Sunny View Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 36.5 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.16 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 14% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, The facility failed to ensure staff promptly reported a significant change in condition to the physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Staff failed to promptly report a significant change in condition to the physician when Resident 1 showed a reduced level of alertness and Resident 1's Glasgow Coma Scale (a scale used to reliably measure a person's level of consciousness after a brain injury) was 9 out of 15 (where a score of 13 or higher correlates with mild brain injury, a score of 9 to 12 correlates with moderate brain injury, and a score of 8 or less represents severe brain injury). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being seen promptly by a physician at the time of a change in condition (on 12/11/23) and/or to receive an acute care hospital evaluation, and as a result was subsequently not deemed a candidate for any intervention when admitted to an acute care hospital admission on [DATE], due to Resident 1's late presentation. Resident 1was then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, dietary staff interview and document review, the facility failed to conserve nutritional food value. The cooked food prepared for lunch on 4/14/25 were placed on the steamtable 1 1/2 hours prior to service. This failure had the potential to compromise nutritional quality and palatability of residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: Processing and cooking conditions cause variable losses of vitamins. Losses vary widely according to cooking method and type of food. Degradation of vitamins depends on specific conditions during the culinary process, e.g., temperature, presence of oxygen, light, moisture, pH, and, of course, duration of heat treatment (Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, June 2006). The molecular structure of vitamins makes them easily degradable under various conditions such as temperature. During kitchen observation on 4/15/25 beginning at 8:50 a.m., the following cooked food were placed in the steamtable; Tray 1 corned beef, Tray 2 chicken stew, Tray 3 potatoes, and Tray 4 pureed carrots. During an interview at the time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, dietary staff interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency when two of two kitchen staff did not follow manufacturer's instruction when testing the potency of a chemical used to sanitize kitchen cookware. This failure had the potential of cookware not being sanitized and placed residents at health risk. Findings: During a kitchen observation on 4/16/25, at 3:52 p.m., a kitchen staff was asked to test the potency of the sanitizer from the red bucket (standard receptacle containing sanitized solution used to clean food contact surfaces). The kitchen sous chef (SC, second in command of a kitchen) dipped the test strip into the red bucket for less than 5 seconds three times and began reading the results. On the third time the dipping of the test strip was timed and it was 4.97 seconds. During the observation the SC stated the solution was used to sanitize pots and pans. On 4/16/25, at 4 p.m., the registered dietitian (RD) was observed dipping three test strips each for less than five seconds. The temperature of the solution was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, dietary staff interview and document review the facility failed to ensure cooked foods were stored under safe temperatures and failed to cover meats and vegetables in the walk-in refrigerator. The failure of not verifying meat temperatures after blast chilling (rapidly chilling food with cold air) had the potential of causing food borne illness had the foods were not chilled to the correct temperature. The failure of not covering refrigerated foods had the potential to diminish its taste and placed the risk for food contamination. Findings: 1. During kitchen observation with the dietary supervisor (DS) on 4/14/25, at 9:30 a.m., there were food racks approximately five feet in length storing uncovered vegetables and meats of chicken, fish, beef and pork in the walk-in refrigerator. One of the tray contained marked or seared [NAME] broil beef, with four pork chop trays under. Another rack stored raw asparagus, partially cooked onion, bell pepper and eggplant on the top rack, foiled macaroni…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for administering oxygen (colorless and odorless gas which is essential for life) for one of two residents (Resident 83). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 83's well- being. Findings: Review of Resident 83's clinical record indicated, Residet 83 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included heart failure (the heart is not pumping blood as effective), vascular dementia (a type of dementia (a general term for the loss of memory and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) caused by brain damage resulting from impaired blood flow, often due to stroke or other conditions affecting blood vessels), and iron deficiency. During an initial observation, of Resident 83, on 4/14/25, at 2:21 p.m., it was observed that the oxygen flow rate was set to 2 1/2 liters per minute (lpm, liters of oxygen flowing per minute). During an observation on 4/16/25, at 9:13 a.m., the oxygen flow rate was observed to be set at 2 3/4 lpm. During an observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage and preparation in the kitchen when: 1. Produce was not labeled or dated in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Hot foods were not kept at 135 degrees Fahrenheit during meal service tray line. These failures had the potential for all residents in the facility to be introduced to food borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/24, at 8:43 a.m., with Director of Dining Services (DDS) in the kitchen, eight raw whole honeydew melons were noted to be in a non-manufacturer hard plastic container in the walk-in refrigerator. No labels or dates were noted on honeydew melons or the container. Three bags of raw shredded carrots, 1 bag of whole raw radish, 2 bags of raw wedged carrots, and 2 bags of raw pre-cut celery were noted in one non-manufacturer hard plastic container with no labels or dates. DDS stated, the honeydews, carrots, radishes and celery all do not have a date or label on them. They should be labeled and dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant F (CNA F) did not perform hand hygiene in between Resident 83's bed making task and glove changed; 2. Certified Nursing Assistant G (CNA G) did not perform hand hygiene in between serving food to residents (Residents 15, 184, 16 and 8) and when assisting two residents with meals (Residents 5 and 83); and 3. Registered Nurse C (RN C) did not perform hand hygiene in between medication administration task and glove changed (Residents 134 and 233). These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/8/2024 at 9:15 a.m., inside Resident 83's room, CNA F donned (put on) a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. CNA F removed Resident 83's dirty linens and placed them in a laundry bag. She removed her dirty gloves and stepped out of the room to get clean linens located at the hallway without performing hand hygiene. CNA F went back to Resident 83's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan when one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 233) did not have application of left-arm brace included in the Care Plan (CP). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate communication between staff in providing necessary treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 233's physician orders dated 1/10/24, it indicated applying left hand resting brace everyday for up to two hours in the morning, two hours in afternoon as tolerated, monitor skin for redness/swelling or changes in skin integrity. During a review of Resident 233's CP, indicated there was no CP for the use of brace. During an interview on 1/12/24 at 12:25 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated there should be a care plan for the brace application. The DON confirmed there was no CP for the left-hand brace. She stated CP should be updated right away with a new order. She further stated to do so, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) would know the need and frequency of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to meet the professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Residents 233) when registered nurse C (RN C ) did not shake the Med Plus (nutritional supplement) as directed prior to pouring in the medication cup; the Med Plus was not dated when opened; and RN C provided a wrong consistency of Med Plus to Resident 233, nectar thick consistency (liquids that are easily pourable and are comparable to heavy syrup found in canned fruit) instead of thin liquids as diet ordered. These failures had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. Findings: 1a. Review of Resident 233's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance), dated 12/27/2023, indicated Resident 233 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided muscle paralysis or weakness) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for effective communication when a facility did not provide language assistance or other communication aid to two of three sampled residents with language barrier (speaking in foreign language) (Residents 83 and 4). This failure had the potential to affect the psychosocial well-being of these residents and a decline in their activities of daily living. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/2024 at 9:08 a.m., Resident 83 was sitting up on a wheelchair and the certified nursing assistant F (CNA F) was also inside the room. CNA F stated Resident 83 was Mandarin speaking only. There was no communication binder/board or descriptive pictures observed inside the room. During a follow up observation on 1/8/2024 at 11:24 a.m., inside Resident 83's room, there were no communication binder/board or descriptive pictures on Resident 83's bedside drawers. Another observation on 1/9/2024 at 9:28 a.m., inside Resident 83's room, there was no on-site communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 16) remained free from accident hazards due to the use of bed rail (side rail) when Resident 16 had the left upper bed rail raised up while in bed without bed rail assessment, physician's order and care plan. This failure had the potential to put Resident 16 at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: Review of Resident 16's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance), last updated 12/21/2023, indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including encounter for palliative care ( a specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness), Alzheimer's disease ( a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and adult failure to thrive (when an older adult has a loss of appetite, eats and drinks less than usual, loses weight, and is less active than normal). Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,176 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,176 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONT PORCH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $383K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA