29's room, Resident 29 was lying in bed with his square pad call light not within his reach. During an interview on 2/9/25 at 6:02…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when: 1. Personal use items including toothbrushes, toothpaste and combs were observed in a shared restroom for Residents 5, 8, 18, and 145 in a unlabeled wash basin (a pink colored wash basin/container for each resident used to store their personal use items). 2. Resident 18's personal use item was observed on Resident 145's (roommates) bedside table. These failures had the potential to cause illness and cross contamination in a medically compromised population. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/9/25 at 3:19 p.m. and 3:45 p.m., in a shared restrooms for Resident 5, Resident 8, Resident 18 and Resident 145, personal use items were observed in a unlabeled wash basin. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 4:19 p.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated the room number should be on the wash basin that holds the resident personal use items, but not the name. 2. During an observation on 2/10/25 at 4:01 p.m., in room Resident 18's,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONT PORCH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $393K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA