Lowry Hills Care And Rehabilitation
10201 E 3rd Ave, Aurora, CO 80010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 108 certified beds · (303) 364-3364 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $2,516 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.3% | 8.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.7% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 20.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.9% | 12.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.73 | 1.38 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 1.74 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 78% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.4%CMS range 23.4–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.5–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 99.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] CPO, diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (a disease that damages nerves and affects muscle control), muscle weakness and autistic disorder (developmental disorder). The [DATE] MDS assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. He required substantial assistance with ADLs. The MDS assessment revealed the resident was going to stay at the facility for long term care. B. Resident #1's representative interview Resident #1's representative was interviewed on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m. The representative said Resident #1 discharged from the facility to home (on [DATE]). The representative said the facility did not set up any home health services for the resident when he was discharged home. She said there was no discharge planning and discussion of plans until a few days prior to discharge. The representative said while Resident #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure interventions were carried out or offered to prevent pressure injury from occurring for two (#8 and #9) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 15 sample residents. Resident #8, was admitted on [DATE] for long term care. The resident was admitted without a pressure injury to the right heel. The resident was at risk for developing pressure injuries. The facility failed to proactively implement treatment interventions to prevent the resident from developing a deep tissue pressure injury to her right heel on 11/1/23 that was staged as stage 3 on 11/28/23. No treatment orders or physician orders were in place to promote prevention and active healing of the pressure injury. The care plan was not updated with a focus, goals and interventions to specifically address the facility acquired pressure injury. Observations revealed the resident was not offered pressure relieving boot to her right heel. Additionally, Resident #9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable homelike environment for seven out of 10 rooms.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were in good repair.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Safe and Homelike Environment policy, dated 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility, both inside and outside, maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.II. ObservationsBetween 5/28/26 at 9:15 a.m. and 6/1/26 at 12:46 p.m. the following observations were made:Resident room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised timely to include the instructions needed to provide effective and personalized care for six (#9, #83, #104, #41, #2 and #29) of 10 residents out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #9's and Resident #83's care plans were updated with catheter care interventions;-Ensure Resident #104's care plan was updated with skin integrity/pressure wound interventions and feeding precaution interventions; -Ensure Resident #41's dementia and behavioral care plan was updated with all appropriate non-pharmacological interventions for psychotropic medications;-Ensure Resident #2's care plan was updated with specific target behaviors and interventions for the resident's use of psychotropic medications; and,-Ensure Resident #29's care plan was updated with specific target behaviors and interventions for the resident's use of psychotropic medications. Findings include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards in three of six medication storage carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure medications were labeled with the date they were opened;-Ensure medications were labeled with medication identification and resident identification; and,-Ensure expired medication were removed and discarded from the medication carts.Findings include: I. Professional reference The PharMerica (1/12/25) Abridged List of Medications with Shortened Expirations Dates, was retrieved on 6/4/26 from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://pharmerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/PMC-[NAME]-Meds-with-Shortened-Expiration-Dates_012025_FINAL.pdf. It read in pertinent part, Once certain products are opened and in use, they must be used within a specific timeframe to avoid reduced stability, sterility and potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to be designed or equipped to assure full visual privacy for each resident for six out of 10 rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents had privacy curtains that provided them with full visual privacy for resident room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER].Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rooms policy, dated 2026, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Resident bedrooms must be designed and equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy of residents. All resident bedrooms will be equipped to assure full visual privacy for each resident, including ceiling suspended curtains which extend around each bed in non-private bedrooms.II. ObservationsBetween 5/28/26 at 9:15 a.m. and 6/1/26 at 12:46 p.m., the following observations were made:Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services for one (#8) of five residents reviewed for ADLs out of 51 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received timely meal assistance.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Assisted Nutrition and Hydration policy, revised 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/3/26 at 12:44 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility willprovide nutritional and hydration care and services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment, recognize, evaluate, and address the needs of every resident, including but not limited to, the resident at risk or already experiencing impaired nutrition and hydration and provide a therapeutic diet, taking into account the resident's clinical condition and preferences. II. Resident #8A. Resident statusResident #8, age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#104) of five residents out of 51 sample residents reviewed for skin assessments.Specifically, the facility failed to assess and obtain orders for the care of Resident #104's controlled ankle motion (CAM - a device that provides protection after orthopedic procedures and assists in offloading pressure) boot for her right leg.Findings include:I. Resident #104A. Resident statusResident #104, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 4/22/26. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, need for assistance with personal care, presence of left artificial hip joint, displaced trimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg and dementia.The 4/22/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion for one (#8) of one resident out of 51 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide passive range of motion services for Resident #8's left hand, which had a contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff and prevents normal movement of a joint or other body part).Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion policy, revised 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/3/26 at 12:44 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility will utilize a systematic approach for prevention of decline in range of motion, including assessment, appropriate care planning and preventative care. Licensed nurses will assess resident's range of motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (#29) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 51 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29, who was an elopement risk, was assessed timely and accurately for a wander guard (wearable tags/bracelets and door sensors that automatically alert staff or lock doors near a restricted exit).Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Elopements and Wandering Residents policy, dated 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:16 p.m. It read in pertinent part, This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. The facility is equipped with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards for one (#7) of two residents out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen administered according to physician's orders for Resident #7.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Oxygen Administration policy, revised 2026, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/3/26 at 12:44 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such a case, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained as soon as practicable when the situation is under control.II. Resident #7A. Resident statusResident #7, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (#1) reviewed for dialysis out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure thorough dialysis documentation was in place for Resident #1; and,-Consistently and thoroughly complete the dialysis communication forms between the facility and the dialysis center for Resident #1.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Hemodialysis policy, dated 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. The facility will coordinate and collaborate with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one (#64) of five residents out of 51 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #64's anti-anxiety medication was ordered and delivered to the facility in a timely manner.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Pharmacy Services policy, undated, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident, are consistent with state and federal requirements, and reflect current standards of practice.II. Resident #64A. Resident status Resident #64, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included Wernicke's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed during high contact resident care areas for Resident #9, who had an indwelling urinary catheter and Resident #3, who had a tracheostomy (airway created through the neck); and, -Ensure Resident #83 and Resident #9's urinary catheter drainage bags and catheter tubing were not dragging on the ground.Findings include:I. Failure to ensure EBP were followed during high contact resident care areas for Resident #9 and Resident #3A. Facility policy and procedureThe EBP policy and procedure, no revision date, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:04 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services and assistance for bathing for one (#6) of three residents reviewed for ADLs out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #6, who had cognitive impairments, incontinence care in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Incontinence policy and procedure, dated August 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/26/25 at 8:27 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, all incontinent residents will receive appropriate treatment and services. II. Resident #6 A. Resident status Resident #6, age [AGE], admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, glaucoma (high eye pressure) and chronic kidney disease. The 6/10/25 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two (#1 and #6) of three residents reviewed for activities programming out of 10 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Offer and provide personalized activity programs for Resident #1 and Resident #6 as documented in their care plans; -Ensure Resident #1 and Resident #6 were invited and encouraged to attend activities of their preference; and, -Ensure Resident #6 was meaningfully engaged during activities. Findings include: I. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 5/28/25 to the community. According to the May 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (a disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food and drinks that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances and preferences for one (#4) of four residents out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided a vegetarian diet per her preference. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences, revised July 2017, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/26/25 at 5:23 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preference in the careplan. II. Resident #4 A. Resident status Resident #4, age [AGE], was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the nerves), dementia and shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -A clean location was provided for wound care supplies; and, -Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and proper hand hygiene were followed for wound care activities. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO)'s, (4/2/24), retrieved on 4/23/25 from https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/PPE.html, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ target gown and glove use during high contact resident activities. EBP may be indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of three residents were free from abuse out of seven sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 1/5/25, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 3/13/25. It read in pertinent part, The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves the identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect. II. Facility investigations A. Incident of physical abuse by Resident #2 towards Resident #3 on 2/8/25 The facility's investigation documented an incident occurred on 2/8/25 between Resident #2 and Resident #3. Another resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for three (#46, #25 and #47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure informed consents, which included the risks associated with taking a psychotropic medication, were obtained for Resident #46, Resident #25 and Resident #47. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Use of Psychotropic Medications policy and procedure, revised 4/12/24 was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/7/24 at 12:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the residents response to medications. Residents and/or representatives shall be educated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for five (#1, #4, #5, #6 and #7) of five certified nurse aides. Specifically, the facility had not completed annual performance reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #1, #4, #5, #6 and #7 in order to determine potential training needs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Evaluation Process policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/6/24 at 3:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of our facility to review the work performance of employees with a formal written evaluation. Factors that will be considered in making decisions include job performance, achieving goals, attendance record and adherence to workplace policies. II. Record review Annual performance reviews were requested on 5/6/24 at 1:59 p.m for CNAs #1, #4, #5, #6 and #7. The facility was unable to provide annual performance evaluations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff performed hand hygiene appropriately while washing dishes and handling clean dishes; and, -Ensure food was labeled, dated and disposed of timely in the nourishment refrigerator. Findings include: I. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene appropriately while washing dishes and handling clean and sanitized dishes A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 5/9/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations, The regulations read in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles. After handling soiled equipment or utensils; during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment for residents, staff and the public that is safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable for one of two shower rooms at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the shower room was sanitary and safe for residents to use. Finding include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Housekeeping Services policy and procedure, revised on 4/12/24, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 5/7/24 at 3:17 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible. II. Observations On 5/7/24 at 2:30 p.m. the shower room between unit 100 and 200 was observed. The following was observed: The shower room had two wooden fabric woven chairs used for residents besides the shower. Both chairs were damp to touch and had visible brown stains on them. The shower curtain divider that hung between both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure five (#1, #4, #5, #6 and #7) of five certified nurse aides (CNA) received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training for continued competence. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNA #1, #4, #5, #6 and #7 received 12 hours of training annually. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Nurse Aide Training Program policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/6/24 at 3:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility maintains an appropriate and effective nurse aide in-service training program for the purpose of ensuring the continuing competence of nurse aides. The staff development coordinator (SDC), with oversight from the director of nursing (DON), shall be responsible for the coordination and/or provision of nurse aide education. Each nurse aide shall be provided at least 12 hours of in-service training annually, based on his/her employment date, not calendar year. II. Training review A review of all five CNAs annual training was reviewed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level II preadmission and resident review (PASRR) was completed for one (#33) of three residents out of 34 sample residents reviewed for PASRR to gain and maintain their highest practical medical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASRR was in place for Resident #33. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Behavioral Health policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/6/24 at 3:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. II. Resident status Resident #33, age younger than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included mild neurocognitive disorder due to unknown physiological condition with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#69 and #35) of three residents reviewed out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 and Resident #35, who were dependent on staff for bathing, received their scheduled showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Shower policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/9/24 at 10:48 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the practice of the facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues. The Activity of Daily Living policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the NHA on 5/6/24 at 3:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (#60 and #58) of six residents out of 34 sample residents reviewed for nutrition status. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights per the physician's orders for Resident #60 and Resident #58. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Weight Monitoring policy, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/7/24 at 4:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended weight loss over a period of time) may indicate a nutritional problem. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: Weights should be recorded at the time obtained. Newly admitted residents and residents with weight loss will have weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one (#46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 34 sampled residents. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: -Acetaminophen (pain medication) administered to Resident #46 did not exceed the recommended 3 grams (gm) in a 24-hour period; and, -As needed (PRN) medication was administered per physician's orders. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2022), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607, Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly according to professional standards in one of three medication carts and one of two medication storage rooms. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure expired medications and vaccines were disposed of timely; -Ensure insulin pens (medication used for glucose control) were labeled with open dates; and, -Ensure Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis) vials were labeled with open dates. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the Lantus glargine insulin package insert, retrieved on 4/29/24 from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021081s076lbl.pdf, When not in use store in refrigerated temperatures of 36 to 46 degrees fahrenheit (F). When in use, can be kept at room temperature for up to 28 days. According to the Novolog insulin package insert, retrieved on 5/8/24 from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020986s082lbl.pdf After initial use a vial may be kept at temperatures below 30 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents who were prescribed mechanical soft diets had food prepared according to their diet orders of mechanical soft as indicated on their meal tray cards. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diet Orders policy and procedure, revised 4/12/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/6/24 at 3:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. Mechanically altered diet is one in which the texture or consistency of food is altered to facilitate oral intake. Examples include soft solids, pureed foods, ground meat and thickened liquids. Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on two of six units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff followed proper cleaning techniques for cleaning and disinfecting resident rooms and high frequency touched areas (call lights, door handles and handrails); -Ensure housekeeping staff were trained appropriately on housekeeping procedures; -Ensure housekeeping staff used the correct surface disinfectant products; and, -Ensure surface disinfectant times were adhered to. Finding include: I. Professional reference Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M, et al. Practical Recommendations for Routine Cleaning and Disinfection Procedures in Healthcare Institutions: A Narrative Review. The Journal of Hospital Infection, (July 2021) 113:104-114, was retrieved on 5/9/24. It revealed in pertinent part, High-touch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the overall kitchen area were free from hanging dust; and -Ensure serving tables are free from chipped paint. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE)The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, 1/1/19, retrieved on 2/5/23 from: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf. Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. Non food contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. Non food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation,and interviews the facility failed to provide prompt responses and resolutions to grievances from residents. Specifically, the facility failed to respond to resident grievances regarding missing laundry and implement an acceptable resolution for the resident right to keep and use personal belongings and have the facility protect the resident property from theft and or loss. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A Grievance/Complaint policy and procedure was requested on 1/26/23 and was not received from the facility. II. Record Review A. Resident laundry grievances On 8/24/22 Resident #38 reported that a fleece jacket had gone missing. According to the grievance document it was not found in the residents room or laundry. On 8/28/22 Resident #8 reported that three shirts and one pair of pants had gone missing. According to the grievance document the items were not found in the residents room or laundry. On 10/6/22 Resident #21 reported that four personally owned sheet sets and a blanket had been lost in the laundry. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure medications and biologics were stored and labeled properly on two of four medications carts and one of two medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Insulin (medication for diabetes) vials and pen injection devices were stored and labeled appropriately with open dates; -Vials of tubersol (used to test for Tuberculosis) were labeled appropriately with open dates; -Ensure the treatment cart was kept free from expired wound dressing supplies; and, -Medication carts were kept clean and free of loose pills. Findings include: I. Manufacturer recommendations According to the Humalog package insert, retrieved [DATE] from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/020563s115lbl.pdf In-use humalog vials, cartridges, pens, and humalog KwikPen should be stored at room temperature, below 86°F (30°C) and must be used within 28 days or be discarded, even if they still contain humalog. Unopened humalog should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents (#60 and #67) of two residents reviewed out of 39 sample residents, had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person centered plan of care. Specifically the facility failed to conduct consistent care planning meetings and invite Resident #60 and #67 to attend a care plan meeting to discuss and develop a person centered plan of care and services that the facility would provide to them. Findings include I. Facility policy and procedure The Care Planning-Resident Participation policy, undated, received from the chief clinical officer (CCO) on 1/27/23 at 6:29 p.m., revealed in pertinent part, The facility supports the resident's rights to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment. The facility will inform the resident in advance of changes to the plan of care. The plan of care will be discussed at regular scheduled care plan conferences. The facility will discuss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to honor resident choices for one (#19) of two reviewed for self-determination, out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure dependent Resident #19, received showers consistently according to the resident's preference. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure An undated Resident Shower policy was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/26/23 at 2:08 p.m. It read, in pertinent part It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice. Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedules protocols and based on resident safety. II. Resident #19 A. Resident status Resident #19, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included bipolar disorder, mild…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#55) of three residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and hygiene, out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide timely incontinent care; -Provide timely consistent feeding assistance; and, -Update care plan for Resident #55 to reflect feeding assistance needs. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Incontinence Care policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/23 at 2:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, all residents that are incontinent will receive appropriate treatment and services. Residents that are incontinent of bladder or bowel will receive appropriate treatment to prevent infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. The Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, undated, was provided by the NHA on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible, for two (#20 and #42) of six residents reviewed for accident/hazards out of 39 sample residents Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide effective monitoring and supervision of Resident #20's safety when the resident left the facility without notifying facility staff of an extended absence;. -Provide health assessment and document the assessment (if done) of Resident #20 upon the resident's return from extended and overnight absences for the facility when the resident was out in the community in potential unsafe conditions unsupervised by facility staff; -Provide Resident #20 with appropriate interventions and supervision to prevent the resident from eloping and being missing for hours before staff became aware of the resident's absence; and, -Ensure Resident #42 had a safe and appropriate mattress that was a compatible fit for the bed frame; so the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (#20) out of one resident reviewed for a person-centered care plan that supports the resident's behavioral health needs, out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop and follow a process to ensure a resident with a substance abuse history was properly monitored for unsafe addicting chemical substances use; -Ensure the facility staff monitored the resident for chemical substance withdrawals and documented concerns when the resident presented with intoxication; and, -Provide a person centered care plan to address Resident #20's mental health needs related to substance use disorder for monitoring and assessment when the resident was actively using an addictive substance, that include and support identified behavioral health care needs. Findings include I.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent for two residents (#29 and #45). Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.41%, which was two errors out of 27 opportunities for error. Findings include I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2020), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: 1. The right medication 2. The right dose 3. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically the facility failed to: -Perform wound care in a sanitary manner for Resident #237; and, -Sanitize multiple use items after use; when providing wound care for Resident #237. Findings include I. Professional reference According to the Center for disease control (CDC) control and prevention, Hand Hygiene Basics retrieved on 2/2/23 from: http://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/basics.html (2019), it read in pertinent part, healthcare providers should practice hand hygiene at key points in time to disrupt the transmission of microorganisms to patient including before patient contact; after contact with blood,body fluids, or contaminated surfaces (even if gloves worn); before invasive procedures; and after removing gloves (wearing gloves is not enough to prevent the transmission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, a list of names, addresses (mailing and email) and telephone numbers of all pertinent State Agencies and advocacy groups. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure the required posting contained the correct phone number for the State Agency; and, -Ensure the required posting contained contact information for other pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Facility Required Postings policy and procedure, dated April 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/26 at 1:16 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility will post required postings in an area that is accessible to all staff and residents. Facility postings include the following: A list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups to include but not limited to: State Survey Agency, State Licensure office, Adult Protective Services (where state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, family members and legal representatives had full access to review the results of the facility's most recent survey findings that included the survey results, certifications, complaint investigations and plans of correction in effect for the preceding three years. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents, family members, and legal representatives had full access to review the facility's most recent survey findings for 2025, including recertifications, complaint investigations, and plans of correction.Findings include:I. Resident group interviewThe resident group interview was conducted on 6/1/26 at 10:49 a.m. with five residents (#31, #33, #55, #65 and #92) who routinely attended monthly resident council meetings and were deemed interviewable by facility and assessment. Three residents said they were not aware they could view the federal and state survey results. The residents said they were unaware that the results of the surveys were supposed to be posted for them to be able to access and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$2,516 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $2,516 — penalty dated 2023-12-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SWEETWATER CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWEETWATER CARE OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2017 |
| CHESLEY, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 12/01/2017 |
| MEDLOCK, REBECCA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 065001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.