No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Gardens Health Care Center

25271 Barton Rd, Loma Linda, CA 92354 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (909) 796-0216 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (909) 796-0216 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (100%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
25455 Barton Rd · (909) 558-4479 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11201 Benton St · (909) 825-7084 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
25630 Barton Rd · (909) 478-5488 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Mountain View Ave · (909) 799-2800 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11444 Benton St · (909) 796-3510

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.6%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.802.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.271.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 43.3–76.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.2–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
100.0%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 101.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and administered in accordance with the facility's medication administration policy and procedure (P&P) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents(Resident 3), when a License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) left a medication cup containing four (4) tablets unattended on Resident 3's beside table. This failure had the potential to cause medication errors, accidental ingestion and intentional misuse, which jeopardized the health and safety of Resident 3, who had severe cognitive impairment (a person has lost their ability to think, remember, or make decisions so much that they cannot live independently) or any person who could access Resident 3's room.During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (contains demographic and medical information) undated, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction), senile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and maintained in sanitary conditions when on May 4, 2026 the following was observed:1.Multiple pieces of cooking equipment had significant accumulations of grease, grime, burnt on residue, rust, food debris, discoloration.2.Several food items were stored on the floor. These failures had the potential to facilitate the growth of harmful microorganisms (tiny living organisms too small to be seen with the naked eye, requiring a microscope for viewing), including bacteria, viruses, and fungi significantly increasing the risk for cross-contamination and development of food-borne illnesses, potentially affecting 93 medically vulnerable residents who rely on meals prepared in the facility's kitchen.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Kitchen (DOK) on May 4, 2026, at 6:33 AM in the dishwashing area, a stack of 18 dish drying racks was observed stored on a wheeled dolly under the counter. The racks exhibited heavy mineral buildup, visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when a cockroach was observed by surveyors in the facility's conference room, multiple staff interviews indicated ongoing sightings of cockroaches on multiple occasions, and the facility's pest control report indicated ongoing, active cockroach activity in the facility's dining area, resident rooms, and boiler room.This failure had the potential for compromising resident health and safety by exposing residents to disease-carrying pests, contamination of food surfaces, and increased risk of infection in a vulnerable population of 98 residents.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on May 4, 2026, at 6:10 AM, in the facility's conference room, with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), a live brown bug which was approximately one and a half (1.5) inches long and resembled a cockroach was observed to be crawling on the ground underneath the conference table. RN 1 acknowledged the bug was alive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for three of six residents (Residents 14, 30, and 73) reviewed for advance directives (a written document that tells your health care providers who should speak for you and what medical decisions they should make if you become unable to speak for yourself) when:1. Resident 14 was not provided advance directive information on admission.2. Resident 30's medical record had discrepant information regarding if Resident 30 had an advance directive or not. Additionally, there was no evidence the facility requested or attempted to obtain a copy of Resident 30 advance directive.3. Resident 73's POLST (Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment - a medical order completed by a healthcare provider that communicates a patient's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment) was incomplete and left blank for the section regarding advance directives. Additionally, there was no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to help maintain dignity for one of three residents (Resident 115) reviewed for urinary catheters (a thin, flexible tube inserted through the an opening which leads into the bladder allowing urine drainage into an external collection bag) when Resident 115's urinary collection bag (bag connected to a catheter by a tube and is used to collect urine) was left uncovered and urine was visible to individuals entering the resident's room and people passing in the hallway.This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 115's dignity, cause embarrassment, humiliation, and diminish the resident's psychosocial well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 115's admission Record, (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (an infection usually caused by bacteria entering the urinary tract), dementia (general term used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) for one of one resident (Resident 52) when Resident 52, who had a known history of verbal aggressive behaviors, was observed to be verbally abusing Resident 56 on May 7, 2026. This failure had the potential to place Resident 56 at risk for physical injury, fear, emotional distress, and psychosocial harm.Findings:A review of Resident 52's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), indicated Resident 52 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a serious medical emergency occurring when blood flow to a brain region is blocked, causing oxygen deprivation and tissue death), type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition where the body cannot properly use or make enough insulin, leading to high blood sugar),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS - a computerized clinical assessment) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) within 14 days for one of five residents (Resident 53), who were reviewed for accidents when Resident 53 experienced a fall with a fracture on April 9, 2026.This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of necessary interventions to address the residents' care and support needs.Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included history of falling, presence of left artificial hip joint, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking.During a concurrent observation and interview on May 4, 2026, at 11:54 AM, with Resident 53, Resident 53 was lying in bed and stated she fell a while ago and thought it may have been a few weeks ago.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS - a computerized resident assessment tool) for one of two residents (Resident 30) reviewed for behavior and emotional mood, when the Resident 30's RAI-MDS dated [DATE], did not indicate Resident 30 was experiencing hallucinations.This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 30 which can potentially jeopardize the residents' health and safety.Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia - such as hallucinations or delusions - with mood disorder symptoms like depression), anxiety disorder (a condition in which feelings of fear, worry, or dread become excessive, persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for medication administration for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 116) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not to administer Cholecalciferol (a vitamin to treat Vitamin D deficiency) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment, and adverse health outcomes for Resident 116.Findings: During a review of Resident 116's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), indicated Resident 116 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included vitamin D deficiency ( a common condition where the body lacks sufficient vitamin D, essential for bone health, immune function, and muscle strength). During a review of Resident 116 physician's orders, dated April 27, 2026, the physician's orders indicated, give Cholecalciferol 2000 units by mouth daily, give 2 tablets of 1000 unit for supplement. During a medication pass observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored the indwelling foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted through an opening into the bladder allowing continuous urine drainage into an external collection bag) for one of three residents (Resident 115) reviewed for urinary catheters when the tubing for Resident 115's urinary collection bag (bag connected to a catheter by a tube and is used to collect urine) was observed to be touching the floor and documentation of observation and monitoring of Resident 115's catheter was not documented as being performed as ordered by the physician.This failure exposed Resident 115 to increased risk of urinary tract infection and the spread of microorganisms (cross contamination), from the floor to his indwelling foley catheter.Findings:During a review of Resident 115's admission Record, (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device that allows residents' to communicate with nursing staff when they need assistance) was within resident reach for one of five sampled residents (Resident 91 ) when Resident 91 call light was wedged/stuck between the mattress and the side bed rail and not accessible to Resident 91.This failure had the potential to place Resident 91 at risk for their safety and well-being.Finding:A review of Resident 91's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes repeated, unprovoked seizures), anxiety disorder (persistent, and uncontrollable fear or worry that interferes with daily life) and altered mental status (any sudden or significant change in a person's normal thinking, awareness, or behavior). During a concurrent observation and interview on May 4, 2026, at 11:22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect, kindness, and dignity, when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) engaged in a verbal altercation with Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s basic right to be violated, which had the potential for Resident 1 to feel disrespected and unsafe. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (one side of the body paralyzed) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Change in Condition Evaluation, dated April 4, 2025, it indicated on April 4, 2025 at around 3 PM, Resident [Resident 1] had a derogatory verbal altercation with a staff member [CNA 1]. Both staff member and Resident educated on the importance of proper communication, mutual respect. Resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice scoop used for the kitchen's ice machine was stored in a clean and sanitary manner as required by the facility's policy. This failure posed potential risk for contamination of ice, which could lead to foodborne illness (food poisoning, is a sickness caused by eating food or drinking water that is contaminated with harmful bacteria, viruses, parasites, or chemicals.) and negatively impact the health and safety of 96 of 96 vulnerable residents who received food and beverages from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on January 14, 2025, at 8:20 AM, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen, the ice machine was inspected. The ice scoop was found resting inside an uncovered blue container located near the ice machine. The DSS stated the ice scoop must always be stored in a clean, covered container to ensure safety and prevent contamination. During a concurrent observation and interview on January 14, 2025, at 8:30 AM, in the kitchen, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper and safe infection control practices were being followed for six of 25 sampled residents (Residents 44, 33, 65, 4, 484 and 47) when: 1. Resident 44's Central Venous Catheter (CVC- thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein to provide access to the heart) dressing was not changed in accordance with facility policy. 2. Resident 44's Intravenous tubing (IV- flexible tube used to give fluids, medicine, or nutrients through a vein) was not dated in accordance with facility policy. 3. Resident 33's oxygen tubing (flexible plastic tube that is used to deliver oxygen from an oxygen supply to a person who needs extra oxygen) was not changed in accordance with facility policy. 4. Resident 65's oxygen tubing was not dated in accordance with facility policy 5. License Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not perform hand hygiene (practice of washing hands with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to remove germs) during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Significant Change of Status Assessments (SCSA- comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) were completed within 14 days for one of two residents (Resident 5) reviewed for hospice (services to provide for the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and emotional needs of a terminally ill patient and/or family members, as delineated in a specific patient plan of care.). This failure resulted on Resident 5's care plan not being updated and revised to reflect her current status, and had the potential to delay identification and implementation of the resident's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), it indicated Resident 5 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessments were completed accurately for two of two residents (Residents 9 and 19) reviewed for insulin (hormone that helps the body use sugar and starches for energy or store them for later use) and antibiotic (medication used to treat bacterial infections) use when: 1. Resident 9's insulin injections were not coded on the MDS assessment. 2. Resident 19's antibiotic therapy was not coded on the MDS assessment. These failures had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Residents 9 and 19's care and support needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body has trouble using insulin properly, causing high blood sugar levels.), and long term use of insulin. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was carried out timely for one of two residents (Resident 62) reviewed for hospice (services to provide for the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and emotional needs of a terminally ill patient and/or family members, as delineated in a specific patient plan of care) when Resident 62's order for a Speech Therapy (ST- assessment and treatment of communication problems and speech disorders) evaluation was not communicated with the hospice provider. This failure had the potential to place Resident 62 at risk for aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material is accidentally inhaled into the lungs), weight loss and further nutritional decline. Findings: During an observation on January 13, 2025, at 8:29 AM, outside of Resident 62's room, Resident 62 was yelling out nonsensically. During a review of Resident 62's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 62 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis (disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services to ensure activities of daily living were being provided for two of four residents (Residents 44 and 54) reviewed for position and mobility when: 1. Resident 44's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP- planned healthcare approach within long-term care facilities that aims to help residents maintain or regain their independence by providing targeted interventions to improve their functional abilities) recommendation from the Physical Therapist (PT- healthcare provider who helps you improve how your body performs physical movements) was not implemented. 2. Resident 54's RNP recommendation from the PT and Occupational Therapist (OT- healthcare provider who helps you improve your ability to perform daily tasks) were not implemented. These failures had the potential to delay the continuity of care for Residents 44 and 54, which could prevent them from maintaining or improving the activities of daily living.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen therapy (administration of oxygen at concentrations greater than that in ambient air with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of decreased perfusion of oxygen to the tissues) was obtained for one of three residents (Resident 33) reviewed for oxygen. This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to develop oxygen toxicity (conditions that occurs when someone breaths too much oxygen, damaging lungs and potential for death) from the lack of monitoring from a physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, it indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of dementia (medical condition that causes a person to lose ability to think, remember, and reason), retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscess (severe infection in the neck that involve a collection of pus in the deep neck spaces), and shortness of breath (difficulty breathing). During an observation on January 13, 2025, at 10:11 AM, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their professional staff maintained an active and current license (legal permit that allows a person to practice nursing) when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) worked with an expired license on [DATE], through [DATE]. This failure had the potential to place 101 highly vulnerable residents whose health conditions are already compromised at risk of receiving care from an unqualified nurse with an expired license, which could have affected and altered their health and well-being. Findings: During a review of a facility provided document titled Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians Licensing Details dated [DATE], it indicated LVN 2 nursing license was delinquent (license that is not renewed within the allotted timeframe). During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE], at 1:32 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON reviewed and acknowledged a facility document titled Nursing Staff Assignment and Sign-in Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on , interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement its policy for blood glucose monitoring, when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was not checked at the scheduled time, which potentially resulted in a change in Resident 1's condition leading to being transferred to a general acute hospital for evaluation and treatment. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and well-being of Resident 1 who is medically compromised. During a review of Resident's 1 admission Record (document containing clinical and demographic data), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body doesn't use insulin [ a hormone that helps sugar from food to get into the cells for energy] properly, causing blood sugar levels to get too high ). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1's, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to identify and monitor cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for activities of daily living (ADL) to ensure the proper maintenance of grooming and personal hygiene services for one of the three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to put clinically compromised resident (Resident 1) at risk for infection when Resident 1 ' s unclean and untrimmed fingernails were not adequately maintained. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning – thinking, remembering, and reasoning – to such an extent that it interferes with a person ' s daily life and activities). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1 ' s the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to identify and monitor cognitive decline), dated 08/09/2024, indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure for restraints, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) wrapped Resident 1 ' s waist and legs in linen sheets on April 15, 2024. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for decreased mobility, circulation, psychological harm and even death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (condition that affects the way the person's brain is working), unspecified fracture of right lower leg (unknown break in bone) and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (person experiences hallucinations with manic/depressive moments). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Annual H & P dated April 13, 2023, it indicated .resident is unable to make decisions concerning health care because dementia . the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect, and dignity when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) used profanity around Resident 1. This failure compromised Resident's 1 dignity and violated her rights to respect, which had the potential for Resident 1 to experience psychosocial harm (mental harm and suffering). Findings: A review of Resident's 1 admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis Alzheimer's disease (most common type of dementia, it is a progressive disease that begins with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated October 3, 2023, at 11:36 AM, documented by Resident's 1 Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP), it indicated Resident 1 does not have the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure immediate protective measure was put into place to provide protections to one of three sampled resident (Resident 3) when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was not suspended immediately after an alleged abuse to Resident 3 was reported. This failure had the potential for further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment in a vulnerable population of 94 residents as the alleged perpetrator, CNA, continued to have access to the alleged victim, Resident 3, and to other residents while the investigation was still in process. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), hyperlipidemia (too many lipids (fats) in the blood), and hypertension (blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 92 clinically compromised residents when the treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended by a licensed nurse. This failure had the potential for a vulnerable population of 92 residents to gain direct access to harmful chemicals, placing them at risk for ingestion of harmful chemicals, which could lead to poisoning and even death. Findings: During an observation on September 29, 2023, at 10:49 AM, Treatment Nurse (TN 1) opened the drawers of the treatment cart. Inside the treatment cart were biological's, medication ointments, and solutions. TN 1 applied medication ointment on a clean dressing, grabbed additional dressing supplies from the next drawer, and then proceeded to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] to provide wound treatment to a resident. The treatment cart was parked at the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] and was left unlocked and unattended by TN 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on September 29, 2023, at 10:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) and A License Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) did not perform COVID-19 (a highly contagious illness caused by a virus) precautions upon entry into Covid positive room on September 19, 2023, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure increased the risk of the transmission of Covid 19 to a compromised resident (Resident 1). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include, urinary tract infection (urine infection), difficulty walking, chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate, poor blood flow), congested heart failure (heart cannot pump blood as well), (COVID-19 (a highly contagious illness caused by a virus). During an observation on September 19, 2023, at 10:43 AM, License Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN1),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient numbers of staff when three out of 12 sampled days (August 5, 2023, August 6, 2023, and August 20, 2023) had less than 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day (DHPPD- the total number of hours worked per patient day divided by the average daily number of residents in the facility). This failure had the potential to result in unmet needs, such as psychosocial and physical needs, and safety concerns for 101 residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on September 1, 2023, at 11:50 AM, with the Payroll Coordinator (PC) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility ' s document titled, Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD- the number that results from dividing the actual nursing hours perform by direct caregivers per patient day and the number of residents in the facility), for dates: August 5, 2023, August 6, 2023, and August 20, 2023, were reviewed. The DHPPD indicated, the Actual DHPPD was 3.17 (facility was short of 0.33) on August 5, 2023, Actual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The ice machine was not kept in sanitary condition. 2. The microwave had food residue. 3. Seven out of seven shelves in the walk-in refrigerator had dust and grime, and the floor inside walk-in refrigerator had old food, black grime, and trash. 4. The reach in refrigerators #1 and # 2 had sticky handles. The gaskets had black grime. The ventilation fans were dusty with black debris. 5. The food warmer had food crumbs and residue on bottom shelves. 6. The shelf storing the spices had dust. 7. The area behind the stove had dust, grease build-up and black grime. 8. In the dry storage room, four lid covers for thickener, flour, sugar, and brown sugar had dust. 9. There were unlabeled and undated food items in the resident refrigerator at Nursing Station 1. The refrigerator had food residue and spilled liquid. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness (illness from eating contaminated food) to 84 medically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services for 86 medically compromised residents when: 1. Outdated medications were observed stored and was available for resident use: 1.a. For Resident 634, a syringe of outdated ABHR gel (mixed medication containing Ativan/Benadryl/Haldol/Reglan; medication used for nausea and vomiting or agitation), with an expiration date of [DATE], was observed stored in the Medication Room refrigerator. 1.b. For Resident 36, four (4) bags of outdated Vancomycin (antibiotic), with an expiration date of [DATE], was observed stored in the Medication Room refrigerator. 1.c. For Resident 34, a vial of outdated Nitroglycerin (medication to treat chest pain), with an expiration date of [DATE], was observed stored in the Medication Cart 300. 1.d. A bottle of Aspirin (blood thinner medication) 81 milligrams (mg - a unit of measurement for dose), with the expiration date smeared off, was observed stored in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food textures were provided for 12 of 12 residents (Residents 1, 8, 14, 20, 39, 46, 47, 57, 74, 82, 534, and 635) with puree textured diet (a diet with smooth food texture like pudding or mashed potatoes designed for someone who has difficulty swallowing and/or chewing) when Residents 1, 8, 14, 20, 39, 46, 47, 57, 74, 82, 534, and 635 received cheese and vegetable lasagna pureed entrée, that was not smooth, for lunch on July 13, 2022. This failure had the potential to place the residents that received this diet at risk of choking. Findings: During a review of a facility document titled, Physician Orders List, dated July 13, 2022, the order list indicated Residents 1, 8, 14, 20, 39, 46, 47, 57, 74, 82, 534, and 635 have a physician's order to receive a pureed diet. During a concurrent observation and interview, with Dietary [NAME] 1, on July 13, 2022, at 10:23 AM, Diet [NAME] 1 was preparing cheese and vegetable lasagna puree entrée. Dietary [NAME] 1 placed designated portions of lasagna…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for three of three residents (Residents 634, 47, and 8) reviewed for call lights. This failure resulted in Residents 634, 47, and 8 not to have means of contacting the staff for assistance. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 634's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 634 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included weakness, anxiety disorder (disorder characterized by significant and uncontrollable feelings of anxiety and fear), and schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). During an observation, in Resident 634's room, on July 14, 2022, at 8:45 AM, Resident 634 was lying in bed in a semi-upright position. Resident 634 did not have her call light next to her. Her call light was on the floor behind her bed's headboard. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for one of six residents (Resident 36) reviewed for medication administration when a licensed nurse used her personal cell phone to text the physician regarding Resident 36's protected health information with the resident's full name in the text message. This failure had the potential for unauthorized individuals to view Resident 36's protected health information on facility's staff personal cell phone. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (increased blood sugar levels), and kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should). During an observation, on July 13, 2022, at 8:50 AM, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) used their personal cell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS - a computerized resident assessment tool) for one of three residents (Resident 48) reviewed for tube feedings (a tube inserted into the stomach used to administer liquid nutrition) when Resident 48's RAI-MDS dated [DATE], did not indicate Resident 48 was receiving enteral nutrition (liquid nutrition) through a feeding tube. This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 48 which can potentially jeopardize the residents' health and safety. Findings: During an observation, on July 13, 2022, at 3:32 PM, Resident 48 was receiving enteral nutrition through a feeding tube that was being administered by an infusion pump at the resident's bedside. During a review of Resident 48's physician's order sheet, dated January 11, 2022, it indicated, [Brand name of enteral nutrition] 1.2 via G-tube [gastric tube - tube inserted into the stomach] & 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 13) reviewed for rehabilitation services was provided physical therapy services (PT services - specially designed exercises and equipment to help patients regain or improve their physical abilities) as ordered by a physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 13 not to obtain services intended to help the resident achieve and maintain his highest level of mobility functioning. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included difficulty in walking, tear of unspecified meniscus (tear of one of the connective tissues of the knee), pain in right and left knees, and dementia (a brain disease that causes memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). During a concurrent observation and interview, on July 12, 2022, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status (nutrition and hydration status) for three of seven residents (Residents 11, 71 and 48) reviewed for nutrition when: 1. Resident 11, who was at risk for weight loss, was not assessed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) upon admission. (RD assessments are essential to determine the overall nutritional status of residents, diagnose malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition), identify underlying issues that could lead to malnutrition, and plan necessary interventions.) 2. Resident 71, who was at risk for weight loss, was not assessed by the RD quarterly, after the facility failed to inform the RD about the resident's refusal to be weighed. 3. Resident 48's tube feeding (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for the administration of liquid nutrition) rate was not administered according to the physician's order on July 13, 2022. These failures had the potential for Residents 11, 71 and 48 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral nutrition bottle (container with liquid nutritional formula administered to a resident through a feeding tube inserted directly into the stomach) for one of three residents (Resident 48) reviewed for tube feeding (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for the administration of liquid nutrition) was labeled with nurse initials and date (when the feeding was started) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for the enteral nutrition bottle to exceed the manufacturer's prescribed hang-time (amount of time a feeding is safe to use after opened), and for Resident 48 to not receive the prescribed amount of nutritional calories resulting in weight loss. Findings: During an observation, on July 13, 2022, at 3:32 PM, Resident 48 was receiving enteral nutrition through a tube feeding that was being administered by an infusion pump at her bedside. The enteral nutrition bottle was not labeled with a date, or the initials of the nurse who started the tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and treatment for one resident (Resident 9) reviewed for respiratory care when Resident 9 received oxygen therapy (use of oxygen as medical treatment) without a physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to receive improper oxygen therapy and potentially missed opportunities to identify Resident 9's significant change in condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (a condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a concurrent observation and interview with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) on July 13, 2022, at 10:04 AM, Resident 9 was on oxygen therapy at 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) knew how to properly assess the arterio-venous fistula (AVF- a site on resident's arm used to connect a blood filtering machine) for two residents (Resident 5 and Resident 9) reviewed for hemodialysis (dialysis- a process of purifying the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally). This failure increased the potential for staff to have delayed detections, reporting and/or management of complications from the hemodialysis access site for Resident 5 and 9. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 5's clinical record, the face sheet indicated Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dependance on renal dialysis (procedure of removing toxins from the body) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal). A review of Resident 5's care plan, dated March 7, 2022, indicated to monitor dialysis access site on the left arm AV fistula for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. This occurred when three errors for Resident 55 occurred out of 27 opportunities for a medication administration error rate of 11.1%. This failure had the potential to expose residents to preventable medication errors which could adversely affect their health and safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (high blood sugar values causing nerve damage), anemia (low red blood cells), and constipation (difficult bowel movement). During a review of Resident 55's Physician Order, dated July 20, 2021, it indicated, TUMS TABLET 500 mg CHEWABLE 2 tab [tablets] PO [by mouth] BID [twice a day] for gas pain . During a review of Resident 55's Physician Order, dated June 10,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately labeled in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures and standards of practice when: 1. For Resident 36, two opened and undated insulin (drug used to lower blood sugar) pens were observed stored in the Medication Cart 300. 2. For Resident 484, an opened foil of Budesonide (steroid medication) inhalation pouches observed in the Medication Cart 300 did not have an open date. 3. An incomplete prescription label for a controlled substance (highly regulated medication due to potential for abuse or misuse), Morphine Sulfate (strong pain medication), was observed stored in the Medication Room Refrigerator. It was not labeled with important information such as prescription number and expiration date. These failures placed Residents 36 and 484 at risk for receiving ineffective or outdated medications, and/or had the potential for drug diversion (illegal use). Findings: 1. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their dietary staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the Food and Nutrition Services, when three Dietary Aides (Dietary Aides 1, 2, and 3) did not know the manufacturer's guidelines related to the sanitizer testing of the dishwasher. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by eating contaminated foods) or food contamination for 84 residents who received foods from the kitchen. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Dishwashing Machine Use, dated March 2010, it indicated, Dishwashing machine chemical sanitizer concentrations and contact times will be as follows: Chlorine 50-100 ppm. During a concurrent observation, and interview, with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), on July 12, 2022, at 8:36 AM, in the dishwashing area of kitchen, DA 1 tested the sanitation level of the dishwasher. DA 1 dipped the chlorine strip directly into the dish water inside of the open compartment on the front of dishwasher,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records for five residents (Residents 284, 11, 13, 15, and 29) of 24 sampled residents, were complete and accurately documented when: 1. For Resident 284, a controlled substance (highly regulated medication due to potential for abuse or misuse) pain medication was removed from the drug supply and logged out of the Control Drug Record (CDR - narcotic count sheet) but not documented as administered on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) at the time of removal. This failure had the potential for inadequate controlled substance accountability in the facility or to expose the resident to preventable medication errors. 2. The Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- written medical orders that addresses a limited number of critical medical decisions) for four of seven residents (Residents 11, 13, 15 and 29) reviewed for advance directives (a legal document that explains how an individual wants medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe infection control program for 86 medically compromised residents when: 1. A licensed nurse did not clean and disinfect the glucometer (devices measures blood sugar values) after using it on Resident 36. 2. Outdated supplies were available for resident use in the Medication Room. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination (unintentional transfer) of blood borne pathogens (microorganisms that cause serious disease present in human blood) due to an improperly cleaned glucometer and/or to be treated with ineffective or deteriorated (reduced quality) supplies which could negatively impact the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 36's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included methicillin resistant staphylococcus infection (infection), type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their kitchen equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition when: 1. The light for the walk-in freezer and refrigerator was dim. 2. The walk-in freezer was noted with a chunk of ice around the black pipe behind the ventilator fans. 3. The walk-in refrigerator was noted with a copper pipe dripping water behind the ventilator fans. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the quality of food served to 84 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation, on July 12, 2022, at 9:23 AM, the light in the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer were found to be dim. Only one small light bulb was noted above the entrance door of the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer. Flashlights were needed to inspect the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer. During an interview with the Maintenance Staff (MS 1), on July 12, 2022, at 3:31 PM, the MS 1 stated it was dark in the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer, and it was hard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-07 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents the results of the most recent survey of the facility. This failure had the potential to prevent residents, family members, and legal representatives from being informed about the facility's compliance with state and federal requirements, which could limit their ability to make fully informed decisions regarding the residents' care.Findings:During the Resident Council Meeting held on May 5, 2026, at 10:30 AM, residents expressed concerns regarding the visibility and accessibility of the most recent survey results of the facility. Further more, multiple residents reported that they were unaware of the location where these results were posted.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on May 5, 2026, at 11:15 AM, the DON acknowledged the most recent survey of the facility must be visibly posted in an unobstructed area and be accessible to the residents and the public. DON was unable to specify or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COTTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 05/20/2016
HELEN LOUISE LARSON REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 10/23/2019
THE LARSON FAMILY TRUST OF 2010Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 11/19/2013
ARMSTRONG, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 03/13/1992
ARMSTRONG, LAURAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 03/13/1992
GOINGS, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER16%since 01/01/2002
GOINGS, PATRICIAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 03/13/1992
GOINGS, VERNAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 03/13/1992
GOINGS, SAMUELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/06/2018
KILIAN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/08/1998

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 4%Other / private 84%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,937per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next