No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley Healthcare Center

1680 N Waterman Ave, San Bernardino, CA 92404 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (909) 886-5291 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$37,151 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,151 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1700 N Waterman Ave · (909) 883-8611 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1700 N Waterman Ave · (909) 883-3088 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2094 Wall Ave · (909) 672-9133 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 E Highland Ave · (909) 881-5484 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.682.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.341.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.7–18.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-07)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from potential serious accident hazards for residents and staff in the facility when: 1. The facility failed to assess and identify one of 10 residents (Resident 104) for smoking upon admission and failed to complete quarterly smoking assessments (an evaluation used to determine a resident's ability to smoke safely) for four of 10 residents (Residents 4, 13, 31, and 71). 2. The facility failed to ensure safety when eight of 10 residents (Residents 4, 13, 26, 32, 71, 79, 82, and 104) were observed smoking unsupervised in a non-oxygen free facility. 3. The facility failed to provide safe storage of a lighter for five of 10 residents (Residents 13, 31, 71, 82, 96), who had a physician's order for supplemental oxygen (a medical treatment delivering additional oxygen to a patient that significantly increases both the risk and intensity of fires). 4. The facility failed to ensure safety measures were followed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure and follow facility policy and procedure for providing a log for signing out for one of four residents (Resident 4), for overnight pass. This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised resident (Resident 4 ' s overall health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' Face Sheet (general demographics) on April 2, 2025, the document indicated Resident 4 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Gout (a condition with form of pain and swelling in the joints), hypertension (a condition with a high blood pressure), contracture of muscle unspecified site (a condition where the muscle tissue becomes stiff and shortened and able to move) and history of falling (a fall in the past), major depressive disorder (a condition that causes sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (a condition of feeling of worry and fear), and responsible party as Resident 4 ' s son, [Name of responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to established food safety and sanitation standards when: 1. A container of parsley flakes was past the best buy date. 2. Two unopened bags of bread were past the best buy date. 3. Food debris was found on the floor under the stove and under the large food mixer. 4. A scoop was on top of grains and cereals container. 5. Wet trays that were stacked together and not air dried. These had the potential to place susceptible residents who receives food from Dietary Services at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation of the kitchen and interview, on 3/3/25, at 8:39 a.m., with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), a container of parsley flakes was found on the spice rack with past best buy date of 02/23/2025. DSS confirmed that the container of parsley flakes was past the best buy date and should be discarded. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/7/25 at 11:10 a.m., with the DSS, Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse, and Administrator, the undated facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was not overflowing and dumpster's lids were completely closed. This failure had the potential to attract pests (like flies and rodents) and spread diseases and infection to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/25, 3:25 p.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), two dumpsters located at the side of the facility across the parking lot were observed with the lid not completely closed and not covering the dumpsters. Multiple bags of trash created an overflow on the dumpster's lid. Maintenance Supervisor stated the trash should not be overflowing, and lids should be closed completely. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/7/25, at 11:10 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse, and Administrator, the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, the policy indicated, .6. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup service will be kept closed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information concerning the right to formulate an Advance Directive (a written document specifying an individual's medical care wishes) for nine of 10 sampled residents (Residents 4, 13, 15, 16, 18, 34, 35, 49, and 55). This failure had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 3/5/25, indicated Resident 4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 4's POLST, (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment - a form that documents an individual's preferences for end-of-life care), dated 10/24/24, indicated Resident 4 did not have an Advance Directive. A review of Resident 4's Advance Directive Acknowledgement form, dated 1/24/25, indicated Resident 4 understood that he was not required to have an Advance Directive to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Bed-Hold (the process of holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is in the acute care hospital) Notification to one of three closed sampled residents (Resident 45) at the time of Resident 45's transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 and/or the resident's responsible party to be unaware of their rights to return to the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 3/6/25, indicated Resident 45 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 45's Progress Notes, dated 2/5/25, indicated the staff was unable to obtain the resident's oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen circulating in the blood) level. The staff then administered 10 liters of oxygen via a non-rebreather mask (an oxygen mask that delivers high concentrations of oxygen) to Resident 45. The document indicated Resident 45's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessments for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 104 and 204). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the care planning process to meet Resident 104 and Resident 204's comprehensive and individualized care needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 104's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 3/5/25, indicated Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/7/25 at 10:30 a.m. with MDSNA, (Minimum Data Set Nurse Assistant) Resident 104's MDS record was reviewed. The MDSNA reviewed the MDS Section A - Identification Information, dated 2/21/25, and verified Resident 104's most recent admission or entry to the facility was on 2/21/25. Review of the MDS Section Z - Assessment Administration, dated 2/21/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the individualized care plans (the plans showing specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) were developed for two of 20 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 70 did not have the care plans developed for the use of divalproex (a medication that affects mood, behavior, or thought processes) and quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat conditions where someone experiences hallucinations, delusions, or disorganized thinking). 2. Resident 104 did not have the care plan developed for the active medical diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition where a person experiences both schizophrenia [a condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave] and a mood disorder [a condition that impacts a person's emotional state]) These failures created the risk of inadequately monitoring the residents which can lead to serious adverse consequences and reduced resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the appropriate respiratory care was provided to two of two final sampled residents (Residents 51 and 67) when: 1. The facility failed to follow the physician's order for oxygen administration for Resident 51. 2. The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration for Resident 67. This failure had the potential for respiratory complications related to inadequate oxygen administration for Residents 51 and 67. Findings: 1. During a facility tour on 3/3/25 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 51 was observed in room with nasal cannula cannula (NC - a small, flexible tube with two prongs, used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient through their nostrils) using oxygen concentrator at the rate of 1 LPM (Liters Per Minute - a unit that express flow rate). In addition, a sign oxygen in use was also observed outside Resident 51's door. During an interview on 3/3/25 10:10 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), LVN 3 confirmed Resident 51 was using an oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care for one of one sampled residents (Resident 204). The facility failed to ensure Resident 204's Sevelamer (a medication used to control high blood levels of phosphorus in people with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis) was administered as ordered by the physician on the days the resident left the facility for dialysis (also known as hemodialysis; a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). This had the potential for Resident 204 not getting the appropriate doses of medications as ordered, resulting in health complications. Findings: A review of Resident 204's admission Record, dated 3/5/25, indicated Resident 204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 204's History and Physical Examination, dated 2/21/25, indicated Resident 204 had a diagnosis of ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease, a severe and irreversible condition where the kidneys…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nutritional and dietary needs were met when the Registered Dietitian (RD) failed to review the quarterly assessment. This had the potential for nutritional and dietary needs to remain unmet for one of six sampled residents (Resident 18). Findings: During an interview on 3/3/25 at 11:28 a.m. with Resident 18, Resident 18 stated she had episodes of weight fluctuations due to her advanced age. Resident 18 further stated she received Lasix (a medication that helps reduce fluid buildup in the body) for fluid retention. During a record review on 3/5/25 at 8:31 a.m. of Resident 18's profile on the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), the profile indicated Resident 18 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute (sudden) kidney failure, morbid obesity among others. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/7/25 at 9:05 a.m., with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), Resident 18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to obtain initial screening for rehabilitative services for one of 20 sampled residents, (Resident 455) upon admission. This failure had the potential to result in a decrease in resident's range of motion (the extent and degree of movement a joint or series of joints can achieve) mobility and muscle strength. Findings: During a review of Resident 455's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information), dated 3/5/25, indicated, Resident 455 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 455's History and Physical Examination, (H&P) dated 1/29/25, indicated, Resident 455 had a past medical history of Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), (commonly known as stroke, occur when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to brain damage), Hemiplegia ( a condition characterized by paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body). H&P indicated Resident 455 has the capacity to make needs known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention measures when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not perform proper hand hygiene (the process of cleaning one's hands to remove dirt, germs, and microorganisms with soap and water or an alcohol based foam or gel) during medication administration for Residents 48, 58, and 59. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to perform hand hygiene and don (put on) gloves and an isolation gown before entering Resident 355 room, who was on Contact Isolation Precautions (a set of precautions used to stop the spread of germs from a patient to others). 3. Two sharps containers (used for safe disposal of used needles and syringes) were observed filled past the full line indicator (a line marker indicating the container needs to be replaced) for two of three sampled medication carts (Carts 2 & 3). This had the potential risk for infections related to needlestick injuries (injuries caused by punctures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for all four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During the review of Resident 1's admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain is not working properly because of imbalance in the body's chemicals). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1's, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its food-related garbage disposal policy when two outdoor dumpsters were left open. This failure had the potential to attract vermin (pest or animals that spread diseases) which could pose a significant health risk to the 100 clinically compromised residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on November 23, 2024, at 1:20 p.m., with Director of Staff Developer (DSD) 1, I brought her to the garbage disposal area outside the facility and showed her that two of the dumpsters were open. During an interview on November 25, 2024, at 3:54 p.m., with Administrator (ADM) 1, I informed ADM 1 that during my inspection of the dumpsters on November 23, 2024, I discovered that two of the dumpsters was left uncovered. I mentioned to ADM 1 that it should be closed at all times with tight fitting lids if it is not in continuous use, in accordance with facility policy. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Related Garbage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy when a staff did not notify the responsible party of blisters observed on the right hand of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) and document in the medical record. This had the potential to exclude the family and responsible party of (Resident 1) to actively participate in the plan of care related to the resident's change of condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (general demographics) on August 28, 2024, the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Alzheimer ' s (a brain condition that slowly destroys memory), dementia (a condition of loss of memory and thinking caused by brain damage of blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet indicated, Responsible Party, Wife [Name of wife] with phone number provided. During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical Examination (H&P), the H&P dated July 16, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The call lights are answered in a timely manner for two of three residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). This failure placed two clinically compromised Residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) health and psychosocial (emotional) status at risk when their need for nursing care was not met timely. 2. Nursing staff monitor one of three residents (Resident 1) every shift for hydration after a change of condition. This failed practice had the potential for a delay in treatment and placed Resident 1 at risk for dehydration. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Multiple sclerosis (disease of the nervous system, which gradually makes a person weaker), paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body) and pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess and develop a plan of care with interventions to preventing and developing pressure ulcer for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure placed a clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1) health and safety at risk. When Resident 1 developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (shortness of breath), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (block airflow, difficult to breathe, congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well), end stage renal disease (kidney lose ability to function). During concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed and verified the following: 1. Wound Assessment Report October 03, 2023 . (Vascular access site, peripherally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments for pressure ulcers (bed sore) were completed for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff did not follow the facility policy and document that the physician ordered treatments were completed daily for the month of July 2023. These failures contributed to the decline of Resident 1's pressure ulcers thereby affecting his physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Pressure ulcer (sustained pressure on an area of the body) of sacral region, Pressure ulcer of back, buttock, hip, stage 4 (deep wound that may impact tissue, ligament and bone), and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body.) During an observation and interview with Resident 1on August 18, 2023, at 1:37 PM, Resident 1 stated, They let me get a bunch of bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not maintain professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There was five shelves that had a rust colored substance on the reach-in refrigerator, and four shelves with rust colored substance in the walk-in refrigerator, this had the potential for the rust colored substance to be transferred to the foods stored on the shelves. 2. There was a personal item stored in the food prep area, this had the potential to contaminate food during food prep. 3. The large ice machine had black smudges on the top ceiling of the ice bin. This had the potential to contaminate the ice. These failures to ensure a safe and sanitary kitchen resulted in the increased risk of resident harm from food borne illness to a population of 90 immuno-compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), on August 1, 2022, at 8:24 AM, the reach-in refrigerator was observed to have five shelves with a rust colored substance and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not maintain equipment in safe operating conditions when: 1. The reach-in refrigerator was leaking, and this had the potential to contaminate food and effect the proper functioning of the refrigerator. 2. The walk-in refrigerator was leaking and had ice buildup on a pipe, this had the potential to affect the proper functioning of the refrigerator 3. The freezer had ice chunks on the pipe, which had the potential to affect the proper functioning of the freezer. These failures to maintain equipment had the potential to place the health of the # residents who received food from the kitchen at risk since refrigeration units in disrepair may no longer be capable of properly cooling or holding time/temperature control for safety foods at safe temperatures. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on August 1, 2022, at 9:25 AM, with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the reach-in refrigerator near the handwashing sink, was very wet inside and was leaking water from the pipe connected to the fan.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services for a universe of 95 residents when: 1. For Resident 54, the facility could not demonstrate controlled substance accountability for liquid Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) controlled substances (highly regulated drugs due to potential for abuse or misuse). This occurred when the quantity dispensed by the Pharmacy did not match the starting amount indicated on the resident's controlled substance record (narcotic count sheet). This failure had the potential to result in drug diversion (illegal use of narcotics) and/or inadequate controlled substances accountability. 2. For one of six medication pass observation residents (Resident 491), insulin (drug to lower blood sugar levels) Apidra (mealtime insulin) was not administered in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective drug treatment and/or suboptimal clinical outcomes. 3. The intravenous (IV - into the resident's vein) Emergency Kit (E-Kit) was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not follow their daily menu for lunch when, on August 1, 2022, at 12:04 PM, three residents on renal diets (a diet low in sodium, phosphorus, and protein for people with kidney disease) received two ounces of protein instead of three ounces. This failure had the potential to affect the nutritional status of the three residents on a renal diet. Findings: During concurrent observation and interview on August 1, 2022, at 12:25 PM, in the kitchen during tray-line (when the cook serves the food onto each resident's plate) [NAME] 1 placed five meatballs on the plate for the residents on renal diets. [NAME] 1 weighed the five meatballs and stated that the scale read two ounces. During an interview with the DSS, on August 1, 2022, at 12:40 PM, when asked how many meatballs it takes to weigh three ounces, she stated, the meatballs come in different sizes, so they would need to be weighed to ensure that the correct portion is served. During a review of the Cooks Spreadsheet, dated 8/1/2022, indicated that the renal diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe infection prevention and control program when: 1. Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1) did not wash her hands with soap and water after performing wound care for Resident 141 who was on contact isolation precautions (to prevent transmission of infectious agents that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment. Contact Precautions require the use of a gown and gloves on every entry into a resident's room) for an infection with Clostridium difficile (C. diff-a bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis-an inflammation of the colon). 2. A laundry staff (LS 1) did not follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the disinfectant used to disinfect the dirty linen carts and barrels. 3. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 4) did not observe hand hygiene after touching and disposing soiled linens. 4. For Resident 491, during medication pass observation, the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) did not perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 12) was treated with respect and dignity when the resident, who was unable to feed himself, was stood over by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) while assisting Resident 12 to eat. This failure had the potential to cause the resident to feel humiliated having to look up at CNA 1 while having food spooned into his mouth and placed him at risk for aspiration. Findings: A review of Resident 12's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memories and thinking skills). During an observation and interview with Resident 12 and CNA 1 on August 1, 2022, at 12:16 PM, Resident 12 was seated in a wheelchair in the dining room and positioned at a dining table. No other residents were seated at the table. A food tray was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discuss and provide information on advanced directives for two of two sampled residents (Residents 85 and 88). This failure had the potential to cause Residents 85 and 88's values and desires related to end-of-life care not to be carried out. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 85's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated a re-admission date of July 2, 2022, with a diagnosis of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from unspecified intracranial artery (bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain, not caused by trauma). A review of Resident 85's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated April 12, 2022, was conducted. Under section D: Information and Signatures, the area where the POLST and advanced directives were supposed to be discussed was blank. The Section Additional Contact, was blank. The POLST indicated Resident 85's nephew had signed the document. During an interview with Resident 85 on August 1, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Resident 85 stated he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of one resident (Resident 83) when Resident 83 refused nail grooming. This failure had the potential to miss opportunities to identify alternatives and consequences of refusing care that can negatively impact Resident 83. Findings: During an observation on August 1, 2022, at 11:21 AM, Resident 83 was observed in bed, noted with long and dirty nails on the left index, middle and ring finger, and a long, dirty nail on the right thumb. During a concurrent interview and record review, with the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment tool) Coordinator (staff responsible for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing home), on August 3, 2022, at 10:45 AM, Resident 83's face sheet (a document that contains resident demographics and diagnoses) indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. The MDS Coordinator stated that nail grooming was part of personal hygiene they assess to see if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and service to promote healing of pressure ulcers was provided for one of three residents observed (Resident 293) when Resident 293's left and right heels were not floated (legs elevated on pillow to keep heels from touching the bed), to relieve pressure as indicated in the care plan. This failure had the potential to lead to worsening of the wounds and delay wound healing which would further compromise the health and welfare of Resident 293. FINDINGS: During a wound treatment observation on August 2, 2022, at 11:42 AM, in Resident 293's room with Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1), Resident 293 was lying in bed on his back. Resident 293's left and right heel pressure ulcers with dressings, were resting directly on his mattress, and not floated to relieve pressure. During the dressing change, the old dressing to the right heel had blood and was stuck to the wound as TN 1 tried to remove the dressing. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to ensure all residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents when, one of two residents (Resident 23) was reviewed for falls. The facility failed to implement the interventions of placing the Resident 23's bed in its lowest position and did not provide a fall mat. These failures had the potential for further falls, serious injuries, and even death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on August 2, 2022, at 3:00 PM, in Resident 23's room, Resident 23 was sitting upright in bed and leaning towards his left side. Resident 23's bed was not placed in the low position and there was no fall mat noted on the floor. Resident 23 stated he had a fall recently but could not remember the exact date. Resident 23 further stated his bed was not always in the lowest position. During a record review of facility's Interdisciplinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was assessed and managed before, during and after wound care, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 141). This failure caused Resident 141 to suffer pain at a level that was unacceptable to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 141's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. A review of Resident 141's Care Plan titled, Surgical Incision/Wound mid [middle] lower abdomen, dated July 30, 2022, indicated, Intervention: Administer pain medication prior to initiating treatment. A review of Resident 141's Care Plan titled, Pressure Ulcer [a wound caused by pressure]: Sacrum [a triangular bone in the lower back formed from fused vertebrae and situated between the two hipbones of the pelvis] (DTI) [Deep Tissue Injury], dated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately labeled in accordance with standards of practice and/or policy when: For Resident 43,70, and 295, four insulin (drug used to lower blood sugar) pens were observed stored opened and undated in the Medication Carts 2 & 3 as follows : a. For Resident 70, on Medication Cart 3, there was a lispro insulin pen was opened and undated. b. For Resident 295, on Medication Cart 2, there was an aspart insulin pen was opened and undated. c. For Resident 43, on Medication Cart 2, there were two glargine insulin pens opened and undated. These failures placed Residents 43, 70, and 295 at risk for receiving ineffective or outdated medications. Finding: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on August 1, 2022, at 12:02 PM, an inspection of Med Cart 3 was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse 6 (LVN 6). An insulin lispro pen for Resident 70 was stored opened and undated in the medication cart. LVN 6 acknowledged the opened and undated insulin lispro pen stored in the cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for dental services needed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 58) when they did not follow up on the status of eligibility for dentures for Resident 58 who was missing upper and lower teeth. This failure prevented Resident 58 from obtaining an identified need for dental services in a timely manner. Findings: During an observation on August 1, 2022, at 9:43 AM, Resident 58 was seen inside his room, observed with missing upper and lower teeth. Resident 58 stated he was interested in how he could get dentures. During a review of Resident 58's medical record on August 3, 2022, at 10:14 AM, Resident 58's face sheet (a document that contains resident demographics and diagnoses) indicated he was admitted [DATE]. Further record review indicated Resident 58 had his last dental consult on December 16, 2021. During an interview on August 3, 2022, at 11:15 AM, the dentist stated during his last visit on December 16, 2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration and coordination with contracted hospice services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) when there was no current hospice plan of care available in the facility and there was no schedule on when skilled nursing, hospice aide, social worker or spiritual counselor visits would be conducted. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 14 not to receive hospice services based on a comprehensive person-centered care plan. Findings: A review of Resident 14's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), undated, indicated an admission date of July 28, 2020, with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement). A review of Resident 14's facility care plan titled, Receiving Hospice Care from [name of hospice] for routine level of care with primary dx [diagnosis] of Parkinson's disease, dementia [a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices for dietary services when: 1) Plastic pitchers used for food service were not air dried and stored for use. 2) Bowls used for food service were found dirty and stacked for use. 3) The food preparation sink had no air gap and were plumed directly to the waste water system. This had the potential for waste water to enter and contaminate the food preparation sink. These failures had the potential to contaminate resident food sources that can cause foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming contaminated food or drink), in a vulnerable population of 90 out of 94 residents receiving dietary services, resulting in severe resident harm, and even death. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on March 9, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Fifteen out of 20 plastic pitchers were found to be clean and stacked wet for resident used for juice or water, observed with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), The DS stated all dishes and containers should be air…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and document in the clinical record for one of six sampled residents (Resident 39) when the pain medication order was changed. This failure resulted in Resident 39 not being aware of change of pain medication order which could result in inappropriate pain management. Finding: During a record review of Resident 39's face sheet (a document containing basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 39's physicians order dated February 25, 2020, indicated, Cut down hydro-codone (a type of pain medication) to 10/325 mg (milligram-a unit of measurement) every 8 hours as needed. During a review of Resident 39's progress notes for the month of February 2020, there is no documented evidence Resident 39 was notified about the change of pain medication order. During an interview with Resident 39 on March 12, 2020 at 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of 39 sampled residents (Resident 253) resident 253 medical records were secured to ensure confidentiality. This failure had the potential to allow unauthorized staff or visitors to access resident's confidential medical and personal information. Findings: During an observation on March 9, 2020, at 3:26 PM, at the nurse's station a computer was left opened and logged in to with Resident 253's general progress notes (a medical record where health care professionals record details to document a resident's clinical status) with Resident 253's name, date of birth and medical diagnoses. During a concurrent observation and interview with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), on March 9, 2020, at 3:31 PM, LVN 1 confirmed Resident 253's medical record with general progress notes name, date of birth , and medical diagnoses of Resident 253 was left opened and unattended. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on March 12, 2020, at 4:01 PM, the DON stated staff are expected to minimize or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- facility assessment tool) assessment was completed according to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) timeframes, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for inadequate monitoring of Resident 1's progress and lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects the urinary system with painful and burning urination), generalized muscle weakness and hypothyroidism (low level of thyroid hormone level in the body). During a concurrent interview and record review with the MDS Nurse on March 13, 2020, at 10:15 AM, reviewed Resident 1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS Nurse confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly comprehensive assessment was completed and submitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) timeframes, for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for inadequate monitoring of Resident 1's progress and lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects the urinary system with painful and burning urination), generalized muscle weakness and hypothyroidism (low level of thyroid hormone level in the body). During a review of facility's undated untitled document indicated, Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a facility assessment tool) assessment with a current target date of December 18, 2019, was completed late. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set [MDS- a facility assessment tool that consists of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) and the care area assessment (CAA)] assessment was conducted and submitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within set timeframes, for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for inadequate monitoring of Resident 1's progress and lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects the urinary system with painful and burning urination), generalized muscle weakness and hypothyroidism (low level of thyroid hormone level in the body). During a concurrent interview and record review with the MDS Nurse on March 13, 2020, at 10:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS- facility assessment tool) assessments for one of three residents (Resident 52) when Resident 52's MDS assessment indicated resident had anticoagulants (blood thinners) for seven days. This failed practice had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 52, which can potentially jeopardize health and safety of Resident 52. Findings: During an observation and interview, on March 9, 2020, at 8:30 AM, in Resident 52's room Resident 52 was sitting in her bed watching TV. Resident 52 was alert, oriented and was able to communicate her needs. Resident 52 stated she was not on any blood thinners. During a review of Resident 52's clinical record, Face Sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 52 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body from any disease or injury) and cerebral infarction (area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 8) physician's order were followed when: 1. Resident 8's physician order for Range of Motion (ROM-a type of exercise to keep the muscles active) was not carried out by nursing services and communicated to Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA 1- a member of the nursing department trained to provide ROM services to residents) 2. Resident 8's physician's order to monitor oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen in the blood) every shift was not being done. This failure had the potential to result in the delay of therapy treatment, and to adversely affect the health and safety of Resident 8. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 8's face sheet (a document which contains basic information about the resident), indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 8's physician order dated March 6, 2020, indicated, Please do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff perform a calibration (to check accuracy) test of the glucometer (device used to check blood sugar) when it malfunctioned during use for one of three sampled residents (Resident 100). This failure had the potential for licensed staff to obtain inaccurate blood sugar readings for Resident 100. Findings: During an observation on March 11, 2020, at 5:20 AM, the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 5) performed a blood sugar check for resident 100, the glucometer did not give a reading. LVN 5 did not calibrate the glucometer after it malfunctioned. LVN 5 continued to check the blood sugar again without recalibration of the glucometer and it did not give a blood sugar reading. During an interview on March 11, 2020, at 6:05 AM, LVN 5 confirmed she did not recalibrate the glucometer after it malfunctioned. LVN 5 stated she never had training for use of the glucometer. During an interview on March 11, 2020, at 6:25 AM, with the LVN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication Remeron (a medication used to treat depression) was available for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 69) when the medication was not available for use. This failure had the potential for Resident 69 not to receive the medication as ordered by the physician. Finding: During a record review of Resident 69's Face sheet (a document with basic information about the resident), indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (depression). During a review of Resident 69's physician order dated November 21, 2019, indicated, Remeron (a medication used to treat depression) 30 mg (milligram-a unit of measurement) tablet take one tablet by mouth every night for depression manifested by poor intake. During a review of Resident 69's medications in the back hall medication cart on March 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), the medication Remeron…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for medication administration when: 1. For Resident 8, nursing staff did not document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR-a record used to document the administration of medications) pain medication was given. 2. For Resident 4 and 33, nursing staff did not document on the MAR the amount of units of insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) was given per thesliding scale (the amount of insulin given based on the blood sugar results) order from the physician. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation of medication administration which put Residents 8, 4, and 33's health and safety at risk. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 8's face sheet (a document which contains basic information), indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 8's physician order dated August 8, 2016, indicated, Norco…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,151 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $37,151 — penalty dated 2025-03-07
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-05 for 17 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COTTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 05/20/2016
HELEN LOUISE LARSON REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 10/23/2019
THE LARSON FAMILY TRUST OF 2010Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 11/19/2013
ARMSTRONG, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 07/01/1992
ARMSTRONG, LAURAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 07/01/1992
GOINGS, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER16%since 01/01/2002
GOINGS, PATRICIAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 07/01/1992
GOINGS, VERNAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 07/01/1992
STEEGE, BRADLEYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/26/2015
KILIAN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/08/1998

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 7%Other / private 81%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,441per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next