Palazzo Post Acute
5400 Fountain Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90029 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (323) 461-4301 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.2% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.26 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.3–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.2–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.36 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards and supervision for one of two sampled residents, (Resident 3), who was a high fall risk and had history of falls with fracture (broken bones). On 10/16/2021, at 9 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) assisted the resident to the activity room, where Resident 3 remained alone, unsupervised. As a result, at 9:20 AM, Resident 1 was found in the activity room, lying on her left side near her wheelchair, and complained of moderate pain to the left hip and left thigh. On 10/17/2021, Resident 3 was diagnosed with a left hip fracture requiring transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 10/18/2021. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 3, a [AGE] year-old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, wedge compression fracture T9-T10 vertebra (a fracture in the front part of the thoracic, pelvis vertebra), wedge compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 13) reviewed for dialysis (a medical treatment that acts as an artificial kidney, filtering waste products, toxins, and excess water from the blood when a person's kidneys can no longer perform these tasks properly) received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to:-Ensure Resident 8 did not miss dialysis appointments due to transportation on 5/16/2026.-Ensure the licensed nurses (in general) conducted the pre (before) and post (after) dialysis assessments for Resident 8 and Resident 13.-Ensure Resident 13 did not receive more than 1000 milliliters (ml, a unit of measurement) of fluid per day as ordered by Resident 13's physician.These failures had the potential to delay critical treatment, compromise the accuracy of dialysis orders, and place Resident 8 and Resident 13 at risk for injury, fluid overload (is a condition where the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to document itemized list of personal property for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) upon admission. This failure had the potential for loss or misappropriation of Resident 2's personal property items and to cause moral distress to Resident 2.Findings: During a record review of the face sheet Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of polyneuropathies (a condition where multiple peripheral damaged nerves throughout the body causing numbness in hands and feet), chronic pain syndrome (a condition where persistent pain beyond the typical healing time), anxiety (feelings of unease, worry, or fear), major depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest and pleasure), opioid dependence (a physical adaptation to regular opioid use where the body requires the drug to function normally and prevent withdrawal symptoms), vascular dementia (a decline in thinking and memory skills caused by restricted or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure resulted in Resident 3's room area to remain cluttered with the resident care items on the dresser, resident's personal blanket left on the bed frame out of the resident's reach alongside an empty Glucerna shake bottle and white paper bag with old crackers, as well as, a wedge a triangular-shaped orthopedic pillow, usually made of firm foam, designed to elevate specific parts of your body) on the floor.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, dated 5/29/26, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus type two (DMII - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 picked up a call light (device for residents to call for help) from the floor and placed it on the bed sheet without cleaning it. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be in unsanitary environment and be exposed to disease-causing germs.Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of right femur and pubis (fracture of right thigh and pelvic bones), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes persistent sadness, loss of interest, and physical symptoms). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 5/5/2026, the MDS indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (CNA 3) had an active license when working an 11pm to 7am shift on [DATE].This failure resulted in CNA 3 not meeting the requirements of the federal regulation for nurse aide registry certification and had the potential to effect the quality of care received for her assigned residents.During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 4:30 pm with Director of Nursing (DON) CNA 3's L & C (Licensing & Certification) Verification Detail Page, undated, from CNA 3's personnel file was reviewed. The page indicated CNA 3's license status was active, employable with expiration date of [DATE], which the DON verified.During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 4:30 pm with the DON a search was done on the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) website to verify CNA 3's certification status on the registry. The search results indicated No data was found that matches your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to create and implement a Care Plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) to meet the individual needs for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) care plan, by failing to: 1. Create and implement a care plan on 11/29/2025 when the resident displayed aggressive behavior and was placed on 1:1supervision (one staff member always stays with one patient to keep them from harming others or themselves). 2. Create and implement a care plan on 12/8/2025 when the resident was readmitted to the facility from the GACH (General Acute Care Hospital) after being evaluated for increased agitation with aggression. These deficient practices had the potential to delay and affect the quality of care and services Resident 1 received.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 3/10/2025 and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from physical abuse (any intentional act causing injury or trauma to another person by way of bodily contact) by failing to: -Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA2) notified Registered Nurse 2 (RN2) that Resident 1 was agitated (to be visibly worried, upset, or restless, often showing this feeling through your movements or voice, like fidgeting or speaking in a tense way) when CNA1 did not allow Resident 1 to go smoke on 9/9/2025 at approximately 1AM. -Ensure Resident 2 did not hit Resident 1 who was blind on the left jaw (the lower part of the face below the mouth) on 9/9/2025 at 1AM. On 9/9/2025 at approximately 1AM, Resident 1 wanted to go smoke and CNA2 told Resident 1 to sit down. Resident 1 became agitated Resident 2 thought Resident 1would hit CNA2 and Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on Resident 1's left jaw. As a result, on 9/9/2025 at 1AM Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the jaw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) by failing to: -Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA2) notified Registered Nurse 2 (RN2) that Resident 1 was agitated (to be visibly worried, upset, or restless, often showing this feeling through your movements or voice, like fidgeting or speaking in a tense way) when CNA1 did not allow Resident 1 to go smoke on 9/9/2025 at approximately 1AM. -Ensure Resident 2 did not hit Resident 1 who was blind on the left jaw (the lower part of the face below the mouth) on 9/9/2025 at 1AM. -Ensure Resident 1 and Resident 2 had adequate supervision to prevent Resident 2 from hitting Resident 1 on his jaw. On 9/9/2025 at approximately 1AM, Resident 1 wanted to go smoke and CNA2 told Resident 1 to sit down. Resident 1 became agitated Resident 2 thought Resident 1would hit CNA2 and Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on Resident 1's left jaw. As a result, on 9/9/2025 at 1AM Resident 2 hit Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions to prevent falls for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to anticipate Resident 1 ' s needs during transfer from the toilet to the wheelchair on 2/19/25. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sliding off the wheelchair and fell to the floor. Resident 1 had the potential to sustain injury because of the fall. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/9/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan initiated on 1/9/25 indicated Resident 1 was at risk for falls related to history of falling, impaired gait/balance. The Care Plan goal indicated Resident 1 will minimize risk of falls or injuries for 90 days. The care plan interventions included adapt environment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure to receive the receipt of a correct emergency drug supplies (E-kit, a pre-set of medications to provide an immediate service to facility's residents) from the pharmacy upon delivery. As a result, the facility did not have a narcotic (controlled drugs) E-kit available in the facility for roughly twenty-four (24) hours, between 6/2/2025 and 6/3/2025. 2. Ensure an E-kit was replaced within 72 hours of first use. 3. Ensure seven of seven drug disposition forms were filled out with dates of disposition, nurse and witnessing nurse's signatures. 4. Ensure to follow up on Resident 69's Norco (a potent opioid and narcotic that treats pain) 10-325 milligrams (mg, unit to measure mass) ordered on 5/28/2025 until 6/4/2025, after surveyor's inquiry. These failures had the potential to delay treatment and receive medications in error, that may or may not affect the health condition of the residents. Findings: 1. During an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) on 6/03/2025 at 2:13 PM, LVN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen by failing to: 1.Ensure to keep the ice scooper holder clean. 2.Ensure the kitchen staff (in general) did not keep their personal perishable food in the facility's refrigerator and did not place their personal belongings anywhere in the kitchen other than the designated area for staff. These failures had potential for residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: 1.During an initial kitchen observation on 6/2/2025 at 7:45 AM and a concurrent interview with the Dietary Food Nutrition Supervisor (DFNS), the DFNS stated the ice scooper holder was dirty. The DFNS stated the facility's Ice Scoop and Container Cleaning Log dated 6/1/2025 and 6/2/2025, indicated the ice scooper and container were cleaned, but the ice scooper holder was dirty. The DFNs stated the ice scooper holder should always be kept clean to prevent contamination. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices by failing to: 1. Develop a sufficient water management plan (a program that identifies hazardous conditions and steps to take to minimize the growth and spread of waterborne pathogens in building water systems) to reduce the growth and spread of Legionella (bacteria that causes Legionnaires Disease, a severe lung infection. Legionella is often found in water systems and is spread by breathing in mist or swallowing water that is contaminated by the bacteria) amongst 97 out of 97 facility residents. 2.Ensure the nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 [LVN3]) followed its enhanced barriers precautions (EBP, an infection prevention protocol) policy during the medication administration observation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 69). 3. Ensure Registered Nurse2 (RN2) would disinfect the injection ports during the preparation of an intravenous (IV, into the vein) vancomycin (an antibiotic to treat certain infections) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 32). These failures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 9) who did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions had a legal representative to assist in making medical decisions. This failure violated Resident 9's right to make an informed decision (choice that individuals make once they have all the information related to the decision topic) in the resident' care. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 9 on 5/10/2018, with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness, low mood, and loss of interest in activities that were once pleasurable), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), age-related incipient cataract (in its early stages, where the lens of the eye is starting to become cloudy but vision is not yet significantly affected), and anxiety disorder (a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 47) related to the risk for falls after Resident 47 had a fall on 12/26/2024. This failure had the potential for Resident 47 to receive inadequate care. Findings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/3/2023 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow imprecise movements), encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), unsteadiness on feet (difficulty maintaining balance while walking or standing), lack of coordination (an inability to control and synchronize movements smoothly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure to provide effective oral hygiene care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 39). This failure resulted in Resident 39 having a tan substance on her teeth, dry lips, and a substance on her reddened, tongue. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/19/2022 with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (g-tube - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition). During a review of the Resident 39's Care Plan Report dated 1/3/2025, the Care Plan Report indicated the resident was at risk for decline in range of motion (ROM, the full movement potential of a joint), and required assistance with oral care. The Care Plan Report indicated the nursing interventions were to provide oral care three times a day. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to implement safety measures for one of one sampled residents (Resident 63) by failing to: -Ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA2 and CNA3) locked Resident 63's bed and the Hoyer lift (a specialized lifting device to weigh or safely transfer a patient with limited mobility) prior to placing the sling (a specialized fabric support, acts as a harness) under Resident 63 on 6/2/2025 at 10:58 AM. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury to Resident 63. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/3/2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing) following cerebral infarction affecting right non-dominant side, other sequelae of cerebral infarction (a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, which damages brain tissues),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a bowel and bladder assessment (a process to evaluate a person's bowel and bladder function) quarterly as indicated in the care plan for one of one sampled residents (Resident 66). This failure had the potential for Resident 66 to not receive the appropriate care for her bowel and bladder function. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/8/2024 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), cirrhosis of the liver (a disease where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue), reduced mobility (an impairment that impacts a person's ability to move or perform tasks), and adult failure to thrive (a condition characterized by a decline in physical, cognitive (ability to understand, think, and reason), and social functioning in adults). During a review of Resident 66's Nursing Bowel and Bladder Evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 1) had a labeled flush bag for the gastrostomy tube (g-tube - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be exposed to infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 05/13/2020 with diagnoses that included aphasia (a communication disorder that impairs a person's ability to process language, affecting their ability to speak, understand, read, or write), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/18/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive (ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to administer the Benadryl (medication that treats the symptoms of allergies and allergic reaction) 25 milligrams (mg., metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) on 3/28/25 when Resident 1 complained of facial itching due to possible allergic reaction. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident1 to continue experiencing allergic reaction and discomfort. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/6/25 with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (chronic long-lasting disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body, as well as fatigue and trouble sleeping) and other disturbances of skin sensation. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 1/13/25 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Resident 1 needed substantial assistance (helper does more than half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the federally required daily actual hours worked by the staff in an area accessible to the public for one of one sampled day (11/12/2024). As a result, the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to residents, family, or visitors. Findings: During an observation of the facility on 11/12/2024 at 10:46 a.m , no Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) actual hours were posted in the DHPPD posting, there was no DHPPD posted for the previous day (11/11/2024). During an interview with Director of Staff and Development (DSD) on 11/12/2024 at 11:20 a.m., DSD stated, the NHPPD posting were on the wall with only the projected hours. The DSD stated, she was not sure if the DHPPD posting had to include the actual hours and if the DHPPD posting for the previous day also had to be posted. During a follow-up observation of the facility on 11/12/2024 at 11:22 a.m., DHPPD were observed posted on the wall with the projection hours information. No actual hours were posted in the DHPPD posting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile Pomalyst (pomalidomide- is an oral chemotherapeutic (a drug used to treat cancer) capsule treatment for Multiple Myeloma [a blood cancer that develops in plasma cells in the bone marrow]) oral capsule (cap) 4 Milligrams (MG) for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 missing a total of 2 dosages on 5/18/24 and 7/13/24. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Multiple Myeloma, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2 - a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), and end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure dignity and respect for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 2 and 7). This failure resulted in Residents 2 and 7 not being treated with dignity and respect and had the potential to affect the resident ' s self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record dated 6/24/24, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, hypertension (high blood pressure), low back pain, anemia (a condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells, to transport oxygen around the body) and cellulitis (bacterial infection that enters your skin and tissue through a wound) of bilateral (both) lower extremities. A review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/30/24 indicated Resident 2 had intact cognition (ability to think, understand and make daily decisions). The same MDS indicated Resident 2 required set up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for the resident's change in condition of loose stools for one of two sampled residents (Resident 74). Resident 74 continued to receive a laxative (medication used to treat constipation) and experience frequent loose stools without appropriate intervention. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 74 to become dehydrated (a condition that occurs when you lose more fluid than you take in, not having enough water to carry out its normal functions) and potentially cause kidney damage, brain damage, and/or death. Findings: A review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/16/2024 with diagnoses that included multiple myeloma (a rare blood cancer), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (occurs when an individual does not eat enough protein and energy to meet their nutritional needs), Type II diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), dependence on renal dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the transfer records from the general acute hospital (GACH 1) were reviewed thoroughly for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, who had appointments arranged by the general acute hospital (GACH 1) for vascular diagnostic (a test used to determine possible circulation problems of the blood vessels), chemotherapy (use of drugs to destroy cancer cells), hematologist (medical doctor who had special training in diagnosis and treating blood disorders) and pulmonologist (medical doctor who had special training in diagnosing and treating diseases of the lungs (body organ that helps with breathing) prior to Resident 1's transfer and admission to the facility on 3/16/24, the facility failed to: 1. Thoroughly review Resident 1's GACH 1 transfer record when the facility admitted Resident 1 on 3/16/24. 2. Notify Resident 1's physician about Resident 1's appointments arranged by the GACH 1 to make decisions whether to continue with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safeguard personal funds for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 retrieved $800 from Resident 1 and placed the money in the narcotic box. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's personal funds becoming stolen or misused. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, unspecified (occurs when the heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should), Type II diabetes mellitus with other skin ulcer (a complication caused by poor circulation and nerve damage from high blood sugar levels), and essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure without a known cause). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 3/18/2024, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact, was dependent and or required maximum assistance from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from verbal abuse. This failure had the potential to result in mental anguish, depression, anxiety and has the potential to result in physical abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including assault by unspecified firearm discharge, essential hypertension (high blood pressure that is multifactorial and doesn ' t have one distinct cause), and unsteadiness on feet (not walking in a steady way). A review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical dated 3/2/2023 indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and to make decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set [MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool] dated 9/9/2023, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, and required limited assistance with activities of daily Living [ADL ' s- activities related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures as isolation gowns were disposed of in unlidded disposal bins in resident rooms 41, 43, 45, and 47, and Certified Nursing Assistant 5 (CNA 5) was observed feeding one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 57) in a designated yellow zone room (area in the facility designated for residents that are under observation for COVID-19, a respiratory disease caused by coronavirus) without wearing gloves. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the possible spread of COVID-19 to residents and staff. Findings: a. During an observation on 10/18/2021, at 10:25 AM, resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had signage posted on the door indicating contact precautions (area where gloves and an isolation gown was required before entering), droplet precautions (area where a mask and eye protection was required before entering), and airborne precautions (area where a N95 respirator mask, a respiratory protective device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 45) when Resident 45's call light (device used to call for assistance from the facility staff) was observed hanging off the resident's bed. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 45 to have the inability to call the facility staff for help when needed. Findings: A review of Resident 45's Facesheet indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a disease caused by aging joints which results in pain, swelling, and reduced motion in the joints), contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) in both the left and right knee. A review of Resident 45's Care Plan, dated 7/8/2021, indicated Resident 45 was at risk for spontaneous fracture due to Vitamin D (a vitamin that is essential for absorption of calcium in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 45, Resident 24) when Resident 45 stated the noise levels in the facility bothered her and Resident 24 could hear staff clock out. This deficient practice caused an increase risk to disturb the sleep schedule of the residents and not allow them to receive enough rest. Findings: A review of Resident 45's Facesheet indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a disease caused by aging joints which results in pain, swelling, and reduced motion in the joints), contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) in both the left and right knee. A review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 8/19/2021, indicated Resident 45 had severe cognitive impairment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was conducted for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). Resident 3 did not have an accurate assessment for cognitive skills for daily decision making. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 3's delay in necessary care and treatment. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, wedge compression fracture T9-T10 Vertebra (a fracture in the front part of the thoracic vertebra), wedge compression fracture of lumbar vertebra (a fracture in the front part of the lumbar vertebra), hypertension (high blood pressure), and osteoporosis (when bones become weak and brittle). A review of the Resident 3's History and Physical dated 6/24/2021, indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 3 was alert oriented to person, place, and time. A review of Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice and implement a physician's written order for a pain management consult for one of three sampled residents (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 17 at risk for increased levels of pain and a decrease in daily function. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyarthritis (joint pain that affects five or more joints), chronic pain, muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis (an inflammatory disorder affecting many joints), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces in the spine causing pressure on the nerves), and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 7/8/2021, indicated Resident 17 had intact cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident 17 required extensive one person physical assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-21 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by not assisting in the arranging for an audiologist referral consult for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice resulted in a delay of services and Resident 3 not being able to hear adequately. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, wedge compression fracture T9-T10 Vertebra (a fracture in the front part of the thoracic vertebra), wedge compression fracture of lumbar vertebra (a fracture in the front part of the lumbar vertebra), and hypertension (high blood pressure), A review of Resident 3's Order Summary Report, dated 6/22/2021, indicated an order for Ear Nose Throat (ENT) evaluation and treatment. A review of the Resident 3's History and Physical dated 6/24/2021, indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet State licensure requirements for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy to have a hands-free sink in the rehabilitation room as outlined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent a sanitary environment in the rehabilitation area. Findings: During an interview, on 10/19/2021, at 11 AM, in the rehabilitation gym, the Physical Therapist stated they do not have a hands-free sink inside the rehabilitation room and they have to go outside to the nurses station to wash their hands. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 10/19/2021 at 11:20 AM, the ADM stated there was no hands-free sink inside the rehabilitation room. A review of California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 5, Chapter 3, Section 72411 and Section 72421 indicated the Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy space requirement indicated a sink shall be provided in the treatment area and shall have controls other than hand controls.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for three of 36 sampled residents (Resident 45, Resident 62 and Resident 85) by failing to accurately document Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) interventions performed on Resident 45 and Resident 62. The facility failed to document records accurately and completely when administering a narcotic medication to Resident 85. These failures had the potential to result in the lack of or delay of care services to the residents as well as the potential to result in confusion and incomplete assessment of the resident's needs. Findings: a. A review of Resident 45's Face sheet indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, (a disease caused by aging joints which results in pain, swelling, and reduced motion in the joints), contractures, (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable, environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 43). Resident 43 had a soiled toilet which was documented as cleaned every hour. This deficient practice may have resulted in the resident's increased level of discomfort and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: On 10/18/2021 at 9 AM, during the initial tour observation of the facility, inside Resident 43's restroom, the toilet was left soiled. During a concurrent interview, Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) stated and confirmed that the toilet was soiled and that Resident 43 did not use the restroom on his own. On 10/21/2021 at 8:30 AM, during an interview with the housekeeping supervisor, when shown a picture of the soiled toilet, the housekeeping supervisor stated and confirmed the toilet was soiled. The housekeeping supervisor stated when a toilet was soiled a CNA or staff member will inform the housekeeper and the toilet would be cleaned. The housekeeping supervisor stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and attractive as voiced by for 10 of 18 sampled residents, (Residents 1, 9, 11, 21, 26, 31, 52, 62, 72, and 88). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the residents' nutritional status and not meet the residents' desires to be served food they felt was palatable and attractive. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/20 at 12:44 p.m., Resident 62 was observed eating lunch in her room. Resident 62's plate consisted of chicken breast, carrots, and white rice. Resident 62 was observed consuming half of her carrots and white rice, and took only one bite of her chicken breast. When asked why she did not finish her meal, Resident 62 stated the chicken was dry and had no flavor. During the resident council meeting (A meeting conducted by Residents to discuss concerns and refer to facility for resolution) on 1/22/20 at 11:01 a.m., Residents 1, 9, 11, 21, 26, 31, 52, 72, and 88 all stated they had been complaining about bland food a long time. They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to pull the resident's privacy curtain 100% closed during a saccrococcyx (buttock) dressing change procedure, for one of one resident (Resident 69). The deficient practice had the potential for loss of dignity and privacy due to personal exposure. Findings: On January 23, 2020 at 9:43 a.m., Resident 69 was observed in bed, facing the window, during a wound treatment observation. However, Resident 69's privacy curtain was not 100% completely closed while the Wound Medical Doctor (Physician), removed slough from his Sacrococcyx (buttock) pressure ulcer On January 23, 2020 at 9:52 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) the treatment nurse, stated I was washing my hands, However, Certified Nursing Aide 7 (C.N.A 7) was assisting the WMD 1 during the entire procedure. On January 23, 2020 at 10:41 a.m., during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON), stated Resident 69's privacy curtain should have been 100% closed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement a comprehensive care plan for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 18 and 59) by failing to: 1. Ensure to develop a care plan for the use of Ativan (medication for anxiety) for Resident 18. 2. Ensure to develop a plan of care for fall that reflect the actual resident's status. 3. Ensure to develop a care plan for the use of Buspirone (medication for anxiety) for Resident 59. This deficient practice placed the residents (Resident 18 and 59) at risk for the lack of and/or delay in delivery of care and services related to fall and the use of Ativan (Resident 18), and Buspirone (Resident 59). Findings: a. A review of Resident 18 admission Record indicated an admission date of 7/11/19 with diagnoses that included history of falling and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 18's History and Physical record indicated Resident 18 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge summary was completed per the facility's policy and procedure, within 30 days after discharge from the facility, for one out of one Resident (Resident 94). The deficient practice had the potential for poor post-discharge continuity of care, and well-being Findings: A review a Resident 94's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 94 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included urinary tract infection, dementia (a chronic brain disorder) with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder, single episode. A review of Resident 94's Physicians Order dated 10/30/19 at 3 p.m., indicated to discharge resident to independent living with home health for safety/medication regimen. A review of the facility's undated Policy and Procedure titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, indicated under Policy and Implementation the following: The discharge summary plan will include will include a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assists the resident in gaining access to vision by following-up on prescription glasses ordered for one sampled resident (Resident 40). This failure has the potential for Resident 40 to have blurred vision and to decrease the quality of life for the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 40's admission record indicated an admission date of 5/10/18, with diagnoses that included cataract (disease that affects vision by clouding the lens in the eyes). During a review of Resident 40's History and Physical record, dated 7/19, indicated Resident 40 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/20, at 10:46 a.m., Resident 40 was observed without eyeglasses. Resident 40 stated she was still waiting for the prescribed eyeglasses. During a record review of Resident 40's Consultation note, dated 6/11/19, indicated a plan for new prescription glasses for Resident 40. During an interview on 1/22/20, at 12:23 p.m., the Social Services (SS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of four sampled residents (Resident 31) by failing to 1. Ensure proper care of the suprapubic [area below the belly button] urinary catheter was provided by the licensed nurses as ordered. 2. Ensure infection control was observed during the change of the main drainage bag to a leg bag [a drainage bag to collect urinary drainage from the catheter that can be attached to the leg]. These deficient practices have the potential to cause urinary tract infection (infection of urinary passageways, bladder and or kidneys). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/21/20 at 10:07 a.m. Resident 31 was observed in a wheelchair with a suprapubic [area below the belly button] urinary catheter. The catheter was connected to a leg bag. On further observation, the leg bag was on top of the bed and not properly sealed with a cap on the port [point of connection to catheter tubing]. The residual urine from the leg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure completion of an orientation program for two Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) of four CNAs (CNA 2 and 4). This failure has the potential to result in the facility staff not to have the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely. Findings: During a record review, on 1/23/20, CNA 2's employee file titled Orientation Topic (documentation of orientation, training, and education), dated 1/19/19, indicated incomplete training and orientation. The education topics were not validated through demonstration and return demonstration. During a record review, on 1/23/20, CNA 4's employee file titled Orientation Topic, dated 12/20/18 was reviewed. The orientation record indicated that the education topics were not validated through demonstration and return demonstration. During an interview on 1/23/20, at 9:06 a.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated CNA 2's date of hire was 1/9/19 and CNA 4's date of hire was 12/20/18. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information posted was accurate and complete on the evening shifts (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) for multiple dates. This failure has the potential for misinformation of staffing data to residents and resident representatives. Findings: A review of the (facility name) shift document (a form used by the facility for staff data information) dated 12/10/19, 12/11/19, 12/24/19, and 12/25/19, there were no documented evidence indicating the total number of licensed nurses and the actual hours worked for those dates. On 1/23/20, at 9:49 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated the staffing assignments should be completed on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The DSD confirmed the staffing information for 12/10/19, 12/11/19, 12/24/29 and 12/25/19 were incomplete. The DSD further stated the total number of staff (three licensed vocational nurses an done registered nurse) including the actual hours worked by the staff each shift should have been listed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Ensure psychotropic drugs (mild altering drugs) warranted an adequate indication for use, for two of five residents (Resident 18 and 59). 2. Ensure a resident had a diagnosis or manifested behaviors of depression (sadness, hopelessness, trouble sleeping) before prescribing an antidepressant (a medication used to treat depression) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice has the potential to place the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medication and increased risk of adverse side effects. Findings: a. A review of Resident 18's admission record indicated an admission date of 7/11/19 with diagnoses that included history of falling and dementia with behavioral disturbance (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 18's History and Physical record indicated Resident 18 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SERRANO GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 1.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERRANO LICENSEE 1 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/01/2016 |
| BIN MENDEL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| BL CALI PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| JS FENTON LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| RGF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| SERRANO GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| SERRANO PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| YAAME LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| FENSTERMAN, HOWARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| FENSTERMAN, JORDAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| FENSTERMAN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| JACOBS, DOV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| LEIBSON, STACI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| TAUB, JUDAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| CUARESMA, ROLANDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $647K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056456. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.