No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Royal Terrace Healthcare

1340 Highland Ave., Duarte, CA 91010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 58 certified beds · (626) 256-4654 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 256-4654 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1345 Huntington Dr · (626) 359-8604 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
1335 Huntington Dr · (626) 359-1316 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1406 Huntington Dr · (626) 357-4580 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1600 Huntington Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1551 Huntington Dr · (626) 358-8516

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.3%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.2%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.66U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 50.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 6) rights were not violated when the facility did not allow Resident 6's family member to visit the resident.This deficient practice had the potential to worsen Resident 6's depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and cause emotional and psychosocial impairments.During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 1/27/2026 with diagnoses which included depression, malignant neoplasm of endometrium (cancer that starts in the endometrium, the inner lining of the uterus [womb]), and hypertension (high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/29/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 6 lacked capacity to make and understand medical decisions.During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/7/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 6 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to make daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being on 6/8/2026 evening shift (from 3 PM to 11 PM).This deficiency practice resulted in incomplete activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) documentation on 6/8/2026 evening shift for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) and having the potential for all residents not receiving services to meet their needs.During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 4/22/2026 with diagnoses which included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near brain that can happen after a head injury), anxiety disorder (mental health condition that involves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents' (Residents 23 and 36) Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) reflected an accurate assessment, by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 23's diagnosis of depression (feeling of deep sadness that made a resident lose interest in things they once enjoyed) was coded in MDS assessment dated [DATE]. b. Ensure Resident 36's use of antipsychotic medication was coded accurately in the MDS assessment dated [DATE]. These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administered the Medicare program and worked with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential to result in Residents 23 and 36 not receiving interventions to address specific care concerns.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement specific, comprehensive, and individualized person-centered care plans (CP) to meet the residents' needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 2 and 36) by failing to: a. Develop an individualized CP to address the diagnosis of depression (feeling of deep sadness that made a resident lose interest in things they once enjoyed) for Resident 2. b. Develop an individualized CP to address the diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) for Resident 36. These failures resulted in the residents not receiving individualized care to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 1/22/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and depression. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for three of three sampled residents (Residents 2, 7, and 36) when:a. The facility did not document the blood sugar level on Resident 2's medical record. b. The facility did not rotate the insulin (a hormone that helped a resident's body use sugar for energy) administration site for Resident 2.c. The facility did not document the psychotropic medication monitoring every shift when Resident 36 was taking citalopram hydrobromide (medication for depression [feeling of deep sadness that made a resident lose interest in things they once enjoyed]) and quetiapine fumarate (medication for psychosis [when a resident lost touch with reality]). d. The facility did not rotate the insulin administration site for Resident 7. These failures had the potential to compromise Residents 2, 7, and 36's health and safety. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage practices in one of one facility kitchen, by failing to: a. Discard five cups of vanilla ice cream dated 5/18/2026 that had spilled over in the kitchen Refrigerator 1. b. Discard one pitcher of prune juice with a use by date of 5/14/2026 in the kitchen Refrigerator 1. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages) for the residents.Findings: During an observation in the facility kitchen in the presence of [NAME] 1 on 5/19/26 at 8:43 AM, there were five cups of vanilla ice cream dated 5/18/26 that had spilled over in the kitchen Refrigerator 1. [NAME] 1 stated there was no expiration date on any of the cups and since they had spilled over and were overflowing, these items should have been removed from the refrigerator and thrown out. During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1 on 5/19/26 at 8:53 AM, there was one pitcher of brown liquid with a use by date of 5/14/26 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe handling and storage of food brought into the facility in one of one resident's refrigerator, by failing to: a. Discard one container of peanut butter and chocolate chip frozen dessert and one container of strawberry ice cream with no name or expiration date. b. Discard one cup of vanilla ice cream with no name or expiration date that was sealed with a plastic wrap. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages) for the residents.Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/19/26 at 9:04 AM with the facility's [NAME] 1 (Cook 1) inside the employee's lounge where the resident's refrigerator was located, Cook1 stated the resident's refrigerator should not have items that were not labeled with a name and expiration date. One container of peanut butter and chocolate chip frozen dessert and a strawberry ice cream with no name or expiration date was observed inside the resident's refrigerator. [NAME] 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with its policy and procedure, when: a. Two of two unlabeled wash basins were stacked on top of each other and placed on the floor underneath the sink located in the shared bathroom between Rooms A and B. b. The resident's urinal (container used for urination) was placed on the nightstand for one of one sampled resident (Resident 58). These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: a. During an observation on 5/19/2026 at 10:36 AM inside the shared bathroom between Rooms A and B, two empty wash basins were stacked on top of each other and placed on the floor underneath the bathroom sink. The two wash basins were both unlabeled. The shared bathroom has two doors, with one door leading to Room A and another door leading to Room B. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/2026 at 10:38 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) inside the shared bathroom between Rooms A and B, CNA 2 stated the two wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) failed to feed Resident 4 at eye-level on 5/19/2026 during Resident 4's lunch meal. This deficient practice resulted in the violation of Resident 4's right to a dignified existence and had the potential to affect Resident 4's feelings of self-worth and self-respect Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 4 on 3/14/2026 and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition (when a resident does not eat enough protein and calories to meet nutritional needs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and generalized muscle weakness (loss of overall physical strength). During a review of Resident 4's doctor's progress note (DPN) dated 3/16/2026, the DPN indicated Resident 4 had full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 60) who was admitted in the facility with pressure induced deep tissue damage (damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long) received care and services to promote wound healing by failing to accurately monitor and assess the correct settings of the low air loss mattress (LALM - tiny laser made air holes in the mattress top surface continually blow out air causing the patient to float, designed to prevent and treat pressure sores, or pressure ulcers) according to Resident 60's weight. This deficient practice placed Resident 60 at risk of poor wound healing and deterioration of current pressure induced deep tissue damage. Findings: During a review of Resident 60's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 60 on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis (working 40 or more hours a week) from 12/9/2025 to 12/23/2025 for 52 of 52 residents (census) in the facility.This deficient practice had the potential to impact the quality of care and outcomes that all residents experience in the facility.Findings: During an observation on 12/22/2025 from 8:05 AM to 5 PM and on 12/23/2025 from 8:02 am to 5 pm, there was no designated RN who served as the DON on a full-time basis in the facility. There were 52 residents in the facility on 12/22/2025 and on 12/23/2025. During a phone interview on 12/23/2025 at 9:08 AM with the former DON (FDON), the FDON stated FDON quit the facility in the first week of December 2025. The FDON could not recall the exact date of when the FDON quit the facility. During an interview on 12/23/2025 at 3:48 PM with the Administrator, the Administrator stated that the facility had not designated a specific RN to serve as a full-time DON for the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards possible and residents received adequate supervision for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) when:a. Resident 2's bed sensor pad alarm (an assistive electronic device that makes alerts/sounds to warn caregivers when the resident tries to get up from the bed) did not sound when Resident 2 got up from Resident 2's bed unassisted by staff and walked to the bathroom.b. The facility's licensed nursing staff (in general) failed to conduct a fall risk assessment (an evaluation to determine a resident's likelihood of falling) or inaccurately assessed Resident 3 as low risk for fall following Resident 3's falls on 5/31/2025, 8/4/2025, and 10/4/2025. c. The facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of health care professionals who work together toward the goals of the resident) failed to conduct a comprehensive root cause analysis (systematic process to identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be free from sexual abuse for one of three sample residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 being subjected to indecent exposure when Resident 1 masturbated in the room in front of Resident 2, and Resident 2 was afraid to go to sleep because Resident 2 feared for his safety.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe with psychotic disturbance (refers to the advanced stage of the dementia, where cognitive impairment significantly interferes with daily functioning), unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (a condition where a person experiences delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that are not real), disorganized thinking and speech, and changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F600Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from sexual abuse for one of three sample residents (Resident 2). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision of Resident 1, when he inappropriately exposed himself and masturbated in the presence of Resident 2, after the facility had knowledge of another incident that had occurred where Resident 1 exposed himself masturbating to other residents in the hallway. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1's behavior to cause psychosocial harm to Resident 2 and other residents if the facility staff did not monitor Resident 1's whereabouts.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe with psychotic disturbance (refers to the advanced stage of the dementia, where cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) which addressed Resident 1's behavior of inappropriately exposing himself and masturbating in the presence of Resident 2 and other residents in the hallway. 1. This deficient practice had the potential to result in psychosocial harm to Resident 2 and other residents in the facility. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe with psychotic disturbance (refers to the advanced stage of the dementia, where cognitive impairment significantly interferes with daily functioning), unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (a condition where a person experiences delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that are not real), disorganized thinking and speech, and changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), received interventions for the risk of elopement (a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge) when Resident 1 expressed to RN 1 that Resident 1 wanted to leave the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised on 9/7/2025 and had the potential for Resident 1 to be injured. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/21/2025 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of liver (chronic liver damage), chronic congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to all parts of the body), and hepatic encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/23/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make own medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 9/9/2025, The PN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary (needed) care and services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Changes in Resident Condition, when:a. Registered Nurse (RN) 3 and LVN 1 did not notify Resident 1's physician regarding Resident 1's complaint of pain and not feeling well, and Resident 1's request to be transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 7/20/2025 during the 3-11 shift (3 PM to 11:30 PM).b. Registered Nurse (RN) 3 and LVN 1 did not document Resident 1's complaint of pain and not feeling well, and Resident 1's request to be transferred to a GACH in Resident 1's medical record on 7/20/2025.c. RN 1 did not notify a physician regarding Resident 1's complaint of pain and Resident 1's and Resident 1's Representative's (RR 1 - someone authorized to make healthcare decisions on behalf of another person) request for Resident 1 to be transferred to a GACH on 7/21/2025 at 2 AM.d. RN 1 did not document in Resident 1's medical record regarding Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) and AD Acknowledgement Forms were filled out completely and correctly and added to the resident's medical record for two of three sampled residents (Residents 3 and 93) in accordance to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Advance Directives. This deficient practice had the potential to cause confusion among the healthcare workers in the event Residents 3 and 93 required immediate medical care and/treatment and had the potential for the residents to receive inadequate or medically unnecessary care and/or treatment or services regarding life-sustaining treatment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage in one of one facility's kitchen by failing to: a. Ensure leftover food from outside the facility was not stored in the kitchen refrigerator. b. Label food items and supplies in the dry storage area with a date open receipt, opened and used/best by date. c. Discard expired food items in the dry storage area. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross-contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that would lead to foodborne illness (an illness caused by eating contaminated food). Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/27/2025 at 8:11 a.m. with the Lead [NAME] (LC) in the facility's kitchen refrigerator there were two (2) to-go boxes inside a white plastic bag with leftover beef, chicken, macaroni salad and rice in the refrigerator which were not labeled and dated. These were stored together with food for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) when staff did not close the privacy curtain while checking Resident 30's Gastrostomy tube (G-tube, feeding tube that is surgically placed through an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall) site. This deficient practice violated Resident 30's right to bodily privacy and resulted in unnecessary exposure of Resident 30's abdominal area and lower extremities. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 30's psychosocial (mental and emotional) well-being, self-esteem, and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 30's Physician Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when needed) was within reach and appropriate to the patient's physical ability for one of one sampled resident (Resident 29). This failure had the potential to result in a delay in meeting Resident 29's needs for assistance and could have led to a fall or accident. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and contractures of both hips, both knees and the left elbow. During a review of Resident 29's History & Physical (H&P), dated 10/17/2024, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 29 had intact cognition (ability to understand), had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized and comprehensive hospice plan of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 95). This failure had the potential for Resident 95 to not receive the necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 95's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cirrhosis (a condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged), hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function when a damaged liver doesn't remove toxins from the blood) and congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 95's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/22/2025, the OSR indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on hospice. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/2025 at 11:19 a.m. with the Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress (Alternating Pressure Mattress which provides alternating pressure and is designed to be used in the prevention, treatment and management of pressure injury which is a localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence and maybe caused by intense or prolonged pressure over the site) was set up accurately according to manufacturer's instruction for one of two sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the risk of reoccurring of pressure injury for Resident 6. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer (lesion/wound caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage of underlying tissue) of sacral (large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) region…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) residents had a dialysis emergency kit (E-kit, contains the main items needed in an emergency) at the bedside for one of three sampled residents (Resident 93). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 93 to not receive or to receive delayed care and emergency treatment from complications caused by unexpected bleeding from the hemodialysis access site. Findings: During a review of Resident 93's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 93 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure), hydronephrosis (a condition characterized by excess fluid in a kidney due to a backup of urine) and dependence on hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Dilaudid (a controlled pain medication) within ordered parameters for one of four sampled residents (Resident 193). This failure resulted in professional standards of practice not being followed and had the potential to ineffectively manage Resident 193's pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 193's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple left-sided rib fractures and high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 193's History & Physical (H&P), dated 5/14/2025, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 193's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 5/19/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 193 had intact cognition (ability to understand). During a review of Resident 193's Order Summary Report, the report indicated Resident 193 had an active order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication refrigerator (MR) was maintained at a temperature between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F, unit of measurement for temperature) to 46 degrees F for one of one sampled medication refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in medications stored in the medication refrigerator to become unstable and ineffective. Findings: During a review of the Medication Refrigerator MR temperature recording log, dated 5/2025, the MR temperature recording log indicated, the MR had a temperature recorded at 48 degrees F on 5/23/2025 and 5/24/2025. During a concurrent observation and interview while inside the facility's medication room on 5/29/2025 at 11:22 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), the MR's temperature was 34 degrees F. LVN 3 stated the MR's temperature should always be kept between 36 to 46 degrees F. LVN 3 stated not keeping the temperature of MR between 36 to 46 degrees F might reduce the medications efficacy and effectiveness. During an interview on 5/29/2025 at 12:50 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of three sampled residents (Resident 9 and 99): a. To perform a screening for Advance Directive (AD, a written instruction, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual became incapacitated [lacking the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care]) upon admission and to obtain a copy of AD to keep/maintain in Resident 99's medical record (MR). b. To ensure Resident 9's AD acknowledgement form was filled out completely. These failures had the potential for the facility staff to provide treatment against the resident's will. Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included sepsis (a serious infection affecting the entire body) and dehydration (body does not have enough water and fluids to carry out its function). During a review of Resident 99's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-16 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava) line and peripheral intravenous (PIV, a short , flexible plastic tube that is inserted into a vein through the skin) line for three of three sampled residents (Residents 43, 46 and 200) by failing to : a. Ensure the PICC line port was covered with a cap and not left open and exposed to the air, when not in use in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on Guidelines for Preventing Intravenous Catheter-Related Infections. b. Label and date the PIV for Resident 200) in accordance with the facility's P&P titled Peripheral IV Dressing Changes. c. Label the PICC line dressing with date of insertion and/or change of dressing. These deficient practices had the potential to result in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving oxygen therapy (a treatment that provides with extra oxygen to breathe in) were provided necessary respiratory care and services for four of four sampled residents (Residents 25, 27, 151 and 199) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on Respiratory Therapy - Prevention of Infection. These failures had the potential to result in respiratory complications and infection for Residents 25, 27, 151 and 199. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 151's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (a condition that causes weakness or inability to move on one side of the body) and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs). During a review of Resident 151's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/7/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 151 had an order for oxygen to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan of care (details why a person is receiving care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the residents' needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19) who had a diagnoses of Cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) and on Bactrim ([sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim] medication that treat infection) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 19 to not receive necessary care, treatment and/or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 19 on 5/8/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) without hematuria (blood in the urine) and overactive bladder (sudden urges to urinate that may be hard to control). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a smoking assessment (an assessment that helps to determine how can help a patient who smokes) upon admission for one of two sampled residents (Resident 100). This failure had the potential to result in unsafe smoking behaviors causing harm to residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 100's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (sudden condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) and hypertension (increased blood pressure). During an observation on 6/15/2024 at 3:48 pm, in the facility's designated smoking area, Resident 100 was observed smoking together with one of Resident 100's visitors. During a concurrent interview, Resident 100 stated Resident 100 was newly admitted to the facility and had a smoking history of more than 40 years. During a review of Resident 100's History and Physical (H&P)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-16 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident who used a plate guard (a dining aid that can help people with limited hand control, grip, or dexterity eat with one hand and reduce the risk of spills) during meals for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1's decline in nutritional status and inability to maintain independence during mealtime. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) and hemiparesis (a condition that causes weakness or inability to move on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/24/2015, the OSR indicated Resident 1 had an order for plate guard at mealtime. During a review of Resident 1's untitled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patient's treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) was accurately documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential to result in miscommunication among health care providers, resulting in inconsistent care for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid [fluid found within the tissues surrounding the brain] in the ventricles [cavities] within the brain) and hypertension (increased blood pressure). During a review of Resident 25's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 25 had unclear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's call light (device used by a resident to signal his need for assistance from the facility staff) was answered in a timely manner. 2. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) assisted Resident 1 with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in accordance with the resident assessment and care plan, including to assist when getting out of bed (OOB). 3. Ensure Resident 1 was not left soiled in urine for prolonged periods of time. These failures had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 1's physical and psychosocial well-being due to possible skin breakdown, loss of dignity, and loss of a homelike environment. (Cross Reference with F725) Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR 1), AR 1 indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 on 9/29/2023 with multiple diagnoses including a history of stroke (brain damage due to blocked blood supply to the brain), left shoulder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for six of 15 sampled residents (Residents 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, & 14) in accordance with the physician's orders by failing to: A. Ensure there was a physician's order for the intervention Assisted Active Range of Motion (AAROM, joint receives partial assistance from an outside force) exercises to both lower extremities (BLEs) in Resident 7's care plan. B. Perform Passive ROM (PROM, outside force exclusively causes joint movement) exercises to Resident 9's right upper extremity (RUE) as indicated in the care plan. C. Perform PROM exercises to Resident 10's BLEs and RUE as indicated in the care plan. D. Perform PROM exercises to Resident 11's BLEs as indicated in the care plan. E. Perform Active ROM (AROM, effort to move the body part without outside help or force) exercises to Resident 13's BLEs as indicated in the care plan. F. Apply Resident 14's left elbow splint (device applied to support the extremity in the best position while resting) and perform PROM exercises to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services (RNS, services provided to help residents maintain their function and joint mobility) as ordered by the physician for six of 15 sampled residents (Residents 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, & 14). A. For Resident 7, Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) services were not provided for 5 days in 4/2024. B. For Resident 9, RNA services were not provided for 4 days in 4/2024. C. For Resident 10, RNA services were not provided for 6 days in 4/2024. D. For Resident 11, RNA services were not provided for 3 days in 4/2024. E. For Resident 13, RNA services were not provided for 3 days in 4/2024. F. For Resident 14, RNA services were not provided for 4 days in 4/2024. These failures had the potential to cause a decline/further decline in the residents' range of motion (ROM, measurement of the amount of movement around a specific joint or body part) with increased risks for pain and skin breakdown. (Cross Reference with F725 and F656) Findings: A. During a review of Resident 7's AR (AR 7), AR 7 indicated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff, including certified nursing assistants (CNAs, staff to provide care to residents and assist with mobility ) and restorative nursing aides (RNAs, staff to help improve and/or maintain residents' function and joint mobility), were assigned to provide care for seven of 15 sampled residents (Residents 1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, & 14) in accordance with the residents' needs and preferences, physician's orders, and/or residents' care plans by failing to: A. Accommodate Resident 1's needs and preferences regarding the call light response time, getting out of bed (OOB), and incontinence brief changes. B. Provide Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) services to Resident 7 as ordered by the physician in 4/2024. C. Provide RNA services to Resident 9 as ordered by the physician in 4/2024. D. Provide RNA services to Resident 10 as ordered by the physician in 4/2024. E. Provide RNA services to Resident 11 as ordered by the physician in 4/2024. F. Provide RNA services to Resident 13 as ordered by the physician in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to verify the competencies and skills sets of the nursing staff to ensure appropriate nursing care and services were provided to the residents by failing to: A. Ensure three of nine sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had an active CNA certification. B. Ensure Director of Staff Development 1 (DSD 1) conducted a Skills Competency test for two of three sampled newly hired CNAs prior to working independently as a CNA. C. Ensure DSD 1 identified the learning needs of four of 27 sampled nursing staff and determine there was no documented evidence on file of a current Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation training (CPR, basic training on life-saving actions during cardiac emergencies) or Basic Life Support training (BLS, CPR training with additional life-saving techniques for those experiencing respiratory distress or an obstructed airway). D. Ensure DSD 1 addressed the staffing shortage brought up by the nursing staff that affected the quality of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident area for two out of twenty-three resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During a review of the Client Accommodations Analysis (CAA), dated 5/27/2025, the CAA indicated rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a 156 square feet of floor area and two beds. During a review of the facility's letter to request for room waiver dated 5/27/2025, the letter indicated the facility was requesting a waiver be granted on the condition that the request did not adversely affect any residents or any resident's special needs. The waiver indicated all proposed rooms provided ample space for safe resident mobility and accessibility and would not impede the ability of any residents in the room to attain their highest practical well-being. During the Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough room for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing care to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 6/16/2024, from 9 am to 10:05 am, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate freely and/or maneuver in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff had enough space to provide care to these residents with dignity and privacy. There was space for beds, side tables, dressers, and other medical equipment. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 6/16/2024 at 11:02 am, regarding rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] that did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SERRANO GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TERRACE LICENSEE 7Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 01/01/2016
BIN MENDEL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
BL CALI PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
JS FENTON LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
RGF CONSULTING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
SERRANO GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
SERRANO PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
YAAME LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
FENSTERMAN, HOWARDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
FENSTERMAN, JORDANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
FENSTERMAN, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
JACOBS, DOVIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
LEIBSON, STACIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
TAUB, JUDAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$338K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 2%Other / private 11%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $338K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$417per resident / day
operating cost
$12,684per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055541. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next