Stanley Healthcare Center
14102 Springdale Street, Westminster, CA 92683 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 30 certified beds · (714) 893-0026 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 44.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 26.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, facility document review, and the California Code of Regulations review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was onsite during the evening and night shift, who could provide the respiratory services to the residents, in accordance with the residents' plan of care. * For the past year, on the evening and night shift, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was on site at the facility, who could provide respiratory services to the residents with oxygen titration orders. These failures had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for the residents. Findings: Review of the California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Section 1399.365, showed the respiratory care services the LVNs may perform in the long-term care setting. The respiratory services LVNs may not perform included the initial setup, change out, or replacement of a breathing circuit or adjustment of the oxygen liter flow or oxygen concentration. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen for 27 of 27 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware and kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * Unlabeled and undated white powder was observed stored inside a plastic measuring cup on the countertop shelf. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses to the residents consuming the food prepared in the facility's kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 4/7/26, showed 27 of 27 residents consumed the food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program in accordance with the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program for the months of May 2025 through February 2026. The facility conducted surveillance of the resident's infections only when the residents were prescribed antimicrobial medications and/or if the residents were diagnosed with an infection. The facility failed to determine whether the residents who exhibited the signs and symptoms of infection and were not prescribed antimicrobial medications met the facility's criteria for infection (utilizing McGeer's Criteria). The facility failed to include these residents in the facility's infection control surveillance program. * The facility failed to ensure the clean laundry sorting table remained free from the staff's personal items. The laundry staff's purse and jacket were observed lying on the clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained for the use of the bilateral side rails and psychotropic medications for one of five final sampled residents (Residents 6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to obtain an informed consent for Resident 6's use of the lorazepam (medication to treat anxiety), buspirone (medication to treat anxiety), and bilateral side rail use. In addition, the facility failed to update the informed consent for citalopram (medication to treat depression) when the medication was increased for Resident 6. These failures had the potential for Resident 6 to be unaware of the risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications and bilateral side rails which could negatively affect the resident's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use revised 7/2023 showed anytime new orders are received that results in a material…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Residents 3) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 3's orthostatic (a sudden drop in blood pressure upon standing, defined as a reduction of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg systolic or 10 mmHg diastolic within three minutes of standing which may cause dizziness, lightheadedness, and fainting) blood pressure related to the use of the quetiapine (antipsychotic medication). In addition, the facility failed to document what nonpharmacological interventions were attempted when Resident 3 had episodes of bizarre delusions related to the use of the quetiapine medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to have adverse complications from the medication and to not provide accurate data to the prescriber in determining the dose adjustments of the psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASRR Level 1 Screening (identifies if a resident has a suspected mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability or related condition) contained accurate information specific to mental illness, for one of two residents (Resident 4) reviewed for PASRR. *Resident 4 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder; however, the PASRR Level 1 Screening showed Resident 4 had no diagnosed mental illness. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 not to receive a PASRR Level II Mental Health Evaluation (determines if the resident can benefit from specialized mental health services), which posed the risk for Resident 4 not obtaining recommendations for specialized services to address the resident's mental health needs.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's PASRR Level 1 Screening results dated 1/13/25, showed Resident 4 had no diagnosed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of 13 final sampled residents (Resident 8) attained and maintained their highest practicable physical well-being. * The facility failed to apply the foot cradle for Resident 8 in accordance with the physician's order. This failure had the potential for delays in providing the necessary care and services for Resident 8.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 8's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 7/13/24, for may have foot cradle in bed to prevent skin breakdown. Review of Resident 8's H&P examination dated 6/15/25, showed the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 4/6/26 at 0838 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 8 was observed awake, lying in the bed. Further observation of Resident 8's room failed to show a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate dialysis (a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that filters waste and excess fluids from the blood) care was provided for one of 13 final sampled residents (Residents 8) who was receiving dialysis services. * The facility failed to ensure a dialysis emergency kit was available at the bedside for Resident 8. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience medical complications.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 8's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 7/13/24, to check the dialysis site for bleeding and signs or symptoms of infection every shift. Review of Resident 8's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 7/13/24, for left arm AV shunt (a direct connection between an artery and a vein, often surgically created in the arm for hemodialysis)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of four final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 6) reviewed for the use of side rails remained free from the accident hazards associated with the use of the elevated side rails. * The facility failed to ensure the side rails assessment was accurate or completed, and/or the least restrictive measures were provided prior to the use of the side rails for Residents 2 and 6. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Proper Use of Side Rails revised 12/2016 showed the purpose of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptom. When side rails usage is appropriate, the facility will assess the space between the mattress and siderails to reduce the risks for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the required physician visits were done timely for one of 13 final sampled residents (Resident 15). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 15 was visited by the physician every 60 days. This failure had the potential to result in an undetected decline in medical, health, or psychosocial condition and can lead to a delay in the necessary care, treatment, and services.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Visits revised 4/2013 showed the attending physician must visit his/her patients at least once every thirty (30) days for the first ninety (90) days following the resident's admission, and then at least every sixty (60) days thereafter. After the first ninety (90) days, if the attending physician determines that a resident need not be seen by him/her every thirty (30) days, an alternate schedule of visits maybe established, but not to exceed every sixty (60) days. A physician assistant or nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the availability of the prescribed medications for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * Resident 5 had a physician's order for Cobenfy (psychotherapeutic medication). The licensed nurse was unable to administer the evening dose of Cobenfy on two consecutive days, due to the unavailability of the medication. This failure posed the risk for inhibiting the therapeutic effects of the medication.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with the prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 2/20/26, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to follow up the MRR recommendation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to implement the pharmacy recommendations approved by physician to change the ibandronate (medication to prevent bone weakening) administration time for Resident 6. This failure placed Resident 6 at an increased risk for developing preventable adverse effects of the medication. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's H&P examination dated 10/26/25, showed the resident had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 6 's Order Summary Report showed the following physician order dated 10/26/25, may administer ibandronate 150 mg one tablet once a month on every 28th day of the month, give with eight ounces of water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 8%. One of three licensed nurses (LVN 2) was found to have made errors during the medication administration to one final sampled resident (Resident 4). * LVN 2 failed to administer the cholecalciferol (supplement) and fluticasone (medication to treat allergies) medications as ordered for Resident 4 due to the unavailability of the medications. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health conditions and posed the risk of possible complications or delays in interventions. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised April 2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 1. On 4/7/26 at 0834 hours, a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage of medications for one of three medication carts (Medication Cart 1) inspected. * The facility failed to ensure the treatment supplies were stored properly. This failure had the potential to alter the efficacy of the stored treatment supplies and pose the risk of infection to the residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medication Labeling and Storage revised 2/2023 showed the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining the storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. On 4/6/25 at 1046 hours, an observation of Medication Cart A and concurrent interview was conducted with the DON. The following was observed:- one individual pack of sterile gauze bandage roll open with package's description showed it contained sterile in unopened, undamaged package.- three individual pack open Medi strip reinforced wound closure, with package's description showed it was a single use only dressing. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in one of one garbage dumpster. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents that carry diseases.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Miscellaneous Areas, Garbage and Trash dated 2023 showed the garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code, the outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. On 4/6/26 at 0740 hours, an observation of the facility's one outside garbage dumpster was conducted. The garbage dumpster was observed with the lid partially propped open by the garbage bags, preventing the lid from fully closing. On 4/6/26 at 1529 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS was shown a photograph of the dumpster taken on 4/6/26 at 0740 hours. The DSS verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurately documented for four of 13 final sampled residents (Residents 2, 6, 8, and 11). * The facility failed to ensure the safety assessment for siderails usage for Residents 2, 6, and 11 were accurate in accordance with the physician's orders. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 6's informed consent for buspirone (medication to treat anxiety), and citalopram (medication to treat depression) were maintained in the residents' medical record. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 8's blood pressure access site was accurately documented in the medical record. * The facility failed to ensure Section D of Resident 11's POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) was signed and dated by the physician. These failures have the potential for the residents care needs not being met as their medical information were inaccurate and incomplete.Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an employee working as a CNA (a healthcare professional who provides basic resident care and support) at the facility held a valid and up-to-date license and met competency evaluation requirements for training. This failure had the potential to result in an unlicensed CNA providing direct care to the residents without proper the certification and training, and placing the residents' safety at risk.Findings:On 1/28/26, CDPH, L&C Program was forwarded a complaint from the CNA Misconduct, which showed CNA 1 picked up an afternoon shift on 1/26/26, at the facility. However, the person who showed up and claimed to be CNA 1 was male. The complainant alleged CNA 1 stole a TV out of the utility closet and left the scheduled shift. Upon further investigation by the facility, showed CNA 1 was a female individual and the male individual who showed up for the afternoon shift was unlicensed and working under CNA 1's license. On 2/4/26 at 1021 hours, an interview and facility document was conducted with the DON.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services were provided for four of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 had an order to suction secretions. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's oxygen nasal cannula was stored in the bag according to the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's nebulizer administration set-up was changed every seven days according to the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4's CPAP washable filter, mask, nasal pillows and tubing were cleaned according to the manufacturer's guideline and facility P&P while the resident was in the facility. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' medical conditions. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Suctioning Upper Airway (Oral Pharyngeal Suctioning) revised on 10/2010 showed to verify there is a physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) had the physician's orders for the indwelling urinary catheter use, care, and maintenance. This failure had the potential for the resident to develop indwelling urinary catheter related infection and/or complications. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 5/15/25. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's physician orders failed to show any orders for the indwelling urinary catheter use, care, and maintenance. On 5/15/25 at 1510 hours, Resident 2 was observed lying in bed, with a urinary drainage bag hanging on the left side of the resident's bed. On 5/15/25 at 1511 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated Resident 2 had an indwelling urinary catheter, and catheter care should be done every shift and documented in the TAR. LVN 1 reviewed Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the microwave utilized to warm up the food was maintained in sanitary condition and free of food residue. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware and kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting board was kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses to the residents consuming the foods prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 3/3/25, showed 23 of 23 residents consumed the foods prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Sanitation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were followed and implemented as evidenced by: * Residents 2, 6, 9, 18, and 22's physicians were not notified when the residents' infections did not meet the McGeer's criteria. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 627 had contact isolation precautions in place due to the clostridium difficile infection. * The Infection & Control Surveillance Log of Infections for February 2025 was inaccurate. Resident 627's CAI infection was not included in the log. * The blood pressure wrist machine used for the residents did not have a cleanable surface (Velcro with cloth material). * The facility failed to ensure the hospice licensed staff practiced EBP when providing wound care treatment for Resident 20 who was on the EBP. * CNA 3 did not wear gown when provided dressing and hygiene to Resident 7 who was on the EBP. These failures posed the risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided met the professional standards of care when LVN 2 failed to properly obtain the blood pressure for one of three residents (final sampled resident, Resident 3) observed for medication administration. This failure had the potential for the residents requiring blood pressure checks to have inaccurate readings. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Blood Pressure, Measuring revised 2010 showed the steps in the Procedure section as follows: - To expose the resident's arm by rolling the sleeve up about five inches above the elbow. - To wrap the blood pressure cuff evenly around the upper arm, approximately one inch from the elbow. - When you locate the pulsation, place the diaphragm of the stethoscope firmly against the skin. Hold diaphragm in place with your hand. - With your free hand, pump air into the cuff by squeezing the bulb until you can no longer hear the pulsation. (Note: You must be watching the mercury level on the manometer while you are pumping the air in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 8) who had limited mobility and ROM functions received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ROM functions and prevent further decline in their ROM functions. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 to experience a decline in her physical abilities. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion revised July 2017 showed the residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in ROM. Residents with limited ROM will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. In addition, resident with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable. On 3/3/25 at 0856 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 8. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 3) reviewed for smoking remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3' smoking assessment was completed upon admission to the facility to determine if the resident was safe to smoke. This failure had the potential for the resident to sustain accidents and/or injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Smoking Policy revised July 2017 showed the residents who smoke must be assessed upon admission with a safe smoking assessment tool. On 3/3/25 at 1201 hours, an interview with was conducted with Resident 3 about his smoking privileges in the facility and how the facility staff had accommodated him. Resident 3 stated, they (the facility staff) take me out to the smoking area and wait with me while I smoke, there's an ashtray and they put the cover over me to keep me clean. On 3/3/25 at 1215 hours, an observation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 13 and 17) reviewed for oxygen therapy. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for Residents 13 and 17's oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the appropriate care and may negatively impact the residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 10/2010 showed to verify there is a physician's order for this procedure, review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. On 3/3/25 at 0907 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 13 was observed lying in bed and receiving oxygen at 5 liters per minute via nasal cannula which was attached to the oxygen machine concentrator . Medical record review for Resident 13 was initiated on 3/3/25. Resident 13 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of 12 final sampled residents reviewed for the side rail use (Residents 1, 12, 13, and 20) remained free from the accident hazards due to the use of side rails. * The facility failed to ensure the Facility Verification of Informed Consent for Resident 13 was accurately completed. The consent form had no physician's signature and date. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order was obtained for the use of the bilateral half side rails for Resident 13. * The facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated for the use of the bilateral half side rails for Resident 20. * The facility failed to provide the manufacturer's manual for Resident 12's bed to show compatibility for the bed's side rails. In addition, Resident 12's assessment for the use of the side rails was not completed. * Resident 1's assessment for the side rails to attempt the least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medications for one of three residents (final sampled resident, Resident 8) observed for medication administration when: * LVN 1 failed to assess Resident 8's bowel status prior to administering a laxative (promotes bowel movements) medication as per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health conditions that could posed the risk for possible complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised April 2019 showed the medications are administered in accordance with the prescriber orders. On 3/4/25 at 0816 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 8 was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 prepared and administered Resident 8's medications which included polyethylene glycol (laxative) powder 17 gm and Senna (laxative) 8.6 mg. LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant's identified drug recommendations were addressed for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 17). This failure posed the risk for the residents to have adverse consequences related to their medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Regimen Review revised 5/19 showed: - The goal of the MRR is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. - The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has ben reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. 1. Medical record review for Resident 17 was initiated on 3/5/25. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. a. Review of Resident 17's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/6/24, to administer Preparation H (temporarily relieve swelling, burning, pain, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 11.11%. Two of two licensed nurses (LVNs 1 and 2) observed during the medication administration were found to have made an errors. * LVN 1 failed to reconstitute the polyethylene glycol medication as per the physician's order for Resident 8. LVN 1 reconstituted the polyethylene glycol medication with five oz of water instead of eight oz of water per the physician's order. * LVN 2 failed to reconstitute the polyethylene glycol medication as per the physician's order for Resident 3. LVN 2 reconstituted the polyethylene glycol medication with five oz of water instead of eight oz of water per the physician's order. In addition, LVN 2 failed to administer Resident 3's vitamin B12 (supplement) medication as ordered. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health conditions and posed the risk for possible complications or delay in interventions. Findings: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of three final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 13) reviewed for hospice services received the necessary care and services. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice visit calendar was available in Resident 1's medical record and provide accurate documentation of the hospice staff visits for Resident 1. The facility also failed to ensure the care plan were updated and available in the resident's medical record. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice visit calendar was available in Resident 13's medical record. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated for the hospice services provided for Resident 13. These failures posed a risk of delayed communication and the provision of hospice care between the hospice provider and the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hospice Program dated 7/2017 showed the facility has designated the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI committee developed and implemented action plans to include monitoring the effectiveness of those plans in achieving and sustaining the improvement for a repeated deficient practice cited at F756. This was not in accordance with the facility's POC from the last recertification survey completed on 3/14/24. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care for all the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Quality Assurance and Performance Review dated 2/2020 showed the QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Key components of this process include: - Tracking and measuring performance; - Establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement; - Identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies; - Systematically analyzing underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies; - Developing and implementing corrective action or performance improvement activities; and - Monitoring or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the quality control record for February and March 2025 reflected on the glucometer with the serial number 1040-4333929. This failure had the potential for the residents requiring glucose checks to have inaccurate readings. Findings: On 3/4/25 at 1339 hours, a concurrent review of the Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Monitoring System: Quality Control Record for February and March 2025 and inspection of the glucometer with the serial number 1040-4333929 was conducted with LVN 1. The log showed the glucometer quality control was completed for February and March 2025. However, when the glucose quality control results documented on the log were compared to the glucometer device's saved results (memory), it showed the glucose quality control results documented for 2/1 through 2/4, 2/6, 2/8 through 2/13, 2/16 through 2/20, 2/23 through 2/27, and 3/3/25, were not observed on the glucometer device. For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurately completed for four of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 1, 12, 13, and 20). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents, resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and mattresses, under bed rails, between split rails, and between the bed rails and head or foot boards. The population most vulnerable to entrapment are elderly patients and residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen when: * Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods (food that require time and temperature controls to limit the growth of illness causing bacteria) were not accurately monitored to ensure proper cool down process was followed. * The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sink was used for handwashing only. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food in the refrigerator used for resident foods. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean and stored in sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils and equipment were kept in good repair. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment were air dried. * The facility failed to ensure the dented cans were removed. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness in a highly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented. * The facility failed to show documentation of Legionella testing protocols. * The facility failed to ensure the personal items and food were not stored in the laundry room with clean linens for the residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the laundry soap, fabric softener, and Clorox were stored properly and in clean condition in the laundry room. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 performed hand hygiene after assisting Resident 19 with lunch and doffing her gloves. * The facility failed to ensure the urinals, basins, and tubs stored in a shared bathroom shelf were labeled. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection to the vulnerable population of residents in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review the facility failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program when the facility failed to conduct an accurate assessment for the McGeer's criteria for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 3) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 6). This failure had the potential for inaccurately identifying for true infections and potentially inhibited the residents' physicians from discontinuing the unnecessary antibiotics. Findings: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Infection, an estimated 70% of nursing home residents receive one or more courses of antibiotics during a year. Studies have shown that 40% to 75% of the antibiotics prescribed in nursing homes may be unnecessary or inappropriate. Frail and older adults are at significant risk of harm from antibiotic overuse including increased adverse drug events, increased drug interactions and infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. The World Health Organization cites…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodation to meet the needs for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 130) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 25). * The facility failed to ensure the call lights for Residents 25 and 130 were within the resident's reach. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being or would result in delayed provision of care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call System, Resident dated 9/22 showed each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 3/11/24 at 0850 hours, Resident 25 was observed lying in bed. The call light was observed to be wrapped around the bed's side rail and on the floor. On 3/11/24 at 0900 hours, a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 25 was conducted with CNA 1 in Resident 25's room. Resident 25's call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary timely assistance with the execution of an advance directive for healthcare and failed to ensure the POLST and Advance directive acknowledgement form was obtained for two of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 12 and 18). * Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she informed the facility on 1/16/24, that she wished to execute an advance directive for health care. The facility attempted to contact the Ombudsman on 1/19/24, to schedule a time in which the Ombudsman could sign Resident 18's advance directive; however, the facility failed to follow up with the Ombudsman and Resident 18 had yet to formulate an advance directive. * The facility failed to ensure the POLST and Advance directive acknowledgement form were obtained from Resident 12's responsible party. These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options to not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to obtain the physician's order for the discharge to home as well as documentation of the physician's notification upon leaving the facility for one of two closed medical records reviewed (Resident 28). This failure had the potential to affect the health and safety of the resident during the transition of care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge Documentation last revised on 12/2016 showed the details of the transfer/discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information will be communicated to the provider. On 3/13/24 at 0956 hours, closed medical record review was conducted for Resident 28 and showed Resident 28 was admitted to the facility for respite care from 12/10/23 to 1/3/24, and discharged home on 1/3/24. However, there was no physician's order for the resident's discharge in the closed medical record. Further review of Resident 28's Discharge summary dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for two of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 16 and 19). * Resident 16 was evaluated to have blanchable redness to his left hip on 1/19/24. Resident 16 developed with DTI on the left hip on 2/11/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident 16's left hip was reassessed per the physician's order. The facility failed to provide the appropriate and necessary services to ensure Resident 16 did not develop a pressure ulcer in the facility. * The facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was consistent with Resident 19's weight. These failures had the potential for the residents to develop the pressure ulcers or worsening of existing pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries revised 1/2017 showed to evaluate, report and document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 22) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 8) remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 locked the wheelchair brakes during a transfer for Resident 22 on 1/23/24, resulting in Resident 22 falling to the ground. * The facility failed to ensure the tab alarm was in place as per the physician's order for Resident 8. These failures had the potential to not prevent further falls for these rresidents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing revised 3/2018 showed according to the MDS, a fall is defined as: Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. An episode where a resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for another person or if he or she had not caught him/herself, is considered a fall. A fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services related to GT for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 23). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 23's HOB was elevated during the enteral feeding to reduce the risk of aspiration. * The facility failed to ensure the licensed staff managed the GT feeding for Resident 23. RNA 1 was observed to turn off the GT feeding to assist with repositioning for Resident 23. These failures posed the risk for complications related to the use of GT for Resident 23. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feedings- Safety Precautions revised 11/2018 showed all personnel responsible for preparing, storing and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and competent in his or her responsibilities. Under the section preventing aspiration showed to elevate the HOB at least 30 degrees during tube feedings. Medical record review for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for four of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 16, and 18). * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for administering the oxygen at 2 LPM instead of 3.5 LPM for Resident 1. * The facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was stored and labeled properly for Resident 2. In addition, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the oxygen therapy for Resident 2. * The facility failed to ensure the oxygen nebulizer mask and tubing were stored properly and labeled for Resident 16. * Resident 18's nasal cannula was improperly stored. These failures posed the risk for the residents' safety and respiratory related complications including infection. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 10/2010 showed to verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; review the physician's orders or facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to monitor and accurately document Resident 2's fluid intake. * The facility failed to show evidence Resident 2's monthly weight was monitored and recorded. * The facility failed to update Resident 2's comprehensive plan of care to reflect the current dialysis access site. These failures had the potential to result in health complications for Resident 2. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident revised 9/2010 showed the residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be care for according to currently recognized standards of care. The resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to ESRD/dialysis care. Review of the facility's P&P titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids revised 10/2010 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 12) remained free from accident hazards related to the use of elevated side rails. * Resident 12 was observed with elevated side rails in place. The facility failed to review the risks and benefits of the side rails with Resident 12 and/or responsible party and failed to obtain the informed consent for the use of the side rails. * Resident 1 was observed in bed with the elevated side rails. However, there was no physician's order, care plan, and informed consent for the use of side rails. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Proper Use of Side Rails revised 12/2016 showed the consent for using restrictive devices will be obtained from the resident and legal representative per facility protocol. The consent for the side rail use will be obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P, the facility failed to ensure the pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to administer Sevelamer Carbonate (medication to treat too much phospate in the blood in residents with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis) with meals as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to monitor and document the blood pressure prior to administration of Midodrine (medication to increase blood pressure) as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019, showed medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 3/11/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant's recommendations were acted upon for one of 14 final sampled (Resident 10). This failure had the potential for the resident not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 3/11/24. Resident 10 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's Physician Orders for 3/2024, showed a physician's order dated 1/19/24, to administer metoprolol tartrate 25 mg tablet PO (by mouth/orally) two times a day for hypertension (high blood pressure); and to hold if the heart rate less than 60 beats per minute or systolic blood pressure greater than 110 mmHg. Review of the facility document titled Medication Regimen Review Report dated 1/2024 showed a medication review completed by the Pharmacist Consultant for Resident 10. The recommendation showed for metoprolol tartrate (blood pressure medication) to be given with food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 12) was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activity). * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained from Resident 12's responsible party for the use of Remeron (an antidepressant drug which can be taken as an appetite stimulant). This failure posed the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2022 showed the residents (and/or representatives) have the right to decline treatment with psychotropic medications. The staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternative. Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 3/11/24. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper storage of medications in the Medication Cart. The facility failed to ensure treatment supplies were not expired in the Treatment Cart. The Facility failed to ensure the expired hand sanitizer bottles were discarded. * Discontinued prednisone (steroid) tablets were observed in the Medication Cart. * The facility failed to ensure a container of germicidal alcohol wipes was stored separately from the residents' medications. * An unlabeled and unpackaged vial of ipratropium and albuterol (combination medication that relaxes muscles in the airways and increase air flow to the lungs) inhalation solution was observed lying in the Medication Cart. * Within the Medication Cart, two 30-ounce bottles of wild cherry Pro-Stat (protein supplement) and one 16-ounce bottle of Milk of Magnesia (laxative & antacid) were observed with an unknown substance accumulated on the outside of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine was administered to one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure put Resident 17 at risk for pneumonia. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pneumococcal Vaccine revised 10/2019 showed all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine. Provisions of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per the facility's physician-approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol. Medical record review for Resident 17 was initiated on 3/14/24. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operation condition when the ice machine manufacturer cleaning and sanitizing instructions were not followed. This failure had the potential to result in the equipment to not function in the way it was intended which could affect the health status of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility P&P titled Sanitization revised 12/08 showed ice machines and ice storage containers will be drained, cleaned, and sanitized per manufacturer's instructions and facility policy. Review of the ice machine instruction manual titled Automatic Ice Maker undated, under the section for Cleaning and Maintenance, showed the ice machine must be cleaned by use of a water jet; for interior cleaning, the ice storage bin should be sanitized occasionally by wiping down the interior with a sanitizing solution made of 28 grams (g) of household bleach or chlorine and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-04-09 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing PPD was posted with an accurate information. * The facility failed to update the daily nursing PPD with the correct date, staffing data, and census. This failure had the potential for the residents and visitors to not be informed about the facility's staffing.Findings: On 4/7/26 at 0940 hours, an observation was conducted of the daily nursing PPD posting. Review of the facility's daily nursing PPD showed a date of 3/31/26. Review of the facility's daily nursing PPD posted on the wall near the business office, failed to show the correct date, census, and staffing data. On 4/7/26 at 1005 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated the NOC or morning shift charge nurses were the staff responsible for removing the old projection and replacing it with their new projection each day. The DSD stated the daily nursing PPD posting was important due to having admissions and discharges often, and to ensure they were not over or understaffed. The DSD acknowledged and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-29 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide written information to the residents about a bed-hold information upon the resident transferring to an acute care hospital for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). These failures had the potential for the residents not receiving accurate information to determine if they wanted a bed-hold and to return to the facility. Findings: Review of the facility'sP&P titled Bed-Holds and Returns revised March 2017 showed prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and their representative that explains in detail the residents' rights and limitations regarding bed-holds, the reserve bed payment policy, and the per diem rate to hold a bed beyond the state's bed-hold period. Review of the facility's Bedhold Notification Upon Transfer form showed the form was to be completed upon transfer and to provide a copy to the resident or their responsible party. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-16 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual and discharge return- anticipated MDS assessments were completed within 14 calendar days after the ARD for the annual and discharge return anticipated assessments for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential of not identifying each resident's preferences and goals of care, functional and health status, strengths and needs, as well as offering guidance for further assessments when the health problems had been identified. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/16/25. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Annual MDS assessment showed had an ARD of 4/25/25. The Annual MDS showed the status of the assessment was in progress and to be completed by 5/9/25 (seven days overdue), 21 days after the ARD of 4/25/25. Review of Resident 1's Discharge Return-Anticipated MDS had an ARD of 4/29/25. The Discharge Return-Anticipated MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately maintained for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). * Resident 2's physician's order for wound care did not include the location of the wound. This failure had the potential for not providing necessary care and services due to incomplete medical records. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 5/15/25. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Skin and Wound Evaluation V7.0 dated 5/15/25, showed the resident had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the medial sacrum (bone at the base of the spine). Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 5/15/25, to cleanse the Stage 3 pressure ulcer and surrounding DTI with normal saline, apply Betadine (an antiseptic solution) to the surrounding DTI tissue, and MediHoney (a wound care paste) to the Stage 3 wound, and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of the diseases and infections for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility staff failed to ensure the EBP was maintained for Resident 2 with an indwelling urinary catheter during incontinence care. This failure had the potential to spread infectious organisms to the other residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility P&P titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated August 2022 showed EBPs are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms to residents. Gloves and gowns are to be used while performing high contact resident care activities, including when performing resident hygiene and changing briefs. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 5/15/25. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 5/15/25 at 1408 hours, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the POLST was updated and the copy of advance directive form was obtained for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the resident's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment not being honored. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 3/3/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's POLST dated 8/2/24, showed the resident had no advance directive. Review of Resident 1's Advance Directive Acknowledgement form dated 8/5/24, showed the resident's family had executed an advance directive. However, review of Resident 1's medical record failed to show the copy of the resident's advance directive. On 3/4/24 at 1000 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 1 and the Social Services/Activities Director. When asked if Resident 1's family would like to execute an advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-03-06 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or their representative of the transfer and reason for the transfer in writing and send a copy of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the LTC Ombudsman for two of three closed record sampled residents (Residents 21 and 26). These failures posed the risk for the resident and/or their representative of not knowing about the appeal process and posed the risk of the LTC Ombudsman not being aware of the circumstances of the residents' transfer/discharge should an appeal be filed or requested by the resident or their representatives regarding the transfer. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer and Discharge revised 12/2016 showed the facility will provide written notices for emergency transfers to the resident or resident's representative and the Ombudsman. These may be sent when practicable but need to be sent before transfer or discharge. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS for discharge was completed and transmitted for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 12). This failure had the potential for not having current information in the resident's medical record. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 3/5/25. Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 12's progress note dated 10/15/24, showed Resident 12 was transferred and admitted to the acute care hospital. Review of Resident 12's admission Record dated 2/9/24, showed Resident 12's most recent acute care hospital stay was between 10/14 to 10/18/24. Review of Resident 12's list of transmitted MDS assessment failed to show the MDS was completed to reflect Resident 12's October 2024 discharge from the facility. On 3/4/25 at 1359 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator was informed and verified the above findings.
- No harm found · B2025-03-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to accurately code the MDS related to RNA services for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure posed a risk of the resident not receiving an individualized care plan tailored to their specific needs. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 3/3/24. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] and 2/5/25, showed Section O for Restorative Nursing Program (range of motion - passive and active) was left blank. Review of Resident 10's Order Summary Report dated 3/4/25, showed the following physician's orders dated 9/4/24, for RNA: - The resident may wear a left knee orthosis and bilateral PRAFO for up to six hours, five times per week, for 90 days, as tolerated. Re-evaluation was scheduled for 11/21/24. - The resident may wear bilateral PRAFO on both ankles daily, five times per week, for up to six hours, as tolerated, for 90 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was revised after Resident 1 had reported an abuse allegation against CNA 1. This failure put Resident 1 at risk of not receiving resident-centered care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 12/2016 showed the care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The P&P showed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include the following: a. measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; g. incorporates identified problem areas; h. incorporates risk factors associated with identified problems; k. reflects treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS discharge assessment was completed for one nonsampled resident (Resident 26). This failure posed the risk for not being able to monitor the resident's decline and progress over time. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 26 was initiated on 3/11/24. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged home on [DATE]. Review of Resident 26's MDS discharge assessment dated [DATE], showed the facility failed to entered the data specific to section J0200 (Pain assessment interview) and the MDS discharge assessment dated [DATE], was subsequently rejected by the CMS system. On 3/14/24 at 1425 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review was conducted with the DON. The DON stated Resident 26 was discharged home on [DATE]. The DON verified Resident 26's MDS discharge assessment dated [DATE], was rejected. The DON reviewed Resident 26's rejected MDS discharge assessment dated [DATE], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan for one of two closed record sampled residents (Resident 27) was initiated upon admission. This failure had the potential for Resident 27 to not receive the necessary care and services in accordance with his care needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plan-Baseline revised 12/2016 showed to assure the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. Closed medical record review for Resident 27 was initiated on [DATE]. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident 27's closed medical record failed to show a baseline care plan was initiated for Resident 27. On [DATE] at 1358 hours, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in one of one garbage dumpsters. This failure had the potential to attract the pest/rodents that carried diseases. Findings: According to the 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code, outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal revised 10/2017 showed the outside dumpsters provided by the garbage pickup services will be kept closed. On 3/11/24 at 0737 hours, an observation of the facility's outside garbage dumpster was conducted. The garbage dumpster was observed with the lid propped open by garbage preventing the lid from fully closing. On 3/11/24 at 1427 hours, an interview was conducted with Maintenance 1. Maintenance 1 verified the garbage dumpster was overflowing with garbage this morning, with the dumpster lid propped open with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOINGS, VERNA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 11/06/2001 |
| LARSON, MARIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 11/06/2001 |
| DAVIS, MICHAEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/26/2016 |
| GOINGS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/06/2001 |
| KILIAN, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/06/2001 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $212K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555651. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.