No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rosemead Healthcare Center

4096 Easy Street, El Monte, CA 91731 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (626) 442-1500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 442-1500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,824 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,824 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
9143 Valley Blvd · (949) 363-0075 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9200 Valley Blvd · (626) 573-9477 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4819 Temple City Blvd · (626) 872-6955 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4343 Encinita Ave · (626) 569-2268 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
CROSSERS0.2 mi
9488 Valley Blvd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.6%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.7%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.102.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.211.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
84.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 84.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.1%CMS range 25.9–50.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 7.6–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge84.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge88.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 6.7–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.591.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a fall (move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control, from a higher to a lower level) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 provided two-person physical assistance (help from two persons) to transfer (moving a resident from one place to another) Resident 1 from the bed to the shower chair (a seat for the tub or shower) when CNA 1 used the Hoyer lift (a mechanical device used by staff to lift and transfer residents from a bed to a chair or one location to another). 2. Ensure CNA 1 followed the facility's policy and procedure titled, Total Mechanical Lift, dated 10/1/2023 when CNA 1 transferred Resident 1 with the Hoyer lift/mechanical lift. As a result, on 7/20/2024, at 11:30 a.m., Resident 1 fell from the shower chair to the floor when CNA 1 removed the Hoyer lift strap from Resident 1's left shoulder. Resident 1 sustained a laceration (a tear, cut, or gash) to the right frontal (forehead)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision during a smoking session (when a group of residents gathered to smoke) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), while Residents 1 and 2 were smoking at the facility's patio area. Resident 2 pushed a metal table and hit Resident 1's right lower leg and the facility's staff (Receptionist 2) did not notice/intervene. As a result, on 2/19/2024 at 9:15 pm, Resident 1 sustained a laceration (a wound when skin, tissue, and/or muscle was torn or cut open) on Resident 1's right lower leg measuring 14.3 centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) in length, by 1.9 cm in width and by 0.2 cm in depth. Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) on 2/19/2024 at 9:25 pm and required 16 surgical staples (pieces of metal used to join up pieces of tissue to close large wounds or surgical cuts) for wound closure. Resident 1 suffered a 7 out of 10 pain (on a 0 to 10 pain score, 0 = no pain at all and 10 =…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting to assist a resident when needed) was within reach and appropriate to the patient's physical ability for three of three sampled residents (Residents 10, 14, and 26). These failures had the potential to result in a delay in meeting Residents 10, 14, and 26's needs for assistance and placed the residents at risk for a fall, injury or accident.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 10 on 2/8/2024 and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 10's Care Plan (CP), the CP indicated Resident 10 had: 1. An actual fall without injury related to functional problems, poor balance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) was provided with care and services to maintain personal hygiene and nail care, by failing to:1, Ensure Resident 1 was seen by a Podiatrist (a medical doctor who specializes in caring for feet and ankles) as indicated in the resident's care plan.2. Ensure Resident 1's feet were not dry and toenails were trimmed. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a negative impact on Resident 1's health, quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and heart failure (the heart muscle cannot pump blood efficiently enough to meet the body's needs for oxygen). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:a. Provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition/medication directly to the stomach) site as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the plan of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 53).b. Elevate the resident's head of the bed (HOB) while receiving feeding formula through the GT in accordance with the resident's plan of care and physician's order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 66). These failures had the potential to result in complications related to tube feedings for Residents 53 and 66.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 53 on 5/19/2015 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings/medication to be administered directly to the stomach), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for residents receiving respiratory therapy (a specialized healthcare field focused on assessing, treating, and managing patients with breathing or cardiopulmonary disorders) in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of two sampled residents (Residents 41 and 67) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 67's bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP, a non-invasive ventilator used to assist breathing) mask and nebulizer (a medical device accessory that fits over the nose and mouth to deliver liquid medication directly into the lungs) mask were stored appropriately when not in use. b. Ensure Resident 41's oxygen was set as ordered and nasal cannula tubing was not touching the floor while oxygen was in use. These failures placed Residents 41 and 67 at risk for complications related to the use of oxygen, shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) and the risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: a. Ensure three Bisacodyl suppositories (a fast-acting, rectal stimulant laxative used to treat constipation) were labeled with the resident's name and expiration date inside one of one medication storage room refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for the residents. b. Ensure one of one E-Kit (Emergency Kit) IV (intravenous) did not have expired Levaquin (antibiotic to treat severe bacterial infections) medication. This deficient practice had the potential to result in harm from administration of expired medication. c. Ensure one of one resident (Resident 15) did not have a bottle of glucose tablets and one tube of diclofenac sodium topical gel (a medication used to relieve joint pain) in the resident's nightstand. This deficient practice had the potential to harm Resident 15 due to risk of error in dispensing and administration.Findings: a. During an observation and interview inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) for one of one facility kitchen. The test strips to measure the concentration of the sanitizing solution inside the red bucket did not have an expiration date. This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses. Findings: During the initial kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 3/24/2026 at 8:30 AM, the DS used the test strips for the red bucket solution to measure the concentration of the sanitizing solution. The DS stated the kitchen staff use the solution in the red bucket to sanitize the food preparation areas in the kitchen. Upon closer inspection of the test strips, the test strip container did not have an expiration date. The DS stated the DS was not sure if the test strips were expired since there was no expiration date on the test strip container. During an interview with the kitchen staff dishwasher (DW) on 3/24/26 at 9:24 AM, the DW stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly cover one of three large trash bins as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on garbage disposal. This deficient practice had the potential to attract vermin (animals that are harmful and carry diseases) and pests (any living thing that has a negative effect on humans) that could potentially enter the facility, affect the resident care areas, and expose the residents and staff to diseases. Findings: During a facility tour on 3/25/2026 at 7:39 AM, one large recycling trash bin had open lid and there was trash on the floor surrounding the trash bin area. During an observation and interview with Central Supply Staff (CS) on 3/25/2026 at 8:00 AM, CS was outside the facility in the parking lot with over twenty boxes of supplies that were delivered earlier in the morning. CS stated there was no more room for additional cardboard boxes in the recycling bin. CS stated CS would remove the new supplies from the cardboard boxes. CS stated CS would break down the empty boxes and leave them on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Keep two of two laundry dryers in a safe and sanitary condition for residents. This deficient practice posed as potential fire hazard.b. Keep electric fans (a powered machine used to create a flow of air to cool and ventilate rooms and control humidity) provided to the residents were in a safe, operating, and sanitary condition for two of two sampled residents (Residents 30 and 90). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 30 and Resident 90's health and quality of life. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/26/2026 at 10: 36 am with Housekeeping 2 (HKP 2) in the facility's laundry room, there were two dryers in the laundry room. Both dryers had multiple random thick patches of brown material in the dryer lint trap. HKP 2 stated the dryer lint trap accumulated thick lint. HKP 2 stated the dryer lint trap needed to be cleaned every 2 hours to avoid potential fire. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and treat one of one sampled resident (Resident 66) with respect, privacy and dignity in accordance with facility's policy titled Resident Rights - Quality of Life. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial (mental and emotional well-being) decline and low self-esteem.Findings: During a review of Resident 66's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow) During a review of Resident 66's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/21/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 66 had severely impaired cognition for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 66 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures (P&P) on Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preferences on end-of-life treatment decisions) were implemented for one of one sampled resident (Resident 93) by failing to ensure Resident 93's AD information was available in the medical record.This failure had the potential for the facility staff to provide medical treatment and services against the will of Resident 93.Findings:During a review of Resident 93's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 93 on 8/14/2025 with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (an inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) of the right femur (thigh bone) and Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with neuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more nerves, typically causing numbness or weakness in the hands and feet). During a review of Resident 93's History & Physical Note (H&P), dated 8/15/2025, the H&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 41) Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment was accurately coded regarding supplemental oxygen (is extra oxygen [a gas essential for life] given to a person to help them breathe when their body is not getting enough oxygen on its own) use. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of necessary care and treatments, incorrect plan of care, and interventions for Resident 41.Findings:During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 on 12/7/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 41's History & Physical (H&P), dated 12/8/2025, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 41's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the integrity and proper labeling of a peripheral intravenous (IV, within a vein, a small, flexible tube [catheter] inserted into a vein to deliver fluids, medications, or nutrients directly into the bloodstream) site in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 99). This failure had the potential to result in infection and accidental IV dislodgement for Resident 99. Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 99 on 3/23/2026 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), dementia (characterized by progressive decline in cognitive function), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). During a review of Resident 99's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/29/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 99 had moderately impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS indicated Resident 99…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its infection control policy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 91) by failing to ensure Resident 91's urinal filled with urine was not placed on top of Resident 91's side table. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 91 developing an infection.Findings: During a review of Resident 91's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by infection and brain injury), respiratory failure (lungs can't supply oxygen to the blood) and other immunodeficiencies (immune system in the body is weak or absent reducing the body's ability to fight infectious diseases). During a review of Resident 91's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/4/26, the H&P indicated Resident 91 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 91's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Surveillance Data Collection Form (SDCF) dated 3/24/2026 for one of five sampled residents (Resident 96) receiving antibiotics. This deficient practice had the potential to result in increased antibiotic resistance and providing antibiotics without justification for Resident 96. Findings: During a review of Resident 96's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL - bacteria that is not easily killed by antibiotics) resistance and urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects part of the urinary tract). During a review of Resident 96's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 3/23/2026, the OSR indicated a physician's order for licensed staff to administer Meropenem (antibiotics, a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) Intravenous (IV) Solution Reconstituted, one (1) gram (gr.- unit of measurement) IV two times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure to conduct a post-fall evaluation and prevention meeting within 72 hours of two unwitnessed falls for a resident who was rated at moderate risk for falls for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice placed Resident 2 at risk for future additional falls and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (multiple peripheral nerves become damaged and include problems with sensation, coordination, or other body functions), paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent worry or fear), bipolar disorder, (mood swings that range from the lows of depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of the resident) Falls Committee met to review and document findings and interventions addressing the resident's falls on 4/19 and 4/22/2025 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) These failures had the potential to result in Resident 2 sustaining injury and/or harm due to falling while in the care of the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 3/27/2025 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), muscle weakness, and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/31/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had no impairment in cognitive skills (ability to make daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 failed to document details of Resident 1's fall at the facility on 5/8/2025. This failure resulted in Resident 1's medical record containing incomplete information. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/14/2021 and readmitted Resident 1 on 2/24/2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (a range of conditions that affect the blood vessels and blood flow in the brain), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures titled, Care Planning, and Fall Management Program, by failing to: 1. Ensure facility staff implemented Resident 1's care plan for falls dated 10/16/2023 to keep personal items within reach and complete quarterly fall risk assessment per facility's fall protocol. 2. Ensure facility staff developed a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for Resident 1's rights, preferences, and autonomy to be in the dining room during mealtimes. These failures resulted in Resident 1's falls on 3/20/2025 and 4/9/2025. Resident 1 sustained redness to Resident 1's cheek from the fall on 3/20/2025. Resident 1 sustained skin discoloration to Resident 1's right forehead, right eye, and right hand and swelling to Resident 1's right eye and right hand from the fall on 4/9/2025. These failures had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 1's mental, physical, and emotional well-being.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan (a plan that outlines resident-specific interventions used to guide a resident ' s care for a given area of concern) for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), a known fall risk, who sustained two falls from the bed on 3/20/2025 and 4/9/2025. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving appropriate care treatments and services and sustaining recurrent falls, which caused Resident 1 to sustain bruising (an injury through unbroken skin resulting in discoloration) to Resident 1 ' s face from a recurring fall on 4/9/2025. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Records, the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/14/2021 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bullous pemphigoid (an autoimmune disease that causes large fluid-filled blisters on the resident ' s skin), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's right to choose where to eat during mealtimes for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 1's rights to self-determination and dignified existence. Cross Reference F656 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/14/2021, and readmitted Resident 1 on 2/24/2025, with diagnoses which included bullous pemphigoid (an autoimmune disease that causes large fluid-filled blisters on the resident's skin), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk of the same slight of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (stroke, damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting right dominant side. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/25/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the resident's dignity for two of two residents (Residents 75 and 80) by failing to: a. Ensure facility staff provided privacy while putting on the undergarment and pants onto Resident 80 that Resident 80 had removed. b. Ensure facility staff provided privacy when providing peri-care to Resident 75. These failures resulted in Residents 75 and 80's privacy not being maintained and Residents 75 and 80's dignity not being protected. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 80's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted Resident 80 to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), urinary tract infection (illness in any part of the urinary tract), and cerebral atherosclerosis (build-up of plaque in blood vessels of the brain). During a review of Resident 80's History & Physical (H&P), dated 11/16/24, the H&P indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of residents' needs for three of three sampled residents (Residents 20, 50, and 55) by failing to ensure the resident's call light was always within reach. These failures had the potential to result in residents to not receive care and a delay in services to meet the residents' needs and could result in a fall or injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of falling and unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning. During a review of Resident 20's Care Plan dated 12/6/2024, the Care Plan indicated Resident 20 was as risk for falls and/or injuries related to a history of fall and fracture (break in the continuity of a bone). The Care Plan interventions indicated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information regarding an Advance Directive (AD, a written preferences regarding treatment options, a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents to understand, reflect on, discuss, and plan for future healthcare decisions for a time when individuals are not able to make their own healthcare decisions) for four of six sampled residents (Residents 24, 36, 55 and 190) in accordance to the facility's policy titled Advance Directives. These failures had the potential to result in the facility staff to provide medical or surgical treatment against Residentd 24, 36, 55, and 190's will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 55 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia. During a review of Resident 55's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 55 had moderately impaired cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 238) received care and services for the provision of a midline intravenous (IV) catheter (a long, thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to safely administer medication into the bloodstream, similar to a cannula [a small tube that is inserted into a vein]) consistent with professional standards of practice, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Midline Dressing Changes and the resident's care plan (a care plan details why a person is receiving care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes, and what care and support will be delivered, how, when and by whom). These failures had the potential to result in an infection to Resident 238 and worsen the residents' health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 238's admission Record (AR), the admission record indicated Resident 238…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, for three of three sampled residents (Residents 24, 43 and 292) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 292's Nasal Cannula (NC, thin flexible tube that delivers oxygen through the nose) tubing was dated. b. Ensure Resident 43's inhalation tubing set was dated and create a care plan (CP) for oxygen use and breathing treatments for Resident 43. c. Place the NC in both nostrils for Resident 24 and post a no smoking sign outside of Resident 24's room when Resident 24 required the use of oxygen. These failures had to the potential for Residents 24, 43 and 292 to experience complications related to oxygen therapy. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 292's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 292 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Residents 36, 66 and 292) who received dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) had a dialysis emergency kit (E-kit) at the bedside in accordance with standards of practice. These failures had the potential to delay in emergency treatment from complications of the dialysis access site for Residents 36, 66 and 292. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 292's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 292 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD, final permanent stage of chronic kidney disease where the kidney function has declined to the point kidneys can no longer function on its own) and dependence on renal dialysis. During a review of Resident 292's History and Physical (H&P, formal document of a medical provider's examination of a patient) dated 1/18/2025, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on the use of grab bars (bars installed on the side of the bed)/bed rails/side rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars attached to the bed) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 7 and 8). These failures placed Residents 7 and 8 at risk for entrapment (an event in which resident was caught, trapped, or entangled in the tight spaces around the bed), and injury from the use of grab bars. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones ), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body that can affect the arm, legs, and facial muscles). During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a 24-hour sufficient nursing staffing on seven of thirteen Saturdays and eleven of thirteen Sundays for Quarter 4 of 2024 (July 1 - September 30) consistent with Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for collecting and reporting staffing information from nursing homes and other long-term care facilities) Staffing Data Report. The facility did not meet the required 3.5 nursing hours per patient day on 7/6/2024, 7/7/2024, 7/13/2024, 7/14/2024, 7/21/2024, 8/11/2024, 8/18/2024, 8/25/2024, 8/31/2024, 9/1/2024, 9/8/2024, 9/15/2024, and 9/22/2024. The facility also did not meet the required 2.4 CNA direct care hours per patient day on 7/6/2024, 7/7/2024, 7/13/2024, 7/14/2024, 7/20/2024, 7/21/2024, 8/4/2024, 8/10/2024, 8/11/2024, 8/18/2024, 8/24/2024, 8/31/2024, 9/8/2024, 9/14/2024, 9/15/2024, and 9/22/2024. These failures had the potential to affect the quality of care and negatively affect the resident's quality of life in the facility. Findings: During a review of a letter to the Administrator from California Department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post actual nursing information for three of three recertification days inspected (2/4/2025, 2/5/2025 and 2/6/2025). These failure had the potential to misinform the residents and visitors of the actual staffing information and potentially affect the quality of nursing care provided to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 2/4/2025 at 9:09 am in Nursing Stations 1 and 2, the facility's Daily Staffing Grid (DSG) in Nursing Station 1 was dated 2/3/2025. Nursing Station 2 did not have DSG posted. During an observation on 2/5/2025 at 10:50 am in Nursing Station 2, Nursing Station 2 did not have DSG posted. During an observation on 2/6/2025 at 10:00 am in Nursing Station 2, Nursing Station 2 did not have DSG posted. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/2025 at 10:35 am with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSGs dated 2/4/2025, 2/5/2025 and 2/6/2025 were reviewed. The DSD stated the DSG posted indicated the projected hours of staff working the 11 pm -7 am shift, 7 am - 3 pm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for four of five sampled residents (Residents 66, 190, 238 and 294 ) by failing to: a. Post the correct isolation sign when an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions that involve using a glove and gown during high-contact resident care activity for residents who are colonized or infected with an MDRO and those at a higher risk of developing an multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, bacteria that is resistant to many types of antibiotics], such as, residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) sign was observed to be posted outside of Resident 294's door on 2/4/2025 instead of a Contact Isolation (type of isolation used with residents who have disease caused by bacteria and viruses that spread through direct and indirect contact) sign for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE, type of MDRO that cause infections that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signed Informed Consent from the resident's responsible party (RP) prior to the administration of Ativan (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) 1 milligram (mg), for one of five sampled residents (Resident 26). This deficient practice violated Resident 26 and the RP's right and had the potential for Resident 26 to receive medication Resident 26's RP did not desire. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included toxic encephalopathy (neurologic disorder), cerebral infarction (causes necrotic-death of living tissue in the brain), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung diseases that block airflow). During a review of Resident 26's History & Physical (H&P), dated 1/5/25, the H&P indicated Resident 26 did not have the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 85) discharge destination was coded correctly. Resident 85 was discharged to home or community. Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF - care provided by trained registered nurses in a medical setting under a doctor's supervision) but was coded in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) as being discharged to a short-term general hospital. This deficient practice resulted in an inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential to result in Resident 85 to not receive interventions to address specific care concerns. Findings: During a review of Resident 85's admission Record (AR), the admission record indicated Resident 85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 189) was provided with a communication device with the language that the resident understood. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 189's communication with the staff and the potential to delay the provision of care, treatment, and services the resident needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 189's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow movements) and bipolar disorder (mental disorder with periods of depression and periods of elevated mood). The AR indicated Resident 189's primary language was Spanish and Castillan (a variety of Spanish spoken in Spain). During a review of Resident 189's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 1/30/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 189…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 292) by failing to turn and reposition Resident 292 every two hours. These failures had the potential for Resident 292 to develop pressure ulcers/bedsores (PU, injuries to the skin and underlying tissue that are result of pressure on the skin for long periods of time). Findings: During a review of Resident 292's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 292 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the right side, dependence on dialysis (procedure that filters blood to remove waste and excess fluid when the kidneys are not working), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD, occurs when the blood vessels become narrow reducing blood flow to the arms and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in accordance with professional standards to prevent the development of pressure ulcers (PU, injuries to the skin and underlying tissue that are result of pressure on the skin for long periods of time) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27) by failing to: a. Ensure bilateral heel protectors were on Resident 27 per Medical Doctor (MD) order. b. Ensure Resident 27's low air loss mattress (LAL, medical mattress designed to reduce pressure on the skin to help prevent the development of PUs) was on the correct setting. These failures had the potential for Resident 27 to develop a PU. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (PVD, chronic condition that occurs when arteries narrow or block, reducing blood flow to the arms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for one of one resident (Resident 140) as indicated in Resident 140's care plan for pain by falling to: 1) Provide non-pharmacological interventions/measures for pain. 2) Notified Resident 140's Medical Doctor (MD) when Resident 4's pain was uncontrolled with the current pain medication/pain management. These failures resulted in Resident 140 experienced pain on the abdomen and had to wait for more than one hour to received pain medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 140's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection), gastric ulcer with perforation (untreated ulcer in the stomach), and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery (continued care after surgery) on the digestive system. During a record review of Resident 140's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 1/1/25-1/31/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen when expired chicken nuggets were observed in the refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness if served to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent initial tour observation of the kitchen and interview on 2/4/25 at 9:30 a.m. with Dietary Staff (Dietary 1), a clear plastic bag of chicken nuggets was observed in the refrigerator with an expiration date of 1/30/25. Dietary 1 stated the clear plastic bag of chicken nuggets expired on 1/30/25. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 9:40 a.m. with the Consultant Registered Dietitian (RD 1), RD 1 stated the plastic bag of chicken nuggets was labeled expired on 1/30/25. RD 1 stated the expired bag of chicken nuggets should not be in the refrigerator. RD 1 stated the importance of discarding expired food was residents could possibly get ill from consuming expired food. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 9:52 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Surveillance Data Collection form for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 66) receiving antibiotics. This deficient practice had the potential to result in increased antibiotic resistance and providing antibiotics without justification. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood). During a review of Resident 66's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/27/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident 66 had moderately impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making. The MDS indicated, Resident 66 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, shower, upper/lower body dressing, putting on/off footwear and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Communication - Call System, for eight of 35 resident rooms (Rooms 7, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, and 36) by failing to: a. Ensure call lights in the resident rooms were functioning. b. Ensure call bells were provided for the residents in the seven of the eight rooms that did not have a functioning call light. c. Ensure resident safety check rounds were conducted and documented when the residents' call lights were inoperable (not functioning). These deficient practices had the potential to result in the delay of care for the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Maintenance Log (ML) for the month of October 2024, the ML indicated five rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]C, 22, 26A, 28B, and 28C) in the facility had issues with call lights not functioning. During an observation on 11/26/2024 at 11:14 am with Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 1, call lights were checked in 35 resident rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure Resident 3 received Resident 3's morning medications in a timely manner as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Medication-Administration. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 3 negatively and result in a physical decline to Resident 3. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 1/22/2020, and re-admitted the resident on 3/28/2024, with diagnoses including, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), muscle wasting and atrophy (the decrease in size or wasting away of a body part or tissue), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a decline in mental function that affects a person's ability to think, remember, and reason). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive standardized assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking devices were stored in a secure area for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) and Resident 1's untitled care plan (CP), dated 6/20/2024, that addressed Resident 1 smoking, when on 8/27/2024, Resident 1 had an electronic smoking device resting on Resident 1's lap. This deficient practice had the potential to result in accidents and resulted in compromised safety to all residents residing at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/17/2024, with diagnoses including, hemiplegia (paralysis [unable to make voluntary muscle movements] that affects one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing) following cerebral infarction ( occurs when blood flow to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 2) were followed. On 8/26/2024, Resident 2 accessed the meal cart unsupervised, without performing hand hygiene (procedures that include the use of alcohol-based hand rubs [containing 60%-95% alcohol] or hand washing with soap and water) and was able to obtain Resident 2's meal tray without assistance from staff. This deficient practice had the potential to result in transmission of infectious microorganisms (an organism that is seen through a microscope) and increased the risk of infection for the residents whose food trays were in the meal cart. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 to the facility on 2/27/2024, and re-admitted the resident on 4/2/2024, with diagnoses including but not limited to, lack of coordination, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions, metabolic encephalopathy (a brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0626 — pattern
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit three of five sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4) to the facility from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) after Residents 2, 3, and 4 were cleared by GACH to return to the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to violate Residents 2, 3, and 4's rights to return to the facility. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 2 to the facility on 4/24/24, with diagnoses that included other acute osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone or joint) of left ankle and foot, cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and the tissue beneath the skin) of left lower limb, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment and care screening tool), dated 5/1/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 2 had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), received the copy of the resident's medical records within two working days upon request as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Access to PHI. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of obtaining a copy of Resident 1's medical records for Resident 1's Requesting Party (RP). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/13/24, with diagnoses that included unspecified sequelae (an aftereffect of a disease, condition, or injury) of cerebral infarction (stroke; occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat), and other abnormalities of gait and other mobility (inability to walk normally due to injuries or underlying conditions). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Mitigation Plan regarding visitation guidelines for Coronavirus (COVID-19, highly contagious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that is spread through inhalation or contact of droplet particles into eyes, nose, or mouth) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) by allowing two family members (FM 1 and FM 2) to be inside Resident 4's Novel Respiratory Precaution (newly identified respiratory organism that causes acute respiratory infections which require the use of a N95 [PPE that is used to provide a tight seal on the person's face to prevent particles or liquid contamination of the face], face shield, gown and gloves prior to entering the room) room without donning (put on) on personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19 virus to residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect its resident from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 physically assaulted (the act of causing physical harm) Resident 1 on 2/19/2024 at 9:15 pm. Resident 2 pushed the patio metal table and hit Resident 1's right lower leg. As a result, on 2/19/2024 at 9:15 pm, Resident 1 sustained a laceration (a wound when skin, tissue, and/or muscle was torn or cut open) on Resident 1's right lower leg measuring 14.3 centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) in length, by 1.9 cm in width and by 0.2 cm in depth. Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) on 2/19/2024 at 9:25 pm and required 16 surgical staples (pieces of metal used to join up pieces of tissue to close large wounds or surgical cuts) for wound closure. Resident 1 suffered a 7 out of 10 pain (on a 0 to 10 pain score, 0 = no pain at all and 10 =…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to meet professional standard of practice of administering medications through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for medication/food) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 74). This failure had the potential to result in G-tube occlusion and unnecessary tube replacement for Resident 74. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood and gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for medication/food). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/15/23, the MDS indicated Resident 74 had unclear speech, rarely/never understood others,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor interventions based on the resident's care plan (a care details why a person is receiving care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes, and what care and support will be delivered, how, when and by whom) and physician (MD) orders for four of four sampled residents (Residents 57, 82,25 and 39) by failing to: a. Follow aspiration (accidental swallowing of food or liquid into the lungs) precautions during feeding for Resident 57; b. Notify the MD of significant vital sign (measurements of the body's most basic functions) changes when Resident 82 had an oxygen (O2) saturation (amount of oxygen circulating in the blood) of 85 percent (%); c. Turn and reposition Resident 25 every two hours per Policy and Procedure (P&P); and d. Turn and reposition Resident 39 per P&P and care plan. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health condition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include the verifying signatures of either the Director of Nursing (DON) or a Registered Nurse (RN) along with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) on the Controlled Medication Count Sheet (also known as Controlled Medication or Controlled Substance [CM/CS]- medications which have a potential for abuse) or Individual Resident Controlled Drug Record or Controlled Drug Record for 17 of 17 sampled logs reviewed. The control and accountability of CS awaiting final disposition (process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) did not follow the facility's Policy and Procedure on Documentation of Controlled Medications. This deficient practice had the potential to result in increased opportunity for controlled substance diversion (the transfer of a controlled substance or other medication from a lawful to an unlawful channel of distribution or use). Findings: During a record review on 2/1/24 at 12 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), 17 Controlled Medication Count Sheet, Controlled Drug Record and Individual Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) met the criteria for the use of antibiotic (medication to treat infection) before it was administered. Resident 6 was administered Azithromycin (an antibiotic) Oral Tablet 250 milligrams (mg) without meeting the criteria for the use the antibiotic to ensure it has an adequate indication. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for Resident 6 for the use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anemia, unspecified (not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), mononeuropathy (damage that happens to a single nerve in the body, causing pain, numbness, and loss of movement) unspecified and anxiety disorder (a persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of medication error rate of five percent (5%) or greater, as evidenced by the identification of five medication errors out of 29 opportunities for error, to yield a cumulative error rate of 17% for one of five residents during medication administration observation (Resident 74). This failure had the potential for adverse consequences for Resident 74. Cross Reference: F658 Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood and gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for medication/food). During a medication administration observation on 1/31/24 at 8:24 AM, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) was administering morning medications to Resident 74 via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement (contract that requires the parties to resolve disputes using an arbitrator instead of going to court) provided a selection of a venue convenient for the resident or their representative for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 20, 48, and 57). This failure resulted in residents signing a binding arbitration agreement that is not in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), Schizophrenia, and dystonia (movement disorder that causes muscles to contract involuntarily). During a review of Resident 20's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/06/23, it indicated Resident 20 is not able to make decision for self. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff for one of two residents after use from Resident 74 to Resident 65. This failure had the potential to place Resident 65 and other residents at the facility at risk for an infection or disease. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (chronic elevated blood pressure causing the heart to not pump enough blood for body's needs) and a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach, can be used to give nutrition and/or drugs). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/15/23, indicated Resident 74 had unclear speech, rarely/never understood others and rarely/never made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party (RP) were informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (a drug that changes brain function and results in altercations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 49). This deficient practice resulted in the violation of Resident 49's and/or RP's right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychotropic medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand what is real) and bipolar disorder (mental disorder with periods of depression [persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable activities] and periods of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based to observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy while providing bedside care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 74). This failure resulted in the violation of Resident 74's right for personal privacy. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) and gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for medication/food). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/15/23, the MDS indicated Resident 74 had unclear speech, rarely/never understood others, and rarely/never made self-understood. The MDS indicated Resident 74 was totally dependent (helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the activity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete set of window blinds in Resident 65's room to maintain privacy and comfort for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 65). This failure resulted in a lack of privacy and absence of a safe, homelike environment for Resident 65. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (undated), the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a femur fracture (partial break in the upper leg bone), obesity (an excess in body fat) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment and care screening tool) assessment dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 65 had severely impaired cognition (thinking), had an upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and was totally dependent on staff for bed and wheelchair mobility. During an observation on 01/30/24 at 9:15 AM in Resident 65's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's change of condition (COC, a sudden clinical change from a resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) after a significant vital sign change (measurements of the body's most basic functions) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 82) when Resident 82 had an oxygen (O2) saturation (amount of oxygen circulating in the blood) of 85 percent (%.) This failure had the potential to result in Resident 82 to develop a respiratory complication. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record, Resident 82 was admitted to facility on 03/15/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to major depressive disorder (mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and loss of interest in activities), epilepsy (seizures [sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat), heart failure (develops when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents (Resident 70) reviewed for Limited Range of Motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] was assessed accurately. For Resident 70, the Range of Motion for the upper extremities was not accurately assessed to reflect resident's limitation in the range of motion on her right upper extremity (wrist and hand). This deficient practice had the potential risk for Resident 70's activities of daily living (ADL, such as bed mobility, eating, dressing, and hygiene) to decline resulting from limitation in range of motion of the resident's right hand/fingers . Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission, the admission record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Degenerative Disease of the Nervous System (conditions that damage and destroy parts of the nervous system over time), Osteoarthritis (progressive loss of function affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized person-centered care plan (details why a person is receiving care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes, and what care and support will be delivered, how, when and by whom) to meet the residents' needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 43 and 56). a. A care plan was not developed for Resident 43 who was assessed as high risk for fall upon admission on [DATE]. b. A care plan was not developed for Resident 56 who was assessed as high risk for fall prior to Resident 56's incidents of fall on 7/31/23 and 11/15/23. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 43 and 56 not to receive necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abnormalities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective communication method to one of two non-English speaking sampled residents (Resident 74). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 74 not to receive necessary care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood and gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for medication/food). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/15/23, the MDS indicated Resident 74 had unclear speech, rarely/never understood others, and rarely/never made self-understood. The MDS indicated Resident 74 was totally dependent (helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four sampled residents (Resident 70) reviewed for nutrition, the necessary assistance in a timely manner during a lunch dining observation. This deficient practice placed Resident 70 at risk for weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission, the admission record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Degenerative Disease of the Nervous System (conditions that damage and destroy parts of the nervous system over time), Osteoarthritis (progressive loss of function affecting many tissues of the joint) unspecified site, and Diabetes Mellitus Type I (high blood sugar). During a review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/30/23, the MDS indicated Resident 70 usually understood others and made self understood. The MDS indicated Resident 70 required set up and clean up assistance (helper sets up or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress (LAL, a bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure injuries) was set correctly for one of one sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to prevent healing and worsen Resident 4's facility acquired pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (undated), the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (body has a low amount of red blood cells), schizophrenia (serious mental illness in which people interpret reality abnormally), hemiplegia (loss of ability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness caused by a disruption of the brain, spinal cord, or nerves connected to the affected muscles) following a stroke affecting the right side of the body.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 74) who was receiving tube feeding (TF, liquid form of nutrients given to people who cannot eat or drink by mouth safely) through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach, can be used to give nutrition and/or drugs), had the head of bed (HOB) elevated to at least 30 degrees during tube feeding. This failure had the potential to result in aspiration (when small particles of food or drops of liquid are breathed into the lungs) leading to aspiration pneumonia (an infection that occurs in the lungs due to aspiration), other complications and death to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information of actual hours worked by staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily. The staffing information included the actual worked hours of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse that was not directly responsible for resident care. This deficient practice of posting inaccurate staffing information could mislead the residents and visitors that may affect the quality of nursing care provided to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 1/30/24 at 9 AM and 1/31/24 at 8:32 AM, the facility's staffing information posted in Nursing Station 1 and 2 indicated the MDS nurse had worked eight hours each day on 1/30/24 and 1/31/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 3:11 PM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated she was responsible for completing the staffing information to be posted before the beginning of morning shift every day. The DSD stated staffing information needed to only include actual hours worked by the staff directly responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Residents 12 and 64) on psychotropic drugs (any drug capable of affecting the mood, emotions, and behavior) were free from unnecessary medication, by failing to ensure: a. Staff attempt Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR-tapering down the medication dose) of Resident 12's Seroquel (antipsychotic drug) 25 milligram ([mg] unit of measurement) since ordered on 11/29/22. b. The use of PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days. Resident 64's PRN order for Trazodone HCL (antidepressant drug) 50 milligrams ([mg]unit of measurement) at bedtime was beyond 14 days from 12/20/23 through 1/30/24 (41 days) without documented rationale (a logical basis for a course of action) from the prescribing physician for the extended use of Trazadone HCL. These deficient practices placed Residents 12 and 64 at risk for adverse drug reaction (a harmful and unintended response to a medicine). Findings: a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement (a contract that requires the parties to resolve disputes using an arbitrator instead of going to court) indicated the resident or their representative had a right to rescind (withdraw) the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it for one of three sampled residents (Resident 57). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 57 signing a binding arbitration agreement that is not in compliance with the applicable federal and state laws. Findings: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, it indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's Disease (occurs when the body cannot make enough dopamine [a chemical messenger that communicates between cells and the brain] in the body causing changes in movement and mood), schizophrenia (mental disorder that causes disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotion responses, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all essential equipment is maintained and in operating condition. This deficient practice had the potential to risk the health, safety, and welfare of the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 8/8/2023 at 2:12 pm, one portable cooling unit was observed with a hose attached to a ceiling vent in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During further observation of the facility, six more portable cooling units were observed in the facility ' s hallways in front of Rooms 9, 16, 21, 26, 28, and 36. During a concurrent interview and observation on 8/8/2023 at 2:31 pm, the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) stated the facility ' s HVAC unit was having issues the day before. MS stated, MS and the maintenance staff installed the seven portable cooling units inside the facility while the heating and cooling company was doing the repair on the facility ' s HVAC unit. In the back of the facility two contractors were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-08-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AARON MAYER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AHM TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/13/2023
MAYER, AARONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2023
PACIFICARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2023
THE COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2023
CABADAS, MARTELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/31/2024
GU, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/31/2024
4096 EASY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2023
MERKIN, NICKOLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2023
NELSON, HARRYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2023
PENNINGTON, PAIGEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$502K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 18%Other / private 4%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $502K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$407per resident / day
operating cost
$12,380per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$376per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055202. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next