No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Villa Serena Healthcare Center

723 E 9th Street, Long Beach, CA 90813 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 52 certified beds · (562) 437-2797 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-18)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
720 Alamitos Ave · (562) 218-6200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
980 Atlantic Ave · (626) 967-9904 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1001 E 10th St · (562) 983-9763 · Call to confirm hours
Park
880 E 7th St · (562) 570-3100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
905 Orange Ave · (562) 599-5100

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.612.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.361.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.7%CMS range 44.3–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.3–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge78.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.8–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 48.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-09)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the Resident's right to be free from neglect when licensed nurses did not provide needed services to prevent the resident, who had difficulty breathing, from becoming unresponsive and die for one of one sampled resident (Resident 45). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses conducted timely assessments of Resident 45's physical condition when the resident developed breathing difficulty. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 had Resident 45 vital signs (measurements of the body's basic functions including oxygen saturation [amount of oxygen in blood], blood pressure [force of blood pushing against the blood vessels walls in the heart], respiration [process of breathing in and out], heart rate ( pulse : number of times the heart beats per minute), and temperature (measure how well the body can make and get rid of heat) taken and monitored when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) notified LVN 1 on [DATE] at 11:10 p.m., that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a Full Code (resident wants all life saving measures in case of emergencies) status and was in distress received Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ([CPR] an emergency procedure to restart a person's heart (chest compressions) to increase the chances of a resident's survival for one of 39 residents who had a Full Code status (Resident 45). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure facility staff were knowledgeable what actions to take when responding to a resident in distress. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN )1 announced a Code Blue (an announcement that signifies a medical emergency where a patient is experiencing a life-threatening situation) when he found Resident 45 unresponsive. 3. Ensure LVN 1 provided resuscitation (action or process of reviving someone from unconsciousness or apparent death) and basic life support ([BLS], basic care healthcare professionals provide to anyone who's heart stops beating suddenly) such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 experienced a change of condition on 4/5/2026 and 4/9/2026.This had the potential to result in not meeting Resident 2's needs, poor resident outcomes, or risk of serious injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (any damage or disease that affects the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic bronchitis (inflammation of airways in the lungs.)During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/27/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) impairment, required supervision when eating, for oral and personal hygiene, and upper body dressing, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to communicate Resident 2's change of condition and indication for the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP - profession that identifies, assesses, and treats speech, language, cognitive communication and swallowing disorders) evaluation. This had the potential to result in a delay of care or treatment for Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (any damage or disease that affects the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic bronchitis (inflammation of airways in the lungs.)During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/27/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive (ability to learn, reason,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) with respect and dignity when Resident 2's family member (FM) while on the phone with Resident 2 overheard CNA 1 speak to Resident 2 using an aggressive and frustrated tone. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 crying and responding I'm not stupid to CNA 1 and had the potential for Resident 2 to become afraid of and withdrawn when interacting with facility staff.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a reversible, serious neurological condition causing brain dysfunction-including confusion, personality changes, and coma-due to advanced liver disease). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 1/16/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2's cognition was intact and she required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's Family Member (FM) reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used inappropriate words in an aggressive and frustrated tone when providing care to Resident 2. This deficient practice resulted in the inability of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to conduct a timely investigation and had the potential for information to be lost and/or forgotten.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a reversible, serious neurological condition causing brain dysfunction-including confusion, personality changes, and coma-due to advanced liver disease). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 1/16/2026, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of three of eight sampled residents (Resident 6, 13, and 19) by failing to: a. Assess Resident 6 for the pre (before) and post (after) RASS Assessment (administered tool used to assess a patient's level of agitation or sedation, ranging from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable) for administration of narcotic pain medication (powerful drugs used to treat moderate to severe pain) as ordered.This deficient practice had the potential to compromise safe medication administration and increase the risk of adverse outcomes.b. Ensure the gastrostomy (g-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), was flushed before and after medication administration as ordered for Resident 13.This deficient practice had the potential to block the gastrostomy (g-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to keep waste contained (trash covered and secure) when two large trash bins in the facility's parking lot were left open.This failure had the potential to allow pests (tiny living things that can make people sick) to enter the area and result in spread of disease.Findings:During an observation on 2/5/2026 at 10:20 a.m. in the facility's parking lot near the rear kitchen entrance, two large trash bins holding garbage and food waste were observed uncovered.During a follow up observation on 2/6/2026 at 9:35 a.m. in the facility's parking lot, the same two trash bins were observed uncovered.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/2026 at 10:20 a.m. with Maintenance Director (MD) 1 in the facility parking lot near the rear kitchen entrance, two large trash bins confining garbage and food waste were observed uncovered. MD 1 stated, outdoor trash bins must remain closed when not in use all the time to prevent pests.During a concurrent interview on 2/6/2026 at 2:18 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain dignity for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 40) when the resident's meal tray was placed on a cluttered bedside table. This failure resulted in Resident 40's feeling unimportant during meal service. Findings: During a meal observation on 2/4/2026 at 12:52 p.m., in Resident 40's room, Resident 40 was observed seated upright at the edge of the bed with a lunch tray on a cluttered (too many things in one place) bedside table.During a follow up meal observation on 2/5/2026 at 8:16 a.m., in Resident 40's room, Resident 40 was observed seated upright at the edge of the bed with a breakfast tray on a cluttered bedside table.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/2026 at 8:30 a.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 at Resident 40's room, Resident 40 was observed seated upright at the edge of the bed with breakfast tray placed on a cluttered bedside table. CNA1 stated that the requested extra bedside table was not provided.During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 10:01 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan to address the resident's risk for aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33).This deficient practice had the potential to increase Resident 33's risk for aspiration and choking.Findings:During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 33's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 10/28/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 33 had severe cognitive (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) impairment, required moderate assistance (helper does less than half the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five employees [Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 5] received a performance evaluation annually.This failure had the potential to result in resident injury or decline in level of care because the staff skills are not being evaluated or monitored.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/2026 at 1:18 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 5's employee files were reviewed. The DSD stated CNA 2 did not receive performance evaluations in the last twelve months. The DSD stated performance evaluations should be completed every year and filed in their employee file. The DSD stated the performance evaluation should have been completed January 2026.During an interview on 2/6/2026 at 2:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated performance evaluations should be completed annually or every twelve months. The DON stated if performance evaluations are not completed annually, there is a risk of resident injuries and a decline in level of care because the staff skills are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff did not administer medication used to treat sever pain when the resident only had mild pain or no pain to one of four sampled residents (Residents 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inconsistent medication administration and Resident 6 receiving unnecessary medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate (slow-growing cancer forming in the prostate glands [gland in the male reproductive system] tissues potentially causing urinary issues (weak flow, frequency), and bone pain), secondary malignant neoplasm of bone (when cancer cells spread from a primary site (prostate) to the bones, causing pain and decreased mobility), and encounter for palliative care (focus on relieving pain and stress to enhance quality of life). During a review of Resident 6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the legally recognized decisionmaker and physician signed the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment ([POLST] form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) form for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 1 to receive treatment or services against their wishes.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and atherosclerotic heart disease (the buildup for plaque on the artery walls causing reduced blood flow to the tissues and increases risk for a blood clot).During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a change of condition (COC) when one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was found with unknown skin discoloration on his right arm and not doing a pain assessment when Resident 1 was found with a skin tear. This deficient practices placed Resident 1 not being monitored for the COC and had the potential for delay in care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle wasting and atrophy, and Type 2 (II) Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 1/3/2025 the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive skills (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility's Water Management Plan (plan that identifies hazardous conditions and steps to take to minimize the growth and spread of bacteria[germs]) was implemented when the water management assessment was not completed. This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents and staff to Legionella (bacteria that can cause serious lung infections) and waterborne infections. Findings: During an interview and record review on 1/16/2025 at 9:19 a.m., there was no documented facility water management plan, and the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) confirmed the water management assessment was not completed. The IPN stated we need to complete the assessment to ensure microbial growth (germs) was not spreading. During an interview with the Administrator on 1/16/2025 at 1:00 p.m. the administrator stated the facility will complete the water management assessment because it was required. During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Legionella, implemented 2/9/2024, the P&P indicated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of all employees screening, education, offering, and current Corona virus disease, COVID-19 (contagious infectious disease), vaccination (medications used to prevent diseases usually given by injection or by mouth) status. This failure had the potential to place staff and residents at risk for serious outcomes such as being hospitalized due to COVID-19. Findings: During an interview and record review on 1/16/2025 at 12:07 p.m., with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the facility's employee records of COVID-19 status 2024 to 2025 was reviewed, and the physicians and consultants COVID-19 immunization status were unknown. The IPN stated she did not know she had to get the physicians and consultants Covid-19 immunization status. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Covid-Vaccination, implemented 2/9/2024, the P&P indicated the policy was to prevent and minimize transmission of Covid-19. The P&P indicated the facility will educate and offer Covid-19 vaccinations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, intervention, and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft. ) for resident per resident in multiple rooms resident bedrooms ( 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 for (17 of 19 residents room). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide nursing care to the residents. Findings : During and observation on 1/14/2025 at 00:00 a.m., with the Maintenance (MN), observed multiple resident's rooms with two, three and six beds in a room. Observed residents go in and out of beds with adequate spacing, side tables, chairs, wheelchairs readily available without impending any movement. During an interview on 1/14/2025 at 00:00 a.m., with the MN , the MN stated we have a room waiver now and will apply for one in 2025. During a review of the room size waiver dated 1/2024 submitted by the Administrator (ADM), for 17 residents' room was reviewed, the letter indicated there was ample room to accommodate residents and enough space for residents care and health and safety of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 4), who was assessed at a moderate risk for developing a skin injury and had intact skin, did not develop the following: a. Stage II (Partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) on the sacrum area (tailbone) measuring 0.5 centimeters [(cm) unit of measurement] in length, 0.5 cm in width and 0 cm in depth on 1/5/2025. b. An open area 0.5 cm round superficial red open area on the right buttocks area on 5/25/2024, resolved (healed) on 6/7/2024. c. Stage II pressure injury on coccyx (tailbone area) measured 1.5 cm length by 1.3 cm in width, and 0.2 cm in depth on 6/21/2024, resolved on 7/16/2024. The facility failed to: 1. Implement Resident 4's (untitled) care plan intervention to turn and reposition the resident as needed when in bed or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one hemodialysis ([HD]a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) resident (Resident 22) received dialysis care and services based on professional standards. The facility failed to: a. Notify the physician, assess Resident 22, educate Resident 22 regarding and risk for missing HD, and monitor Resident 22 for complications after Resident 22 missed HD on 1/2/2025 and 1/3/2025. b. Assess Resident 22 and complete Resident 22's Dialysis Transfer Information (form used by facility and dialysis center to communicate regarding resident status) prior to sending Resident 22 to dialysis on 12/14/2024. These deficient practices had the potential to result in complications from dialysis. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure: a) One of three sampled resident's (Resident 22) informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for psychotropics (drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) was obtained. b) Three of six sampled resident's (Resident 22, 41, and 18) were evaluated for a gradual dose reduction (involves the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication) of psychotropic medications. c) One of one sampled resident's (Resident 44) was appropriately being monitored for the signs and symptoms of lithium toxicity (occurs when you have too much of the prescription medication lithium in your body). d) One of one sample resident's (Resident 42) had one of his benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications appropriately for one (Residents 39) of three residents observed during the medication pass. During medication pass, there were two medication errors out of twenty-six opportunities. These medication administration errors resulted to a medication error rate of 7.69 percent. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including malignant neoplasm (cancer - abnormal mass of cells that grows uncontrollably and can spread to other parts of the body) of breasts. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 12/29/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 39's cognition (ability to think) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 39 needed substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) when eating, performing oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility: a. Failed to ensure medications for one of three residents (Resident 41) were stored in a secure location. b. Failed to ensure the medication refrigerator temperature was within normal range (30 to 4g degrees Fahrenheit). These deficient practices had the potential to result in unauthorized use of medications and the loss of viability (ability to work) of medication for improper storage temperature. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including allergic rhinitis (inflammation [redness and swelling] of the inside of the nose) and asthma (a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation and muscle tightening around the airways which makes it harder to breathe). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 41's cognition was intact. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed food production recipes and fortified diet (diet to increase caloric intake) guidelines during lunch preparation and tray line observation on 1/13/2025 when: 1.cook used small scoop size to serve pureed fish for residents on pureed diet. 10 residents on pureed diet received 3/8 cup (3 ounces (oz.)) of pureed fish instead of ½ cup (4ounces (oz).) per menu. Three residents on the renal diet (a diet aimed at keeping levels of fluids, electrolytes, and minerals balanced in the body in individuals with kidney disease or who are on dialysis) received peas for lunch instead of green beans per menu. 2.Fortified diets (diet enhanced to increase caloric content) were not prepared and were not served to residents who were on fortified diet. These deficient practices had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased caloric intake and weight loss for 10 residents on pureed diet who received less protein and seven residents who required a fortified diet. Findings: According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1.One open bag of frozen pepperoni with and one large plastic bag of diced chicken were stored in the freezer with no open date or label. One bag of frozen chicken thighs stored uncovered in the reach in freezer. 2.One Dietary Aide (DA1) working in the dish machine area did not wash hands and change gloves when removing the clean and sanitized dishes from the dish machine. 3.Dishware were not sanitized with adequate amount of sanitizer per manufactures guidelines. Sanitizers and disinfectants are used on food contact surfaces to prevent food borne illness. These deficiencies had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 45 out of 48 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1.During an observation in the kitchen on 1/13/2025 at 9:12AM there was one open bag of pepperoni with no open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of 10 hours of continued education in the field of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) for the one of one facility staff (Infection Prevention Nurse -IPN). This failure had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for the staff and residents of the facility. Findings: During an interview on 1/16/2025 at 9:07 a.m., with the IPN, the IPN stated she did not have annual 10 hours of continuing education in the field of Infection Prevention and Control after the initial IP training was completed in 2023. During a record review of the California Department of Public Health All Facilities Letter (AFL) 20-84, titled, Infection Prevention Recommendations and Incorporation into the Quality and Accountability Supplemental Payment (QASP) Program, 11/4/2020, the AFL indicated it was important that each facilities Infection Preventionist have training in fundamental Infection Prevention and Control principles to effectively perform the IP duties. Ongoing education was necessary to remain aware of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics by clinicians) by not monitoring the side effects and addressing antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infection) use for one of two sampled residents (Resident 16). This failure had the potential for the Resident 16 to receive inappropriate antibiotics and develop adverse reactions for long term antibiotic use. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hepatic encephalopathy (a brain disorder that occurs when the liver fails and toxins build up in the blood). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/11/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 16's cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 16 needed supervision (helper provides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 residents' bedroom , rooms( 2 and 19) accommodate no more than 4 residents in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide nursing care. Findings: During an observation on 1/14/2025 at 3:14 p.m., observed room two occupied with six residents and room three was occupied with six residents . The residents were able to move in and out of their rooms and there was space for wheelchairs, beds, and bedside tables. During a record review of the waiver signed by the administrator dated submitted by the administrator indicated resident 2 and 3 did not meet the four resident per room requirement by federal regulation . The letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and 3 had enough space to provide each resident care without affecting their health and safety or impending any of the residents in the room to attain his or her wellbeing.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT-a coordinated group of experts from several different fields who work together) failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 41) was assessed to determine if the resident was capable of self-administering medications. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 41 to self-administer medications incorrectly resulting in subtherapeutic (below the level necessary to treat effectively) medication effects which can lead to health issues. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including allergic rhinitis (inflammation [redness and swelling] of the inside of the nose) and asthma (a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation and muscle tightening around the airways which makes it harder to breathe). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that a resident has an advance directive (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 42). This deficient had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. During a review of Resident 42's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (MDD: a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 42's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/18/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 42 had fluctuating capacity to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents' (Residents 39 and Resident 44) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment screening was reassessed to determine the facility's ability to provide the special needs of the residents. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services they need. a. During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (MDD a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (group of mental health conditions characterized by fear, nervousness, and excessive worry), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD: mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing traumatic events). During a review of Resident 39's History and Physical (H&P) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three residents' (Resident 7) Restoril (medication for insomnia - trouble falling or staying asleep) was available. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 7's lack of sleep which can result in negative health outcomes. Findings During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including insomnia. During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 11/14/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 7's cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 7 needed set up assistance when eating, performing oral hygiene, and supervision with upper dressing, toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and showering. During a review of Resident 7's Order Listing Report for Temazepam (Restoril), from 12/1/2024 to 1/31/2025, the summary indicated on 1/11/2025, Restoril 30 milligrams (mg - unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-18 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the physician about an abnormal laboratory (bodily specimen test process and resulting) result in a timely manner for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44). This deficient practice placed Resident 44 at risk for delayed treatment of abnormal laboratory results. During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) with current episode manic without psychotic features, alcohol abuse (drinking alcohol in a harmful way or when dependent on alcohol), and adult failure to thrive (decline in health and ability for older individuals). During a review of Resident 44's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/10/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 44 had the capacity to understand and make decisions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2025-01-18 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 34 had a peanut butter sandwich that was requested for a snack. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's rights , wellbeing and can lead to insufficient food intake. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus ( cancer of the large airway that leads from the windpipe to the lungs ), Anemia ( lack of blood) and acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure ( a weekend heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet , arms, lungs and other organs). During a review of Resident 34's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/3/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 34 has fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set [(MDS), resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.One resident (Resident 2) who was on mechanical soft texture diet (soft food) received quesadilla (a Mexican dish consisting of a tortilla that is filled with cheese and then cooked on a griddle or stove) texture in form that meet their needs when the quesadilla was dry with hard and golden brown crispy edges, was not chopped and resident was not able to eat and stated it was overcooked. This deficient practice had the potential to result in decrease intake related to inconsistent texture, meal dissatisfaction, and increase choking and aspiration risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 2 on 5/2/2024 with diagnosis including, but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat.) During a review of Resident 2's physician diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident's (Resident 2) care plan was revised to include interventions to reduce Resident 2's fall risk, such as staff to always provide direct line of sight (unobstructive view) supervision while Resident 2 was awake. The facility also failed to include Resident 2's Responsible Party (RP) in the care planning process during the interdisciplinary Team (IDT-team of healthcare professionals and the resident and/or Resident's RP working together to meet resident's goals) meeting held after Resident 2's sustained fall on 5/15/2024. These deficient practices had the potential to result in future falls for Resident 2 resulting in injury and it violated Resident 2's and Resident 2 RP's rights to be involved in the care planning process. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including overactive bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) who had a history of multiple falls, was supervised, and monitored while sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 sustaining an unwitnessed fall on 5/14/2024 when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 left Resident 2 unsupervised in the dining room. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including overactive bladder (sudden urge to urinate that is hard to control) and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness which can affect daily activities) with severe psychotic (seeing or hearing things that are not there) symptoms. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 4/3/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2's cognitive skills for daily decision-making were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were enough bath and shower towels for 50 out of 50 sampled residents . This deficient practice places the residents at risk for infection, decrease in hygiene and comfort. Findings: During an interview on 5/6/2024 at 09:23 a.m., Resident 2 stated the facility run out of things like towels, Resident 2 stated she has to wait until the next day before we get towels to bathe. Resident 2 stated there is a towel shortage. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/2024 at 10:30 a.m., with Central Supply (CS), CS stated that there were no towels and stated sometimes it takes more than one day before there are towels available to the facility. During a concurrent observation at the linen room and interview on 5/6/2024 at 10:34 a.m., with laundry assistant ( LA), LA stated clean towels are delivered by a company called Medical every Tuesday and Friday , she stated the last delivery was on 5/3/2024 and the next one will be delivered on 5/7/2024 LA walked to cart 1, cart 2, Cart 3, cart 4 also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored under food safety requirement by: 1.Unplugging the freezer for over 30 minutes while storing resident food. 2. Resident food stored in the freezer with a temperature of 15 degrees Fahrenheit (°F- scale of temperature). These deficient practices placed residents at risk for food-borne illness also called food poisoning caused by eating contaminated food or eating food not kept at appropriate temperatures) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization for 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings: During an observation 1/19/2024 at 5:38 p.m. on the initial kitchen tour in the facility kitchen, observed the freezer was unplugged since 5 p.m. on 1/19/2024. Observed ice cream was melted. During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 5:55 p.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD stated the freezer was unplugged 30 minutes ago because ice was building up on the condenser. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/19/2024 at 5:57 p.m. with the Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices for the preparation and distribution of food was done under sanitary conditions in the kitchen for 48 out of 48 residents by: 1.Failing to ensure the Chlorine Sanitizer Agent (recommended to sanitize food contact surfaces including utensils, equipment, and tables) for the dishwasher was between 50-100 PPM (unit used to describe very small concentrations of a substance in a larger solution) for four dishwashing cycles. 2.Failing to ensure the Dish Machine Temperatures was within proper range of 120-160 degrees (a measure of temperature) for 5 dishwashing cycles. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever that can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation on 1/19/2024 at 5:40 p.m. during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of 13 sampled residents rights were protected by: 1. Resident 49 received a cold temperature shower. This failure resulted in Resident 49 unknowingly being placed in a cold shower until the water temperature in the shower warmed up. 2.Resident 19 was not provided a dignity bag (restores the dignity of [catheterized-a procedure used to drain the bladder and collect urine, through a flexible tube patient by concealing urinary drainage bags from public view) for Resident 19 indwelling catheter ([foley catheter] plastic or rubber tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) drainage bag (collects urine). This deficient practice has the potential to affect resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 49 admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a serious condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff member failed to ensure call light was within reach and in working condition for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 43). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 43 not being unable to call facility staff for help when needed and delay in necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 43 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complications ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar, mixed hyperlipidemia ( an inherited condition in which levels of certain fats in the blood are higher than they should be ), schizophrenia ( a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). During a review of Resident 43's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/20/23, the H&P indicated Resident 43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 48) had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) assessment done when diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) prior to admission. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 48 not receiving the necessary services and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar, anxiety, and insomnia (difficulty falling asleep). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's low air loss mattress (mattress designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown. was inflated for one of two sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 32 physical comfort and had Resident 32 pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including ischemic with cardiomyopathy ( heart muscle that cannot pump well because of damage from lack of blood supply to the heart), pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back unstageable ( a type of pressure ulcer that occurs due to prolong pressure on a specific area of the skin, resulting in the lack of blood flow and oxygen to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the resident from having an unplanned severe (severe weight loss is the weight loss greater than 5 % in one month and greater than 7.5 % in three months) weight loss of 14 pounds ([lbs.] which constituted 7.4 percent % in one month and 10.3 % in two months) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 40). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the licensed nurses followed the Registered Dietician (RD) dietary recommendations of Multivitamins (a pill containing a combination of vitamins), Prostat (a ready-to-drink concentrated liquid high in protein) 30 cubic centimeter ([cc]-unit of volume) daily, and iron (a mineral that the body needs to produce red blood cells) supplements on 11/16/2023, recommendations of including a complete blood count ([CBC] a blood test that measures the number and quality of red blood cells (RBCs or erythrocytes) and white blood cells), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP]a blood test about resident's body's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests of complete blood count ([CBC] a blood test that measures the number and quality of red blood cells (RBCs or erythrocytes) and white blood cells), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP]a blood test about resident's body's fluid balance and levels of electrolytes) and a thyroid stimulating hormone ([TSH] measures the amount of thyroid stimulating hormone in your blood) test on 12/15/2023 as ordered by the attending physician on 12/17/2023 for one of one sample resident (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential to delay necessary care and treatment for Resident 40. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (Face Sheet) dated 11/10/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cellulitis (a common skin infection caused by bacteria) of the left leg, hypertension (high blood pressure), and adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite, and poor nutrition). During a review of Resident 40's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 residents' bedroom rooms (2 and 3) accommodate no more than four residents in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide nursing care. Findings: During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 12:57 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] and 3 were occupied with six residents each. The residents were observed to have no issues moving in and out of rooms and had enough space for wheelchairs, beds, and bedside tables. During a record review of the waiver signed by the administrator dated 3/7/2025 submitted by the Administrator (ADM) indicated resident rooms are permitted to have no more than four beds per room and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not meet the four resident per room requirement by federal regulation. During an interview on 2/9/2025 at 3:51p.m. with the ADM, the ADM stated the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 3 and ensured they are compatible as they have dementia (a progressive state of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 17 of 19 resident rooms met the requirements of 80 square feet ([sq. ft.] a unit of area measurement) per residents in multi-bed resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents.Findings: During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 2:02p.m., residents in a three (3) room bedroom were observed having a wheelchair that was not blocking or hindering other residents, had bedside tables, and had enough space going in and out of room. During a review of the Client Accommodations Analysis (identifies approved use ot induvial rooms and approved capacities) dated 2/2/2026, the Client Accommodations Analysis indicated the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] (6 beds) 470 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER] (6 beds) 426 sq. ft.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 143 sq. ft.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 155 sq. ft.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 146 sq. ft.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-21 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 resident bedrooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] ) accommodated no more than four residents in each room . This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide nursing care. Findings: During an observation on 1/20/23 at 1:17 p.m., observed room [ROOM NUMBER] occupied five residents and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied with six residents. The residents were able to move in and out of their rooms and there was space for the beds, side table and wheelchairs. During a record review of the room waver signed by the Administrator dated 1/24 , submitted by the administrator indicated Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 3 did not meet the four residents per room required by federal regulation . The letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and 3 had enough space to provide each resident care without affecting their health and safety or impeding any of the residents in the room to attain his or her wellbeing.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-21 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for resident per resident in multiple rooms resident bedrooms (rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19) for 17 of 19 resident's room. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide nursing care to the residents. Findings : During an observation on 1/21/2024 at 1:17 p.m., with Maintenance (MN), observed multiple resident's rooms with two, three and six beds in a room. Observed residents go in and out of beds with adequate spacing, side tables, beds, wheelchairs readily available without impending any movement. During an interview on 1/21/2024 at 1:19 p.m. with MN, the MN stated we have a room waiver and would like to apply for another one this year. During a review of the room size waiver dated 1/23 submitted by the Administrator , for 17 residents rooms was reviewed, the letter indicated there was ample room to accommodate residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-01-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AARON MAYER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DEUTSCH 2016 GRATOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
MAYER 2012 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/15/2016
DEUTSCH, RAFAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2014
DEUTSCH, ISAACIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER72%since 06/30/2023
CARAVAN OPERATIONS CORPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2014
JEN KIN, EDENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$389K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 20%Other / private 4%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $389K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$433per resident / day
operating cost
$13,178per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055329. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next