Fallbrook Skilled Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 80.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 22 CCR S 72313S 72313. Nursing Service--Administration of Medications and Treatments(a) Medications and treatments shall be administered as follows:(1) No medication or treatment shall be administered except on the order of a person lawfully authorized to give such order.(2) Medications and treatments shall be administered as prescribed.(3) Tests and taking of vital signs, upon which administration of medications or treatments are conditioned, shall be performed as required and the results recorded.(4) Preparation of doses for more than one scheduled administration time shall not be permitted.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 residents reviewed for omitted medication doses, (Residents 1, 3, and 4) and this failure placed the residents at risk of harm due to uncontrolled high blood presure. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis (health problems) that included Type 2 diabetes (a disorder of hormone secretion, that causes high blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 22 CCR S 72543S 72543. Patients' Health Recordsa) Records shall be permanent, either typewritten or legibly written in ink, be capable of being photocopied and shall be kept on all patients admitted or accepted for care. All health records of discharged patients shall be completed and filed within 30 days after discharge date and such records shall be kept for a minimum of 7 years, except for minors whose records shall be kept at least until 1 year after the minor has reached the age of 18 years, but in no case less than 7 years. All exposed X-ray film shall be retained for seven years. All required records, either originals or accurate reproductions thereof, shall be maintained in such form as to be legible and readily available upon the request of the attending licensed healthcare practitioner acting within the scope of his or her professional licensure, the facility staff or any authorized officer, agent, or employee of either, or any other person authorized by law to make such request.(b) Information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure leftover and opened food items were labeled and dated when placed in the refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. An undated facility policy titled, Leftover Foods indicated, Policy: Leftover foods will be stored and served in a safe manner. Procedure: Leftover foods are those that have been prepared for a meal and not served. 1. Storage of leftovers b. Label and date. During an observation of the reach-in refrigerator on 04/29/2025 at 11:14, there were two plates that contained a hamburger and French fries and one place that contained a pureed hamburger and pureed French fries that were not labeled or dated. The Dietary Manager stated the plates should be labeled and dated and that he would discard them now. 2. An undated facility policy titled, Foods Brought by Family /Visitors indicated, 6. Perishable foods must be stored in re-sealable containers with tightly fitting lids in the refrigerator.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was placed within reach for 1 (Resident #1) of 19 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Strategies for Reducing the Risk of Falls revised 03/2018, indicated Call light within resident's reach. An admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident #1 on 11/21/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of personal history of traumatic brain injury. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/03/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. During an observation on 04/29/2025 at 2:42 PM, Resident #1 was observed in bed and their call light was noted on the floor behind the resident's bed. During an interview on 04/29/2025 at 3:29 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse #5 stated Resident #1's call light should be close to them. During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #8 on 01/07/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/2025, revealed Resident # 8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated that the resident had active diagnoses to include depression and schizophrenia. Resident #8's Care Plan Report included a focus area initiated 03/03/2025, that indicated the resident had a nutritional problem or the potential for a nutritional problem related to diagnoses to include dementia, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Resident #8's medical record revealed no evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fingernails and toenails were kept cleaned and trimmed for 3 (Residents #1, #23, and #40) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised 03/2018, indicated, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident #1 on 11/21/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of personal history of traumatic brain injury. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/03/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident was dependent on staff for ADLs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's catheter tubing and privacy bag were kept off the floor for 1 (Resident #14) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary revised 09/2014, indicated, 3b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #14 on 11/14/2012. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of epilepsy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/24/2025, revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated that the resident had an indwelling catheter. Resident #14's Care Plan Report included a focus area revised 01/10/2025, that indicated the resident had a potential for actual impairment due to skin integrity related to fragile skin,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0555 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident ' s preference for their personal physician for one of three residents (Resident 1) when reviewed. This failure ignored the resident ' s right to choose a physician and caused Resident 1 to feel ignored and depressed. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: recurrent enterocolitis (stomach inflammation, causing pain or diarrhea or constipation); heart disease; major depressive disorder; anxiety. Resident 1 has the capacity (ability) to make her own health care decisions. On 9/17/24 at 11:35 A.M. Resident 1 was interviewed. Resident 1 stated she had made an appointment to see her regular doctor outside of the facility. Resident 1 said when her daughter called the facility to ask about transportation arrangements related to the doctor appointment, her daughter was told the facility staff cancelled the appointment and explained (Res 1) must see our doctor. Resident 1 said she was upset…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a registered nurse (RN) on duty 8 consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. This failure had the potential for more advanced assessments and care activities provided by an RN to be unavailable to residents. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility on 7/17/23 at 10 A.M., there were no RN's observed to be on duty. During a resident council meeting on 7/18/23 at 9:56 A.M., Resident (4) stated, The staffing schedule was messed up; weekends are especially hard, staff call off and it makes it hard on residents. During a resident council meeting on 7/18/23 at 9:10 A.M., seven of seven residents (4,13,25,33,37,51,125) stated there were lots of registry staff, some are rude and ignore residents, and there are no RN's, only LVN's. A review of the facility's document, titled Staffing Assignments, for July 17, July 18 and July 19 2023, indicated a blank space for the column RN. A review of the PBJ (payroll based journal) Staffing Data Report, CASPER report 1705D, FY (fiscal year) Quarter 2,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all food items were labeled and dated. In addition, the facility did not ensure that there were no expired food items. This failure had the potential for all residents who eat at the facility to become ill due to increased bacteria growth in the food, and/or have decreased food intake leading to weight loss due to poor food palatability. Findings: An initial tour/observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted on 7/17/23 at 9:50 A.M., with the facility's Dietary Services Manager (DSM). In the walk in refrigerator, there was a bakers rack with two trays of cappuccino mousse, two trays of fruit salad, and two trays of lettuce salad with no made-on date nor an expiration date. In the dry storage area, there were the following items with no expiration date: Four 6-pound cans of black beans; Two 6-pound cans of pinto beans; Two 6-pound cans of sweet potatoes; Nine 6-pound cans of beef stew. An interview was conducted with the DSM on 7/17/23 at 10:00 A.M. The DSM stated, The cans have no expiration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $952K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA